user/sven/linux.git/kernel, branch v4.19.274

bpf: add missing header file include

2023-02-25T10:51:51Z

commit f3dd0c53370e70c0f9b7e931bbec12916f3bb8cc upstream. Commit 74e19ef0ff80 ("uaccess: Add speculation barrier to copy_from_user()") built fine on x86-64 and arm64, and that's the extent of my local build testing. It turns out those got the include incidentally through other header files ( in particular), but that was not true of other architectures, resulting in build errors kernel/bpf/core.c: In function ‘___bpf_prog_run’: kernel/bpf/core.c:1913:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘barrier_nospec’ so just make sure to explicitly include the proper header file to make everybody see it. Fixes: 74e19ef0ff80 ("uaccess: Add speculation barrier to copy_from_user()") Reported-by: kernel test robot Reported-by: Viresh Kumar Reported-by: Huacai Chen Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Tested-by: Dave Hansen Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

uaccess: Add speculation barrier to copy_from_user()

2023-02-25T10:51:51Z

commit 74e19ef0ff8061ef55957c3abd71614ef0f42f47 upstream. The results of "access_ok()" can be mis-speculated. The result is that you can end speculatively: if (access_ok(from, size)) // Right here even for bad from/size combinations. On first glance, it would be ideal to just add a speculation barrier to "access_ok()" so that its results can never be mis-speculated. But there are lots of system calls just doing access_ok() via "copy_to_user()" and friends (example: fstat() and friends). Those are generally not problematic because they do not _consume_ data from userspace other than the pointer. They are also very quick and common system calls that should not be needlessly slowed down. "copy_from_user()" on the other hand uses a user-controller pointer and is frequently followed up with code that might affect caches. Take something like this: if (!copy_from_user(&kernelvar, uptr, size)) do_something_with(kernelvar); If userspace passes in an evil 'uptr' that *actually* points to a kernel addresses, and then do_something_with() has cache (or other) side-effects, it could allow userspace to infer kernel data values. Add a barrier to the common copy_from_user() code to prevent mis-speculated values which happen after the copy. Also add a stub for architectures that do not define barrier_nospec(). This makes the macro usable in generic code. Since the barrier is now usable in generic code, the x86 #ifdef in the BPF code can also go away. Reported-by: Jordy Zomer Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann # BPF bits Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

alarmtimer: Prevent starvation by small intervals and SIG_IGN

2023-02-25T10:51:50Z

commit d125d1349abeb46945dc5e98f7824bf688266f13 upstream. syzbot reported a RCU stall which is caused by setting up an alarmtimer with a very small interval and ignoring the signal. The reproducer arms the alarm timer with a relative expiry of 8ns and an interval of 9ns. Not a problem per se, but that's an issue when the signal is ignored because then the timer is immediately rearmed because there is no way to delay that rearming to the signal delivery path. See posix_timer_fn() and commit 58229a189942 ("posix-timers: Prevent softirq starvation by small intervals and SIG_IGN") for details. The reproducer does not set SIG_IGN explicitely, but it sets up the timers signal with SIGCONT. That has the same effect as explicitely setting SIG_IGN for a signal as SIGCONT is ignored if there is no handler set and the task is not ptraced. The log clearly shows that: [pid 5102] --- SIGCONT {si_signo=SIGCONT, si_code=SI_TIMER, si_timerid=0, si_overrun=316014, si_int=0, si_ptr=NULL} --- It works because the tasks are traced and therefore the signal is queued so the tracer can see it, which delays the restart of the timer to the signal delivery path. But then the tracer is killed: [pid 5087] kill(-5102, SIGKILL ... ./strace-static-x86_64: Process 5107 detached and after it's gone the stall can be observed: syzkaller login: [ 79.439102][ C0] hrtimer: interrupt took 68471 ns [ 184.460538][ C1] rcu: INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: ... [ 184.658237][ C1] rcu: Stack dump where RCU GP kthread last ran: [ 184.664574][ C1] Sending NMI from CPU 1 to CPUs 0: [ 184.669821][ C0] NMI backtrace for cpu 0 [ 184.669831][ C0] CPU: 0 PID: 5108 Comm: syz-executor192 Not tainted 6.2.0-rc6-next-20230203-syzkaller #0 ... [ 184.670036][ C0] Call Trace: [ 184.670041][ C0] [ 184.670045][ C0] alarmtimer_fired+0x327/0x670 posix_timer_fn() prevents that by checking whether the interval for timers which have the signal ignored is smaller than a jiffie and artifically delay it by shifting the next expiry out by a jiffie. That's accurate vs. the overrun accounting, but slightly inaccurate vs. timer_gettimer(2). The comment in that function says what needs to be done and there was a fix available for the regular userspace induced SIG_IGN mechanism, but that did not work due to the implicit ignore for SIGCONT and similar signals. This needs to be worked on, but for now the only available workaround is to do exactly what posix_timer_fn() does: Increase the interval of self-rearming timers, which have their signal ignored, to at least a jiffie. Interestingly this has been fixed before via commit ff86bf0c65f1 ("alarmtimer: Rate limit periodic intervals") already, but that fix got lost in a later rework. Reported-by: syzbot+b9564ba6e8e00694511b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: f2c45807d399 ("alarmtimer: Switch over to generic set/get/rearm routine") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Acked-by: John Stultz Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87k00q1no2.ffs@tglx Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exit: Use READ_ONCE() for all oops/warn limit reads

2023-02-06T06:49:46Z

commit 7535b832c6399b5ebfc5b53af5c51dd915ee2538 upstream. Use a temporary variable to take full advantage of READ_ONCE() behavior. Without this, the report (and even the test) might be out of sync with the initial test. Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y5x7GXeluFmZ8E0E@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Fixes: 9fc9e278a5c0 ("panic: Introduce warn_limit") Fixes: d4ccd54d28d3 ("exit: Put an upper limit on how often we can oops") Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Petr Mladek Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Marco Elver Cc: tangmeng Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Tiezhu Yang Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

panic: Expose "warn_count" to sysfs

2023-02-06T06:49:46Z

commit 8b05aa26336113c4cea25f1c333ee8cd4fc212a6 upstream. Since Warn count is now tracked and is a fairly interesting signal, add the entry /sys/kernel/warn_count to expose it to userspace. Cc: Petr Mladek Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: tangmeng Cc: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Tiezhu Yang Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117234328.594699-6-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

panic: Introduce warn_limit

2023-02-06T06:49:46Z

commit 9fc9e278a5c0b708eeffaf47d6eb0c82aa74ed78 upstream. Like oops_limit, add warn_limit for limiting the number of warnings when panic_on_warn is not set. Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Baolin Wang Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Eric Biggers Cc: Huang Ying Cc: Petr Mladek Cc: tangmeng Cc: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" Cc: Tiezhu Yang Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117234328.594699-5-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

panic: Consolidate open-coded panic_on_warn checks

2023-02-06T06:49:46Z

commit 79cc1ba7badf9e7a12af99695a557e9ce27ee967 upstream. Several run-time checkers (KASAN, UBSAN, KFENCE, KCSAN, sched) roll their own warnings, and each check "panic_on_warn". Consolidate this into a single function so that future instrumentation can be added in a single location. Cc: Marco Elver Cc: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Juri Lelli Cc: Vincent Guittot Cc: Dietmar Eggemann Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Ben Segall Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Cc: Valentin Schneider Cc: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Alexander Potapenko Cc: Andrey Konovalov Cc: Vincenzo Frascino Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: David Gow Cc: tangmeng Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Shuah Khan Cc: Petr Mladek Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" Cc: Tiezhu Yang Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Reviewed-by: Marco Elver Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117234328.594699-4-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exit: Allow oops_limit to be disabled

2023-02-06T06:49:45Z

commit de92f65719cd672f4b48397540b9f9eff67eca40 upstream. In preparation for keeping oops_limit logic in sync with warn_limit, have oops_limit == 0 disable checking the Oops counter. Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Baolin Wang Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Eric Biggers Cc: Huang Ying Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exit: Expose "oops_count" to sysfs

2023-02-06T06:49:45Z

commit 9db89b41117024f80b38b15954017fb293133364 upstream. Since Oops count is now tracked and is a fairly interesting signal, add the entry /sys/kernel/oops_count to expose it to userspace. Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Jann Horn Cc: Arnd Bergmann Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117234328.594699-3-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

exit: Put an upper limit on how often we can oops

2023-02-06T06:49:45Z

commit d4ccd54d28d3c8598e2354acc13e28c060961dbb upstream. Many Linux systems are configured to not panic on oops; but allowing an attacker to oops the system **really** often can make even bugs that look completely unexploitable exploitable (like NULL dereferences and such) if each crash elevates a refcount by one or a lock is taken in read mode, and this causes a counter to eventually overflow. The most interesting counters for this are 32 bits wide (like open-coded refcounts that don't use refcount_t). (The ldsem reader count on 32-bit platforms is just 16 bits, but probably nobody cares about 32-bit platforms that much nowadays.) So let's panic the system if the kernel is constantly oopsing. The speed of oopsing 2^32 times probably depends on several factors, like how long the stack trace is and which unwinder you're using; an empirically important one is whether your console is showing a graphical environment or a text console that oopses will be printed to. In a quick single-threaded benchmark, it looks like oopsing in a vfork() child with a very short stack trace only takes ~510 microseconds per run when a graphical console is active; but switching to a text console that oopses are printed to slows it down around 87x, to ~45 milliseconds per run. (Adding more threads makes this faster, but the actual oops printing happens under &die_lock on x86, so you can maybe speed this up by a factor of around 2 and then any further improvement gets eaten up by lock contention.) It looks like it would take around 8-12 days to overflow a 32-bit counter with repeated oopsing on a multi-core X86 system running a graphical environment; both me (in an X86 VM) and Seth (with a distro kernel on normal hardware in a standard configuration) got numbers in that ballpark. 12 days aren't *that* short on a desktop system, and you'd likely need much longer on a typical server system (assuming that people don't run graphical desktop environments on their servers), and this is a *very* noisy and violent approach to exploiting the kernel; and it also seems to take orders of magnitude longer on some machines, probably because stuff like EFI pstore will slow it down a ton if that's active. Signed-off-by: Jann Horn Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221107201317.324457-1-jannh@google.com Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117234328.594699-2-keescook@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman