user/sven/linux.git/kernel/exit.c, branch v4.19.133

exit: Move preemption fixup up, move blocking operations down

2020-06-22T07:05:14Z

[ Upstream commit 586b58cac8b4683eb58a1446fbc399de18974e40 ] With CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y and CONFIG_CGROUPS=y, kernel oopses in non-preemptible context look untidy; after the main oops, the kernel prints a "sleeping function called from invalid context" report because exit_signals() -> cgroup_threadgroup_change_begin() -> percpu_down_read() can sleep, and that happens before the preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_ENABLED) fixup. It looks like the same thing applies to profile_task_exit() and kcov_task_exit(). Fix it by moving the preemption fixup up and the calls to profile_task_exit() and kcov_task_exit() down. Fixes: 1dc0fffc48af ("sched/core: Robustify preemption leak checks") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200305220657.46800-1-jannh@google.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

make 'user_access_begin()' do 'access_ok()'

2020-06-22T07:04:58Z

commit 594cc251fdd0d231d342d88b2fdff4bc42fb0690 upstream. Originally, the rule used to be that you'd have to do access_ok() separately, and then user_access_begin() before actually doing the direct (optimized) user access. But experience has shown that people then decide not to do access_ok() at all, and instead rely on it being implied by other operations or similar. Which makes it very hard to verify that the access has actually been range-checked. If you use the unsafe direct user accesses, hardware features (either SMAP - Supervisor Mode Access Protection - on x86, or PAN - Privileged Access Never - on ARM) do force you to use user_access_begin(). But nothing really forces the range check. By putting the range check into user_access_begin(), we actually force people to do the right thing (tm), and the range check vill be visible near the actual accesses. We have way too long a history of people trying to avoid them. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Miles Chen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exit: panic before exit_mm() on global init exit

2020-01-09T09:19:02Z

commit 43cf75d96409a20ef06b756877a2e72b10a026fc upstream. Currently, when global init and all threads in its thread-group have exited we panic via: do_exit() -> exit_notify() -> forget_original_parent() -> find_child_reaper() This makes it hard to extract a useable coredump for global init from a kernel crashdump because by the time we panic exit_mm() will have already released global init's mm. This patch moves the panic futher up before exit_mm() is called. As was the case previously, we only panic when global init and all its threads in the thread-group have exited. Signed-off-by: chenqiwu Acked-by: Christian Brauner Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov [christian.brauner@ubuntu.com: fix typo, rewrite commit message] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1576736993-10121-1-git-send-email-qiwuchen55@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cgroup: Call cgroup_release() before __exit_signal()

2019-08-09T15:52:34Z

commit 6b115bf58e6f013ca75e7115aabcbd56c20ff31d upstream. cgroup_release() calls cgroup_subsys->release() which is used by the pids controller to uncharge its pid. We want to use it to manage iteration of dying tasks which requires putting it before __unhash_process(). Move cgroup_release() above __exit_signal(). While this makes it uncharge before the pid is freed, pid is RCU freed anyway and the window is very narrow. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cgroup/pids: turn cgroup_subsys->free() into cgroup_subsys->release() to fix the accounting

2019-04-05T20:33:13Z

[ Upstream commit 51bee5abeab2058ea5813c5615d6197a23dbf041 ] The only user of cgroup_subsys->free() callback is pids_cgrp_subsys which needs pids_free() to uncharge the pid. However, ->free() is called from __put_task_struct()->cgroup_free() and this is too late. Even the trivial program which does for (;;) { int pid = fork(); assert(pid >= 0); if (pid) wait(NULL); else exit(0); } can run out of limits because release_task()->call_rcu(delayed_put_task_struct) implies an RCU gp after the task/pid goes away and before the final put(). Test-case: mkdir -p /tmp/CG mount -t cgroup2 none /tmp/CG echo '+pids' > /tmp/CG/cgroup.subtree_control mkdir /tmp/CG/PID echo 2 > /tmp/CG/PID/pids.max perl -e 'while ($p = fork) { wait; } $p // die "fork failed: $!\n"' & echo $! > /tmp/CG/PID/cgroup.procs Without this patch the forking process fails soon after migration. Rename cgroup_subsys->free() to cgroup_subsys->release() and move the callsite into the new helper, cgroup_release(), called by release_task() which actually frees the pid(s). Reported-by: Herton R. Krzesinski Reported-by: Jan Stancek Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/wait: Fix rcuwait_wake_up() ordering

2019-03-05T16:58:49Z

[ Upstream commit 6dc080eeb2ba01973bfff0d79844d7a59e12542e ] For some peculiar reason rcuwait_wake_up() has the right barrier in the comment, but not in the code. This mistake has been observed to cause a deadlock in the following situation: P1 P2 percpu_up_read() percpu_down_write() rcu_sync_is_idle() // false rcu_sync_enter() ... __percpu_up_read() [S] ,- __this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count) | smp_rmb(); [L] | task = rcu_dereference(w->task) // NULL | | [S] w->task = current | smp_mb(); | [L] readers_active_check() // fail `-> Where the smp_rmb() (obviously) fails to constrain the store. [ peterz: Added changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Prateek Sood Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Andrea Parri Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: 8f95c90ceb54 ("sched/wait, RCU: Introduce rcuwait machinery") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1543590656-7157-1-git-send-email-prsood@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kernel/exit.c: release ptraced tasks before zap_pid_ns_processes

2019-02-06T16:30:14Z

commit 8fb335e078378c8426fabeed1ebee1fbf915690c upstream. Currently, exit_ptrace() adds all ptraced tasks in a dead list, then zap_pid_ns_processes() waits on all tasks in a current pidns, and only then are tasks from the dead list released. zap_pid_ns_processes() can get stuck on waiting tasks from the dead list. In this case, we will have one unkillable process with one or more dead children. Thanks to Oleg for the advice to release tasks in find_child_reaper(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190110175200.12442-1-avagin@gmail.com Fixes: 7c8bd2322c7f ("exit: ptrace: shift "reap dead" code from exit_ptrace() to forget_original_parent()") Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

signal: Pass pid type into group_send_sig_info

2018-07-21T17:57:35Z

This passes the information we already have at the call sight into group_send_sig_info. Ultimatelly allowing for to better handle signals sent to a group of processes. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"

pid: Implement PIDTYPE_TGID

2018-07-21T15:43:12Z

Everywhere except in the pid array we distinguish between a tasks pid and a tasks tgid (thread group id). Even in the enumeration we want that distinction sometimes so we have added __PIDTYPE_TGID. With leader_pid we almost have an implementation of PIDTYPE_TGID in struct signal_struct. Add PIDTYPE_TGID as a first class member of the pid_type enumeration and into the pids array. Then remove the __PIDTYPE_TGID special case and the leader_pid in signal_struct. The net size increase is just an extra pointer added to struct pid and an extra pair of pointers of an hlist_node added to task_struct. The effect on code maintenance is the removal of a number of special cases today and the potential to remove many more special cases as PIDTYPE_TGID gets used to it's fullest. The long term potential is allowing zombie thread group leaders to exit, which will remove a lot more special cases in the code. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"

pids: Move task_pid_type into sched/signal.h

2018-07-21T15:43:12Z

The function is general and inline so there is no need to hide it inside of exit.c Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman"