user/sven/linux.git/kernel/locking, branch v5.10.48

locking/lockdep: Improve noinstr vs errors

2021-06-30T12:47:18Z

[ Upstream commit 49faa77759b211fff344898edc23bb780707fff5 ] Better handle the failure paths. vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: debug_locks_off()+0x23: call to console_verbose() leaves .noinstr.text section vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: debug_locks_off()+0x19: call to __kasan_check_write() leaves .noinstr.text section debug_locks_off+0x19/0x40: instrument_atomic_write at include/linux/instrumented.h:86 (inlined by) __debug_locks_off at include/linux/debug_locks.h:17 (inlined by) debug_locks_off at lib/debug_locks.c:41 Fixes: 6eebad1ad303 ("lockdep: __always_inline more for noinstr") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210621120120.784404944@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/mutex: clear MUTEX_FLAGS if wait_list is empty due to signal

2021-05-26T10:06:50Z

[ Upstream commit 3a010c493271f04578b133de977e0e5dd2848cea ] When a interruptible mutex locker is interrupted by a signal without acquiring this lock and removed from the wait queue. if the mutex isn't contended enough to have a waiter put into the wait queue again, the setting of the WAITER bit will force mutex locker to go into the slowpath to acquire the lock every time, so if the wait queue is empty, the WAITER bit need to be clear. Fixes: 040a0a371005 ("mutex: Add support for wound/wait style locks") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Zqiang Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210517034005.30828-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/lockdep: Correct calling tracepoints

2021-05-26T10:06:50Z

[ Upstream commit 89e70d5c583c55088faa2201d397ee30a15704aa ] The commit eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") reverses tracepoints for lock_contended() and lock_acquired(), thus the ftrace log shows the wrong locking sequence that "acquired" event is prior to "contended" event: -0 [001] d.s3 20803.501685: lock_acquire: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock -0 [001] d.s3 20803.501686: lock_acquired: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock -0 [001] d.s3 20803.501689: lock_contended: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock -0 [001] d.s3 20803.501690: lock_release: 0000000008b91ab4 &sg_policy->update_lock This patch fixes calling tracepoints for lock_contended() and lock_acquired(). Fixes: eb1f00237aca ("lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints") Signed-off-by: Leo Yan Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210512120937.90211-1-leo.yan@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath()

2021-04-28T11:40:00Z

[ Upstream commit 84a24bf8c52e66b7ac89ada5e3cfbe72d65c1896 ] While this code is executed with the wait_lock held, a reader can acquire the lock without holding wait_lock. The writer side loops checking the value with the atomic_cond_read_acquire(), but only truly acquires the lock when the compare-and-exchange is completed successfully which isn’t ordered. This exposes the window between the acquire and the cmpxchg to an A-B-A problem which allows reads following the lock acquisition to observe values speculatively before the write lock is truly acquired. We've seen a problem in epoll where the reader does a xchg while holding the read lock, but the writer can see a value change out from under it. Writer | Reader -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ep_scan_ready_list() | |- write_lock_irq() | |- queued_write_lock_slowpath() | |- atomic_cond_read_acquire() | | read_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags); --> (observes value before unlock) | chain_epi_lockless() | | epi->next = xchg(&ep->ovflist, epi); | | read_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags); | | | atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() | |-- READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist); | A core can order the read of the ovflist ahead of the atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(). Switching the cmpxchg to use acquire semantics addresses this issue at which point the atomic_cond_read can be switched to use relaxed semantics. Fixes: b519b56e378ee ("locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwlock") Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi [peterz: use try_cmpxchg()] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Steve Capper Acked-by: Will Deacon Acked-by: Waiman Long Tested-by: Steve Capper Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

lockdep: Add a missing initialization hint to the "INFO: Trying to register non-static key" message

2021-04-21T11:00:51Z

[ Upstream commit 3a85969e9d912d5dd85362ee37b5f81266e00e77 ] Since this message is printed when dynamically allocated spinlocks (e.g. kzalloc()) are used without initialization (e.g. spin_lock_init()), suggest to developers to check whether initialization functions for objects were called, before making developers wonder what annotation is missing. [ mingo: Minor tweaks to the message. ] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321064913.4619-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

lockdep: Address clang -Wformat warning printing for %hd

2021-04-14T06:42:12Z

commit 6d48b7912cc72275dc7c59ff961c8bac7ef66a92 upstream. Clang doesn't like format strings that truncate a 32-bit value to something shorter: kernel/locking/lockdep.c:709:4: error: format specifies type 'short' but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat] In this case, the warning is a slightly questionable, as it could realize that both class->wait_type_outer and class->wait_type_inner are in fact 8-bit struct members, even though the result of the ?: operator becomes an 'int'. However, there is really no point in printing the number as a 16-bit 'short' rather than either an 8-bit or 32-bit number, so just change it to a normal %d. Fixes: de8f5e4f2dc1 ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210322115531.3987555-1-arnd@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

locking/ww_mutex: Simplify use_ww_ctx & ww_ctx handling

2021-04-07T13:00:06Z

[ Upstream commit 5de2055d31ea88fd9ae9709ac95c372a505a60fa ] The use_ww_ctx flag is passed to mutex_optimistic_spin(), but the function doesn't use it. The frequent use of the (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) combination is repetitive. In fact, ww_ctx should not be used at all if !use_ww_ctx. Simplify ww_mutex code by dropping use_ww_ctx from mutex_optimistic_spin() an clear ww_ctx if !use_ww_ctx. In this way, we can replace (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) by just (ww_ctx). Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316153119.13802-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/lockdep: Avoid unmatched unlock

2021-03-04T10:37:47Z

[ Upstream commit 7f82e631d236cafd28518b998c6d4d8dc2ef68f6 ] Commit f6f48e180404 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions") overlooked that print_usage_bug() releases the graph_lock and called it without the graph lock held. Fixes: f6f48e180404 ("lockdep: Teach lockdep about "USED" <- "IN-NMI" inversions") Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Waiman Long Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YBfkuyIfB1+VRxXP@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/lockdep: Avoid noinstr warning for DEBUG_LOCKDEP

2021-02-07T14:37:14Z

[ Upstream commit 77ca93a6b1223e210e58e1000c09d8d420403c94 ] vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: lock_is_held_type()+0x60: call to check_flags.part.0() leaves .noinstr.text section Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210106144017.652218215@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rtmutex: Remove unused argument from rt_mutex_proxy_unlock()

2021-01-30T12:55:17Z

commit 2156ac1934166d6deb6cd0f6ffc4c1076ec63697 upstream Nothing uses the argument. Remove it as preparation to use pi_state_update_owner(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman