user/sven/linux.git/kernel/locking, branch v5.15.8

locking/rwsem: Make handoff bit handling more consistent

2021-12-01T08:04:54Z

[ Upstream commit d257cc8cb8d5355ffc43a96bab94db7b5a324803 ] There are some inconsistency in the way that the handoff bit is being handled in readers and writers that lead to a race condition. Firstly, when a queue head writer set the handoff bit, it will clear it when the writer is being killed or interrupted on its way out without acquiring the lock. That is not the case for a queue head reader. The handoff bit will simply be inherited by the next waiter. Secondly, in the out_nolock path of rwsem_down_read_slowpath(), both the waiter and handoff bits are cleared if the wait queue becomes empty. For rwsem_down_write_slowpath(), however, the handoff bit is not checked and cleared if the wait queue is empty. This can potentially make the handoff bit set with empty wait queue. Worse, the situation in rwsem_down_write_slowpath() relies on wstate, a variable set outside of the critical section containing the ->count manipulation, this leads to race condition where RWSEM_FLAG_HANDOFF can be double subtracted, corrupting ->count. To make the handoff bit handling more consistent and robust, extract out handoff bit clearing code into the new rwsem_del_waiter() helper function. Also, completely eradicate wstate; always evaluate everything inside the same critical section. The common function will only use atomic_long_andnot() to clear bits when the wait queue is empty to avoid possible race condition. If the first waiter with handoff bit set is killed or interrupted to exit the slowpath without acquiring the lock, the next waiter will inherit the handoff bit. While at it, simplify the trylock for loop in rwsem_down_write_slowpath() to make it easier to read. Fixes: 4f23dbc1e657 ("locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation") Reported-by: Zhenhua Ma Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211116012912.723980-1-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

lockdep: Let lock_is_held_type() detect recursive read as read

2021-11-18T18:16:23Z

[ Upstream commit 2507003a1d10917c9158077bf6030719d02c941e ] lock_is_held_type(, 1) detects acquired read locks. It only recognized locks acquired with lock_acquire_shared(). Read locks acquired with lock_acquire_shared_recursive() are not recognized because a `2' is stored as the read value. Rework the check to additionally recognise lock's read value one and two as a read held lock. Fixes: e918188611f07 ("locking: More accurate annotations for read_lock()") Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Boqun Feng Acked-by: Waiman Long Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210903084001.lblecrvz4esl4mrr@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/rwsem: Disable preemption for spinning region

2021-11-18T18:16:16Z

[ Upstream commit 7cdacc5f52d68a9370f182c844b5b3e6cc975cc1 ] The spinning region rwsem_spin_on_owner() should not be preempted, however the rwsem_down_write_slowpath() invokes it and don't disable preemption. Fix it by adding a pair of preempt_disable/enable(). Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu [peterz: Fix CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER=n build] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Waiman Long Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211013134154.1085649-3-yanfei.xu@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/lockdep: Avoid RCU-induced noinstr fail

2021-11-18T18:16:09Z

[ Upstream commit ce0b9c805dd66d5e49fd53ec5415ae398f4c56e6 ] vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: look_up_lock_class()+0xc7: call to rcu_read_lock_any_held() leaves .noinstr.text section Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624095148.311980536@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/rwbase: Take care of ordering guarantee for fastpath reader

2021-09-15T15:49:16Z

Readers of rwbase can lock and unlock without taking any inner lock, if that happens, we need the ordering provided by atomic operations to satisfy the ordering semantics of lock/unlock. Without that, considering the follow case: { X = 0 initially } CPU 0 CPU 1 ===== ===== rt_write_lock(); X = 1 rt_write_unlock(): atomic_add(READER_BIAS - WRITER_BIAS, ->readers); // ->readers is READER_BIAS. rt_read_lock(): if ((r = atomic_read(->readers)) < 0) // True atomic_try_cmpxchg(->readers, r, r + 1); // succeed. r1 = X; // r1 may be 0, because nothing prevent the reordering // of "X=1" and atomic_add() on CPU 1. Therefore audit every usage of atomic operations that may happen in a fast path, and add necessary barriers. Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210909110203.953991276@infradead.org

locking/rwbase: Extract __rwbase_write_trylock()

2021-09-15T15:49:15Z

The code in rwbase_write_lock() is a little non-obvious vs the read+set 'trylock', extract the sequence into a helper function to clarify the code. This also provides a single site to fix fast-path ordering. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YUCq3L+u44NDieEJ@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

locking/rwbase: Properly match set_and_save_state() to restore_state()

2021-09-15T15:49:15Z

Noticed while looking at the readers race. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Will Deacon Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210909110203.828203010@infradead.org

locking/rtmutex: Fix ww_mutex deadlock check

2021-09-09T08:31:22Z

Dan reported that rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain() can be called with .orig_waiter == NULL however commit a055fcc132d4 ("locking/rtmutex: Return success on deadlock for ww_mutex waiters") unconditionally dereferences it. Since both call-sites that have .orig_waiter == NULL don't care for the return value, simply disable the deadlock squash by adding the NULL check. Notably, both callers use the deadlock condition as a termination condition for the iteration; once detected, it is sure that (de)boosting is done. Arguably step [3] would be a more natural termination point, but it's dubious whether adding a third deadlock detection state would improve the code. Fixes: a055fcc132d4 ("locking/rtmutex: Return success on deadlock for ww_mutex waiters") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/YS9La56fHMiCCo75@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

locking/rwsem: Add missing __init_rwsem() for PREEMPT_RT

2021-09-02T20:07:17Z

730633f0b7f95 became the first direct caller of __init_rwsem() vs the usual init_rwsem(), exposing PREEMPT_RT's lack thereof. Add it. [ tglx: Move it out of line ] Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/50a936b7d8f12277d6ec7ed2ef0421a381056909.camel@gmx.de

Merge tag 'locking-core-2021-08-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

2021-08-30T21:26:36Z

Pull locking and atomics updates from Thomas Gleixner: "The regular pile: - A few improvements to the mutex code - Documentation updates for atomics to clarify the difference between cmpxchg() and try_cmpxchg() and to explain the forward progress expectations. - Simplification of the atomics fallback generator - The addition of arch_atomic_long*() variants and generic arch_*() bitops based on them. - Add the missing might_sleep() invocations to the down*() operations of semaphores. The PREEMPT_RT locking core: - Scheduler updates to support the state preserving mechanism for 'sleeping' spin- and rwlocks on RT. This mechanism is carefully preserving the state of the task when blocking on a 'sleeping' spin- or rwlock and takes regular wake-ups targeted at the same task into account. The preserved or updated (via a regular wakeup) state is restored when the lock has been acquired. - Restructuring of the rtmutex code so it can be utilized and extended for the RT specific lock variants. - Restructuring of the ww_mutex code to allow sharing of the ww_mutex specific functionality for rtmutex based ww_mutexes. - Header file disentangling to allow substitution of the regular lock implementations with the PREEMPT_RT variants without creating an unmaintainable #ifdef mess. - Shared base code for the PREEMPT_RT specific rw_semaphore and rwlock implementations. Contrary to the regular rw_semaphores and rwlocks the PREEMPT_RT implementation is writer unfair because it is infeasible to do priority inheritance on multiple readers. Experience over the years has shown that real-time workloads are not the typical workloads which are sensitive to writer starvation. The alternative solution would be to allow only a single reader which has been tried and discarded as it is a major bottleneck especially for mmap_sem. Aside of that many of the writer starvation critical usage sites have been converted to a writer side mutex/spinlock and RCU read side protections in the past decade so that the issue is less prominent than it used to be. - The actual rtmutex based lock substitutions for PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels which affect mutex, ww_mutex, rw_semaphore, spinlock_t and rwlock_t. The spin/rw_lock*() functions disable migration across the critical section to preserve the existing semantics vs per-CPU variables. - Rework of the futex REQUEUE_PI mechanism to handle the case of early wake-ups which interleave with a re-queue operation to prevent the situation that a task would be blocked on both the rtmutex associated to the outer futex and the rtmutex based hash bucket spinlock. While this situation cannot happen on !RT enabled kernels the changes make the underlying concurrency problems easier to understand in general. As a result the difference between !RT and RT kernels is reduced to the handling of waiting for the critical section. !RT kernels simply spin-wait as before and RT kernels utilize rcu_wait(). - The substitution of local_lock for PREEMPT_RT with a spinlock which protects the critical section while staying preemptible. The CPU locality is established by disabling migration. The underlying concepts of this code have been in use in PREEMPT_RT for way more than a decade. The code has been refactored several times over the years and this final incarnation has been optimized once again to be as non-intrusive as possible, i.e. the RT specific parts are mostly isolated. It has been extensively tested in the 5.14-rt patch series and it has been verified that !RT kernels are not affected by these changes" * tag 'locking-core-2021-08-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (92 commits) locking/rtmutex: Return success on deadlock for ww_mutex waiters locking/rtmutex: Prevent spurious EDEADLK return caused by ww_mutexes locking/rtmutex: Dequeue waiter on ww_mutex deadlock locking/rtmutex: Dont dereference waiter lockless locking/semaphore: Add might_sleep() to down_*() family locking/ww_mutex: Initialize waiter.ww_ctx properly static_call: Update API documentation locking/local_lock: Add PREEMPT_RT support locking/spinlock/rt: Prepare for RT local_lock locking/rtmutex: Add adaptive spinwait mechanism locking/rtmutex: Implement equal priority lock stealing preempt: Adjust PREEMPT_LOCK_OFFSET for RT locking/rtmutex: Prevent lockdep false positive with PI futexes futex: Prevent requeue_pi() lock nesting issue on RT futex: Simplify handle_early_requeue_pi_wakeup() futex: Reorder sanity checks in futex_requeue() futex: Clarify comment in futex_requeue() futex: Restructure futex_requeue() futex: Correct the number of requeued waiters for PI futex: Remove bogus condition for requeue PI ...