user/sven/linux.git/kernel/dma/pool.c, branch v6.16.2

dma-mapping: replace zone_dma_bits by zone_dma_limit

2024-08-22T04:18:00Z

The hardware DMA limit might not be power of 2. When RAM range starts above 0, say 4GB, DMA limit of 30 bits should end at 5GB. A single high bit can not encode this limit. Use a plain address for the DMA zone limit instead. Since the DMA zone can now potentially span beyond 4GB physical limit of DMA32, make sure to use DMA zone for GFP_DMA32 allocations in that case. Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Co-developed-by: Baruch Siach Signed-off-by: Baruch Siach Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas Reviewed-by: Petr Tesarik Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig

mm, treewide: rename MAX_ORDER to MAX_PAGE_ORDER

2024-01-08T23:27:15Z

commit 23baf831a32c ("mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely") has changed the definition of MAX_ORDER to be inclusive. This has caused issues with code that was not yet upstream and depended on the previous definition. To draw attention to the altered meaning of the define, rename MAX_ORDER to MAX_PAGE_ORDER. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231228144704.14033-2-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Cc: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

dma-pool: remove a __maybe_unused label in atomic_pool_expand

2023-08-31T12:12:37Z

Move the #endif a line so that free_page label is only seen by the compile pass when actually used. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Chunhui He Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy

mm, treewide: redefine MAX_ORDER sanely

2023-04-06T02:42:46Z

MAX_ORDER currently defined as number of orders page allocator supports: user can ask buddy allocator for page order between 0 and MAX_ORDER-1. This definition is counter-intuitive and lead to number of bugs all over the kernel. Change the definition of MAX_ORDER to be inclusive: the range of orders user can ask from buddy allocator is 0..MAX_ORDER now. [kirill@shutemov.name: fix min() warning] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230315153800.32wib3n5rickolvh@box [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix another min_t warning] [kirill@shutemov.name: fixups per Zi Yan] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230316232144.b7ic4cif4kjiabws@box.shutemov.name [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix underlining in docs] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303191025.VRCTk6mP-lkp@intel.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230315113133.11326-11-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman [powerpc] Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: Zi Yan Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

dma/pool: create dma atomic pool only if dma zone has managed pages

2022-01-15T14:30:29Z

Currently three dma atomic pools are initialized as long as the relevant kernel codes are built in. While in kdump kernel of x86_64, this is not right when trying to create atomic_pool_dma, because there's no managed pages in DMA zone. In the case, DMA zone only has low 1M memory presented and locked down by memblock allocator. So no pages are added into buddy of DMA zone. Please check commit f1d4d47c5851 ("x86/setup: Always reserve the first 1M of RAM"). Then in kdump kernel of x86_64, it always prints below failure message: DMA: preallocated 128 KiB GFP_KERNEL pool for atomic allocations swapper/0: page allocation failure: order:5, mode:0xcc1(GFP_KERNEL|GFP_DMA), nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0 CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.13.0-0.rc5.20210611git929d931f2b40.42.fc35.x86_64 #1 Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R910/0P658H, BIOS 2.12.0 06/04/2018 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x7f/0xa1 warn_alloc.cold+0x72/0xd6 __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0xf29/0xf50 __alloc_pages+0x24d/0x2c0 alloc_page_interleave+0x13/0xb0 atomic_pool_expand+0x118/0x210 __dma_atomic_pool_init+0x45/0x93 dma_atomic_pool_init+0xdb/0x176 do_one_initcall+0x67/0x320 kernel_init_freeable+0x290/0x2dc kernel_init+0xa/0x111 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Mem-Info: ...... DMA: failed to allocate 128 KiB GFP_KERNEL|GFP_DMA pool for atomic allocation DMA: preallocated 128 KiB GFP_KERNEL|GFP_DMA32 pool for atomic allocations Here, let's check if DMA zone has managed pages, then create atomic_pool_dma if yes. Otherwise just skip it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211223094435.248523-3-bhe@redhat.com Fixes: 6f599d84231f ("x86/kdump: Always reserve the low 1M when the crashkernel option is specified") Signed-off-by: Baoquan He Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Acked-by: John Donnelly Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Marek Szyprowski Cc: Robin Murphy Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: David Laight Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim Cc: Pekka Enberg Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

dma-pool: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions

2020-11-27T09:33:42Z

When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig

dma-mapping: merge into

2020-10-06T05:07:06Z

Move more nitty gritty DMA implementation details into the common internal header. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig

dma-mapping: merge into

2020-10-06T05:07:04Z

Merge dma-contiguous.h into dma-map-ops.h, after removing the comment describing the contiguous allocator into kernel/dma/contigous.c. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig

dma-direct: remove dma_direct_{alloc,free}_pages

2020-09-11T07:10:29Z

Just merge these helpers into the main dma_direct_{alloc,free} routines, as the additional checks are always false for the two callers. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy

dma-pool: Fix an uninitialized variable bug in atomic_pool_expand()

2020-08-27T07:22:56Z

The "page" pointer can be used with out being initialized. Fixes: d7e673ec2c8e ("dma-pool: Only allocate from CMA when in same memory zone") Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig