<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>user/sven/linux.git/kernel/workqueue.c, branch v5.4.122</title>
<subtitle>Linux Kernel
</subtitle>
<id>https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/atom?h=v5.4.122</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/atom?h=v5.4.122'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/'/>
<updated>2021-04-14T06:24:17Z</updated>
<entry>
<title>workqueue: Move the position of debug_work_activate() in __queue_work()</title>
<updated>2021-04-14T06:24:17Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Zqiang</name>
<email>qiang.zhang@windriver.com</email>
</author>
<published>2021-02-18T03:16:49Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=c88fa8d4f99419da2e0167ac15bffc56569d7ef9'/>
<id>urn:sha1:c88fa8d4f99419da2e0167ac15bffc56569d7ef9</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 0687c66b5f666b5ad433f4e94251590d9bc9d10e ]

The debug_work_activate() is called on the premise that
the work can be inserted, because if wq be in WQ_DRAINING
status, insert work may be failed.

Fixes: e41e704bc4f4 ("workqueue: improve destroy_workqueue() debuggability")
Signed-off-by: Zqiang &lt;qiang.zhang@windriver.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan &lt;jiangshanlai@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>workqueue: Restrict affinity change to rescuer</title>
<updated>2021-02-07T14:35:49Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Peter Zijlstra</name>
<email>peterz@infradead.org</email>
</author>
<published>2021-01-15T18:08:36Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=b1a1c262e4b0e713e52c63bd3233f1b9d6f2f056'/>
<id>urn:sha1:b1a1c262e4b0e713e52c63bd3233f1b9d6f2f056</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 640f17c82460e9724fd256f0a1f5d99e7ff0bda4 ]

create_worker() will already set the right affinity using
kthread_bind_mask(), this means only the rescuer will need to change
it's affinity.

Howveer, while in cpu-hot-unplug a regular task is not allowed to run
on online&amp;&amp;!active as it would be pushed away quite agressively. We
need KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU to survive in that environment.

Therefore set the affinity after getting that magic flag.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider &lt;valentin.schneider@arm.com&gt;
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider &lt;valentin.schneider@arm.com&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210121103506.826629830@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>workqueue: Kick a worker based on the actual activation of delayed works</title>
<updated>2021-01-12T19:16:09Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Yunfeng Ye</name>
<email>yeyunfeng@huawei.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-11-19T06:21:25Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=515dc635eb76c655dce29c0aef655c5b332aa5b1'/>
<id>urn:sha1:515dc635eb76c655dce29c0aef655c5b332aa5b1</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 01341fbd0d8d4e717fc1231cdffe00343088ce0b ]

In realtime scenario, We do not want to have interference on the
isolated cpu cores. but when invoking alloc_workqueue() for percpu wq
on the housekeeping cpu, it kick a kworker on the isolated cpu.

  alloc_workqueue
    pwq_adjust_max_active
      wake_up_worker

The comment in pwq_adjust_max_active() said:
  "Need to kick a worker after thawed or an unbound wq's
   max_active is bumped"

So it is unnecessary to kick a kworker for percpu's wq when invoking
alloc_workqueue(). this patch only kick a worker based on the actual
activation of delayed works.

Signed-off-by: Yunfeng Ye &lt;yeyunfeng@huawei.com&gt;
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan &lt;jiangshanlai@gmail.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>workqueue: Remove the warning in wq_worker_sleeping()</title>
<updated>2020-10-01T11:17:54Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Sebastian Andrzej Siewior</name>
<email>bigeasy@linutronix.de</email>
</author>
<published>2020-03-27T23:29:59Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=644148cd15378b89123e9cdc9d1840cf6135f7ea'/>
<id>urn:sha1:644148cd15378b89123e9cdc9d1840cf6135f7ea</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 62849a9612924a655c67cf6962920544aa5c20db ]

The kernel test robot triggered a warning with the following race:
   task-ctx A                            interrupt-ctx B
 worker
  -&gt; process_one_work()
    -&gt; work_item()
      -&gt; schedule();
         -&gt; sched_submit_work()
           -&gt; wq_worker_sleeping()
             -&gt; -&gt;sleeping = 1
               atomic_dec_and_test(nr_running)
         __schedule();                *interrupt*
                                       async_page_fault()
                                       -&gt; local_irq_enable();
                                       -&gt; schedule();
                                          -&gt; sched_submit_work()
                                            -&gt; wq_worker_sleeping()
                                               -&gt; if (WARN_ON(-&gt;sleeping)) return
                                          -&gt; __schedule()
                                            -&gt;  sched_update_worker()
                                              -&gt; wq_worker_running()
                                                 -&gt; atomic_inc(nr_running);
                                                 -&gt; -&gt;sleeping = 0;

      -&gt;  sched_update_worker()
        -&gt; wq_worker_running()
          if (!-&gt;sleeping) return

In this context the warning is pointless everything is fine.
An interrupt before wq_worker_sleeping() will perform the -&gt;sleeping
assignment (0 -&gt; 1 &gt; 0) twice.
An interrupt after wq_worker_sleeping() will trigger the warning and
nr_running will be decremented (by A) and incremented once (only by B, A
will skip it). This is the case until the -&gt;sleeping is zeroed again in
wq_worker_running().

Remove the WARN statement because this condition may happen. Document
that preemption around wq_worker_sleeping() needs to be disabled to
protect -&gt;sleeping and not just as an optimisation.

Fixes: 6d25be5782e48 ("sched/core, workqueues: Distangle worker accounting from rq lock")
Reported-by: kernel test robot &lt;lkp@intel.com&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior &lt;bigeasy@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar &lt;mingo@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200327074308.GY11705@shao2-debian
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>workqueue: don't use wq_select_unbound_cpu() for bound works</title>
<updated>2020-03-18T06:17:50Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Hillf Danton</name>
<email>hdanton@sina.com</email>
</author>
<published>2020-01-25T01:14:45Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=22540ca3d00d2990a4148a13b92209c3dc5422db'/>
<id>urn:sha1:22540ca3d00d2990a4148a13b92209c3dc5422db</id>
<content type='text'>
commit aa202f1f56960c60e7befaa0f49c72b8fa11b0a8 upstream.

wq_select_unbound_cpu() is designed for unbound workqueues only, but
it's wrongly called when using a bound workqueue too.

Fixing this ensures work queued to a bound workqueue with
cpu=WORK_CPU_UNBOUND always runs on the local CPU.

Before, that would happen only if wq_unbound_cpumask happened to include
it (likely almost always the case), or was empty, or we got lucky with
forced round-robin placement.  So restricting
/sys/devices/virtual/workqueue/cpumask to a small subset of a machine's
CPUs would cause some bound work items to run unexpectedly there.

Fixes: ef557180447f ("workqueue: schedule WORK_CPU_UNBOUND work on wq_unbound_cpumask CPUs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.5+
Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton &lt;hdanton@sina.com&gt;
[dj: massage changelog]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan &lt;daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com&gt;
Cc: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: Lai Jiangshan &lt;jiangshanlai@gmail.com&gt;
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>workqueue: Add RCU annotation for pwq list walk</title>
<updated>2020-01-26T09:01:07Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Sebastian Andrzej Siewior</name>
<email>bigeasy@linutronix.de</email>
</author>
<published>2019-11-15T18:01:25Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=16128944c90749d0b88758bcf727c8e8af3b2f4e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:16128944c90749d0b88758bcf727c8e8af3b2f4e</id>
<content type='text'>
[ Upstream commit 49e9d1a9faf2f71fdfd80a30697ee9a15070626d ]

An additional check has been recently added to ensure that a RCU related lock
is held while the RCU list is iterated.
The `pwqs' are sometimes iterated without a RCU lock but with the &amp;wq-&gt;mutex
acquired leading to a warning.

Teach list_for_each_entry_rcu() that the RCU usage is okay if &amp;wq-&gt;mutex
is acquired during the list traversal.

Fixes: 28875945ba98d ("rcu: Add support for consolidated-RCU reader checking")
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior &lt;bigeasy@linutronix.de&gt;
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin &lt;sashal@kernel.org&gt;
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>workqueue: Fix missing kfree(rescuer) in destroy_workqueue()</title>
<updated>2019-12-17T18:56:54Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Tejun Heo</name>
<email>tj@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-09-20T20:39:57Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=26ba4f73a097b41726c2046f61858c184d7f75d1'/>
<id>urn:sha1:26ba4f73a097b41726c2046f61858c184d7f75d1</id>
<content type='text'>
commit 8efe1223d73c218ce7e8b2e0e9aadb974b582d7f upstream.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Reported-by: Qian Cai &lt;cai@lca.pw&gt;
Fixes: def98c84b6cd ("workqueue: Fix spurious sanity check failures in destroy_workqueue()")
Cc: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu &lt;nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp&gt;
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>workqueue: Fix pwq ref leak in rescuer_thread()</title>
<updated>2019-12-17T18:56:13Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Tejun Heo</name>
<email>tj@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-09-25T13:59:15Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=470e77ea879585a8a2e8f264877b113d2b68074f'/>
<id>urn:sha1:470e77ea879585a8a2e8f264877b113d2b68074f</id>
<content type='text'>
commit e66b39af00f426b3356b96433d620cb3367ba1ff upstream.

008847f66c3 ("workqueue: allow rescuer thread to do more work.") made
the rescuer worker requeue the pwq immediately if there may be more
work items which need rescuing instead of waiting for the next mayday
timer expiration.  Unfortunately, it doesn't check whether the pwq is
already on the mayday list and unconditionally gets the ref and moves
it onto the list.  This doesn't corrupt the list but creates an
additional reference to the pwq.  It got queued twice but will only be
removed once.

This leak later can trigger pwq refcnt warning on workqueue
destruction and prevent freeing of the workqueue.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Cc: "Williams, Gerald S" &lt;gerald.s.williams@intel.com&gt;
Cc: NeilBrown &lt;neilb@suse.de&gt;
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v3.19+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>workqueue: Fix spurious sanity check failures in destroy_workqueue()</title>
<updated>2019-12-17T18:56:13Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Tejun Heo</name>
<email>tj@kernel.org</email>
</author>
<published>2019-09-19T01:43:40Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=20caa355f3d4dfd0e5725947d5e4c501c99ed972'/>
<id>urn:sha1:20caa355f3d4dfd0e5725947d5e4c501c99ed972</id>
<content type='text'>
commit def98c84b6cdf2eeea19ec5736e90e316df5206b upstream.

Before actually destrying a workqueue, destroy_workqueue() checks
whether it's actually idle.  If it isn't, it prints out a bunch of
warning messages and leaves the workqueue dangling.  It unfortunately
has a couple issues.

* Mayday list queueing increments pwq's refcnts which gets detected as
  busy and fails the sanity checks.  However, because mayday list
  queueing is asynchronous, this condition can happen without any
  actual work items left in the workqueue.

* Sanity check failure leaves the sysfs interface behind too which can
  lead to init failure of newer instances of the workqueue.

This patch fixes the above two by

* If a workqueue has a rescuer, disable and kill the rescuer before
  sanity checks.  Disabling and killing is guaranteed to flush the
  existing mayday list.

* Remove sysfs interface before sanity checks.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Reported-by: Marcin Pawlowski &lt;mpawlowski@fb.com&gt;
Reported-by: "Williams, Gerald S" &lt;gerald.s.williams@intel.com&gt;
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman &lt;gregkh@linuxfoundation.org&gt;

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>workqueue: require CPU hotplug read exclusion for apply_workqueue_attrs</title>
<updated>2019-09-13T11:15:40Z</updated>
<author>
<name>Daniel Jordan</name>
<email>daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com</email>
</author>
<published>2019-09-06T01:40:23Z</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.stealer.net/cgit.cgi/user/sven/linux.git/commit/?id=509b3204890ab31c3e652c26424a0706bb809933'/>
<id>urn:sha1:509b3204890ab31c3e652c26424a0706bb809933</id>
<content type='text'>
Change the calling convention for apply_workqueue_attrs to require CPU
hotplug read exclusion.

Avoids lockdep complaints about nested calls to get_online_cpus in a
future patch where padata calls apply_workqueue_attrs when changing
other CPU-hotplug-sensitive data structures with the CPU read lock
already held.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jordan &lt;daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com&gt;
Acked-by: Tejun Heo &lt;tj@kernel.org&gt;
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert &lt;steffen.klassert@secunet.com&gt;
Cc: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
Cc: Lai Jiangshan &lt;jiangshanlai@gmail.com&gt;
Cc: Peter Zijlstra &lt;peterz@infradead.org&gt;
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu &lt;herbert@gondor.apana.org.au&gt;
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
