user/sven/linux.git/kernel/sched, branch v4.9.93

sched: Stop resched_cpu() from sending IPIs to offline CPUs

2018-03-22T08:17:54Z

[ Upstream commit a0982dfa03efca6c239c52cabebcea4afb93ea6b ] The rcutorture test suite occasionally provokes a splat due to invoking resched_cpu() on an offline CPU: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 8 at /home/paulmck/public_git/linux-rcu/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:128 native_smp_send_reschedule+0x37/0x40 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 8 Comm: rcu_preempt Not tainted 4.14.0-rc4+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 task: ffff902ede9daf00 task.stack: ffff96c50010c000 RIP: 0010:native_smp_send_reschedule+0x37/0x40 RSP: 0018:ffff96c50010fdb8 EFLAGS: 00010096 RAX: 000000000000002e RBX: ffff902edaab4680 RCX: 0000000000000003 RDX: 0000000080000003 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: ffff96c50010fdb8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 00000000299f36ae R12: 0000000000000001 R13: ffffffff9de64240 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffffffff9de64240 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff902edfc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000f7d4c642 CR3: 000000001e0e2000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 Call Trace: resched_curr+0x8f/0x1c0 resched_cpu+0x2c/0x40 rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs+0x152/0x220 force_qs_rnp+0x147/0x1d0 ? sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus+0x450/0x450 rcu_gp_kthread+0x5a9/0x950 kthread+0x142/0x180 ? force_qs_rnp+0x1d0/0x1d0 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 Code: 14 01 0f 92 c0 84 c0 74 14 48 8b 05 14 4f f4 00 be fd 00 00 00 ff 90 a0 00 00 00 5d c3 89 fe 48 c7 c7 38 89 ca 9d e8 e5 56 08 00 <0f> ff 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 8b 05 52 9e 37 02 85 c0 75 38 55 48 ---[ end trace 26df9e5df4bba4ac ]--- This splat cannot be generated by expedited grace periods because they always invoke resched_cpu() on the current CPU, which is good because expedited grace periods require that resched_cpu() unconditionally succeed. However, other parts of RCU can tolerate resched_cpu() acting as a no-op, at least as long as it doesn't happen too often. This commit therefore makes resched_cpu() invoke resched_curr() only if the CPU is either online or is the current CPU. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched: Stop switched_to_rt() from sending IPIs to offline CPUs

2018-03-22T08:17:54Z

[ Upstream commit 2fe2582649aa2355f79acddb86bd4d6c5363eb63 ] The rcutorture test suite occasionally provokes a splat due to invoking rt_mutex_lock() which needs to boost the priority of a task currently sitting on a runqueue that belongs to an offline CPU: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12 at /home/paulmck/public_git/linux-rcu/arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:128 native_smp_send_reschedule+0x37/0x40 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 12 Comm: rcub/7 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc4+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014 task: ffff9ed3de5f8cc0 task.stack: ffffbbf80012c000 RIP: 0010:native_smp_send_reschedule+0x37/0x40 RSP: 0018:ffffbbf80012fd10 EFLAGS: 00010082 RAX: 000000000000002f RBX: ffff9ed3dd9cb300 RCX: 0000000000000004 RDX: 0000000080000004 RSI: 0000000000000086 RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: ffffbbf80012fd10 R08: 000000000009da7a R09: 0000000000007b9d R10: 0000000000000001 R11: ffffffffbb57c2cd R12: 000000000000000d R13: ffff9ed3de5f8cc0 R14: 0000000000000061 R15: ffff9ed3ded59200 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ed3dea00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000080686f0 CR3: 000000001b9e0000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: resched_curr+0x61/0xd0 switched_to_rt+0x8f/0xa0 rt_mutex_setprio+0x25c/0x410 task_blocks_on_rt_mutex+0x1b3/0x1f0 rt_mutex_slowlock+0xa9/0x1e0 rt_mutex_lock+0x29/0x30 rcu_boost_kthread+0x127/0x3c0 kthread+0x104/0x140 ? rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp+0x90/0x90 ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 Code: f0 00 0f 92 c0 84 c0 74 14 48 8b 05 34 74 c5 00 be fd 00 00 00 ff 90 a0 00 00 00 5d c3 89 fe 48 c7 c7 a0 c6 fc b9 e8 d5 b5 06 00 <0f> ff 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 8b 05 a2 d1 13 02 85 c0 75 38 55 48 But the target task's priority has already been adjusted, so the only purpose of switched_to_rt() invoking resched_curr() is to wake up the CPU running some task that needs to be preempted by the boosted task. But the CPU is offline, which presumably means that the task must be migrated to some other CPU, and that this other CPU will undertake any needed preemption at the time of migration. Because the runqueue lock is held when resched_curr() is invoked, we know that the boosted task cannot go anywhere, so it is not necessary to invoke resched_curr() in this particular case. This commit therefore makes switched_to_rt() refrain from invoking resched_curr() when the target CPU is offline. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/rt: Up the root domain ref count when passing it around via IPIs

2018-02-17T12:21:13Z

commit 364f56653708ba8bcdefd4f0da2a42904baa8eeb upstream. When issuing an IPI RT push, where an IPI is sent to each CPU that has more than one RT task scheduled on it, it references the root domain's rto_mask, that contains all the CPUs within the root domain that has more than one RT task in the runable state. The problem is, after the IPIs are initiated, the rq->lock is released. This means that the root domain that is associated to the run queue could be freed while the IPIs are going around. Add a sched_get_rd() and a sched_put_rd() that will increment and decrement the root domain's ref count respectively. This way when initiating the IPIs, the scheduler will up the root domain's ref count before releasing the rq->lock, ensuring that the root domain does not go away until the IPI round is complete. Reported-by: Pavan Kondeti Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: 4bdced5c9a292 ("sched/rt: Simplify the IPI based RT balancing logic") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAEU1=PkiHO35Dzna8EQqNSKW1fr1y1zRQ5y66X117MG06sQtNA@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/rt: Use container_of() to get root domain in rto_push_irq_work_func()

2018-02-17T12:21:13Z

commit ad0f1d9d65938aec72a698116cd73a980916895e upstream. When the rto_push_irq_work_func() is called, it looks at the RT overloaded bitmask in the root domain via the runqueue (rq->rd). The problem is that during CPU up and down, nothing here stops rq->rd from changing between taking the rq->rd->rto_lock and releasing it. That means the lock that is released is not the same lock that was taken. Instead of using this_rq()->rd to get the root domain, as the irq work is part of the root domain, we can simply get the root domain from the irq work that is passed to the routine: container_of(work, struct root_domain, rto_push_work) This keeps the root domain consistent. Reported-by: Pavan Kondeti Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: 4bdced5c9a292 ("sched/rt: Simplify the IPI based RT balancing logic") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAEU1=PkiHO35Dzna8EQqNSKW1fr1y1zRQ5y66X117MG06sQtNA@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/deadline: Zero out positive runtime after throttling constrained tasks

2018-01-23T18:57:05Z

commit ae83b56a56f8d9643dedbee86b457fa1c5d42f59 upstream. When a contrained task is throttled by dl_check_constrained_dl(), it may carry the remaining positive runtime, as a result when dl_task_timer() fires and calls replenish_dl_entity(), it will not be replenished correctly due to the positive dl_se->runtime. This patch assigns its runtime to 0 if positive after throttling. Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Acked-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Luca Abeni Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Thomas Gleixner Fixes: df8eac8cafce ("sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1494421417-27550-1-git-send-email-xlpang@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Cc: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/deadline: Use deadline instead of period when calculating overflow

2017-12-20T09:07:23Z

[ Upstream commit 2317d5f1c34913bac5971d93d69fb6c31bb74670 ] I was testing Daniel's changes with his test case, and tweaked it a little. Instead of having the runtime equal to the deadline, I increased the deadline ten fold. Daniel's test case had: attr.sched_runtime = 2 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 ms */ attr.sched_deadline = 2 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 ms */ attr.sched_period = 2 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 s */ To make it more interesting, I changed it to: attr.sched_runtime = 2 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 ms */ attr.sched_deadline = 20 * 1000 * 1000; /* 20 ms */ attr.sched_period = 2 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 s */ The results were rather surprising. The behavior that Daniel's patch was fixing came back. The task started using much more than .1% of the CPU. More like 20%. Looking into this I found that it was due to the dl_entity_overflow() constantly returning true. That's because it uses the relative period against relative runtime vs the absolute deadline against absolute runtime. runtime / (deadline - t) > dl_runtime / dl_period There's even a comment mentioning this, and saying that when relative deadline equals relative period, that the equation is the same as using deadline instead of period. That comment is backwards! What we really want is: runtime / (deadline - t) > dl_runtime / dl_deadline We care about if the runtime can make its deadline, not its period. And then we can say "when the deadline equals the period, the equation is the same as using dl_period instead of dl_deadline". After correcting this, now when the task gets enqueued, it can throttle correctly, and Daniel's fix to the throttling of sleeping deadline tasks works even when the runtime and deadline are not the same. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Luca Abeni Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Romulo Silva de Oliveira Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/02135a27f1ae3fe5fd032568a5a2f370e190e8d7.1488392936.git.bristot@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/deadline: Throttle a constrained deadline task activated after the deadline

2017-12-20T09:07:23Z

[ Upstream commit df8eac8cafce7d086be3bd5cf5a838fa37594dfb ] During the activation, CBS checks if it can reuse the current task's runtime and period. If the deadline of the task is in the past, CBS cannot use the runtime, and so it replenishes the task. This rule works fine for implicit deadline tasks (deadline == period), and the CBS was designed for implicit deadline tasks. However, a task with constrained deadline (deadine < period) might be awakened after the deadline, but before the next period. In this case, replenishing the task would allow it to run for runtime / deadline. As in this case deadline < period, CBS enables a task to run for more than the runtime / period. In a very loaded system, this can cause a domino effect, making other tasks miss their deadlines. To avoid this problem, in the activation of a constrained deadline task after the deadline but before the next period, throttle the task and set the replenishing timer to the begin of the next period, unless it is boosted. Reproducer: --------------- %< --------------- int main (int argc, char **argv) { int ret; int flags = 0; unsigned long l = 0; struct timespec ts; struct sched_attr attr; memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr)); attr.size = sizeof(attr); attr.sched_policy = SCHED_DEADLINE; attr.sched_runtime = 2 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 ms */ attr.sched_deadline = 2 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 ms */ attr.sched_period = 2 * 1000 * 1000 * 1000; /* 2 s */ ts.tv_sec = 0; ts.tv_nsec = 2000 * 1000; /* 2 ms */ ret = sched_setattr(0, &attr, flags); if (ret < 0) { perror("sched_setattr"); exit(-1); } for(;;) { /* XXX: you may need to adjust the loop */ for (l = 0; l < 150000; l++); /* * The ideia is to go to sleep right before the deadline * and then wake up before the next period to receive * a new replenishment. */ nanosleep(&ts, NULL); } exit(0); } --------------- >% --------------- On my box, this reproducer uses almost 50% of the CPU time, which is obviously wrong for a task with 2/2000 reservation. Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Luca Abeni Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Romulo Silva de Oliveira Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/edf58354e01db46bf42df8d2dd32418833f68c89.1488392936.git.bristot@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/deadline: Make sure the replenishment timer fires in the next period

2017-12-20T09:07:23Z

[ Upstream commit 5ac69d37784b237707a7b15d199cdb6c6fdb6780 ] Currently, the replenishment timer is set to fire at the deadline of a task. Although that works for implicit deadline tasks because the deadline is equals to the begin of the next period, that is not correct for constrained deadline tasks (deadline < period). For instance: f.c: --------------- %< --------------- int main (void) { for(;;); } --------------- >% --------------- # gcc -o f f.c # trace-cmd record -e sched:sched_switch \ -e syscalls:sys_exit_sched_setattr \ chrt -d --sched-runtime 490000000 \ --sched-deadline 500000000 \ --sched-period 1000000000 0 ./f # trace-cmd report | grep "{pid of ./f}" After setting parameters, the task is replenished and continue running until being throttled: f-11295 [003] 13322.113776: sys_exit_sched_setattr: 0x0 The task is throttled after running 492318 ms, as expected: f-11295 [003] 13322.606094: sched_switch: f:11295 [-1] R ==> watchdog/3:32 [0] But then, the task is replenished 500719 ms after the first replenishment: -0 [003] 13322.614495: sched_switch: swapper/3:0 [120] R ==> f:11295 [-1] Running for 490277 ms: f-11295 [003] 13323.104772: sched_switch: f:11295 [-1] R ==> swapper/3:0 [120] Hence, in the first period, the task runs 2 * runtime, and that is a bug. During the first replenishment, the next deadline is set one period away. So the runtime / period starts to be respected. However, as the second replenishment took place in the wrong instant, the next replenishment will also be held in a wrong instant of time. Rather than occurring in the nth period away from the first activation, it is taking place in the (nth period - relative deadline). Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Reviewed-by: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Romulo Silva de Oliveira Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Tommaso Cucinotta Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ac50d89887c25285b47465638354b63362f8adff.1488392936.git.bristot@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/deadline: Add missing update_rq_clock() in dl_task_timer()

2017-12-20T09:07:23Z

[ Upstream commit dcc3b5ffe1b32771c9a22e2c916fb94c4fcf5b79 ] The following warning can be triggered by hot-unplugging the CPU on which an active SCHED_DEADLINE task is running on: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/sched.h:833 replenish_dl_entity+0x71e/0xc40 rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Tainted: G B 4.11.0-rc1+ #24 Hardware name: LENOVO ThinkCentre M8500t-N000/SHARKBAY, BIOS FBKTC1AUS 02/16/2016 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x85/0xc4 __warn+0x172/0x1b0 warn_slowpath_fmt+0xb4/0xf0 ? __warn+0x1b0/0x1b0 ? debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x2c0/0x2c0 ? cpudl_set+0x3d/0x2b0 replenish_dl_entity+0x71e/0xc40 enqueue_task_dl+0x2ea/0x12e0 ? dl_task_timer+0x777/0x990 ? __hrtimer_run_queues+0x270/0xa50 dl_task_timer+0x316/0x990 ? enqueue_task_dl+0x12e0/0x12e0 ? enqueue_task_dl+0x12e0/0x12e0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x270/0xa50 ? hrtimer_cancel+0x20/0x20 ? hrtimer_interrupt+0x119/0x600 hrtimer_interrupt+0x19c/0x600 ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10 local_apic_timer_interrupt+0x74/0xe0 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x76/0xa0 apic_timer_interrupt+0x93/0xa0 The DL task will be migrated to a suitable later deadline rq once the DL timer fires and currnet rq is offline. The rq clock of the new rq should be updated. This patch fixes it by updating the rq clock after holding the new rq's rq lock. Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1488865888-15894-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/rt: Do not pull from current CPU if only one CPU to pull

2017-12-20T09:07:17Z

commit f73c52a5bcd1710994e53fbccc378c42b97a06b6 upstream. Daniel Wagner reported a crash on the BeagleBone Black SoC. This is a single CPU architecture, and does not have a functional arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() implementation which can crash the kernel if that is called. As it only has one CPU, it shouldn't be called, but if the kernel is compiled for SMP, the push/pull RT scheduling logic now calls it for irq_work if the one CPU is overloaded, it can use that function to call itself and crash the kernel. Ideally, we should disable the SCHED_FEAT(RT_PUSH_IPI) if the system only has a single CPU. But SCHED_FEAT is a constant if sched debugging is turned off. Another fix can also be used, and this should also help with normal SMP machines. That is, do not initiate the pull code if there's only one RT overloaded CPU, and that CPU happens to be the current CPU that is scheduling in a lower priority task. Even on a system with many CPUs, if there's many RT tasks waiting to run on a single CPU, and that CPU schedules in another RT task of lower priority, it will initiate the PULL logic in case there's a higher priority RT task on another CPU that is waiting to run. But if there is no other CPU with waiting RT tasks, it will initiate the RT pull logic on itself (as it still has RT tasks waiting to run). This is a wasted effort. Not only does this help with SMP code where the current CPU is the only one with RT overloaded tasks, it should also solve the issue that Daniel encountered, because it will prevent the PULL logic from executing, as there's only one CPU on the system, and the check added here will cause it to exit the RT pull code. Reported-by: Daniel Wagner Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-rt-users Fixes: 4bdced5c9 ("sched/rt: Simplify the IPI based RT balancing logic") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171202130454.4cbbfe8d@vmware.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman