user/sven/linux.git/kernel/events, branch v4.9.99

perf/core: Fix the perf_cpu_time_max_percent check

2018-05-09T07:50:18Z

commit 1572e45a924f254d9570093abde46430c3172e3d upstream. Use "proc_dointvec_minmax" instead of "proc_dointvec" to check the input value from user-space. If not, we can set a big value and some vars will overflow like "sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate" which will cause a lot of unexpected problems. Signed-off-by: Tan Xiaojun Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Cc: Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1487829879-56237-1-git-send-email-tanxiaojun@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf: Return proper values for user stack errors

2018-04-29T09:31:57Z

commit 78b562fbfa2cf0a9fcb23c3154756b690f4905c1 upstream. Return immediately when we find issue in the user stack checks. The error value could get overwritten by following check for PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_INTR. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Cc: x86@kernel.org Fixes: 60e2364e60e8 ("perf: Add ability to sample machine state on interrupt") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180415092352.12403-1-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf: Fix sample_max_stack maximum check

2018-04-29T09:31:57Z

commit 5af44ca53d019de47efe6dbc4003dd518e5197ed upstream. The syzbot hit KASAN bug in perf_callchain_store having the entry stored behind the allocated bounds [1]. We miss the sample_max_stack check for the initial event that allocates callchain buffers. This missing check allows to create an event with sample_max_stack value bigger than the global sysctl maximum: # sysctl -a | grep perf_event_max_stack kernel.perf_event_max_stack = 127 # perf record -vv -C 1 -e cycles/max-stack=256/ kill ... perf_event_attr: size 112 ... sample_max_stack 256 ------------------------------------------------------------ sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 1 group_fd -1 flags 0x8 = 4 Note the '-C 1', which forces perf record to create just single event. Otherwise it opens event for every cpu, then the sample_max_stack check fails on the second event and all's fine. The fix is to run the sample_max_stack check also for the first event with callchains. [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=152352732920874&w=2 Reported-by: syzbot+7c449856228b63ac951e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Andi Kleen Cc: H. Peter Anvin Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Cc: x86@kernel.org Fixes: 97c79a38cd45 ("perf core: Per event callchain limit") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180415092352.12403-2-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Fix use-after-free in uprobe_perf_close()

2018-04-20T06:20:42Z

commit 621b6d2ea297d0fb6030452c5bcd221f12165fcf upstream. A use-after-free bug was caught by KASAN while running usdt related code (BCC project. bcc/tests/python/test_usdt2.py): ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in uprobe_perf_close+0x222/0x3b0 Read of size 4 at addr ffff880384f9b4a4 by task test_usdt2.py/870 CPU: 4 PID: 870 Comm: test_usdt2.py Tainted: G W 4.16.0-next-20180409 #215 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0xc7/0x15b ? show_regs_print_info+0x5/0x5 ? printk+0x9c/0xc3 ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0x6e/0x6e ? uprobe_perf_close+0x222/0x3b0 print_address_description+0x83/0x3a0 ? uprobe_perf_close+0x222/0x3b0 kasan_report+0x1dd/0x460 ? uprobe_perf_close+0x222/0x3b0 uprobe_perf_close+0x222/0x3b0 ? probes_open+0x180/0x180 ? free_filters_list+0x290/0x290 trace_uprobe_register+0x1bb/0x500 ? perf_event_attach_bpf_prog+0x310/0x310 ? probe_event_disable+0x4e0/0x4e0 perf_uprobe_destroy+0x63/0xd0 _free_event+0x2bc/0xbd0 ? lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x100/0x100 ? ring_buffer_attach+0x550/0x550 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x1a/0x30 ? perf_event_release_kernel+0x3e4/0xc00 ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x12e/0x540 ? wait_for_completion+0x430/0x430 ? lock_downgrade+0x3c0/0x3c0 ? lock_release+0x980/0x980 ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x118/0x150 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x121/0x210 ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x150/0x150 perf_event_release_kernel+0x5d4/0xc00 ? put_event+0x30/0x30 ? fsnotify+0xd2d/0xea0 ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1a0 ? __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags.part.0+0x1b0/0x1b0 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0x152/0x2b0 ? pvclock_read_flags+0x80/0x80 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x1a/0x30 ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1a0 ? pvclock_clocksource_read+0x152/0x2b0 ? locks_remove_file+0xec/0x470 ? pvclock_read_flags+0x80/0x80 ? fcntl_setlk+0x880/0x880 ? ima_file_free+0x8d/0x390 ? lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x100/0x100 ? ima_file_check+0x110/0x110 ? fsnotify+0xea0/0xea0 ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x1a/0x30 ? rcu_note_context_switch+0x600/0x600 perf_release+0x21/0x40 __fput+0x264/0x620 ? fput+0xf0/0xf0 ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x121/0x210 ? do_raw_spin_trylock+0x150/0x150 ? SyS_fchdir+0x100/0x100 ? fsnotify+0xea0/0xea0 task_work_run+0x14b/0x1e0 ? task_work_cancel+0x1c0/0x1c0 ? copy_fd_bitmaps+0x150/0x150 ? vfs_read+0xe5/0x260 exit_to_usermode_loop+0x17b/0x1b0 ? trace_event_raw_event_sys_exit+0x1a0/0x1a0 do_syscall_64+0x3f6/0x490 ? syscall_return_slowpath+0x2c0/0x2c0 ? lockdep_sys_exit+0x1f/0xaa ? syscall_return_slowpath+0x1a3/0x2c0 ? lockdep_sys_exit+0x1f/0xaa ? prepare_exit_to_usermode+0x11c/0x1e0 ? enter_from_user_mode+0x30/0x30 random: crng init done ? __put_user_4+0x1c/0x30 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2 RIP: 0033:0x7f41d95f9340 RSP: 002b:00007fffe71e4268 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000003 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000000d RCX: 00007f41d95f9340 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000002401 RDI: 000000000000000d RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007f41ca8ff700 R09: 00007f41d996dd1f R10: 00007fffe71e41e0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fffe71e4330 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: fffffffffffffffc R15: 00007fffe71e4290 Allocated by task 870: kasan_kmalloc+0xa0/0xd0 kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x11a/0x430 copy_process.part.19+0x11a0/0x41c0 _do_fork+0x1be/0xa20 do_syscall_64+0x198/0x490 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x3d/0xa2 Freed by task 0: __kasan_slab_free+0x12e/0x180 kmem_cache_free+0x102/0x4d0 free_task+0xfe/0x160 __put_task_struct+0x189/0x290 delayed_put_task_struct+0x119/0x250 rcu_process_callbacks+0xa6c/0x1b60 __do_softirq+0x238/0x7ae The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff880384f9b480 which belongs to the cache task_struct of size 12928 It occurs because task_struct is freed before perf_event which refers to the task and task flags are checked while teardown of the event. perf_event_alloc() assigns task_struct to hw.target of perf_event, but there is no reference counting for it. As a fix we get_task_struct() in perf_event_alloc() at above mentioned assignment and put_task_struct() in _free_event(). Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: 63b6da39bb38e8f1a1ef3180d32a39d6 ("perf: Fix perf_event_exit_task() race") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180409100346.6416-1-bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Correct event creation with PERF_FORMAT_GROUP

2018-04-13T17:48:23Z

[ Upstream commit ba5213ae6b88fb170c4771fef6553f759c7d8cdd ] Andi was asking about PERF_FORMAT_GROUP vs inherited events, which led to the discovery of a bug from commit: 3dab77fb1bf8 ("perf: Rework/fix the whole read vs group stuff") - PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP = 1U << 4, + PERF_SAMPLE_READ = 1U << 4, - if (attr->inherit && (attr->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP)) + if (attr->inherit && (attr->read_format & PERF_FORMAT_GROUP)) is a clear fail :/ While this changes user visible behaviour; it was previously possible to create an inherited event with PERF_SAMPLE_READ; this is deemed acceptible because its results were always incorrect. Reported-by: Andi Kleen Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Fixes: 3dab77fb1bf8 ("perf: Rework/fix the whole read vs group stuff") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170530094512.dy2nljns2uq7qa3j@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Fix error handling in perf_event_alloc()

2018-04-13T17:48:03Z

[ Upstream commit 36cc2b9222b5106de34085c4dd8635ac67ef5cba ] We don't set an error code here which means that perf_event_alloc() returns ERR_PTR(0) (in other words NULL). The callers are not expecting that and would Oops. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Fixes: 375637bc5249 ("perf/core: Introduce address range filtering") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170522090418.hvs6icgpdo53wkn5@mwanda Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/callchain: Force USER_DS when invoking perf_callchain_user()

2018-04-13T17:47:54Z

[ Upstream commit 88b0193d9418c00340e45e0a913a0813bc6c8c96 ] Perf can generate and record a user callchain in response to a synchronous request, such as a tracepoint firing. If this happens under set_fs(KERNEL_DS), then we can end up walking the user stack (and dereferencing/saving whatever we find there) without the protections usually afforded by checks such as access_ok. Rather than play whack-a-mole with each architecture's stack unwinding implementation, fix the root of the problem by ensuring that we force USER_DS when invoking perf_callchain_user from the perf core. Reported-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/hwbp: Simplify the perf-hwbp code, fix documentation

2018-04-08T10:12:41Z

commit f67b15037a7a50c57f72e69a6d59941ad90a0f0f upstream. Annoyingly, modify_user_hw_breakpoint() unnecessarily complicates the modification of a breakpoint - simplify it and remove the pointless local variables. Also update the stale Docbook while at it. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Vince Weaver Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/x86/intel: Account interrupts for PEBS errors

2017-12-09T21:01:52Z

[ Upstream commit 475113d937adfd150eb82b5e2c5507125a68e7af ] It's possible to set up PEBS events to get only errors and not any data, like on SNB-X (model 45) and IVB-EP (model 62) via 2 perf commands running simultaneously: taskset -c 1 ./perf record -c 4 -e branches:pp -j any -C 10 This leads to a soft lock up, because the error path of the intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm() does not account event->hw.interrupt for error PEBS interrupts, so in case you're getting ONLY errors you don't have a way to stop the event when it's over the max_samples_per_tick limit: NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#22 stuck for 22s! [perf_fuzzer:5816] ... RIP: 0010:[] [] smp_call_function_single+0xe2/0x140 ... Call Trace: ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xf5/0x1b0 ? perf_cgroup_attach+0x70/0x70 perf_install_in_context+0x199/0x1b0 ? ctx_resched+0x90/0x90 SYSC_perf_event_open+0x641/0xf90 SyS_perf_event_open+0x9/0x10 do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x1f0 entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25 Add perf_event_account_interrupt() which does the interrupt and frequency checks and call it from intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm()'s error path. We keep the pending_kill and pending_wakeup logic only in the __perf_event_overflow() path, because they make sense only if there's any data to deliver. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Stephane Eranian Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Vince Weaver Cc: Vince Weaver Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1482931866-6018-2-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: one perf event close won't free bpf program attached by another perf event

2017-10-12T09:51:21Z

[ Upstream commit ec9dd352d591f0c90402ec67a317c1ed4fb2e638 ] This patch fixes a bug exhibited by the following scenario: 1. fd1 = perf_event_open with attr.config = ID1 2. attach bpf program prog1 to fd1 3. fd2 = perf_event_open with attr.config = ID1 4. user program closes fd2 and prog1 is detached from the tracepoint. 5. user program with fd1 does not work properly as tracepoint no output any more. The issue happens at step 4. Multiple perf_event_open can be called successfully, but only one bpf prog pointer in the tp_event. In the current logic, any fd release for the same tp_event will free the tp_event->prog. The fix is to free tp_event->prog only when the closing fd corresponds to the one which registered the program. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman