user/sven/linux.git/kernel, branch v3.10.81

ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer

2015-06-22T23:55:53Z

commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream. The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority, so correct it. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Wang Long Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

revert "softirq: Add support for triggering softirq work on softirqs"

2015-05-17T16:51:33Z

commit fc21c0cff2f425891b28ff6fb6b03b325c977428 upstream. This commit was incomplete in that code to remove items from the per-cpu lists was missing and never acquired a user in the 5 years it has been in the tree. We're going to implement what it seems to try to archive in a simpler way, and this code is in the way of doing so. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Jens Axboe Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Pan Xinhui Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ksoftirqd: Enable IRQs and call cond_resched() before poking RCU

2015-05-06T19:56:27Z

commit 28423ad283d5348793b0c45cc9b1af058e776fd6 upstream. While debugging an issue with excessive softirq usage, I encountered the following note in commit 3e339b5dae24a706 ("softirq: Use hotplug thread infrastructure"): [ paulmck: Call rcu_note_context_switch() with interrupts enabled. ] ...but despite this note, the patch still calls RCU with IRQs disabled. This seemingly innocuous change caused a significant regression in softirq CPU usage on the sending side of a large TCP transfer (~1 GB/s): when introducing 0.01% packet loss, the softirq usage would jump to around 25%, spiking as high as 50%. Before the change, the usage would never exceed 5%. Moving the call to rcu_note_context_switch() after the cond_sched() call, as it was originally before the hotplug patch, completely eliminated this problem. Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ptrace: fix race between ptrace_resume() and wait_task_stopped()

2015-05-06T19:56:24Z

commit b72c186999e689cb0b055ab1c7b3cd8fffbeb5ed upstream. ptrace_resume() is called when the tracee is still __TASK_TRACED. We set tracee->exit_code and then wake_up_state() changes tracee->state. If the tracer's sub-thread does wait() in between, task_stopped_code(ptrace => T) wrongly looks like another report from tracee. This confuses debugger, and since wait_task_stopped() clears ->exit_code the tracee can miss a signal. Test-case: #include #include #include #include #include #include int pid; void *waiter(void *arg) { int stat; for (;;) { assert(pid == wait(&stat)); assert(WIFSTOPPED(stat)); if (WSTOPSIG(stat) == SIGHUP) continue; assert(WSTOPSIG(stat) == SIGCONT); printf("ERR! extra/wrong report:%x\n", stat); } } int main(void) { pthread_t thread; pid = fork(); if (!pid) { assert(ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0,0,0) == 0); for (;;) kill(getpid(), SIGHUP); } assert(pthread_create(&thread, NULL, waiter, NULL) == 0); for (;;) ptrace(PTRACE_CONT, pid, 0, SIGCONT); return 0; } Note for stable: the bug is very old, but without 9899d11f6544 "ptrace: ensure arch_ptrace/ptrace_request can never race with SIGKILL" the fix should use lock_task_sighand(child). Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Reported-by: Pavel Labath Tested-by: Pavel Labath Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

ring-buffer: Replace this_cpu_() with __this_cpu_()

2015-05-06T19:56:21Z

commit 80a9b64e2c156b6523e7a01f2ba6e5d86e722814 upstream. It has come to my attention that this_cpu_read/write are horrible on architectures other than x86. Worse yet, they actually disable preemption or interrupts! This caused some unexpected tracing results on ARM. 101.356868: preempt_count_add <-ring_buffer_lock_reserve 101.356870: preempt_count_sub <-ring_buffer_lock_reserve The ring_buffer_lock_reserve has recursion protection that requires accessing a per cpu variable. But since preempt_disable() is traced, it too got traced while accessing the variable that is suppose to prevent recursion like this. The generic version of this_cpu_read() and write() are: #define this_cpu_generic_read(pcp) \ ({ typeof(pcp) ret__; \ preempt_disable(); \ ret__ = *this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)); \ preempt_enable(); \ ret__; \ }) #define this_cpu_generic_to_op(pcp, val, op) \ do { \ unsigned long flags; \ raw_local_irq_save(flags); \ *__this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)) op val; \ raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \ } while (0) Which is unacceptable for locations that know they are within preempt disabled or interrupt disabled locations. Paul McKenney stated that __this_cpu_() versions produce much better code on other architectures than this_cpu_() does, if we know that the call is done in a preempt disabled location. I also changed the recursive_unlock() to use two local variables instead of accessing the per_cpu variable twice. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150317114411.GE3589@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150317104038.312e73d1@gandalf.local.home Acked-by: Christoph Lameter Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-Koenig Tested-by: Uwe Kleine-Koenig Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

move d_rcu from overlapping d_child to overlapping d_alias

2015-04-29T08:34:00Z

commit 946e51f2bf37f1656916eb75bd0742ba33983c28 upstream. Signed-off-by: Al Viro Cc: Ben Hutchings [hujianyang: Backported to 3.10 refer to the work of Ben Hutchings in 3.2: - Apply name changes in all the different places we use d_alias and d_child - Move the WARN_ON() in __d_free() to d_free() as we don't have dentry_free()] Signed-off-by: hujianyang Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

console: Fix console name size mismatch

2015-04-19T08:10:51Z

commit 30a22c215a0007603ffc08021f2e8b64018517dd upstream. commit 6ae9200f2cab7 ("enlarge console.name") increased the storage for the console name to 16 bytes, but not the corresponding struct console_cmdline::name storage. Console names longer than 8 bytes cause read beyond end-of-string and failure to match console; I'm not sure if there are other unexpected consequences. Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf: Fix irq_work 'tail' recursion

2015-04-13T12:02:12Z

commit d525211f9d1be8b523ec7633f080f2116f5ea536 upstream. Vince reported a watchdog lockup like: [] perf_tp_event+0xc4/0x210 [] perf_trace_lock+0x12a/0x160 [] lock_release+0x130/0x260 [] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x24/0x40 [] do_send_sig_info+0x5d/0x80 [] send_sigio_to_task+0x12f/0x1a0 [] send_sigio+0xae/0x100 [] kill_fasync+0x97/0xf0 [] perf_event_wakeup+0xd4/0xf0 [] perf_pending_event+0x33/0x60 [] irq_work_run_list+0x4c/0x80 [] irq_work_run+0x18/0x40 [] smp_trace_irq_work_interrupt+0x3f/0xc0 [] trace_irq_work_interrupt+0x6d/0x80 Which is caused by an irq_work generating new irq_work and therefore not allowing forward progress. This happens because processing the perf irq_work triggers another perf event (tracepoint stuff) which in turn generates an irq_work ad infinitum. Avoid this by raising the recursion counter in the irq_work -- which effectively disables all software events (including tracepoints) from actually triggering again. Reported-by: Vince Weaver Tested-by: Vince Weaver Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Paul Mackerras Cc: Steven Rostedt Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150219170311.GH21418@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

workqueue: fix hang involving racing cancel[_delayed]_work_sync()'s for PREEMPT_NONE

2015-03-26T14:00:58Z

commit 8603e1b30027f943cc9c1eef2b291d42c3347af1 upstream. cancel[_delayed]_work_sync() are implemented using __cancel_work_timer() which grabs the PENDING bit using try_to_grab_pending() and then flushes the work item with PENDING set to prevent the on-going execution of the work item from requeueing itself. try_to_grab_pending() can always grab PENDING bit without blocking except when someone else is doing the above flushing during cancelation. In that case, try_to_grab_pending() returns -ENOENT. In this case, __cancel_work_timer() currently invokes flush_work(). The assumption is that the completion of the work item is what the other canceling task would be waiting for too and thus waiting for the same condition and retrying should allow forward progress without excessive busy looping Unfortunately, this doesn't work if preemption is disabled or the latter task has real time priority. Let's say task A just got woken up from flush_work() by the completion of the target work item. If, before task A starts executing, task B gets scheduled and invokes __cancel_work_timer() on the same work item, its try_to_grab_pending() will return -ENOENT as the work item is still being canceled by task A and flush_work() will also immediately return false as the work item is no longer executing. This puts task B in a busy loop possibly preventing task A from executing and clearing the canceling state on the work item leading to a hang. task A task B worker executing work __cancel_work_timer() try_to_grab_pending() set work CANCELING flush_work() block for work completion completion, wakes up A __cancel_work_timer() while (forever) { try_to_grab_pending() -ENOENT as work is being canceled flush_work() false as work is no longer executing } This patch removes the possible hang by updating __cancel_work_timer() to explicitly wait for clearing of CANCELING rather than invoking flush_work() after try_to_grab_pending() fails with -ENOENT. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20150206171156.GA8942@axis.com v3: bit_waitqueue() can't be used for work items defined in vmalloc area. Switched to custom wake function which matches the target work item and exclusive wait and wakeup. v2: v1 used wake_up() on bit_waitqueue() which leads to NULL deref if the target bit waitqueue has wait_bit_queue's on it. Use DEFINE_WAIT_BIT() and __wake_up_bit() instead. Reported by Tomeu Vizoso. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reported-by: Rabin Vincent Cc: Tomeu Vizoso Tested-by: Jesper Nilsson Tested-by: Rabin Vincent Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

PM / QoS: remove duplicate call to pm_qos_update_target

2015-03-18T12:22:28Z

In 3.10.y backport patch 1dba303727f52ea062580b0a9b3f0c3b462769cf, the logic to call pm_qos_update_target was moved to __pm_qos_update_request. However, the original code was left in function pm_qos_update_request. Currently, if pm_qos_update_request is called where new_value != req->node.prio then pm_qos_update_target will be called twice in a row. Once in pm_qos_update_request and then again in the following call to _pm_qos_update_request. Removing the left over code from pm_qos_update_request stops this second call to pm_qos_update_target where the work of removing / re-adding the new_value in the constraints list would be duplicated. Signed-off-by: Michael Scott Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman