user/sven/linux.git/kernel/events, branch v6.13.7

perf/core: Fix pmus_lock vs. pmus_srcu ordering

2025-03-13T12:07:54Z

[ Upstream commit 2565e42539b120b81a68a58da961ce5d1e34eac8 ] Commit a63fbed776c7 ("perf/tracing/cpuhotplug: Fix locking order") placed pmus_lock inside pmus_srcu, this makes perf_pmu_unregister() trip lockdep. Move the locking about such that only pmu_idr and pmus (list) are modified while holding pmus_lock. This avoids doing synchronize_srcu() while holding pmus_lock and all is well again. Fixes: a63fbed776c7 ("perf/tracing/cpuhotplug: Fix locking order") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241104135517.679556858@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: Fix low freq setting via IOC_PERIOD

2025-03-07T17:27:06Z

commit 0d39844150546fa1415127c5fbae26db64070dd3 upstream. A low attr::freq value cannot be set via IOC_PERIOD on some platforms. The perf_event_check_period() introduced in: 81ec3f3c4c4d ("perf/x86: Add check_period PMU callback") was intended to check the period, rather than the frequency. A low frequency may be mistakenly rejected by limit_period(). Fix it. Fixes: 81ec3f3c4c4d ("perf/x86: Add check_period PMU callback") Signed-off-by: Kan Liang Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Ravi Bangoria Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250117151913.3043942-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250115154949.3147-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com/ Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Add RCU read lock protection to perf_iterate_ctx()

2025-03-07T17:27:05Z

commit 0fe8813baf4b2e865d3b2c735ce1a15b86002c74 upstream. The perf_iterate_ctx() function performs RCU list traversal but currently lacks RCU read lock protection. This causes lockdep warnings when running perf probe with unshare(1) under CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage kernel/events/core.c:8168 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! Call Trace: lockdep_rcu_suspicious ? perf_event_addr_filters_apply perf_iterate_ctx perf_event_exec begin_new_exec ? load_elf_phdrs load_elf_binary ? lock_acquire ? find_held_lock ? bprm_execve bprm_execve do_execveat_common.isra.0 __x64_sys_execve do_syscall_64 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe This protection was previously present but was removed in commit bd2756811766 ("perf: Rewrite core context handling"). Add back the necessary rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pair around perf_iterate_ctx() call in perf_event_exec(). [ mingo: Use scoped_guard() as suggested by Peter ] Fixes: bd2756811766 ("perf: Rewrite core context handling") Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250117-fix_perf_rcu-v1-1-13cb9210fc6a@debian.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

uprobes: Remove too strict lockdep_assert() condition in hprobe_expire()

2025-03-07T17:27:03Z

[ Upstream commit f8c857238a392f21d5726d07966f6061007c8d4f ] hprobe_expire() is used to atomically switch pending uretprobe instance (struct return_instance) from being SRCU protected to be refcounted. This can be done from background timer thread, or synchronously within current thread when task is forked. In the former case, return_instance has to be protected through RCU read lock, and that's what hprobe_expire() used to check with lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held()). But in the latter case (hprobe_expire() called from dup_utask()) there is no RCU lock being held, and it's both unnecessary and incovenient. Inconvenient due to the intervening memory allocations inside dup_return_instance()'s loop. Unnecessary because dup_utask() is called synchronously in current thread, and no uretprobe can run at that point, so return_instance can't be freed either. So drop rcu_read_lock_held() condition, and expand corresponding comment to explain necessary lifetime guarantees. lockdep_assert()-detected issue is a false positive. Fixes: dd1a7567784e ("uprobes: SRCU-protect uretprobe lifetime (with timeout)") Reported-by: Breno Leitao Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250225223214.2970740-1-andrii@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

uprobes: Reject the shared zeropage in uprobe_write_opcode()

2025-03-07T17:27:02Z

[ Upstream commit bddf10d26e6e5114e7415a0e442ec6f51a559468 ] We triggered the following crash in syzkaller tests: BUG: Bad page state in process syz.7.38 pfn:1eff3 page: refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x1eff3 flags: 0x3fffff00004004(referenced|reserved|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) raw: 003fffff00004004 ffffe6c6c07bfcc8 ffffe6c6c07bfcc8 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000000fffffffe 0000000000000000 page dumped because: PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_FREE flag(s) set Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x32/0x50 bad_page+0x69/0xf0 free_unref_page_prepare+0x401/0x500 free_unref_page+0x6d/0x1b0 uprobe_write_opcode+0x460/0x8e0 install_breakpoint.part.0+0x51/0x80 register_for_each_vma+0x1d9/0x2b0 __uprobe_register+0x245/0x300 bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach+0x29b/0x4f0 link_create+0x1e2/0x280 __sys_bpf+0x75f/0xac0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x1a/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x56/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x78/0xe2 BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:00000000452453e0 type:MM_FILEPAGES val:-1 The following syzkaller test case can be used to reproduce: r2 = creat(&(0x7f0000000000)='./file0\x00', 0x8) write$nbd(r2, &(0x7f0000000580)=ANY=[], 0x10) r4 = openat(0xffffffffffffff9c, &(0x7f0000000040)='./file0\x00', 0x42, 0x0) mmap$IORING_OFF_SQ_RING(&(0x7f0000ffd000/0x3000)=nil, 0x3000, 0x0, 0x12, r4, 0x0) r5 = userfaultfd(0x80801) ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r5, 0xc018aa3f, &(0x7f0000000040)={0xaa, 0x20}) r6 = userfaultfd(0x80801) ioctl$UFFDIO_API(r6, 0xc018aa3f, &(0x7f0000000140)) ioctl$UFFDIO_REGISTER(r6, 0xc020aa00, &(0x7f0000000100)={{&(0x7f0000ffc000/0x4000)=nil, 0x4000}, 0x2}) ioctl$UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE(r5, 0xc020aa04, &(0x7f0000000000)={{&(0x7f0000ffd000/0x1000)=nil, 0x1000}}) r7 = bpf$PROG_LOAD(0x5, &(0x7f0000000140)={0x2, 0x3, &(0x7f0000000200)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB="1800000000120000000000000000000095"], &(0x7f0000000000)='GPL\x00', 0x7, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, '\x00', 0x0, @fallback=0x30, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x10, 0x0, @void, @value}, 0x94) bpf$BPF_LINK_CREATE_XDP(0x1c, &(0x7f0000000040)={r7, 0x0, 0x30, 0x1e, @val=@uprobe_multi={&(0x7f0000000080)='./file0\x00', &(0x7f0000000100)=[0x2], 0x0, 0x0, 0x1}}, 0x40) The cause is that zero pfn is set to the PTE without increasing the RSS count in mfill_atomic_pte_zeropage() and the refcount of zero folio does not increase accordingly. Then, the operation on the same pfn is performed in uprobe_write_opcode()->__replace_page() to unconditional decrease the RSS count and old_folio's refcount. Therefore, two bugs are introduced: 1. The RSS count is incorrect, when process exit, the check_mm() report error "Bad rss-count". 2. The reserved folio (zero folio) is freed when folio->refcount is zero, then free_pages_prepare->free_page_is_bad() report error "Bad page state". There is more, the following warning could also theoretically be triggered: __replace_page() -> ... -> folio_remove_rmap_pte() -> VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO(is_zero_folio(folio), folio) Considering that uprobe hit on the zero folio is a very rare case, just reject zero old folio immediately after get_user_page_vma_remote(). [ mingo: Cleaned up the changelog ] Fixes: 7396fa818d62 ("uprobes/core: Make background page replacement logic account for rss_stat counters") Fixes: 2b1444983508 ("uprobes, mm, x86: Add the ability to install and remove uprobes breakpoints") Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250224031149.1598949-1-tongtiangen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: Order the PMU list to fix warning about unordered pmu_ctx_list

2025-03-07T17:27:02Z

[ Upstream commit 2016066c66192a99d9e0ebf433789c490a6785a2 ] Syskaller triggers a warning due to prev_epc->pmu != next_epc->pmu in perf_event_swap_task_ctx_data(). vmcore shows that two lists have the same perf_event_pmu_context, but not in the same order. The problem is that the order of pmu_ctx_list for the parent is impacted by the time when an event/PMU is added. While the order for a child is impacted by the event order in the pinned_groups and flexible_groups. So the order of pmu_ctx_list in the parent and child may be different. To fix this problem, insert the perf_event_pmu_context to its proper place after iteration of the pmu_ctx_list. The follow testcase can trigger above warning: # perf record -e cycles --call-graph lbr -- taskset -c 3 ./a.out & # perf stat -e cpu-clock,cs -p xxx // xxx is the pid of a.out test.c void main() { int count = 0; pid_t pid; printf("%d running\n", getpid()); sleep(30); printf("running\n"); pid = fork(); if (pid == -1) { printf("fork error\n"); return; } if (pid == 0) { while (1) { count++; } } else { while (1) { count++; } } } The testcase first opens an LBR event, so it will allocate task_ctx_data, and then open tracepoint and software events, so the parent context will have 3 different perf_event_pmu_contexts. On inheritance, child ctx will insert the perf_event_pmu_context in another order and the warning will trigger. [ mingo: Tidied up the changelog. ] Fixes: bd2756811766 ("perf: Rewrite core context handling") Signed-off-by: Luo Gengkun Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Kan Liang Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250122073356.1824736-1-luogengkun@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kernel: be more careful about dup_mmap() failures and uprobe registering

2025-02-08T09:02:19Z

[ Upstream commit 64c37e134b120fb462fb4a80694bfb8e7be77b14 ] If a memory allocation fails during dup_mmap(), the maple tree can be left in an unsafe state for other iterators besides the exit path. All the locks are dropped before the exit_mmap() call (in mm/mmap.c), but the incomplete mm_struct can be reached through (at least) the rmap finding the vmas which have a pointer back to the mm_struct. Up to this point, there have been no issues with being able to find an mm_struct that was only partially initialised. Syzbot was able to make the incomplete mm_struct fail with recent forking changes, so it has been proven unsafe to use the mm_struct that hasn't been initialised, as referenced in the link below. Although 8ac662f5da19f ("fork: avoid inappropriate uprobe access to invalid mm") fixed the uprobe access, it does not completely remove the race. This patch sets the MMF_OOM_SKIP to avoid the iteration of the vmas on the oom side (even though this is extremely unlikely to be selected as an oom victim in the race window), and sets MMF_UNSTABLE to avoid other potential users from using a partially initialised mm_struct. When registering vmas for uprobe, skip the vmas in an mm that is marked unstable. Modifying a vma in an unstable mm may cause issues if the mm isn't fully initialised. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/6756d273.050a0220.2477f.003d.GAE@google.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250127170221.1761366-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com Fixes: d24062914837 ("fork: use __mt_dup() to duplicate maple tree in dup_mmap()") Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Peng Zhang Cc: Matthew Wilcox Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: Save raw sample data conditionally based on sample type

2025-02-08T09:00:57Z

[ Upstream commit b9c44b91476b67327a521568a854babecc4070ab ] Currently, space for raw sample data is always allocated within sample records for both BPF output and tracepoint events. This leads to unused space in sample records when raw sample data is not requested. This patch enforces checking sample type of an event in perf_sample_save_raw_data(). So raw sample data will only be saved if explicitly requested, reducing overhead when it is not needed. Fixes: 0a9081cf0a11 ("perf/core: Add perf_sample_save_raw_data() helper") Signed-off-by: Yabin Cui Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers Acked-by: Namhyung Kim Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240515193610.2350456-2-yabinc@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

uprobes: Fix race in uprobe_free_utask

2025-01-10T08:28:01Z

Max Makarov reported kernel panic [1] in perf user callchain code. The reason for that is the race between uprobe_free_utask and bpf profiler code doing the perf user stack unwind and is triggered within uprobe_free_utask function: - after current->utask is freed and - before current->utask is set to NULL general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x9e759c37ee555c76: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI RIP: 0010:is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 ... ? die_addr+0x36/0x90 ? exc_general_protection+0x217/0x420 ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30 ? is_uprobe_at_func_entry+0x28/0x80 perf_callchain_user+0x20a/0x360 get_perf_callchain+0x147/0x1d0 bpf_get_stackid+0x60/0x90 bpf_prog_9aac297fb833e2f5_do_perf_event+0x434/0x53b ? __smp_call_single_queue+0xad/0x120 bpf_overflow_handler+0x75/0x110 ... asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1a/0x20 RIP: 0010:__kmem_cache_free+0x1cb/0x350 ... ? uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 ? acct_collect+0x4c/0x220 uprobe_free_utask+0x62/0x80 mm_release+0x12/0xb0 do_exit+0x26b/0xaa0 __x64_sys_exit+0x1b/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x80 It can be easily reproduced by running following commands in separate terminals: # while :; do bpftrace -e 'uprobe:/bin/ls:_start { printf("hit\n"); }' -c ls; done # bpftrace -e 'profile:hz:100000 { @[ustack()] = count(); }' Fixing this by making sure current->utask pointer is set to NULL before we start to release the utask object. [1] https://github.com/grafana/pyroscope/issues/3673 Fixes: cfa7f3d2c526 ("perf,x86: avoid missing caller address in stack traces captured in uprobe") Reported-by: Max Makarov Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250109141440.2692173-1-jolsa@kernel.org

Merge tag 'mm-nonmm-stable-2024-11-24-02-05' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

2024-11-26T00:09:48Z

Pull non-MM updates from Andrew Morton: - The series "resource: A couple of cleanups" from Andy Shevchenko performs some cleanups in the resource management code - The series "Improve the copy of task comm" from Yafang Shao addresses possible race-induced overflows in the management of task_struct.comm[] - The series "Remove unnecessary header includes from {tools/}lib/list_sort.c" from Kuan-Wei Chiu adds some cleanups and a small fix to the list_sort library code and to its selftest - The series "Enhance min heap API with non-inline functions and optimizations" also from Kuan-Wei Chiu optimizes and cleans up the min_heap library code - The series "nilfs2: Finish folio conversion" from Ryusuke Konishi finishes off nilfs2's folioification - The series "add detect count for hung tasks" from Lance Yang adds more userspace visibility into the hung-task detector's activity - Apart from that, singelton patches in many places - please see the individual changelogs for details * tag 'mm-nonmm-stable-2024-11-24-02-05' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm: (71 commits) gdb: lx-symbols: do not error out on monolithic build kernel/reboot: replace sprintf() with sysfs_emit() lib: util_macros_kunit: add kunit test for util_macros.h util_macros.h: fix/rework find_closest() macros Improve consistency of '#error' directive messages ocfs2: fix uninitialized value in ocfs2_file_read_iter() hung_task: add docs for hung_task_detect_count hung_task: add detect count for hung tasks dma-buf: use atomic64_inc_return() in dma_buf_getfile() fs/proc/kcore.c: fix coccinelle reported ERROR instances resource: avoid unnecessary resource tree walking in __region_intersects() ocfs2: remove unused errmsg function and table ocfs2: cluster: fix a typo lib/scatterlist: use sg_phys() helper checkpatch: always parse orig_commit in fixes tag nilfs2: convert metadata aops from writepage to writepages nilfs2: convert nilfs_recovery_copy_block() to take a folio nilfs2: convert nilfs_page_count_clean_buffers() to take a folio nilfs2: remove nilfs_writepage nilfs2: convert checkpoint file to be folio-based ...