user/sven/linux.git/kernel/padata.c, branch v4.4.194

padata: use smp_mb in padata_reorder to avoid orphaned padata jobs

2019-08-04T07:34:51Z

commit cf144f81a99d1a3928f90b0936accfd3f45c9a0a upstream. Testing padata with the tcrypt module on a 5.2 kernel... # modprobe tcrypt alg="pcrypt(rfc4106(gcm(aes)))" type=3 # modprobe tcrypt mode=211 sec=1 ...produces this splat: INFO: task modprobe:10075 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Not tainted 5.2.0-base+ #16 modprobe D 0 10075 10064 0x80004080 Call Trace: ? __schedule+0x4dd/0x610 ? ring_buffer_unlock_commit+0x23/0x100 schedule+0x6c/0x90 schedule_timeout+0x3b/0x320 ? trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x4f/0x1f0 wait_for_common+0x160/0x1a0 ? wake_up_q+0x80/0x80 { crypto_wait_req } # entries in braces added by hand { do_one_aead_op } { test_aead_jiffies } test_aead_speed.constprop.17+0x681/0xf30 [tcrypt] do_test+0x4053/0x6a2b [tcrypt] ? 0xffffffffa00f4000 tcrypt_mod_init+0x50/0x1000 [tcrypt] ... The second modprobe command never finishes because in padata_reorder, CPU0's load of reorder_objects is executed before the unlocking store in spin_unlock_bh(pd->lock), causing CPU0 to miss CPU1's increment: CPU0 CPU1 padata_reorder padata_do_serial LOAD reorder_objects // 0 INC reorder_objects // 1 padata_reorder TRYLOCK pd->lock // failed UNLOCK pd->lock CPU0 deletes the timer before returning from padata_reorder and since no other job is submitted to padata, modprobe waits indefinitely. Add a pair of full barriers to guarantee proper ordering: CPU0 CPU1 padata_reorder padata_do_serial UNLOCK pd->lock smp_mb() LOAD reorder_objects INC reorder_objects smp_mb__after_atomic() padata_reorder TRYLOCK pd->lock smp_mb__after_atomic is needed so the read part of the trylock operation comes after the INC, as Andrea points out. Thanks also to Andrea for help with writing a litmus test. Fixes: 16295bec6398 ("padata: Generic parallelization/serialization interface") Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan Cc: Cc: Andrea Parri Cc: Boqun Feng Cc: Herbert Xu Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steffen Klassert Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

padata: free correct variable

2017-05-20T12:27:02Z

commit 07a77929ba672d93642a56dc2255dd21e6e2290b upstream. The author meant to free the variable that was just allocated, instead of the one that failed to be allocated, but made a simple typo. This patch rectifies that. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

padata: avoid race in reordering

2017-04-08T07:53:32Z

commit de5540d088fe97ad583cc7d396586437b32149a5 upstream. Under extremely heavy uses of padata, crashes occur, and with list debugging turned on, this happens instead: [87487.298728] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 882 at lib/list_debug.c:33 __list_add+0xae/0x130 [87487.301868] list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (ffffb17abfc043d0), but was ffff8dba70872c80. (prev=ffff8dba70872b00). [87487.339011] [] dump_stack+0x68/0xa3 [87487.342198] [] ? console_unlock+0x281/0x6d0 [87487.345364] [] __warn+0xff/0x140 [87487.348513] [] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4a/0x50 [87487.351659] [] __list_add+0xae/0x130 [87487.354772] [] ? _raw_spin_lock+0x64/0x70 [87487.357915] [] padata_reorder+0x1e6/0x420 [87487.361084] [] padata_do_serial+0xa5/0x120 padata_reorder calls list_add_tail with the list to which its adding locked, which seems correct: spin_lock(&squeue->serial.lock); list_add_tail(&padata->list, &squeue->serial.list); spin_unlock(&squeue->serial.lock); This therefore leaves only place where such inconsistency could occur: if padata->list is added at the same time on two different threads. This pdata pointer comes from the function call to padata_get_next(pd), which has in it the following block: next_queue = per_cpu_ptr(pd->pqueue, cpu); padata = NULL; reorder = &next_queue->reorder; if (!list_empty(&reorder->list)) { padata = list_entry(reorder->list.next, struct padata_priv, list); spin_lock(&reorder->lock); list_del_init(&padata->list); atomic_dec(&pd->reorder_objects); spin_unlock(&reorder->lock); pd->processed++; goto out; } out: return padata; I strongly suspect that the problem here is that two threads can race on reorder list. Even though the deletion is locked, call to list_entry is not locked, which means it's feasible that two threads pick up the same padata object and subsequently call list_add_tail on them at the same time. The fix is thus be hoist that lock outside of that block. Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Acked-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

padata: use %*pb[l] to print bitmaps including cpumasks and nodemasks

2015-02-14T05:21:38Z

printk and friends can now format bitmaps using '%*pb[l]'. cpumask and nodemask also provide cpumask_pr_args() and nodemask_pr_args() respectively which can be used to generate the two printf arguments necessary to format the specified cpu/nodemask. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

padata: Fix wrong usage of rcu_dereference()

2013-12-05T13:28:42Z

A kernel with enabled lockdep complains about the wrong usage of rcu_dereference() under a rcu_read_lock_bh() protected region. =============================== [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] 3.13.0-rc1+ #126 Not tainted ------------------------------- linux/kernel/padata.c:115 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! other info that might help us debug this: rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1 1 lock held by cryptomgr_test/153: #0: (rcu_read_lock_bh){.+....}, at: [] padata_do_parallel+0x5/0x270 Fix that by using rcu_dereference_bh() instead. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause Acked-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu

padata: make the sequence counter an atomic_t

2013-10-30T04:02:58Z

Using a spinlock to atomically increase a counter sounds wrong -- we've atomic_t for this! Also move 'seq_nr' to a different cache line than 'lock' to reduce cache line trashing. This has the nice side effect of decreasing the size of struct parallel_data from 192 to 128 bytes for a x86-64 build, e.g. occupying only two instead of three cache lines. Those changes results in a 5% performance increase on an IPsec test run using pcrypt. Btw. the seq_lock spinlock was never explicitly initialized -- one more reason to get rid of it. Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause Acked-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu

padata - Register hotcpu notifier after initialization

2013-08-29T04:37:59Z

padata_cpu_callback() takes pinst->lock, to avoid taking an uninitialized lock, register the notifier after it's initialization. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger Acked-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu

padata - share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED

2013-08-29T04:37:59Z

Share code between CPU_ONLINE and CPU_DOWN_FAILED, same to CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_UP_CANCELED. It will fix 2 bugs: "not check the return value of __padata_remove_cpu() and __padata_add_cpu()". "need add 'break' between CPU_UP_CANCELED and CPU_DOWN_FAILED". Signed-off-by: Chen Gang Acked-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu

padata: use __this_cpu_read per-cpu helper

2012-12-06T09:16:23Z

For bottom halves off, __this_cpu_read is better. Signed-off-by: Shan Wei Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter Acked-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu

padata: Fix cpu hotplug

2012-03-29T11:52:46Z

We don't remove the cpu that went offline from our cpumasks on cpu hotplug. This got lost somewhere along the line, so restore it. This fixes a hang of the padata instance on cpu hotplug. Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu