user/sven/linux.git/kernel/trace, branch v4.4.234

tracing: Fix event trigger to accept redundant spaces

2020-06-30T00:08:04Z

commit 6784beada631800f2c5afd567e5628c843362cee upstream. Fix the event trigger to accept redundant spaces in the trigger input. For example, these return -EINVAL echo " traceon" > events/ftrace/print/trigger echo "traceon if common_pid == 0" > events/ftrace/print/trigger echo "disable_event:kmem:kmalloc " > events/ftrace/print/trigger But these are hard to find what is wrong. To fix this issue, use skip_spaces() to remove spaces in front of actual tokens, and set NULL if there is no token. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/159262476352.185015.5261566783045364186.stgit@devnote2 Cc: Tom Zanussi Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 85f2b08268c0 ("tracing: Add basic event trigger framework") Reviewed-by: Tom Zanussi Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

blktrace: break out of blktrace setup on concurrent calls

2020-06-30T00:08:02Z

[ Upstream commit 1b0b283648163dae2a214ca28ed5a99f62a77319 ] We use one blktrace per request_queue, that means one per the entire disk. So we cannot run one blktrace on say /dev/vda and then /dev/vda1, or just two calls on /dev/vda. We check for concurrent setup only at the very end of the blktrace setup though. If we try to run two concurrent blktraces on the same block device the second one will fail, and the first one seems to go on. However when one tries to kill the first one one will see things like this: The kernel will show these: ``` debugfs: File 'dropped' in directory 'nvme1n1' already present! debugfs: File 'msg' in directory 'nvme1n1' already present! debugfs: File 'trace0' in directory 'nvme1n1' already present! `` And userspace just sees this error message for the second call: ``` blktrace /dev/nvme1n1 BLKTRACESETUP(2) /dev/nvme1n1 failed: 5/Input/output error ``` The first userspace process #1 will also claim that the files were taken underneath their nose as well. The files are taken away form the first process given that when the second blktrace fails, it will follow up with a BLKTRACESTOP and BLKTRACETEARDOWN. This means that even if go-happy process #1 is waiting for blktrace data, we *have* been asked to take teardown the blktrace. This can easily be reproduced with break-blktrace [0] run_0005.sh test. Just break out early if we know we're already going to fail, this will prevent trying to create the files all over again, which we know still exist. [0] https://github.com/mcgrof/break-blktrace Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

Stop the ad-hoc games with -Wno-maybe-initialized

2020-05-20T06:11:49Z

commit 78a5255ffb6a1af189a83e493d916ba1c54d8c75 upstream. We have some rather random rules about when we accept the "maybe-initialized" warnings, and when we don't. For example, we consider it unreliable for gcc versions < 4.9, but also if -O3 is enabled, or if optimizing for size. And then various kernel config options disabled it, because they know that they trigger that warning by confusing gcc sufficiently (ie PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES). And now gcc-10 seems to be introducing a lot of those warnings too, so it falls under the same heading as 4.9 did. At the same time, we have a very straightforward way to _enable_ that warning when wanted: use "W=2" to enable more warnings. So stop playing these ad-hoc games, and just disable that warning by default, with the known and straight-forward "if you want to work on the extra compiler warnings, use W=123". Would it be great to have code that is always so obvious that it never confuses the compiler whether a variable is used initialized or not? Yes, it would. In a perfect world, the compilers would be smarter, and our source code would be simpler. That's currently not the world we live in, though. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

kbuild: compute false-positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized cases in Kconfig

2020-05-20T06:11:49Z

commit b303c6df80c9f8f13785aa83a0471fca7e38b24d upstream. Since -Wmaybe-uninitialized was introduced by GCC 4.7, we have patched various false positives: - commit e74fc973b6e5 ("Turn off -Wmaybe-uninitialized when building with -Os") turned off this option for -Os. - commit 815eb71e7149 ("Kbuild: disable 'maybe-uninitialized' warning for CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES") turned off this option for CONFIG_PROFILE_ALL_BRANCHES - commit a76bcf557ef4 ("Kbuild: enable -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for "make W=1"") turned off this option for GCC < 4.9 Arnd provided more explanation in https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/14/903 I think this looks better by shifting the logic from Makefile to Kconfig. Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/350 Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

blktrace: fix dereference after null check

2020-05-20T06:11:39Z

commit 153031a301bb07194e9c37466cfce8eacb977621 upstream. There was a recent change in blktrace.c that added a RCU protection to `q->blk_trace` in order to fix a use-after-free issue during access. However the change missed an edge case that can lead to dereferencing of `bt` pointer even when it's NULL: Coverity static analyzer marked this as a FORWARD_NULL issue with CID 1460458. ``` /kernel/trace/blktrace.c: 1904 in sysfs_blk_trace_attr_store() 1898 ret = 0; 1899 if (bt == NULL) 1900 ret = blk_trace_setup_queue(q, bdev); 1901 1902 if (ret == 0) { 1903 if (attr == &dev_attr_act_mask) >>> CID 1460458: Null pointer dereferences (FORWARD_NULL) >>> Dereferencing null pointer "bt". 1904 bt->act_mask = value; 1905 else if (attr == &dev_attr_pid) 1906 bt->pid = value; 1907 else if (attr == &dev_attr_start_lba) 1908 bt->start_lba = value; 1909 else if (attr == &dev_attr_end_lba) ``` Added a reassignment with RCU annotation to fix the issue. Fixes: c780e86dd48 ("blktrace: Protect q->blk_trace with RCU") Reviewed-by: Ming Lei Reviewed-by: Bob Liu Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Cengiz Can Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

blktrace: Protect q->blk_trace with RCU

2020-05-20T06:11:38Z

commit c780e86dd48ef6467a1146cf7d0fe1e05a635039 upstream. KASAN is reporting that __blk_add_trace() has a use-after-free issue when accessing q->blk_trace. Indeed the switching of block tracing (and thus eventual freeing of q->blk_trace) is completely unsynchronized with the currently running tracing and thus it can happen that the blk_trace structure is being freed just while __blk_add_trace() works on it. Protect accesses to q->blk_trace by RCU during tracing and make sure we wait for the end of RCU grace period when shutting down tracing. Luckily that is rare enough event that we can afford that. Note that postponing the freeing of blk_trace to an RCU callback should better be avoided as it could have unexpected user visible side-effects as debugfs files would be still existing for a short while block tracing has been shut down. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205711 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni Reviewed-by: Ming Lei Tested-by: Ming Lei Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche Reported-by: Tristan Madani Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe [bwh: Backported to 4.4: - Drop changes in blk_trace_note_message_enabled(), blk_trace_bio_get_cgid() - Adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

blktrace: fix trace mutex deadlock

2020-05-20T06:11:38Z

commit 2967acbb257a6a9bf912f4778b727e00972eac9b upstream. A previous commit changed the locking around registration/cleanup, but direct callers of blk_trace_remove() were missed. This means that if we hit the error path in setup, we will deadlock on attempting to re-acquire the queue trace mutex. Fixes: 1f2cac107c59 ("blktrace: fix unlocked access to init/start-stop/teardown") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

blktrace: fix unlocked access to init/start-stop/teardown

2020-05-20T06:11:38Z

commit 1f2cac107c591c24b60b115d6050adc213d10fc0 upstream. sg.c calls into the blktrace functions without holding the proper queue mutex for doing setup, start/stop, or teardown. Add internal unlocked variants, and export the ones that do the proper locking. Fixes: 6da127ad0918 ("blktrace: Add blktrace ioctls to SCSI generic devices") Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

blktrace: Fix potential deadlock between delete & sysfs ops

2020-05-20T06:11:37Z

commit 5acb3cc2c2e9d3020a4fee43763c6463767f1572 upstream. The lockdep code had reported the following unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(s_active#228); lock(&bdev->bd_mutex/1); lock(s_active#228); lock(&bdev->bd_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** The deadlock may happen when one task (CPU1) is trying to delete a partition in a block device and another task (CPU0) is accessing tracing sysfs file (e.g. /sys/block/dm-1/trace/act_mask) in that partition. The s_active isn't an actual lock. It is a reference count (kn->count) on the sysfs (kernfs) file. Removal of a sysfs file, however, require a wait until all the references are gone. The reference count is treated like a rwsem using lockdep instrumentation code. The fact that a thread is in the sysfs callback method or in the ioctl call means there is a reference to the opended sysfs or device file. That should prevent the underlying block structure from being removed. Instead of using bd_mutex in the block_device structure, a new blk_trace_mutex is now added to the request_queue structure to protect access to the blk_trace structure. Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Fix typo in patch subject line, and prune a comment detailing how the code used to work. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf, trace: check event type in bpf_perf_event_read

2020-05-10T08:26:19Z

commit ad572d174787daa59e24b8b5c83028c09cdb5ddb upstream. similar to bpf_perf_event_output() the bpf_perf_event_read() helper needs to check the type of the perf_event before reading the counter. Fixes: a43eec304259 ("bpf: introduce bpf_perf_event_output() helper") Reported-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman