user/sven/linux.git/kernel/locking, branch v4.19.159

locking/lockdep: Fix overflow in presentation of average lock-time

2020-09-03T09:24:21Z

[ Upstream commit a7ef9b28aa8d72a1656fa6f0a01bbd1493886317 ] Though the number of lock-acquisitions is tracked as unsigned long, this is passed as the divisor to div_s64() which interprets it as a s32, giving nonsense values with more than 2 billion acquisitons. E.g. acquisitions holdtime-min holdtime-max holdtime-total holdtime-avg ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2350439395 0.07 353.38 649647067.36 0.-32 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200725185110.11588-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locktorture: Print ratio of acquisitions, not failures

2020-04-23T08:30:23Z

commit 80c503e0e68fbe271680ab48f0fe29bc034b01b7 upstream. The __torture_print_stats() function in locktorture.c carefully initializes local variable "min" to statp[0].n_lock_acquired, but then compares it to statp[i].n_lock_fail. Given that the .n_lock_fail field should normally be zero, and given the initialization, it seems reasonable to display the maximum and minimum number acquisitions instead of miscomputing the maximum and minimum number of failures. This commit therefore switches from failures to acquisitions. And this turns out to be not only a day-zero bug, but entirely my own fault. I hate it when that happens! Fixes: 0af3fe1efa53 ("locktorture: Add a lock-torture kernel module") Reported-by: Will Deacon Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Will Deacon Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Josh Triplett Cc: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

locking/lockdep: Avoid recursion in lockdep_count_{for,back}ward_deps()

2020-04-17T08:48:42Z

[ Upstream commit 25016bd7f4caf5fc983bbab7403d08e64cba3004 ] Qian Cai reported a bug when PROVE_RCU_LIST=y, and read on /proc/lockdep triggered a warning: [ ] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirqs_enabled) ... [ ] Call Trace: [ ] lock_is_held_type+0x5d/0x150 [ ] ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x64/0x80 [ ] rcu_read_lock_any_held+0xac/0x100 [ ] ? rcu_read_lock_held+0xc0/0xc0 [ ] ? __slab_free+0x421/0x540 [ ] ? kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 [ ] ? __kmalloc_node+0x1d7/0x320 [ ] ? kvmalloc_node+0x6f/0x80 [ ] __bfs+0x28a/0x3c0 [ ] ? class_equal+0x30/0x30 [ ] lockdep_count_forward_deps+0x11a/0x1a0 The warning got triggered because lockdep_count_forward_deps() call __bfs() without current->lockdep_recursion being set, as a result a lockdep internal function (__bfs()) is checked by lockdep, which is unexpected, and the inconsistency between the irq-off state and the state traced by lockdep caused the warning. Apart from this warning, lockdep internal functions like __bfs() should always be protected by current->lockdep_recursion to avoid potential deadlocks and data inconsistency, therefore add the current->lockdep_recursion on-and-off section to protect __bfs() in both lockdep_count_forward_deps() and lockdep_count_backward_deps() Reported-by: Qian Cai Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200312151258.128036-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/spinlock/debug: Fix various data races

2020-01-12T11:17:05Z

[ Upstream commit 1a365e822372ba24c9da0822bc583894f6f3d821 ] This fixes various data races in spinlock_debug. By testing with KCSAN, it is observable that the console gets spammed with data races reports, suggesting these are extremely frequent. Example data race report: read to 0xffff8ab24f403c48 of 4 bytes by task 221 on cpu 2: debug_spin_lock_before kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:85 [inline] do_raw_spin_lock+0x9b/0x210 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:112 __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:143 [inline] _raw_spin_lock+0x39/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151 spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:338 [inline] get_partial_node.isra.0.part.0+0x32/0x2f0 mm/slub.c:1873 get_partial_node mm/slub.c:1870 [inline] write to 0xffff8ab24f403c48 of 4 bytes by task 167 on cpu 3: debug_spin_unlock kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:103 [inline] do_raw_spin_unlock+0xc9/0x1a0 kernel/locking/spinlock_debug.c:138 __raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:159 [inline] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2d/0x50 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:191 spin_unlock_irqrestore include/linux/spinlock.h:393 [inline] free_debug_processing+0x1b3/0x210 mm/slub.c:1214 __slab_free+0x292/0x400 mm/slub.c:2864 As a side-effect, with KCSAN, this eventually locks up the console, most likely due to deadlock, e.g. .. -> printk lock -> spinlock_debug -> KCSAN detects data race -> kcsan_print_report() -> printk lock -> deadlock. This fix will 1) avoid the data races, and 2) allow using lock debugging together with KCSAN. Reported-by: Qian Cai Signed-off-by: Marco Elver Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191120155715.28089-1-elver@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Revert "locking/pvqspinlock: Don't wait if vCPU is preempted"

2019-10-11T16:21:06Z

commit 89340d0935c9296c7b8222b6eab30e67cb57ab82 upstream. This patch reverts commit 75437bb304b20 (locking/pvqspinlock: Don't wait if vCPU is preempted). A large performance regression was caused by this commit. on over-subscription scenarios. The test was run on a Xeon Skylake box, 2 sockets, 40 cores, 80 threads, with three VMs of 80 vCPUs each. The score of ebizzy -M is reduced from 13000-14000 records/s to 1700-1800 records/s: Host Guest score vanilla w/o kvm optimizations upstream 1700-1800 records/s vanilla w/o kvm optimizations revert 13000-14000 records/s vanilla w/ kvm optimizations upstream 4500-5000 records/s vanilla w/ kvm optimizations revert 14000-15500 records/s Exit from aggressive wait-early mechanism can result in premature yield and extra scheduling latency. Actually, only 6% of wait_early events are caused by vcpu_is_preempted() being true. However, when one vCPU voluntarily releases its vCPU, all the subsequently waiters in the queue will do the same and the cascading effect leads to bad performance. kvm optimizations: [1] commit d73eb57b80b (KVM: Boost vCPUs that are delivering interrupts) [2] commit 266e85a5ec9 (KVM: X86: Boost queue head vCPU to mitigate lock waiter preemption) Tested-by: loobinliu@tencent.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Waiman Long Cc: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Radim Krčmář Cc: loobinliu@tencent.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 75437bb304b20 (locking/pvqspinlock: Don't wait if vCPU is preempted) Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

locking/lockdep: Add debug_locks check in __lock_downgrade()

2019-10-01T06:26:07Z

[ Upstream commit 71492580571467fb7177aade19c18ce7486267f5 ] Tetsuo Handa had reported he saw an incorrect "downgrading a read lock" warning right after a previous lockdep warning. It is likely that the previous warning turned off lock debugging causing the lockdep to have inconsistency states leading to the lock downgrade warning. Fix that by add a check for debug_locks at the beginning of __lock_downgrade(). Debugged-by: Tetsuo Handa Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa Reported-by: syzbot+53383ae265fb161ef488@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1547093005-26085-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

locking/lockdep: Hide unused 'class' variable

2019-07-31T05:27:09Z

[ Upstream commit 68037aa78208f34bda4e5cd76c357f718b838cbb ] The usage is now hidden in an #ifdef, so we need to move the variable itself in there as well to avoid this warning: kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:203:21: error: unused variable 'class' [-Werror,-Wunused-variable] Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Bart Van Assche Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Qian Cai Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Waiman Long Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Will Deacon Cc: Yuyang Du Cc: frederic@kernel.org Fixes: 68d41d8c94a3 ("locking/lockdep: Fix lock used or unused stats error") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190715092809.736834-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/lockdep: Fix lock used or unused stats error

2019-07-31T05:27:09Z

[ Upstream commit 68d41d8c94a31dfb8233ab90b9baf41a2ed2da68 ] The stats variable nr_unused_locks is incremented every time a new lock class is register and decremented when the lock is first used in __lock_acquire(). And after all, it is shown and checked in lockdep_stats. However, under configurations that either CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not defined: The commit: 091806515124b20 ("locking/lockdep: Consolidate lock usage bit initialization") missed marking the LOCK_USED flag at IRQ usage initialization because as mark_usage() is not called. And the commit: 886532aee3cd42d ("locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") further made mark_lock() not defined such that the LOCK_USED cannot be marked at all when the lock is first acquired. As a result, we fix this by not showing and checking the stats under such configurations for lockdep_stats. Reported-by: Qian Cai Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Cc: arnd@arndb.de Cc: frederic@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190709101522.9117-1-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/lockdep: Fix merging of hlocks with non-zero references

2019-07-26T07:14:03Z

[ Upstream commit d9349850e188b8b59e5322fda17ff389a1c0cd7d ] The sequence static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(test_ww_class); struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_a; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_b; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_c; struct mutex lock_c; ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_c, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_c, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); (*) ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_c); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); (**) will trigger the following error in __lock_release() when calling mutex_release() at **: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0) The problem is that the hlock merging happening at * updates the references for test_ww_class incorrectly to 3 whereas it should've updated it to 4 (representing all the instances for ww_ctx and ww_lock_[abc]). Fix this by updating the references during merging correctly taking into account that we can have non-zero references (both for the hlock that we merge into another hlock or for the hlock we are merging into). Signed-off-by: Imre Deak Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Ville=20Syrj=C3=A4l=C3=A4?= Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Will Deacon Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524201509.9199-2-imre.deak@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/rwsem: Prevent decrement of reader count before increment

2019-05-22T05:37:34Z

[ Upstream commit a9e9bcb45b1525ba7aea26ed9441e8632aeeda58 ] During my rwsem testing, it was found that after a down_read(), the reader count may occasionally become 0 or even negative. Consequently, a writer may steal the lock at that time and execute with the reader in parallel thus breaking the mutual exclusion guarantee of the write lock. In other words, both readers and writer can become rwsem owners simultaneously. The current reader wakeup code does it in one pass to clear waiter->task and put them into wake_q before fully incrementing the reader count. Once waiter->task is cleared, the corresponding reader may see it, finish the critical section and do unlock to decrement the count before the count is incremented. This is not a problem if there is only one reader to wake up as the count has been pre-incremented by 1. It is a problem if there are more than one readers to be woken up and writer can steal the lock. The wakeup was actually done in 2 passes before the following v4.9 commit: 70800c3c0cc5 ("locking/rwsem: Scan the wait_list for readers only once") To fix this problem, the wakeup is now done in two passes again. In the first pass, we collect the readers and count them. The reader count is then fully incremented. In the second pass, the waiter->task is then cleared and they are put into wake_q to be woken up later. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Acked-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tim Chen Cc: Will Deacon Cc: huang ying Fixes: 70800c3c0cc5 ("locking/rwsem: Scan the wait_list for readers only once") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190428212557.13482-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin