user/sven/linux.git/kernel/events, branch v4.10.9

perf/core: Fix event inheritance on fork()

2017-03-26T11:08:10Z

commit e7cc4865f0f31698ef2f7aac01a50e78968985b7 upstream. While hunting for clues to a use-after-free, Oleg spotted that perf_event_init_context() can loose an error value with the result that fork() can succeed even though we did not fully inherit the perf event context. Spotted-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: oleg@redhat.com Fixes: 889ff0150661 ("perf/core: Split context's event group list into pinned and non-pinned lists") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170316125823.190342547@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Fix use-after-free in perf_release()

2017-03-26T11:08:10Z

commit e552a8389aa409e257b7dcba74f67f128f979ccc upstream. Dmitry reported syzcaller tripped a use-after-free in perf_release(). After much puzzlement Oleg spotted the below scenario: Task1 Task2 fork() perf_event_init_task() /* ... */ goto bad_fork_$foo; /* ... */ perf_event_free_task() mutex_lock(ctx->lock) perf_free_event(B) perf_event_release_kernel(A) mutex_lock(A->child_mutex) list_for_each_entry(child, ...) { /* child == B */ ctx = B->ctx; get_ctx(ctx); mutex_unlock(A->child_mutex); mutex_lock(A->child_mutex) list_del_init(B->child_list) mutex_unlock(A->child_mutex) /* ... */ mutex_unlock(ctx->lock); put_ctx() /* >0 */ free_task(); mutex_lock(ctx->lock); mutex_lock(A->child_mutex); /* ... */ mutex_unlock(A->child_mutex); mutex_unlock(ctx->lock) put_ctx() /* 0 */ ctx->task && !TOMBSTONE put_task_struct() /* UAF */ This patch closes the hole by making perf_event_free_task() destroy the task <-> ctx relation such that perf_event_release_kernel() will no longer observe the now dead task. Spotted-by: Oleg Nesterov Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: fweisbec@gmail.com Cc: oleg@redhat.com Fixes: c6e5b73242d2 ("perf: Synchronously clean up child events") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170314155949.GE32474@worktop Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170316125823.140295131@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Fix crash in perf_event_read()

2017-02-10T08:04:50Z

Alexei had his box explode because doing read() on a package (rapl/uncore) event that isn't currently scheduled in ends up doing an out-of-bounds load. Rework the code to more explicitly deal with event->oncpu being -1. Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov Tested-by: Alexei Starovoitov Tested-by: David Carrillo-Cisneros Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: eranian@google.com Fixes: d6a2f9035bfc ("perf/core: Introduce PMU_EV_CAP_READ_ACTIVE_PKG") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170131102710.GL6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/core: Fix PERF_RECORD_MMAP2 prot/flags for anonymous memory

2017-01-30T10:41:26Z

Andres reported that MMAP2 records for anonymous memory always have their protection field 0. Turns out, someone daft put the prot/flags generation code in the file branch, leaving them unset for anonymous memory. Reported-by: Andres Freund Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Don Zickus Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: acme@kernel.org Cc: anton@ozlabs.org Cc: namhyung@kernel.org Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.16+ Fixes: f972eb63b100 ("perf: Pass protection and flags bits through mmap2 interface") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170126221508.GF6536@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/core: Fix use-after-free bug

2017-01-30T10:41:25Z

Dmitry reported a KASAN use-after-free on event->group_leader. It turns out there's a hole in perf_remove_from_context() due to event_function_call() not calling its function when the task associated with the event is already dead. In this case the event will have been detached from the task, but the grouping will have been retained, such that group operations might still work properly while there are live child events etc. This does however mean that we can miss a perf_group_detach() call when the group decomposes, this in turn can then lead to use-after-free. Fix it by explicitly doing the group detach if its still required. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.5+ Cc: syzkaller Fixes: 63b6da39bb38 ("perf: Fix perf_event_exit_task() race") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170126153955.GD6515@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/x86/intel: Account interrupts for PEBS errors

2017-01-14T10:06:49Z

It's possible to set up PEBS events to get only errors and not any data, like on SNB-X (model 45) and IVB-EP (model 62) via 2 perf commands running simultaneously: taskset -c 1 ./perf record -c 4 -e branches:pp -j any -C 10 This leads to a soft lock up, because the error path of the intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm() does not account event->hw.interrupt for error PEBS interrupts, so in case you're getting ONLY errors you don't have a way to stop the event when it's over the max_samples_per_tick limit: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#22 stuck for 22s! [perf_fuzzer:5816] ... RIP: 0010:[] [] smp_call_function_single+0xe2/0x140 ... Call Trace: ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf5/0x1b0 ? perf_cgroup_attach+0x70/0x70 perf_install_in_context+0x199/0x1b0 ? ctx_resched+0x90/0x90 SYSC_perf_event_open+0x641/0xf90 SyS_perf_event_open+0x9/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 Add perf_event_account_interrupt() which does the interrupt and frequency checks and call it from intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm()'s error path. We keep the pending_kill and pending_wakeup logic only in the __perf_event_overflow() path, because they make sense only if there's any data to deliver. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: Vince Weaver Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1482931866-6018-2-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/core: Fix concurrent sys_perf_event_open() vs. 'move_group' race

2017-01-14T09:56:11Z

Di Shen reported a race between two concurrent sys_perf_event_open() calls where both try and move the same pre-existing software group into a hardware context. The problem is exactly that described in commit: f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking") ... where, while we wait for a ctx->mutex acquisition, the event->ctx relation can have changed under us. That very same commit failed to recognise sys_perf_event_context() as an external access vector to the events and thereby didn't apply the established locking rules correctly. So while one sys_perf_event_open() call is stuck waiting on mutex_lock_double(), the other (which owns said locks) moves the group about. So by the time the former sys_perf_event_open() acquires the locks, the context we've acquired is stale (and possibly dead). Apply the established locking rules as per perf_event_ctx_lock_nested() to the mutex_lock_double() for the 'move_group' case. This obviously means we need to validate state after we acquire the locks. Reported-by: Di Shen (Keen Lab) Tested-by: John Dias Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Min Chong Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Fixes: f63a8daa5812 ("perf: Fix event->ctx locking") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170106131444.GZ3174@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

perf/core: Fix sys_perf_event_open() vs. hotplug

2017-01-14T09:56:10Z

There is problem with installing an event in a task that is 'stuck' on an offline CPU. Blocked tasks are not dis-assosciated from offlined CPUs, after all, a blocked task doesn't run and doesn't require a CPU etc.. Only on wakeup do we ammend the situation and place the task on a available CPU. If we hit such a task with perf_install_in_context() we'll loop until either that task wakes up or the CPU comes back online, if the task waking depends on the event being installed, we're stuck. While looking into this issue, I also spotted another problem, if we hit a task with perf_install_in_context() that is in the middle of being migrated, that is we observe the old CPU before sending the IPI, but run the IPI (on the old CPU) while the task is already running on the new CPU, things also go sideways. Rework things to rely on task_curr() -- outside of rq->lock -- which is rather tricky. Imagine the following scenario where we're trying to install the first event into our task 't': CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 (current == t) t->perf_event_ctxp[] = ctx; smp_mb(); cpu = task_cpu(t); switch(t, n); migrate(t, 2); switch(p, t); ctx = t->perf_event_ctxp[]; // must not be NULL smp_function_call(cpu, ..); generic_exec_single() func(); spin_lock(ctx->lock); if (task_curr(t)) // false add_event_to_ctx(); spin_unlock(ctx->lock); perf_event_context_sched_in(); spin_lock(ctx->lock); // sees event So its CPU0's store of t->perf_event_ctxp[] that must not go 'missing'. Because if CPU2's load of that variable were to observe NULL, it would not try to schedule the ctx and we'd have a task running without its counter, which would be 'bad'. As long as we observe !NULL, we'll acquire ctx->lock. If we acquire it first and not see the event yet, then CPU0 must observe task_curr() and retry. If the install happens first, then we must see the event on sched-in and all is well. I think we can translate the first part (until the 'must not be NULL') of the scenario to a litmus test like: C C-peterz { } P0(int *x, int *y) { int r1; WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1); smp_mb(); r1 = READ_ONCE(*y); } P1(int *y, int *z) { WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1); smp_store_release(z, 1); } P2(int *x, int *z) { int r1; int r2; r1 = smp_load_acquire(z); smp_mb(); r2 = READ_ONCE(*x); } exists (0:r1=0 /\ 2:r1=1 /\ 2:r2=0) Where: x is perf_event_ctxp[], y is our tasks's CPU, and z is our task being placed on the rq of CPU2. The P0 smp_mb() is the one added by this patch, ordering the store to perf_event_ctxp[] from find_get_context() and the load of task_cpu() in task_function_call(). The smp_store_release/smp_load_acquire model the RCpc locking of the rq->lock and the smp_mb() of P2 is the context switch switching from whatever CPU2 was running to our task 't'. This litmus test evaluates into: Test C-peterz Allowed States 7 0:r1=0; 2:r1=0; 2:r2=0; 0:r1=0; 2:r1=0; 2:r2=1; 0:r1=0; 2:r1=1; 2:r2=1; 0:r1=1; 2:r1=0; 2:r2=0; 0:r1=1; 2:r1=0; 2:r2=1; 0:r1=1; 2:r1=1; 2:r2=0; 0:r1=1; 2:r1=1; 2:r2=1; No Witnesses Positive: 0 Negative: 7 Condition exists (0:r1=0 /\ 2:r1=1 /\ 2:r2=0) Observation C-peterz Never 0 7 Hash=e427f41d9146b2a5445101d3e2fcaa34 And the strong and weak model agree. Reported-by: Mark Rutland Tested-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: Will Deacon Cc: jeremy.linton@arm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161209135900.GU3174@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

Merge branch 'perf-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

2016-12-24T00:49:12Z

Pull perf fixes from Ingo Molnar: "On the kernel side there's two x86 PMU driver fixes and a uprobes fix, plus on the tooling side there's a number of fixes and some late updates" * 'perf-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (36 commits) perf sched timehist: Fix invalid period calculation perf sched timehist: Remove hardcoded 'comm_width' check at print_summary perf sched timehist: Enlarge default 'comm_width' perf sched timehist: Honour 'comm_width' when aligning the headers perf/x86: Fix overlap counter scheduling bug perf/x86/pebs: Fix handling of PEBS buffer overflows samples/bpf: Move open_raw_sock to separate header samples/bpf: Remove perf_event_open() declaration samples/bpf: Be consistent with bpf_load_program bpf_insn parameter tools lib bpf: Add bpf_prog_{attach,detach} samples/bpf: Switch over to libbpf perf diff: Do not overwrite valid build id perf annotate: Don't throw error for zero length symbols perf bench futex: Fix lock-pi help string perf trace: Check if MAP_32BIT is defined (again) samples/bpf: Make perf_event_read() static uprobes: Fix uprobes on MIPS, allow for a cache flush after ixol breakpoint creation samples/bpf: Make samples more libbpf-centric tools lib bpf: Add flags to bpf_create_map() tools lib bpf: use __u32 from linux/types.h ...

uprobes: Fix uprobes on MIPS, allow for a cache flush after ixol breakpoint creation

2016-12-18T08:42:11Z

Commit: 72e6ae285a1d ('ARM: 8043/1: uprobes need icache flush after xol write' ... has introduced an arch-specific method to ensure all caches are flushed appropriately after an instruction is written to an XOL page. However, when the XOL area is created and the out-of-line breakpoint instruction is copied, caches are not flushed at all and stale data may be found in icache. Replace a simple copy_to_page() with arch_uprobe_copy_ixol() to allow the arch to ensure all caches are updated accordingly. This change fixes uprobes on MIPS InterAptiv (tested on Creator Ci40). Signed-off-by: Marcin Nowakowski Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Victor Kamensky Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481625657-22850-1-git-send-email-marcin.nowakowski@imgtec.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar