user/sven/linux.git/kernel/events, branch v6.1.85

perf: Fix the nr_addr_filters fix

2024-02-05T20:13:00Z

[ Upstream commit 388a1fb7da6aaa1970c7e2a7d7fcd983a87a8484 ] Thomas reported that commit 652ffc2104ec ("perf/core: Fix narrow startup race when creating the perf nr_addr_filters sysfs file") made the entire attribute group vanish, instead of only the nr_addr_filters attribute. Additionally a stray return. Insufficient coffee was involved with both writing and merging the patch. Fixes: 652ffc2104ec ("perf/core: Fix narrow startup race when creating the perf nr_addr_filters sysfs file") Reported-by: Thomas Richter Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Tested-by: Thomas Richter Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231122100756.GP8262@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: Fix narrow startup race when creating the perf nr_addr_filters sysfs file

2024-02-05T20:12:47Z

[ Upstream commit 652ffc2104ec1f69dd4a46313888c33527145ccf ] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2023061204-decal-flyable-6090@gregkh Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf: Fix perf_event_validate_size() lockdep splat

2023-12-20T16:00:24Z

commit 7e2c1e4b34f07d9aa8937fab88359d4a0fce468e upstream. When lockdep is enabled, the for_each_sibling_event(sibling, event) macro checks that event->ctx->mutex is held. When creating a new group leader event, we call perf_event_validate_size() on a partially initialized event where event->ctx is NULL, and so when for_each_sibling_event() attempts to check event->ctx->mutex, we get a splat, as reported by Lucas De Marchi: WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1471 at kernel/events/core.c:1950 __do_sys_perf_event_open+0xf37/0x1080 This only happens for a new event which is its own group_leader, and in this case there cannot be any sibling events. Thus it's safe to skip the check for siblings, which avoids having to make invasive and ugly changes to for_each_sibling_event(). Avoid the splat by bailing out early when the new event is its own group_leader. Fixes: 382c27f4ed28f803 ("perf: Fix perf_event_validate_size()") Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231214000620.3081018-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZXpm6gQ%2Fd59jGsuW@xpf.sh.intel.com/ Reported-by: Lucas De Marchi Reported-by: Pengfei Xu Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231215112450.3972309-1-mark.rutland@arm.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf: Fix perf_event_validate_size()

2023-12-13T17:39:24Z

[ Upstream commit 382c27f4ed28f803b1f1473ac2d8db0afc795a1b ] Budimir noted that perf_event_validate_size() only checks the size of the newly added event, even though the sizes of all existing events can also change due to not all events having the same read_format. When we attach the new event, perf_group_attach(), we do re-compute the size for all events. Fixes: a723968c0ed3 ("perf: Fix u16 overflows") Reported-by: Budimir Markovic Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: Bail out early if the request AUX area is out of bound

2023-11-28T17:06:54Z

[ Upstream commit 54aee5f15b83437f23b2b2469bcf21bdd9823916 ] When perf-record with a large AUX area, e.g 4GB, it fails with: #perf record -C 0 -m ,4G -e arm_spe_0// -- sleep 1 failed to mmap with 12 (Cannot allocate memory) and it reveals a WARNING with __alloc_pages(): ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 44 PID: 17573 at mm/page_alloc.c:5568 __alloc_pages+0x1ec/0x248 Call trace: __alloc_pages+0x1ec/0x248 __kmalloc_large_node+0xc0/0x1f8 __kmalloc_node+0x134/0x1e8 rb_alloc_aux+0xe0/0x298 perf_mmap+0x440/0x660 mmap_region+0x308/0x8a8 do_mmap+0x3c0/0x528 vm_mmap_pgoff+0xf4/0x1b8 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x18c/0x218 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x38/0x58 invoke_syscall+0x50/0x128 el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x58/0x188 do_el0_svc+0x34/0x50 el0_svc+0x34/0x108 el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8/0xc0 el0t_64_sync+0x1a4/0x1a8 'rb->aux_pages' allocated by kcalloc() is a pointer array which is used to maintains AUX trace pages. The allocated page for this array is physically contiguous (and virtually contiguous) with an order of 0..MAX_ORDER. If the size of pointer array crosses the limitation set by MAX_ORDER, it reveals a WARNING. So bail out early with -ENOMEM if the request AUX area is out of bound, e.g.: #perf record -C 0 -m ,4G -e arm_spe_0// -- sleep 1 failed to mmap with 12 (Cannot allocate memory) Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: Fix potential NULL deref

2023-11-02T08:35:32Z

commit a71ef31485bb51b846e8db8b3a35e432cc15afb5 upstream. Smatch is awesome. Fixes: 32671e3799ca ("perf: Disallow mis-matched inherited group reads") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf: Disallow mis-matched inherited group reads

2023-10-25T10:03:15Z

commit 32671e3799ca2e4590773fd0e63aaa4229e50c06 upstream. Because group consistency is non-atomic between parent (filedesc) and children (inherited) events, it is possible for PERF_FORMAT_GROUP read() to try and sum non-matching counter groups -- with non-sensical results. Add group_generation to distinguish the case where a parent group removes and adds an event and thus has the same number, but a different configuration of events as inherited groups. This became a problem when commit fa8c269353d5 ("perf/core: Invert perf_read_group() loops") flipped the order of child_list and sibling_list. Previously it would iterate the group (sibling_list) first, and for each sibling traverse the child_list. In this order, only the group composition of the parent is relevant. By flipping the order the group composition of the child (inherited) events becomes an issue and the mis-match in group composition becomes evident. That said; even prior to this commit, while reading of a group that is not equally inherited was not broken, it still made no sense. (Ab)use ECHILD as error return to indicate issues with child process group composition. Fixes: fa8c269353d5 ("perf/core: Invert perf_read_group() loops") Reported-by: Budimir Markovic Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018115654.GK33217@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf: Fix function pointer case

2023-08-11T10:08:09Z

commit 1af6239d1d3e61d33fd2f0ba53d3d1a67cc50574 upstream. With the advent of CFI it is no longer acceptible to cast function pointers. The robot complains thusly: kernel-events-core.c:warning:cast-from-int-(-)(struct-perf_cpu_pmu_context-)-to-remote_function_f-(aka-int-(-)(void-)-)-converts-to-incompatible-function-type Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Cixi Geng Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Fix hardlockup failure caused by perf throttle

2023-05-11T14:03:31Z

[ Upstream commit 15def34e2635ab7e0e96f1bc32e1b69609f14942 ] commit e050e3f0a71bf ("perf: Fix broken interrupt rate throttling") introduces a change in throttling threshold judgment. Before this, compare hwc->interrupts and max_samples_per_tick, then increase hwc->interrupts by 1, but this commit reverses order of these two behaviors, causing the semantics of max_samples_per_tick to change. In literal sense of "max_samples_per_tick", if hwc->interrupts == max_samples_per_tick, it should not be throttled, therefore, the judgment condition should be changed to "hwc->interrupts > max_samples_per_tick". In fact, this may cause the hardlockup to fail, The minimum value of max_samples_per_tick may be 1, in this case, the return value of __perf_event_account_interrupt function is 1. As a result, nmi_watchdog gets throttled, which would stop PMU (Use x86 architecture as an example, see x86_pmu_handle_irq). Fixes: e050e3f0a71b ("perf: Fix broken interrupt rate throttling") Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230227023508.102230-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: Fix the same task check in perf_event_set_output

2023-04-13T14:55:32Z

[ Upstream commit 24d3ae2f37d8bc3c14b31d353c5d27baf582b6a6 ] The same task check in perf_event_set_output has some potential issues for some usages. For the current perf code, there is a problem if using of perf_event_open() to have multiple samples getting into the same mmap’d memory when they are both attached to the same process. https://lore.kernel.org/all/92645262-D319-4068-9C44-2409EF44888E@gmail.com/ Because the event->ctx is not ready when the perf_event_set_output() is invoked in the perf_event_open(). Besides the above issue, before the commit bd2756811766 ("perf: Rewrite core context handling"), perf record can errors out when sampling with a hardware event and a software event as below. $ perf record -e cycles,dummy --per-thread ls failed to mmap with 22 (Invalid argument) That's because that prior to the commit a hardware event and a software event are from different task context. The problem should be a long time issue since commit c3f00c70276d ("perk: Separate find_get_context() from event initialization"). The task struct is stored in the event->hw.target for each per-thread event. It is a more reliable way to determine whether two events are attached to the same task. The event->hw.target was also introduced several years ago by the commit 50f16a8bf9d7 ("perf: Remove type specific target pointers"). It can not only be used to fix the issue with the current code, but also back port to fix the issues with an older kernel. Note: The event->hw.target was introduced later than commit c3f00c70276d. The patch may cannot be applied between the commit c3f00c70276d and commit 50f16a8bf9d7. Anybody that wants to back-port this at that period may have to find other solutions. Fixes: c3f00c70276d ("perf: Separate find_get_context() from event initialization") Signed-off-by: Kan Liang Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Zhengjun Xing Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230322202449.512091-1-kan.liang@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin