user/sven/linux.git/kernel/locking, branch v5.4.235

locking/lockdep: Avoid RCU-induced noinstr fail

2021-11-17T08:48:28Z

[ Upstream commit ce0b9c805dd66d5e49fd53ec5415ae398f4c56e6 ] vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: look_up_lock_class()+0xc7: call to rcu_read_lock_any_held() leaves .noinstr.text section Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210624095148.311980536@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/mutex: Fix HANDOFF condition

2021-09-15T07:47:25Z

[ Upstream commit 048661a1f963e9517630f080687d48af79ed784c ] Yanfei reported that setting HANDOFF should not depend on recomputing @first, only on @first state. Which would then give: if (ww_ctx || !first) first = __mutex_waiter_is_first(lock, &waiter); if (first) __mutex_set_flag(lock, MUTEX_FLAG_HANDOFF); But because 'ww_ctx || !first' is basically 'always' and the test for first is relatively cheap, omit that first branch entirely. Reported-by: Yanfei Xu Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Waiman Long Reviewed-by: Yanfei Xu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210630154114.896786297@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

lockding/lockdep: Avoid to find wrong lock dep path in check_irq_usage()

2021-07-14T14:53:15Z

[ Upstream commit 7b1f8c6179769af6ffa055e1169610b51d71edd5 ] In the step #3 of check_irq_usage(), we seach backwards to find a lock whose usage conflicts the usage of @target_entry1 on safe/unsafe. However, we should only keep the irq-unsafe usage of @target_entry1 into consideration, because it could be a case where a lock is hardirq-unsafe but soft-safe, and in check_irq_usage() we find it because its hardirq-unsafe could result into a hardirq-safe-unsafe deadlock, but currently since we don't filter out the other usage bits, so we may find a lock dependency path softirq-unsafe -> softirq-safe, which in fact doesn't cause a deadlock. And this may cause misleading lockdep splats. Fix this by only keeping LOCKF_ENABLED_IRQ_ALL bits when we try the backwards search. Reported-by: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-4-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/lockdep: Fix the dep path printing for backwards BFS

2021-07-14T14:53:15Z

[ Upstream commit 69c7a5fb2482636f525f016c8333fdb9111ecb9d ] We use the same code to print backwards lock dependency path as the forwards lock dependency path, and this could result into incorrect printing because for a backwards lock_list ->trace is not the call trace where the lock of ->class is acquired. Fix this by introducing a separate function on printing the backwards dependency path. Also add a few comments about the printing while we are at it. Reported-by: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210618170110.3699115-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/mutex: clear MUTEX_FLAGS if wait_list is empty due to signal

2021-05-26T10:05:15Z

[ Upstream commit 3a010c493271f04578b133de977e0e5dd2848cea ] When a interruptible mutex locker is interrupted by a signal without acquiring this lock and removed from the wait queue. if the mutex isn't contended enough to have a waiter put into the wait queue again, the setting of the WAITER bit will force mutex locker to go into the slowpath to acquire the lock every time, so if the wait queue is empty, the WAITER bit need to be clear. Fixes: 040a0a371005 ("mutex: Add support for wound/wait style locks") Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Zqiang Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210517034005.30828-1-qiang.zhang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/qrwlock: Fix ordering in queued_write_lock_slowpath()

2021-04-28T11:19:14Z

[ Upstream commit 84a24bf8c52e66b7ac89ada5e3cfbe72d65c1896 ] While this code is executed with the wait_lock held, a reader can acquire the lock without holding wait_lock. The writer side loops checking the value with the atomic_cond_read_acquire(), but only truly acquires the lock when the compare-and-exchange is completed successfully which isn’t ordered. This exposes the window between the acquire and the cmpxchg to an A-B-A problem which allows reads following the lock acquisition to observe values speculatively before the write lock is truly acquired. We've seen a problem in epoll where the reader does a xchg while holding the read lock, but the writer can see a value change out from under it. Writer | Reader -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ep_scan_ready_list() | |- write_lock_irq() | |- queued_write_lock_slowpath() | |- atomic_cond_read_acquire() | | read_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags); --> (observes value before unlock) | chain_epi_lockless() | | epi->next = xchg(&ep->ovflist, epi); | | read_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags); | | | atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed() | |-- READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist); | A core can order the read of the ovflist ahead of the atomic_cmpxchg_relaxed(). Switching the cmpxchg to use acquire semantics addresses this issue at which point the atomic_cond_read can be switched to use relaxed semantics. Fixes: b519b56e378ee ("locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwlock") Signed-off-by: Ali Saidi [peterz: use try_cmpxchg()] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Steve Capper Acked-by: Will Deacon Acked-by: Waiman Long Tested-by: Steve Capper Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

lockdep: Add a missing initialization hint to the "INFO: Trying to register non-static key" message

2021-04-21T10:56:13Z

[ Upstream commit 3a85969e9d912d5dd85362ee37b5f81266e00e77 ] Since this message is printed when dynamically allocated spinlocks (e.g. kzalloc()) are used without initialization (e.g. spin_lock_init()), suggest to developers to check whether initialization functions for objects were called, before making developers wonder what annotation is missing. [ mingo: Minor tweaks to the message. ] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321064913.4619-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

locking/ww_mutex: Simplify use_ww_ctx & ww_ctx handling

2021-04-07T12:47:40Z

[ Upstream commit 5de2055d31ea88fd9ae9709ac95c372a505a60fa ] The use_ww_ctx flag is passed to mutex_optimistic_spin(), but the function doesn't use it. The frequent use of the (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) combination is repetitive. In fact, ww_ctx should not be used at all if !use_ww_ctx. Simplify ww_mutex code by dropping use_ww_ctx from mutex_optimistic_spin() an clear ww_ctx if !use_ww_ctx. In this way, we can replace (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) by just (ww_ctx). Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210316153119.13802-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rtmutex: Remove unused argument from rt_mutex_proxy_unlock()

2021-01-30T12:54:09Z

commit 2156ac1934166d6deb6cd0f6ffc4c1076ec63697 upstream Nothing uses the argument. Remove it as preparation to use pi_state_update_owner(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exec: Transform exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore

2021-01-09T12:44:55Z

[ Upstream commit f7cfd871ae0c5008d94b6f66834e7845caa93c15 ] Recently syzbot reported[0] that there is a deadlock amongst the users of exec_update_mutex. The problematic lock ordering found by lockdep was: perf_event_open (exec_update_mutex -> ovl_i_mutex) chown (ovl_i_mutex -> sb_writes) sendfile (sb_writes -> p->lock) by reading from a proc file and writing to overlayfs proc_pid_syscall (p->lock -> exec_update_mutex) While looking at possible solutions it occured to me that all of the users and possible users involved only wanted to state of the given process to remain the same. They are all readers. The only writer is exec. There is no reason for readers to block on each other. So fix this deadlock by transforming exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore named exec_update_lock that only exec takes for writing. Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov Cc: Al Viro Cc: Bernd Edlinger Cc: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Christopher Yeoh Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov Cc: Sargun Dhillon Cc: Christian Brauner Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Fixes: eea9673250db ("exec: Add exec_update_mutex to replace cred_guard_mutex") [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000063640c05ade8e3de@google.com Reported-by: syzbot+db9cdf3dd1f64252c6ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87ft4mbqen.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin