user/sven/linux.git/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c, branch v5.0.3

bpf: fix potential deadlock in bpf_prog_register

2019-01-31T22:18:21Z

Lockdep found a potential deadlock between cpu_hotplug_lock, bpf_event_mutex, and cpuctx_mutex: [ 13.007000] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 13.007587] 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f892422-dirty #477 Not tainted [ 13.008124] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 13.008624] test_progs/246 is trying to acquire lock: [ 13.009030] 0000000094160d1d (tracepoints_mutex){+.+.}, at: tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.009770] [ 13.009770] but task is already holding lock: [ 13.010239] 00000000d663ef86 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}, at: bpf_probe_register+0x1d/0x60 [ 13.010877] [ 13.010877] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 13.010877] [ 13.011532] [ 13.011532] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 13.012129] [ 13.012129] -> #4 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}: [ 13.012582] perf_event_query_prog_array+0x9b/0x130 [ 13.013016] _perf_ioctl+0x3aa/0x830 [ 13.013354] perf_ioctl+0x2e/0x50 [ 13.013668] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8f/0x6a0 [ 13.014003] ksys_ioctl+0x70/0x80 [ 13.014320] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 [ 13.014668] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.015007] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.015469] [ 13.015469] -> #3 (&cpuctx_mutex){+.+.}: [ 13.015910] perf_event_init_cpu+0x5a/0x90 [ 13.016291] perf_event_init+0x1b2/0x1de [ 13.016654] start_kernel+0x2b8/0x42a [ 13.016995] secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0 [ 13.017382] [ 13.017382] -> #2 (pmus_lock){+.+.}: [ 13.017794] perf_event_init_cpu+0x21/0x90 [ 13.018172] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xb3/0x960 [ 13.018573] _cpu_up+0xa7/0x140 [ 13.018871] do_cpu_up+0xa4/0xc0 [ 13.019178] smp_init+0xcd/0xd2 [ 13.019483] kernel_init_freeable+0x123/0x24f [ 13.019878] kernel_init+0xa/0x110 [ 13.020201] ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30 [ 13.020541] [ 13.020541] -> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: [ 13.021051] static_key_slow_inc+0xe/0x20 [ 13.021424] tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x28c/0x300 [ 13.021891] perf_trace_event_init+0x11f/0x250 [ 13.022297] perf_trace_init+0x6b/0xa0 [ 13.022644] perf_tp_event_init+0x25/0x40 [ 13.023011] perf_try_init_event+0x6b/0x90 [ 13.023386] perf_event_alloc+0x9a8/0xc40 [ 13.023754] __do_sys_perf_event_open+0x1dd/0xd30 [ 13.024173] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.024519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.024968] [ 13.024968] -> #0 (tracepoints_mutex){+.+.}: [ 13.025434] __mutex_lock+0x86/0x970 [ 13.025764] tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.026215] bpf_probe_register+0x40/0x60 [ 13.026584] bpf_raw_tracepoint_open.isra.34+0xa4/0x130 [ 13.027042] __do_sys_bpf+0x94f/0x1a90 [ 13.027389] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.027727] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.028171] [ 13.028171] other info that might help us debug this: [ 13.028171] [ 13.028807] Chain exists of: [ 13.028807] tracepoints_mutex --> &cpuctx_mutex --> bpf_event_mutex [ 13.028807] [ 13.029666] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 13.029666] [ 13.030140] CPU0 CPU1 [ 13.030510] ---- ---- [ 13.030875] lock(bpf_event_mutex); [ 13.031166] lock(&cpuctx_mutex); [ 13.031645] lock(bpf_event_mutex); [ 13.032135] lock(tracepoints_mutex); [ 13.032441] [ 13.032441] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 13.032441] [ 13.032911] 1 lock held by test_progs/246: [ 13.033239] #0: 00000000d663ef86 (bpf_event_mutex){+.+.}, at: bpf_probe_register+0x1d/0x60 [ 13.033909] [ 13.033909] stack backtrace: [ 13.034258] CPU: 1 PID: 246 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 5.0.0-rc3-00018-g2fa53f892422-dirty #477 [ 13.034964] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-2.el7 04/01/2014 [ 13.035657] Call Trace: [ 13.035859] dump_stack+0x5f/0x8b [ 13.036130] print_circular_bug.isra.37+0x1ce/0x1db [ 13.036526] __lock_acquire+0x1158/0x1350 [ 13.036852] ? lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 13.037154] lock_acquire+0x98/0x190 [ 13.037447] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.037876] __mutex_lock+0x86/0x970 [ 13.038167] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.038600] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.039028] ? __mutex_lock+0x86/0x970 [ 13.039337] ? __mutex_lock+0x24a/0x970 [ 13.039649] ? bpf_probe_register+0x1d/0x60 [ 13.039992] ? __bpf_trace_sched_wake_idle_without_ipi+0x10/0x10 [ 13.040478] ? tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.040906] tracepoint_probe_register_prio+0x2d/0x300 [ 13.041325] bpf_probe_register+0x40/0x60 [ 13.041649] bpf_raw_tracepoint_open.isra.34+0xa4/0x130 [ 13.042068] ? __might_fault+0x3e/0x90 [ 13.042374] __do_sys_bpf+0x94f/0x1a90 [ 13.042678] do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x180 [ 13.042975] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 13.043382] RIP: 0033:0x7f23b10a07f9 [ 13.045155] RSP: 002b:00007ffdef42fdd8 EFLAGS: 00000202 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141 [ 13.045759] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffdef42ff70 RCX: 00007f23b10a07f9 [ 13.046326] RDX: 0000000000000070 RSI: 00007ffdef42fe10 RDI: 0000000000000011 [ 13.046893] RBP: 00007ffdef42fdf0 R08: 0000000000000038 R09: 00007ffdef42fe10 [ 13.047462] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000000 [ 13.048029] R13: 0000000000000016 R14: 00007f23b1db4690 R15: 0000000000000000 Since tracepoints_mutex will be taken in tracepoint_probe_register/unregister() there is no need to take bpf_event_mutex too. bpf_event_mutex is protecting modifications to prog array used in kprobe/perf bpf progs. bpf_raw_tracepoints don't need to take this mutex. Fixes: c4f6699dfcb8 ("bpf: introduce BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT") Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function

2019-01-04T02:57:57Z

Nobody has actually used the type (VERIFY_READ vs VERIFY_WRITE) argument of the user address range verification function since we got rid of the old racy i386-only code to walk page tables by hand. It existed because the original 80386 would not honor the write protect bit when in kernel mode, so you had to do COW by hand before doing any user access. But we haven't supported that in a long time, and these days the 'type' argument is a purely historical artifact. A discussion about extending 'user_access_begin()' to do the range checking resulted this patch, because there is no way we're going to move the old VERIFY_xyz interface to that model. And it's best done at the end of the merge window when I've done most of my merges, so let's just get this done once and for all. This patch was mostly done with a sed-script, with manual fix-ups for the cases that weren't of the trivial 'access_ok(VERIFY_xyz' form. There were a couple of notable cases: - csky still had the old "verify_area()" name as an alias. - the iter_iov code had magical hardcoded knowledge of the actual values of VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} (not that they mattered, since nothing really used it) - microblaze used the type argument for a debug printout but other than those oddities this should be a total no-op patch. I tried to fix up all architectures, did fairly extensive grepping for access_ok() uses, and the changes are trivial, but I may have missed something. Any missed conversion should be trivially fixable, though. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds

bpf: support raw tracepoints in modules

2018-12-18T22:08:12Z

Distributions build drivers as modules, including network and filesystem drivers which export numerous tracepoints. This enables bpf(BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN) to attach to those tracepoints. Signed-off-by: Matt Mullins Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: fix check of allowed specifiers in bpf_trace_printk

2018-11-23T20:54:14Z

A format string consisting of "%p" or "%s" followed by an invalid specifier (e.g. "%p%\n" or "%s%") could pass the check which would make format_decode (lib/vsprintf.c) to warn. Fixes: 9c959c863f82 ("tracing: Allow BPF programs to call bpf_trace_printk()") Reported-by: syzbot+1ec5c5ec949c4adaa0c4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

tracing: Add SPDX License format to bpf_trace.c

2018-08-16T23:07:36Z

Add the SPDX License header to ease license compliance management. Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware)

bpf: guard bpf_get_current_cgroup_id() with CONFIG_CGROUPS

2018-06-04T19:52:26Z

Commit bf6fa2c893c5 ("bpf: implement bpf_get_current_cgroup_id() helper") introduced a new helper bpf_get_current_cgroup_id(). The helper has a dependency on CONFIG_CGROUPS. When CONFIG_CGROUPS is not defined, using the helper will result the following verifier error: kernel subsystem misconfigured func bpf_get_current_cgroup_id#80 which is hard for users to interpret. Guarding the reference to bpf_get_current_cgroup_id_proto with CONFIG_CGROUPS will result in below better message: unknown func bpf_get_current_cgroup_id#80 Fixes: bf6fa2c893c5 ("bpf: implement bpf_get_current_cgroup_id() helper") Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: implement bpf_get_current_cgroup_id() helper

2018-06-04T01:22:41Z

bpf has been used extensively for tracing. For example, bcc contains an almost full set of bpf-based tools to trace kernel and user functions/events. Most tracing tools are currently either filtered based on pid or system-wide. Containers have been used quite extensively in industry and cgroup is often used together to provide resource isolation and protection. Several processes may run inside the same container. It is often desirable to get container-level tracing results as well, e.g. syscall count, function count, I/O activity, etc. This patch implements a new helper, bpf_get_current_cgroup_id(), which will return cgroup id based on the cgroup within which the current task is running. The later patch will provide an example to show that userspace can get the same cgroup id so it could configure a filter or policy in the bpf program based on task cgroup id. The helper is currently implemented for tracing. It can be added to other program types as well when needed. Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: fix context access in tracing progs on 32 bit archs

2018-06-03T14:46:56Z

Wang reported that all the testcases for BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT program type in test_verifier report the following errors on x86_32: 172/p unpriv: spill/fill of different pointers ldx FAIL Unexpected error message! 0: (bf) r6 = r10 1: (07) r6 += -8 2: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+3 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6=fp-8,call_-1 R10=fp0,call_-1 3: (bf) r2 = r10 4: (07) r2 += -76 5: (7b) *(u64 *)(r6 +0) = r2 6: (55) if r1 != 0x0 goto pc+1 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2=fp-76,call_-1 R6=fp-8,call_-1 R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=fp 7: (7b) *(u64 *)(r6 +0) = r1 8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r6 +0) 9: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +68) invalid bpf_context access off=68 size=8 378/p check bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period byte load permitted FAIL Failed to load prog 'Permission denied'! 0: (b7) r0 = 0 1: (71) r0 = *(u8 *)(r1 +68) invalid bpf_context access off=68 size=1 379/p check bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period half load permitted FAIL Failed to load prog 'Permission denied'! 0: (b7) r0 = 0 1: (69) r0 = *(u16 *)(r1 +68) invalid bpf_context access off=68 size=2 380/p check bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period word load permitted FAIL Failed to load prog 'Permission denied'! 0: (b7) r0 = 0 1: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +68) invalid bpf_context access off=68 size=4 381/p check bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period dword load permitted FAIL Failed to load prog 'Permission denied'! 0: (b7) r0 = 0 1: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 +68) invalid bpf_context access off=68 size=8 Reason is that struct pt_regs on x86_32 doesn't fully align to 8 byte boundary due to its size of 68 bytes. Therefore, bpf_ctx_narrow_access_ok() will then bail out saying that off & (size_default - 1) which is 68 & 7 doesn't cleanly align in the case of sample_period access from struct bpf_perf_event_data, hence verifier wrongly thinks we might be doing an unaligned access here though underlying arch can handle it just fine. Therefore adjust this down to machine size and check and rewrite the offset for narrow access on that basis. We also need to fix corresponding pe_prog_is_valid_access(), since we hit the check for off % size != 0 (e.g. 68 % 8 -> 4) in the first and last test. With that in place, progs for tracing work on x86_32. Reported-by: Wang YanQing Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Tested-by: Wang YanQing Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: bpf_prog_array_copy() should return -ENOENT if exclude_prog not found

2018-05-30T10:37:38Z

This makes is it possible for bpf prog detach to return -ENOENT. Acked-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Sean Young Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann

bpf: introduce bpf subcommand BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY

2018-05-25T01:18:19Z

Currently, suppose a userspace application has loaded a bpf program and attached it to a tracepoint/kprobe/uprobe, and a bpf introspection tool, e.g., bpftool, wants to show which bpf program is attached to which tracepoint/kprobe/uprobe. Such attachment information will be really useful to understand the overall bpf deployment in the system. There is a name field (16 bytes) for each program, which could be used to encode the attachment point. There are some drawbacks for this approaches. First, bpftool user (e.g., an admin) may not really understand the association between the name and the attachment point. Second, if one program is attached to multiple places, encoding a proper name which can imply all these attachments becomes difficult. This patch introduces a new bpf subcommand BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY. Given a pid and fd, if the is associated with a tracepoint/kprobe/uprobe perf event, BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY will return . prog_id . tracepoint name, or . k[ret]probe funcname + offset or kernel addr, or . u[ret]probe filename + offset to the userspace. The user can use "bpftool prog" to find more information about bpf program itself with prog_id. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov