user/sven/linux.git/kernel/sched, branch v4.14.328

sched/fair: Don't balance task to its current running CPU

2023-08-11T09:33:48Z

[ Upstream commit 0dd37d6dd33a9c23351e6115ae8cdac7863bc7de ] We've run into the case that the balancer tries to balance a migration disabled task and trigger the warning in set_task_cpu() like below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/core.c:3115 set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240 Modules linked in: hclgevf xt_CHECKSUM ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 <...snip> CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O 6.1.0-rc4+ #1 Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V5.B221.01 12/09/2021 pstate: 604000c9 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240 lr : load_balance+0x5d0/0xc60 sp : ffff80000803bc70 x29: ffff80000803bc70 x28: ffff004089e190e8 x27: ffff004089e19040 x26: ffff007effcabc38 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000001 x23: ffff80000803be84 x22: 000000000000000c x21: ffffb093e79e2a78 x20: 000000000000000c x19: ffff004089e19040 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000001fad x16: 0000000000000030 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000003 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000400 x9 : ffffb093e4cee530 x8 : 00000000fffffffe x7 : 0000000000ce168a x6 : 000000000000013e x5 : 00000000ffffffe1 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000b2a x2 : 0000000000000b2a x1 : ffffb093e6d6c510 x0 : 0000000000000001 Call trace: set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240 load_balance+0x5d0/0xc60 rebalance_domains+0x26c/0x380 _nohz_idle_balance.isra.0+0x1e0/0x370 run_rebalance_domains+0x6c/0x80 __do_softirq+0x128/0x3d8 ____do_softirq+0x18/0x24 call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x38 do_softirq_own_stack+0x24/0x3c __irq_exit_rcu+0xcc/0xf4 irq_exit_rcu+0x18/0x24 el1_interrupt+0x4c/0xe4 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x2c el1h_64_irq+0x74/0x78 arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x4c default_idle_call+0x58/0x194 do_idle+0x244/0x2b0 cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x3c secondary_start_kernel+0x14c/0x190 __secondary_switched+0xb0/0xb4 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Further investigation shows that the warning is superfluous, the migration disabled task is just going to be migrated to its current running CPU. This is because that on load balance if the dst_cpu is not allowed by the task, we'll re-select a new_dst_cpu as a candidate. If no task can be balanced to dst_cpu we'll try to balance the task to the new_dst_cpu instead. In this case when the migration disabled task is not on CPU it only allows to run on its current CPU, load balance will select its current CPU as new_dst_cpu and later triggers the warning above. The new_dst_cpu is chosen from the env->dst_grpmask. Currently it contains CPUs in sched_group_span() and if we have overlapped groups it's possible to run into this case. This patch makes env->dst_grpmask of group_balance_mask() which exclude any CPUs from the busiest group and solve the issue. For balancing in a domain with no overlapped groups the behaviour keeps same as before. Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530082507.10444-1-yangyicong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched_getaffinity: don't assume 'cpumask_size()' is fully initialized

2023-04-05T09:14:19Z

[ Upstream commit 6015b1aca1a233379625385feb01dd014aca60b5 ] The getaffinity() system call uses 'cpumask_size()' to decide how big the CPU mask is - so far so good. It is indeed the allocation size of a cpumask. But the code also assumes that the whole allocation is initialized without actually doing so itself. That's wrong, because we might have fixed-size allocations (making copying and clearing more efficient), but not all of it is then necessarily used if 'nr_cpu_ids' is smaller. Having checked other users of 'cpumask_size()', they all seem to be ok, either using it purely for the allocation size, or explicitly zeroing the cpumask before using the size in bytes to copy it. See for example the ublk_ctrl_get_queue_affinity() function that uses the proper 'zalloc_cpumask_var()' to make sure that the whole mask is cleared, whether the storage is on the stack or if it was an external allocation. Fix this by just zeroing the allocation before using it. Do the same for the compat version of sched_getaffinity(), which had the same logic. Also, for consistency, make sched_getaffinity() use 'cpumask_bits()' to access the bits. For a cpumask_var_t, it ends up being a pointer to the same data either way, but it's just a good idea to treat it like you would a 'cpumask_t'. The compat case already did that. Reported-by: Ryan Roberts Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/7d026744-6bd6-6827-0471-b5e8eae0be3f@arm.com/ Cc: Yury Norov Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/fair: Sanitize vruntime of entity being migrated

2023-04-05T09:14:19Z

commit a53ce18cacb477dd0513c607f187d16f0fa96f71 upstream. Commit 829c1651e9c4 ("sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed") fixes an overflowing bug, but ignore a case that se->exec_start is reset after a migration. For fixing this case, we delay the reset of se->exec_start after placing the entity which se->exec_start to detect long sleeping task. In order to take into account a possible divergence between the clock_task of 2 rqs, we increase the threshold to around 104 days. Fixes: 829c1651e9c4 ("sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed") Originally-by: Zhang Qiao Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Tested-by: Zhang Qiao Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230317160810.107988-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed

2023-04-05T09:14:18Z

commit 829c1651e9c4a6f78398d3e67651cef9bb6b42cc upstream. When a scheduling entity is placed onto cfs_rq, its vruntime is pulled to the base level (around cfs_rq->min_vruntime), so that the entity doesn't gain extra boost when placed backwards. However, if the entity being placed wasn't executed for a long time, its vruntime may get too far behind (e.g. while cfs_rq was executing a low-weight hog), which can inverse the vruntime comparison due to s64 overflow. This results in the entity being placed with its original vruntime way forwards, so that it will effectively never get to the cpu. To prevent that, ignore the vruntime of the entity being placed if it didn't execute for much longer than the characteristic sheduler time scale. [rkagan: formatted, adjusted commit log, comments, cutoff value] Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao Co-developed-by: Roman Kagan Signed-off-by: Roman Kagan Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230130122216.3555094-1-rkagan@amazon.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

panic: Consolidate open-coded panic_on_warn checks

2023-02-06T06:46:34Z

commit 79cc1ba7badf9e7a12af99695a557e9ce27ee967 upstream. Several run-time checkers (KASAN, UBSAN, KFENCE, KCSAN, sched) roll their own warnings, and each check "panic_on_warn". Consolidate this into a single function so that future instrumentation can be added in a single location. Cc: Marco Elver Cc: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Vincent Guittot Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ben Segall Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Cc: Valentin Schneider Cc: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Alexander Potapenko Cc: Andrey Konovalov Cc: Vincenzo Frascino Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: David Gow Cc: tangmeng Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Petr Mladek Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" Cc: Tiezhu Yang Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Marco Elver Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117234328.594699-4-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/debug: Remove mpol_get/put and task_lock/unlock from sched_show_numa

2022-04-20T07:08:13Z

[ Upstream commit 28c988c3ec29db74a1dda631b18785958d57df4f ] The older format of /proc/pid/sched printed home node info which required the mempolicy and task lock around mpol_get(). However the format has changed since then and there is no need for sched_show_numa() any more to have mempolicy argument, asssociated mpol_get/put and task_lock/unlock. Remove them. Fixes: 397f2378f1361 ("sched/numa: Fix numa balancing stats in /proc/pid/sched") Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju Acked-by: Mel Gorman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220118050515.2973-1-bharata@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

cputime, cpuacct: Include guest time in user time in cpuacct.stat

2022-01-27T08:00:59Z

commit 9731698ecb9c851f353ce2496292ff9fcea39dff upstream. cpuacct.stat in no-root cgroups shows user time without guest time included int it. This doesn't match with user time shown in root cpuacct.stat and /proc//stat. This also affects cgroup2's cpu.stat in the same way. Make account_guest_time() to add user time to cgroup's cpustat to fix this. Fixes: ef12fefabf94 ("cpuacct: add per-cgroup utime/stime statistics") Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan Acked-by: Tejun Heo Cc: Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211115164607.23784-1-arbn@yandex-team.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/rt: Try to restart rt period timer when rt runtime exceeded

2022-01-27T08:00:50Z

[ Upstream commit 9b58e976b3b391c0cf02e038d53dd0478ed3013c ] When rt_runtime is modified from -1 to a valid control value, it may cause the task to be throttled all the time. Operations like the following will trigger the bug. E.g: 1. echo -1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us 2. Run a FIFO task named A that executes while(1) 3. echo 950000 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rt_runtime_us When rt_runtime is -1, The rt period timer will not be activated when task A enqueued. And then the task will be throttled after setting rt_runtime to 950,000. The task will always be throttled because the rt period timer is not activated. Fixes: d0b27fa77854 ("sched: rt-group: synchonised bandwidth period") Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: Li Hua Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211203033618.11895-1-hucool.lihua@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

wait: add wake_up_pollfree()

2021-12-14T09:16:55Z

commit 42288cb44c4b5fff7653bc392b583a2b8bd6a8c0 upstream. Several ->poll() implementations are special in that they use a waitqueue whose lifetime is the current task, rather than the struct file as is normally the case. This is okay for blocking polls, since a blocking poll occurs within one task; however, non-blocking polls require another solution. This solution is for the queue to be cleared before it is freed, using 'wake_up_poll(wq, EPOLLHUP | POLLFREE);'. However, that has a bug: wake_up_poll() calls __wake_up() with nr_exclusive=1. Therefore, if there are multiple "exclusive" waiters, and the wakeup function for the first one returns a positive value, only that one will be called. That's *not* what's needed for POLLFREE; POLLFREE is special in that it really needs to wake up everyone. Considering the three non-blocking poll systems: - io_uring poll doesn't handle POLLFREE at all, so it is broken anyway. - aio poll is unaffected, since it doesn't support exclusive waits. However, that's fragile, as someone could add this feature later. - epoll doesn't appear to be broken by this, since its wakeup function returns 0 when it sees POLLFREE. But this is fragile. Although there is a workaround (see epoll), it's better to define a function which always sends POLLFREE to all waiters. Add such a function. Also make it verify that the queue really becomes empty after all waiters have been woken up. Reported-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211209010455.42744-2-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/core: Mitigate race cpus_share_cache()/update_top_cache_domain()

2021-11-26T10:40:39Z

[ Upstream commit 42dc938a590c96eeb429e1830123fef2366d9c80 ] Nothing protects the access to the per_cpu variable sd_llc_id. When testing the same CPU (i.e. this_cpu == that_cpu), a race condition exists with update_top_cache_domain(). One scenario being: CPU1 CPU2 ================================================================== per_cpu(sd_llc_id, CPUX) => 0 partition_sched_domains_locked() detach_destroy_domains() cpus_share_cache(CPUX, CPUX) update_top_cache_domain(CPUX) per_cpu(sd_llc_id, CPUX) => 0 per_cpu(sd_llc_id, CPUX) = CPUX per_cpu(sd_llc_id, CPUX) => CPUX return false ttwu_queue_cond() wouldn't catch smp_processor_id() == cpu and the result is a warning triggered from ttwu_queue_wakelist(). Avoid a such race in cpus_share_cache() by always returning true when this_cpu == that_cpu. Fixes: 518cd6234178 ("sched: Only queue remote wakeups when crossing cache boundaries") Reported-by: Jing-Ting Wu Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211104175120.857087-1-vincent.donnefort@arm.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin