user/sven/linux.git/kernel, branch v4.19.291

perf: Fix function pointer case

2023-08-11T09:45:36Z

commit 1af6239d1d3e61d33fd2f0ba53d3d1a67cc50574 upstream. With the advent of CFI it is no longer acceptible to cast function pointers. The robot complains thusly: kernel-events-core.c:warning:cast-from-int-(-)(struct-perf_cpu_pmu_context-)-to-remote_function_f-(aka-int-(-)(void-)-)-converts-to-incompatible-function-type Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Cixi Geng Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

tracing: Fix warning in trace_buffered_event_disable()

2023-08-11T09:45:32Z

[ Upstream commit dea499781a1150d285c62b26659f62fb00824fce ] Warning happened in trace_buffered_event_disable() at WARN_ON_ONCE(!trace_buffered_event_ref) Call Trace: ? __warn+0xa5/0x1b0 ? trace_buffered_event_disable+0x189/0x1b0 __ftrace_event_enable_disable+0x19e/0x3e0 free_probe_data+0x3b/0xa0 unregister_ftrace_function_probe_func+0x6b8/0x800 event_enable_func+0x2f0/0x3d0 ftrace_process_regex.isra.0+0x12d/0x1b0 ftrace_filter_write+0xe6/0x140 vfs_write+0x1c9/0x6f0 [...] The cause of the warning is in __ftrace_event_enable_disable(), trace_buffered_event_enable() was called once while trace_buffered_event_disable() was called twice. Reproduction script show as below, for analysis, see the comments: ``` #!/bin/bash cd /sys/kernel/tracing/ # 1. Register a 'disable_event' command, then: # 1) SOFT_DISABLED_BIT was set; # 2) trace_buffered_event_enable() was called first time; echo 'cmdline_proc_show:disable_event:initcall:initcall_finish' > \ set_ftrace_filter # 2. Enable the event registered, then: # 1) SOFT_DISABLED_BIT was cleared; # 2) trace_buffered_event_disable() was called first time; echo 1 > events/initcall/initcall_finish/enable # 3. Try to call into cmdline_proc_show(), then SOFT_DISABLED_BIT was # set again!!! cat /proc/cmdline # 4. Unregister the 'disable_event' command, then: # 1) SOFT_DISABLED_BIT was cleared again; # 2) trace_buffered_event_disable() was called second time!!! echo '!cmdline_proc_show:disable_event:initcall:initcall_finish' > \ set_ftrace_filter ``` To fix it, IIUC, we can change to call trace_buffered_event_enable() at fist time soft-mode enabled, and call trace_buffered_event_disable() at last time soft-mode disabled. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230726095804.920457-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com Cc: Fixes: 0fc1b09ff1ff ("tracing: Use temp buffer when filtering events") Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ring-buffer: Fix wrong stat of cpu_buffer->read

2023-08-11T09:45:32Z

[ Upstream commit 2d093282b0d4357373497f65db6a05eb0c28b7c8 ] When pages are removed in rb_remove_pages(), 'cpu_buffer->read' is set to 0 in order to make sure any read iterators reset themselves. However, this will mess 'entries' stating, see following steps: # cd /sys/kernel/tracing/ # 1. Enlarge ring buffer prepare for later reducing: # echo 20 > per_cpu/cpu0/buffer_size_kb # 2. Write a log into ring buffer of cpu0: # taskset -c 0 echo "hello1" > trace_marker # 3. Read the log: # cat per_cpu/cpu0/trace_pipe <...>-332 [000] ..... 62.406844: tracing_mark_write: hello1 # 4. Stop reading and see the stats, now 0 entries, and 1 event readed: # cat per_cpu/cpu0/stats entries: 0 [...] read events: 1 # 5. Reduce the ring buffer # echo 7 > per_cpu/cpu0/buffer_size_kb # 6. Now entries became unexpected 1 because actually no entries!!! # cat per_cpu/cpu0/stats entries: 1 [...] read events: 0 To fix it, introduce 'page_removed' field to count total removed pages since last reset, then use it to let read iterators reset themselves instead of changing the 'read' pointer. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230724054040.3489499-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com Cc: Cc: Fixes: 83f40318dab0 ("ring-buffer: Make removal of ring buffer pages atomic") Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ftrace: Fix possible warning on checking all pages used in ftrace_process_locs()

2023-08-11T09:45:29Z

[ Upstream commit 26efd79c4624294e553aeaa3439c646729bad084 ] As comments in ftrace_process_locs(), there may be NULL pointers in mcount_loc section: > Some architecture linkers will pad between > the different mcount_loc sections of different > object files to satisfy alignments. > Skip any NULL pointers. After commit 20e5227e9f55 ("ftrace: allow NULL pointers in mcount_loc"), NULL pointers will be accounted when allocating ftrace pages but skipped before adding into ftrace pages, this may result in some pages not being used. Then after commit 706c81f87f84 ("ftrace: Remove extra helper functions"), warning may occur at: WARN_ON(pg->next); To fix it, only warn for case that no pointers skipped but pages not used up, then free those unused pages after releasing ftrace_lock. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230712060452.3175675-1-zhengyejian1@huawei.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 706c81f87f84 ("ftrace: Remove extra helper functions") Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ftrace: Store the order of pages allocated in ftrace_page

2023-08-11T09:45:29Z

[ Upstream commit db42523b4f3e83ff86b53cdda219a9767c8b047f ] Instead of saving the size of the records field of the ftrace_page, store the order it uses to allocate the pages, as that is what is needed to know in order to free the pages. This simplifies the code. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=whyMxheOqXAORt9a7JK9gc9eHTgCJ55Pgs4p=X3RrQubQ@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds [ change log written by Steven Rostedt ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Stable-dep-of: 26efd79c4624 ("ftrace: Fix possible warning on checking all pages used in ftrace_process_locs()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ftrace: Check if pages were allocated before calling free_pages()

2023-08-11T09:45:29Z

[ Upstream commit 59300b36f85f254260c81d9dd09195fa49eb0f98 ] It is possible that on error pg->size can be zero when getting its order, which would return a -1 value. It is dangerous to pass in an order of -1 to free_pages(). Check if order is greater than or equal to zero before calling free_pages(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210330093916.432697c7@gandalf.local.home/ Reported-by: Abaci Robot Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Stable-dep-of: 26efd79c4624 ("ftrace: Fix possible warning on checking all pages used in ftrace_process_locs()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

ftrace: Add information on number of page groups allocated

2023-08-11T09:45:29Z

[ Upstream commit da537f0aef1372c5204356a7df06be8769467b7b ] Looking for ways to shrink the size of the dyn_ftrace structure, knowing the information about how many pages and the number of groups of those pages, is useful in working out the best ways to save on memory. This adds one info print on how many groups of pages were used to allocate the ftrace dyn_ftrace structures, and also shows the number of pages and groups in the dyn_ftrace_total_info (which is used for debugging). Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Stable-dep-of: 26efd79c4624 ("ftrace: Fix possible warning on checking all pages used in ftrace_process_locs()") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

tracing/histograms: Return an error if we fail to add histogram to hist_vars list

2023-08-11T09:45:27Z

commit 4b8b3905165ef98386a3c06f196c85d21292d029 upstream. Commit 6018b585e8c6 ("tracing/histograms: Add histograms to hist_vars if they have referenced variables") added a check to fail histogram creation if save_hist_vars() failed to add histogram to hist_vars list. But the commit failed to set ret to failed return code before jumping to unregister histogram, fix it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-kernel/20230714203341.51396-1-mkhalfella@purestorage.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 6018b585e8c6 ("tracing/histograms: Add histograms to hist_vars if they have referenced variables") Signed-off-by: Mohamed Khalfella Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Address KCSAN report on bpf_lru_list

2023-08-11T09:45:25Z

[ Upstream commit ee9fd0ac3017c4313be91a220a9ac4c99dde7ad4 ] KCSAN reported a data-race when accessing node->ref. Although node->ref does not have to be accurate, take this chance to use a more common READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE() pattern instead of data_race(). There is an existing bpf_lru_node_is_ref() and bpf_lru_node_set_ref(). This patch also adds bpf_lru_node_clear_ref() to do the WRITE_ONCE(node->ref, 0) also. ================================================================== BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __bpf_lru_list_rotate / __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem write to 0xffff888137038deb of 1 bytes by task 11240 on cpu 1: __bpf_lru_node_move kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:113 [inline] __bpf_lru_list_rotate_active kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:149 [inline] __bpf_lru_list_rotate+0x1bf/0x750 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:240 bpf_lru_list_pop_free_to_local kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:329 [inline] bpf_common_lru_pop_free kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:447 [inline] bpf_lru_pop_free+0x638/0xe20 kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.c:499 prealloc_lru_pop kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:290 [inline] __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem+0xe7/0x820 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1316 bpf_percpu_hash_update+0x5e/0x90 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:2313 bpf_map_update_value+0x2a9/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:200 generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1687 bpf_map_do_batch+0x2d9/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4534 __sys_bpf+0x338/0x810 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5096 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd read to 0xffff888137038deb of 1 bytes by task 11241 on cpu 0: bpf_lru_node_set_ref kernel/bpf/bpf_lru_list.h:70 [inline] __htab_lru_percpu_map_update_elem+0x2f1/0x820 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:1332 bpf_percpu_hash_update+0x5e/0x90 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:2313 bpf_map_update_value+0x2a9/0x370 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:200 generic_map_update_batch+0x3ae/0x4f0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1687 bpf_map_do_batch+0x2d9/0x3d0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4534 __sys_bpf+0x338/0x810 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5096 [inline] __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094 [inline] __x64_sys_bpf+0x43/0x50 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5094 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd value changed: 0x01 -> 0x00 Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on: CPU: 0 PID: 11241 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7-syzkaller-00136-g6a66fdd29ea1 #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 03/30/2023 ================================================================== Reported-by: syzbot+ebe648a84e8784763f82@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230511043748.1384166-1-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

sched/fair: Don't balance task to its current running CPU

2023-08-11T09:45:25Z

[ Upstream commit 0dd37d6dd33a9c23351e6115ae8cdac7863bc7de ] We've run into the case that the balancer tries to balance a migration disabled task and trigger the warning in set_task_cpu() like below: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 0 at kernel/sched/core.c:3115 set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240 Modules linked in: hclgevf xt_CHECKSUM ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 <...snip> CPU: 7 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/7 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O 6.1.0-rc4+ #1 Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 V2/BC82AMDC, BIOS 2280-V2 CS V5.B221.01 12/09/2021 pstate: 604000c9 (nZCv daIF +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc : set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240 lr : load_balance+0x5d0/0xc60 sp : ffff80000803bc70 x29: ffff80000803bc70 x28: ffff004089e190e8 x27: ffff004089e19040 x26: ffff007effcabc38 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000001 x23: ffff80000803be84 x22: 000000000000000c x21: ffffb093e79e2a78 x20: 000000000000000c x19: ffff004089e19040 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 0000000000001fad x16: 0000000000000030 x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000003 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000 x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000400 x9 : ffffb093e4cee530 x8 : 00000000fffffffe x7 : 0000000000ce168a x6 : 000000000000013e x5 : 00000000ffffffe1 x4 : 0000000000000001 x3 : 0000000000000b2a x2 : 0000000000000b2a x1 : ffffb093e6d6c510 x0 : 0000000000000001 Call trace: set_task_cpu+0x188/0x240 load_balance+0x5d0/0xc60 rebalance_domains+0x26c/0x380 _nohz_idle_balance.isra.0+0x1e0/0x370 run_rebalance_domains+0x6c/0x80 __do_softirq+0x128/0x3d8 ____do_softirq+0x18/0x24 call_on_irq_stack+0x2c/0x38 do_softirq_own_stack+0x24/0x3c __irq_exit_rcu+0xcc/0xf4 irq_exit_rcu+0x18/0x24 el1_interrupt+0x4c/0xe4 el1h_64_irq_handler+0x18/0x2c el1h_64_irq+0x74/0x78 arch_cpu_idle+0x18/0x4c default_idle_call+0x58/0x194 do_idle+0x244/0x2b0 cpu_startup_entry+0x30/0x3c secondary_start_kernel+0x14c/0x190 __secondary_switched+0xb0/0xb4 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Further investigation shows that the warning is superfluous, the migration disabled task is just going to be migrated to its current running CPU. This is because that on load balance if the dst_cpu is not allowed by the task, we'll re-select a new_dst_cpu as a candidate. If no task can be balanced to dst_cpu we'll try to balance the task to the new_dst_cpu instead. In this case when the migration disabled task is not on CPU it only allows to run on its current CPU, load balance will select its current CPU as new_dst_cpu and later triggers the warning above. The new_dst_cpu is chosen from the env->dst_grpmask. Currently it contains CPUs in sched_group_span() and if we have overlapped groups it's possible to run into this case. This patch makes env->dst_grpmask of group_balance_mask() which exclude any CPUs from the busiest group and solve the issue. For balancing in a domain with no overlapped groups the behaviour keeps same as before. Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230530082507.10444-1-yangyicong@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin