user/sven/linux.git/kernel/events, branch v5.4.113

exec: Transform exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore

2021-01-09T12:44:55Z

[ Upstream commit f7cfd871ae0c5008d94b6f66834e7845caa93c15 ] Recently syzbot reported[0] that there is a deadlock amongst the users of exec_update_mutex. The problematic lock ordering found by lockdep was: perf_event_open (exec_update_mutex -> ovl_i_mutex) chown (ovl_i_mutex -> sb_writes) sendfile (sb_writes -> p->lock) by reading from a proc file and writing to overlayfs proc_pid_syscall (p->lock -> exec_update_mutex) While looking at possible solutions it occured to me that all of the users and possible users involved only wanted to state of the given process to remain the same. They are all readers. The only writer is exec. There is no reason for readers to block on each other. So fix this deadlock by transforming exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore named exec_update_lock that only exec takes for writing. Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov Cc: Al Viro Cc: Bernd Edlinger Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Christopher Yeoh Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Sargun Dhillon Cc: Christian Brauner Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Fixes: eea9673250db ("exec: Add exec_update_mutex to replace cred_guard_mutex") [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000063640c05ade8e3de@google.com Reported-by: syzbot+db9cdf3dd1f64252c6ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87ft4mbqen.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf: Break deadlock involving exec_update_mutex

2021-01-09T12:44:54Z

[ Upstream commit 78af4dc949daaa37b3fcd5f348f373085b4e858f ] Syzbot reported a lock inversion involving perf. The sore point being perf holding exec_update_mutex() for a very long time, specifically across a whole bunch of filesystem ops in pmu::event_init() (uprobes) and anon_inode_getfile(). This then inverts against procfs code trying to take exec_update_mutex. Move the permission checks later, such that we need to hold the mutex over less code. Reported-by: syzbot+db9cdf3dd1f64252c6ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: Fix race in the perf_mmap_close() function

2020-11-18T18:20:33Z

commit f91072ed1b7283b13ca57fcfbece5a3b92726143 upstream. There's a possible race in perf_mmap_close() when checking ring buffer's mmap_count refcount value. The problem is that the mmap_count check is not atomic because we call atomic_dec() and atomic_read() separately. perf_mmap_close: ... atomic_dec(&rb->mmap_count); ... if (atomic_read(&rb->mmap_count)) goto out_put; free_uid out_put: ring_buffer_put(rb); /* could be last */ The race can happen when we have two (or more) events sharing same ring buffer and they go through atomic_dec() and then they both see 0 as refcount value later in atomic_read(). Then both will go on and execute code which is meant to be run just once. The code that detaches ring buffer is probably fine to be executed more than once, but the problem is in calling free_uid(), which will later on demonstrate in related crashes and refcount warnings, like: refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free. ... RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x6d/0xf ... Call Trace: prepare_creds+0x190/0x1e0 copy_creds+0x35/0x172 copy_process+0x471/0x1a80 _do_fork+0x83/0x3a0 __do_sys_wait4+0x83/0x90 __do_sys_clone+0x85/0xa0 do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x1e0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Using atomic decrease and check instead of separated calls. Tested-by: Michael Petlan Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Acked-by: Namhyung Kim Acked-by: Wade Mealing Fixes: 9bb5d40cd93c ("perf: Fix mmap() accounting hole"); Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200916115311.GE2301783@krava [sudip: used ring_buffer] Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf: Fix get_recursion_context()

2020-11-18T18:20:28Z

[ Upstream commit ce0f17fc93f63ee91428af10b7b2ddef38cd19e5 ] One should use in_serving_softirq() to detect SoftIRQ context. Fixes: 96f6d4444302 ("perf_counter: avoid recursion") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201030151955.120572175@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: Fix a memory leak in perf_event_parse_addr_filter()

2020-11-10T11:37:34Z

commit 7bdb157cdebbf95a1cd94ed2e01b338714075d00 upstream. As shown through runtime testing, the "filename" allocation is not always freed in perf_event_parse_addr_filter(). There are three possible ways that this could happen: - It could be allocated twice on subsequent iterations through the loop, - or leaked on the success path, - or on the failure path. Clean up the code flow to make it obvious that 'filename' is always freed in the reallocation path and in the two return paths as well. We rely on the fact that kfree(NULL) is NOP and filename is initialized with NULL. This fixes the leak. No other side effects expected. [ Dan Carpenter: cleaned up the code flow & added a changelog. ] [ Ingo Molnar: updated the changelog some more. ] Fixes: 375637bc5249 ("perf/core: Introduce address range filtering") Signed-off-by: "kiyin(尹亮)" Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: Anthony Liguori -- kernel/events/core.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf: Fix task_function_call() error handling

2020-10-14T08:33:05Z

[ Upstream commit 6d6b8b9f4fceab7266ca03d194f60ec72bd4b654 ] The error handling introduced by commit: 2ed6edd33a21 ("perf: Add cond_resched() to task_function_call()") looses any return value from smp_call_function_single() that is not {0, -EINVAL}. This is a problem because it will return -EXNIO when the target CPU is offline. Worse, in that case it'll turn into an infinite loop. Fixes: 2ed6edd33a21 ("perf: Add cond_resched() to task_function_call()") Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Barret Rhoden Tested-by: Srikar Dronamraju Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200827064732.20860-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf: Use new infrastructure to fix deadlocks in execve

2020-10-01T11:17:48Z

[ Upstream commit 6914303824bb572278568330d72fc1f8f9814e67 ] This changes perf_event_set_clock to use the new exec_update_mutex instead of cred_guard_mutex. This should be safe, as the credentials are only used for reading. Signed-off-by: Bernd Edlinger Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

uprobes: __replace_page() avoid BUG in munlock_vma_page()

2020-08-26T08:40:51Z

commit c17c3dc9d08b9aad9a55a1e53f205187972f448e upstream. syzbot crashed on the VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail) in munlock_vma_page(), when called from uprobes __replace_page(). Which of many ways to fix it? Settled on not calling when PageCompound (since Head and Tail are equals in this context, PageCompound the usual check in uprobes.c, and the prior use of FOLL_SPLIT_PMD will have cleared PageMlocked already). Fixes: 5a52c9df62b4 ("uprobe: use FOLL_SPLIT_PMD instead of FOLL_SPLIT") Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju Acked-by: Song Liu Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Cc: [5.4+] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.11.2008161338360.20413@eggly.anvils Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Fix endless multiplex timer

2020-08-11T13:33:32Z

commit 90c91dfb86d0ff545bd329d3ddd72c147e2ae198 upstream. Kan and Andi reported that we fail to kill rotation when the flexible events go empty, but the context does not. XXX moar Fixes: fd7d55172d1e ("perf/cgroups: Don't rotate events for cgroups unnecessarily") Reported-by: Andi Kleen Reported-by: Kan Liang Tested-by: Kan Liang Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200305123851.GX2596@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Cc: Robin Murphy Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

uprobes: Change handle_swbp() to send SIGTRAP with si_code=SI_KERNEL, to fix GDB regression

2020-07-29T08:18:29Z

commit fe5ed7ab99c656bd2f5b79b49df0e9ebf2cead8a upstream. If a tracee is uprobed and it hits int3 inserted by debugger, handle_swbp() does send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0) which means si_code == SI_USER. This used to work when this code was written, but then GDB started to validate si_code and now it simply can't use breakpoints if the tracee has an active uprobe: # cat test.c void unused_func(void) { } int main(void) { return 0; } # gcc -g test.c -o test # perf probe -x ./test -a unused_func # perf record -e probe_test:unused_func gdb ./test -ex run GNU gdb (GDB) 10.0.50.20200714-git ... Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap. 0x00007ffff7ddf909 in dl_main () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (gdb) The tracee hits the internal breakpoint inserted by GDB to monitor shared library events but GDB misinterprets this SIGTRAP and reports a signal. Change handle_swbp() to use force_sig(SIGTRAP), this matches do_int3_user() and fixes the problem. This is the minimal fix for -stable, arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c is equally wrong; it should use send_sigtrap(TRAP_TRACE) instead of send_sig(SIGTRAP), but this doesn't confuse GDB and needs another x86-specific patch. Reported-by: Aaron Merey Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200723154420.GA32043@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman