user/sven/linux.git/kernel, branch v4.4.105

sched/rt: Simplify the IPI based RT balancing logic

2017-11-30T08:37:25Z

commit 4bdced5c9a2922521e325896a7bbbf0132c94e56 upstream. When a CPU lowers its priority (schedules out a high priority task for a lower priority one), a check is made to see if any other CPU has overloaded RT tasks (more than one). It checks the rto_mask to determine this and if so it will request to pull one of those tasks to itself if the non running RT task is of higher priority than the new priority of the next task to run on the current CPU. When we deal with large number of CPUs, the original pull logic suffered from large lock contention on a single CPU run queue, which caused a huge latency across all CPUs. This was caused by only having one CPU having overloaded RT tasks and a bunch of other CPUs lowering their priority. To solve this issue, commit: b6366f048e0c ("sched/rt: Use IPI to trigger RT task push migration instead of pulling") changed the way to request a pull. Instead of grabbing the lock of the overloaded CPU's runqueue, it simply sent an IPI to that CPU to do the work. Although the IPI logic worked very well in removing the large latency build up, it still could suffer from a large number of IPIs being sent to a single CPU. On a 80 CPU box, I measured over 200us of processing IPIs. Worse yet, when I tested this on a 120 CPU box, with a stress test that had lots of RT tasks scheduling on all CPUs, it actually triggered the hard lockup detector! One CPU had so many IPIs sent to it, and due to the restart mechanism that is triggered when the source run queue has a priority status change, the CPU spent minutes! processing the IPIs. Thinking about this further, I realized there's no reason for each run queue to send its own IPI. As all CPUs with overloaded tasks must be scanned regardless if there's one or many CPUs lowering their priority, because there's no current way to find the CPU with the highest priority task that can schedule to one of these CPUs, there really only needs to be one IPI being sent around at a time. This greatly simplifies the code! The new approach is to have each root domain have its own irq work, as the rto_mask is per root domain. The root domain has the following fields attached to it: rto_push_work - the irq work to process each CPU set in rto_mask rto_lock - the lock to protect some of the other rto fields rto_loop_start - an atomic that keeps contention down on rto_lock the first CPU scheduling in a lower priority task is the one to kick off the process. rto_loop_next - an atomic that gets incremented for each CPU that schedules in a lower priority task. rto_loop - a variable protected by rto_lock that is used to compare against rto_loop_next rto_cpu - The cpu to send the next IPI to, also protected by the rto_lock. When a CPU schedules in a lower priority task and wants to make sure overloaded CPUs know about it. It increments the rto_loop_next. Then it atomically sets rto_loop_start with a cmpxchg. If the old value is not "0", then it is done, as another CPU is kicking off the IPI loop. If the old value is "0", then it will take the rto_lock to synchronize with a possible IPI being sent around to the overloaded CPUs. If rto_cpu is greater than or equal to nr_cpu_ids, then there's either no IPI being sent around, or one is about to finish. Then rto_cpu is set to the first CPU in rto_mask and an IPI is sent to that CPU. If there's no CPUs set in rto_mask, then there's nothing to be done. When the CPU receives the IPI, it will first try to push any RT tasks that is queued on the CPU but can't run because a higher priority RT task is currently running on that CPU. Then it takes the rto_lock and looks for the next CPU in the rto_mask. If it finds one, it simply sends an IPI to that CPU and the process continues. If there's no more CPUs in the rto_mask, then rto_loop is compared with rto_loop_next. If they match, everything is done and the process is over. If they do not match, then a CPU scheduled in a lower priority task as the IPI was being passed around, and the process needs to start again. The first CPU in rto_mask is sent the IPI. This change removes this duplication of work in the IPI logic, and greatly lowers the latency caused by the IPIs. This removed the lockup happening on the 120 CPU machine. It also simplifies the code tremendously. What else could anyone ask for? Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for simplifying the rto_loop_start atomic logic and supplying me with the rto_start_trylock() and rto_start_unlock() helper functions. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Clark Williams Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira Cc: John Kacur Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Scott Wood Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170424114732.1aac6dc4@gandalf.local.home Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched: Make resched_cpu() unconditional

2017-11-30T08:37:19Z

commit 7c2102e56a3f7d85b5d8f33efbd7aecc1f36fdd8 upstream. The current implementation of synchronize_sched_expedited() incorrectly assumes that resched_cpu() is unconditional, which it is not. This means that synchronize_sched_expedited() can hang when resched_cpu()'s trylock fails as follows (analysis by Neeraj Upadhyay): o CPU1 is waiting for expedited wait to complete: sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus rdp->exp_dynticks_snap & 0x1 // returns 1 for CPU5 IPI sent to CPU5 synchronize_sched_expedited_wait ret = swait_event_timeout(rsp->expedited_wq, sync_rcu_preempt_exp_done(rnp_root), jiffies_stall); expmask = 0x20, CPU 5 in idle path (in cpuidle_enter()) o CPU5 handles IPI and fails to acquire rq lock. Handles IPI sync_sched_exp_handler resched_cpu returns while failing to try lock acquire rq->lock need_resched is not set o CPU5 calls rcu_idle_enter() and as need_resched is not set, goes to idle (schedule() is not called). o CPU 1 reports RCU stall. Given that resched_cpu() is now used only by RCU, this commit fixes the assumption by making resched_cpu() unconditional. Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay Suggested-by: Neeraj Upadhyay Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: don't let ldimm64 leak map addresses on unprivileged

2017-11-21T08:21:17Z

commit 0d0e57697f162da4aa218b5feafe614fb666db07 upstream. The patch fixes two things at once: 1) It checks the env->allow_ptr_leaks and only prints the map address to the log if we have the privileges to do so, otherwise it just dumps 0 as we would when kptr_restrict is enabled on %pK. Given the latter is off by default and not every distro sets it, I don't want to rely on this, hence the 0 by default for unprivileged. 2) Printing of ldimm64 in the verifier log is currently broken in that we don't print the full immediate, but only the 32 bit part of the first insn part for ldimm64. Thus, fix this up as well; it's okay to access, since we verified all ldimm64 earlier already (including just constants) through replace_map_fd_with_map_ptr(). Fixes: 1be7f75d1668 ("bpf: enable non-root eBPF programs") Fixes: cbd357008604 ("bpf: verifier (add ability to receive verification log)") Reported-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: David S. Miller [bwh: Backported to 4.4: s/bpf_verifier_env/verifier_env/] Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

workqueue: Fix NULL pointer dereference

2017-11-15T16:13:11Z

commit cef572ad9bd7f85035ba8272e5352040e8be0152 upstream. When queue_work() is used in irq (not in task context), there is a potential case that trigger NULL pointer dereference. ---------------------------------------------------------------- worker_thread() |-spin_lock_irq() |-process_one_work() |-worker->current_pwq = pwq |-spin_unlock_irq() |-worker->current_func(work) |-spin_lock_irq() |-worker->current_pwq = NULL |-spin_unlock_irq() //interrupt here |-irq_handler |-__queue_work() //assuming that the wq is draining |-is_chained_work(wq) |-current_wq_worker() //Here, 'current' is the interrupted worker! |-current->current_pwq is NULL here! |-schedule() ---------------------------------------------------------------- Avoid it by checking for task context in current_wq_worker(), and if not in task context, we shouldn't use the 'current' to check the condition. Reported-by: Xiaofei Tan Signed-off-by: Li Bin Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Fixes: 8d03ecfe4718 ("workqueue: reimplement is_chained_work() using current_wq_worker()") Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

workqueue: replace pool->manager_arb mutex with a flag

2017-11-02T08:40:48Z

commit 692b48258dda7c302e777d7d5f4217244478f1f6 upstream. Josef reported a HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected by lockdep: [ 1270.472259] WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected [ 1270.472783] 4.14.0-rc1-xfstests-12888-g76833e8 #110 Not tainted [ 1270.473240] ----------------------------------------------------- [ 1270.473710] kworker/u5:2/5157 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: [ 1270.474239] (&(&lock->wait_lock)->rlock){+.+.}, at: [] __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0xa2/0x280 [ 1270.474994] [ 1270.474994] and this task is already holding: [ 1270.475440] (&pool->lock/1){-.-.}, at: [] worker_thread+0x366/0x3c0 [ 1270.476046] which would create a new lock dependency: [ 1270.476436] (&pool->lock/1){-.-.} -> (&(&lock->wait_lock)->rlock){+.+.} [ 1270.476949] [ 1270.476949] but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: [ 1270.477553] (&pool->lock/1){-.-.} ... [ 1270.488900] to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: [ 1270.489327] (&(&lock->wait_lock)->rlock){+.+.} ... [ 1270.494735] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: [ 1270.494735] [ 1270.495250] CPU0 CPU1 [ 1270.495600] ---- ---- [ 1270.495947] lock(&(&lock->wait_lock)->rlock); [ 1270.496295] local_irq_disable(); [ 1270.496753] lock(&pool->lock/1); [ 1270.497205] lock(&(&lock->wait_lock)->rlock); [ 1270.497744] [ 1270.497948] lock(&pool->lock/1); , which will cause a irq inversion deadlock if the above lock scenario happens. The root cause of this safe -> unsafe lock order is the mutex_unlock(pool->manager_arb) in manage_workers() with pool->lock held. Unlocking mutex while holding an irq spinlock was never safe and this problem has been around forever but it never got noticed because the only time the mutex is usually trylocked while holding irqlock making actual failures very unlikely and lockdep annotation missed the condition until the recent b9c16a0e1f73 ("locking/mutex: Fix lockdep_assert_held() fail"). Using mutex for pool->manager_arb has always been a bit of stretch. It primarily is an mechanism to arbitrate managership between workers which can easily be done with a pool flag. The only reason it became a mutex is that pool destruction path wants to exclude parallel managing operations. This patch replaces the mutex with a new pool flag POOL_MANAGER_ACTIVE and make the destruction path wait for the current manager on a wait queue. v2: Drop unnecessary flag clearing before pool destruction as suggested by Boqun. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo Reported-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Boqun Feng Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/autogroup: Fix autogroup_move_group() to never skip sched_move_task()

2017-10-27T08:23:17Z

commit 18f649ef344127ef6de23a5a4272dbe2fdb73dde upstream. The PF_EXITING check in task_wants_autogroup() is no longer needed. Remove it, but see the next patch. However the comment is correct in that autogroup_move_group() must always change task_group() for every thread so the sysctl_ check is very wrong; we can race with cgroups and even sys_setsid() is not safe because a task running with task_group() == ag->tg must participate in refcounting: int main(void) { int sctl = open("/proc/sys/kernel/sched_autogroup_enabled", O_WRONLY); assert(sctl > 0); if (fork()) { wait(NULL); // destroy the child's ag/tg pause(); } assert(pwrite(sctl, "1\n", 2, 0) == 2); assert(setsid() > 0); if (fork()) pause(); kill(getppid(), SIGKILL); sleep(1); // The child has gone, the grandchild runs with kref == 1 assert(pwrite(sctl, "0\n", 2, 0) == 2); assert(setsid() > 0); // runs with the freed ag/tg for (;;) sleep(1); return 0; } crashes the kernel. It doesn't really need sleep(1), it doesn't matter if autogroup_move_group() actually frees the task_group or this happens later. Reported-by: Vern Lovejoy Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: hartsjc@redhat.com Cc: vbendel@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161114184609.GA15965@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal [sumits: submit to 4.4 LTS, post testing on Hikey] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

locking/lockdep: Add nest_lock integrity test

2017-10-21T15:09:03Z

[ Upstream commit 7fb4a2cea6b18dab56d609530d077f168169ed6b ] Boqun reported that hlock->references can overflow. Add a debug test for that to generate a clear error when this happens. Without this, lockdep is likely to report a mysterious failure on unlock. Reported-by: Boqun Feng Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Andrew Morton Cc: Chris Wilson Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Nicolai Hähnle Cc: Paul E. McKenney Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: one perf event close won't free bpf program attached by another perf event

2017-10-21T15:09:02Z

[ Upstream commit ec9dd352d591f0c90402ec67a317c1ed4fb2e638 ] This patch fixes a bug exhibited by the following scenario: 1. fd1 = perf_event_open with attr.config = ID1 2. attach bpf program prog1 to fd1 3. fd2 = perf_event_open with attr.config = ID1 4. user program closes fd2 and prog1 is detached from the tracepoint. 5. user program with fd1 does not work properly as tracepoint no output any more. The issue happens at step 4. Multiple perf_event_open can be called successfully, but only one bpf prog pointer in the tp_event. In the current logic, any fd release for the same tp_event will free the tp_event->prog. The fix is to free tp_event->prog only when the closing fd corresponds to the one which registered the program. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf/verifier: reject BPF_ALU64|BPF_END

2017-10-21T15:09:02Z

[ Upstream commit e67b8a685c7c984e834e3181ef4619cd7025a136 ] Neither ___bpf_prog_run nor the JITs accept it. Also adds a new test case. Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Edward Cree Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rcu: Allow for page faults in NMI handlers

2017-10-18T07:20:41Z

commit 28585a832602747cbfa88ad8934013177a3aae38 upstream. A number of architecture invoke rcu_irq_enter() on exception entry in order to allow RCU read-side critical sections in the exception handler when the exception is from an idle or nohz_full CPU. This works, at least unless the exception happens in an NMI handler. In that case, rcu_nmi_enter() would already have exited the extended quiescent state, which would mean that rcu_irq_enter() would (incorrectly) cause RCU to think that it is again in an extended quiescent state. This will in turn result in lockdep splats in response to later RCU read-side critical sections. This commit therefore causes rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() to take no action if there is an rcu_nmi_enter() in effect, thus avoiding the unscheduled return to RCU quiescent state. This in turn should make the kernel safe for on-demand RCU voyeurism. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170922211022.GA18084@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 0be964be0 ("module: Sanitize RCU usage and locking") Reported-by: Steven Rostedt Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman