user/sven/linux.git/kernel/sched/rt.c, branch v5.4.76

sched: Defend cfs and rt bandwidth quota against overflow

2020-06-22T07:31:07Z

[ Upstream commit d505b8af58912ae1e1a211fabc9995b19bd40828 ] When users write some huge number into cpu.cfs_quota_us or cpu.rt_runtime_us, overflow might happen during to_ratio() shifts of schedulable checks. to_ratio() could be altered to avoid unnecessary internal overflow, but min_cfs_quota_period is less than 1 << BW_SHIFT, so a cutoff would still be needed. Set a cap MAX_BW for cfs_quota_us and rt_runtime_us to prevent overflow. Signed-off-by: Huaixin Chang Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Ben Segall Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200425105248.60093-1-changhuaixin@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/core: Further clarify sched_class::set_next_task()

2020-01-26T09:01:03Z

commit a0e813f26ebcb25c0b5e504498fbd796cca1a4ba upstream. It turns out there really is something special to the first set_next_task() invocation. In specific the 'change' pattern really should not cause balance callbacks. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: bsegall@google.com Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Cc: juri.lelli@redhat.com Cc: ktkhai@virtuozzo.com Cc: mgorman@suse.de Cc: qais.yousef@arm.com Cc: qperret@google.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: valentin.schneider@arm.com Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org Fixes: f95d4eaee6d0 ("sched/{rt,deadline}: Fix set_next_task vs pick_next_task") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191108131909.775434698@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched: Fix pick_next_task() vs 'change' pattern race

2019-11-08T21:34:14Z

Commit 67692435c411 ("sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path") inadvertly introduced a race because it changed a previously unexplored dependency between dropping the rq->lock and sched_class::put_prev_task(). The comments about dropping rq->lock, in for example newidle_balance(), only mentions the task being current and ->on_cpu being set. But when we look at the 'change' pattern (in for example sched_setnuma()): queued = task_on_rq_queued(p); /* p->on_rq == TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED */ running = task_current(rq, p); /* rq->curr == p */ if (queued) dequeue_task(...); if (running) put_prev_task(...); /* change task properties */ if (queued) enqueue_task(...); if (running) set_next_task(...); It becomes obvious that if we do this after put_prev_task() has already been called on @p, things go sideways. This is exactly what the commit in question allows to happen when it does: prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev, rf); if (!rq->nr_running) newidle_balance(rq, rf); The newidle_balance() call will drop rq->lock after we've called put_prev_task() and that allows the above 'change' pattern to interleave and mess up the state. Furthermore, it turns out we lost the RT-pull when we put the last DL task. Fix both problems by extracting the balancing from put_prev_task() and doing a multi-class balance() pass before put_prev_task(). Fixes: 67692435c411 ("sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path") Reported-by: Quentin Perret Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Tested-by: Quentin Perret Tested-by: Valentin Schneider

Merge branch 'timers-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

2019-09-17T19:35:15Z

Pull core timer updates from Thomas Gleixner: "Timers and timekeeping updates: - A large overhaul of the posix CPU timer code which is a preparation for moving the CPU timer expiry out into task work so it can be properly accounted on the task/process. An update to the bogus permission checks will come later during the merge window as feedback was not complete before heading of for travel. - Switch the timerqueue code to use cached rbtrees and get rid of the homebrewn caching of the leftmost node. - Consolidate hrtimer_init() + hrtimer_init_sleeper() calls into a single function - Implement the separation of hrtimers to be forced to expire in hard interrupt context even when PREEMPT_RT is enabled and mark the affected timers accordingly. - Implement a mechanism for hrtimers and the timer wheel to protect RT against priority inversion and live lock issues when a (hr)timer which should be canceled is currently executing the callback. Instead of infinitely spinning, the task which tries to cancel the timer blocks on a per cpu base expiry lock which is held and released by the (hr)timer expiry code. - Enable the Hyper-V TSC page based sched_clock for Hyper-V guests resulting in faster access to timekeeping functions. - Updates to various clocksource/clockevent drivers and their device tree bindings. - The usual small improvements all over the place" * 'timers-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (101 commits) posix-cpu-timers: Fix permission check regression posix-cpu-timers: Always clear head pointer on dequeue hrtimer: Add a missing bracket and hide `migration_base' on !SMP posix-cpu-timers: Make expiry_active check actually work correctly posix-timers: Unbreak CONFIG_POSIX_TIMERS=n build tick: Mark sched_timer to expire in hard interrupt context hrtimer: Add kernel doc annotation for HRTIMER_MODE_HARD x86/hyperv: Hide pv_ops access for CONFIG_PARAVIRT=n posix-cpu-timers: Utilize timerqueue for storage posix-cpu-timers: Move state tracking to struct posix_cputimers posix-cpu-timers: Deduplicate rlimit handling posix-cpu-timers: Remove pointless comparisons posix-cpu-timers: Get rid of 64bit divisions posix-cpu-timers: Consolidate timer expiry further posix-cpu-timers: Get rid of zero checks rlimit: Rewrite non-sensical RLIMIT_CPU comment posix-cpu-timers: Respect INFINITY for hard RTTIME limit posix-cpu-timers: Switch thread group sampling to array posix-cpu-timers: Restructure expiry array posix-cpu-timers: Remove cputime_expires ...

posix-cpu-timers: Move expiry cache into struct posix_cputimers

2019-08-28T09:50:35Z

The expiry cache belongs into the posix_cputimers container where the other cpu timers information is. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190821192921.014444012@linutronix.de

sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path

2019-08-08T07:09:31Z

Avoid the RETRY_TASK case in the pick_next_task() slow path. By doing the put_prev_task() early, we get the rt/deadline pull done, and by testing rq->nr_running we know if we need newidle_balance(). This then gives a stable state to pick a task from. Since the fast-path is fair only; it means the other classes will always have pick_next_task(.prev=NULL, .rf=NULL) and we can simplify. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Aaron Lu Cc: Valentin Schneider Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld Cc: Julien Desfossez Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/aa34d24b36547139248f32a30138791ac6c02bd6.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com

sched: Allow put_prev_task() to drop rq->lock

2019-08-08T07:09:31Z

Currently the pick_next_task() loop is convoluted and ugly because of how it can drop the rq->lock and needs to restart the picking. For the RT/Deadline classes, it is put_prev_task() where we do balancing, and we could do this before the picking loop. Make this possible. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Valentin Schneider Cc: Aaron Lu Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld Cc: Julien Desfossez Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e4519f6850477ab7f3d257062796e6425ee4ba7c.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com

sched: Add task_struct pointer to sched_class::set_curr_task

2019-08-08T07:09:31Z

In preparation of further separating pick_next_task() and set_curr_task() we have to pass the actual task into it, while there, rename the thing to better pair with put_prev_task(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Aaron Lu Cc: Valentin Schneider Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld Cc: Julien Desfossez Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a96d1bcdd716db4a4c5da2fece647a1456c0ed78.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com

sched/{rt,deadline}: Fix set_next_task vs pick_next_task

2019-08-08T07:09:30Z

Because pick_next_task() implies set_curr_task() and some of the details haven't mattered too much, some of what _should_ be in set_curr_task() ended up in pick_next_task, correct this. This prepares the way for a pick_next_task() variant that does not affect the current state; allowing remote picking. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Aaron Lu Cc: Valentin Schneider Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Phil Auld Cc: Julien Desfossez Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/38c61d5240553e043c27c5e00b9dd0d184dd6081.1559129225.git.vpillai@digitalocean.com

sched: Mark hrtimers to expire in hard interrupt context

2019-08-01T18:51:19Z

The scheduler related hrtimers need to expire in hard interrupt context even on PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels. Mark then as such. No functional change. [ tglx: Split out from larger combo patch. Add changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190726185753.077004842@linutronix.de