user/sven/linux.git/kernel, branch v5.4.38

signal: check sig before setting info in kill_pid_usb_asyncio

2020-05-02T06:48:55Z

[ Upstream commit eaec2b0bd30690575c581eebffae64bfb7f684ac ] In kill_pid_usb_asyncio, if signal is not valid, we do not need to set info struct. Signed-off-by: Zhiqiang Liu Acked-by: Christian Brauner Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f525fd08-1cf7-fb09-d20c-4359145eb940@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

perf/core: fix parent pid/tid in task exit events

2020-05-02T06:48:52Z

commit f3bed55e850926614b9898fe982f66d2541a36a5 upstream. Current logic yields the child task as the parent. Before: $ perf record bash -c "perf list > /dev/null" $ perf script -D |grep 'FORK\|EXIT' 4387036190981094 0x5a70 [0x30]: PERF_RECORD_FORK(10472:10472):(10470:10470) 4387036606207580 0xf050 [0x30]: PERF_RECORD_EXIT(10472:10472):(10472:10472) 4387036607103839 0x17150 [0x30]: PERF_RECORD_EXIT(10470:10470):(10470:10470) ^ Note the repeated values here -------------------/ After: 383281514043 0x9d8 [0x30]: PERF_RECORD_FORK(2268:2268):(2266:2266) 383442003996 0x2180 [0x30]: PERF_RECORD_EXIT(2268:2268):(2266:2266) 383451297778 0xb70 [0x30]: PERF_RECORD_EXIT(2266:2266):(2265:2265) Fixes: 94d5d1b2d891 ("perf_counter: Report the cloning task as parent on perf_counter_fork()") Reported-by: KP Singh Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200417182842.12522-1-irogers@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched/core: Fix reset-on-fork from RT with uclamp

2020-05-02T06:48:52Z

commit eaf5a92ebde5bca3bb2565616115bd6d579486cd upstream. uclamp_fork() resets the uclamp values to their default when the reset-on-fork flag is set. It also checks whether the task has a RT policy, and sets its uclamp.min to 1024 accordingly. However, during reset-on-fork, the task's policy is lowered to SCHED_NORMAL right after, hence leading to an erroneous uclamp.min setting for the new task if it was forked from RT. Fix this by removing the unnecessary check on rt_task() in uclamp_fork() as this doesn't make sense if the reset-on-fork flag is set. Fixes: 1a00d999971c ("sched/uclamp: Set default clamps for RT tasks") Reported-by: Chitti Babu Theegala Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Patrick Bellasi Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416085956.217587-1-qperret@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cpumap: Avoid warning when CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS is enabled

2020-05-02T06:48:51Z

commit bc23d0e3f717ced21fbfacab3ab887d55e5ba367 upstream. When the kernel is built with CONFIG_DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS, the cpumap code can trigger a spurious warning if CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is also set. This happens because in this configuration, NR_CPUS can be larger than nr_cpumask_bits, so the initial check in cpu_map_alloc() is not sufficient to guard against hitting the warning in cpumask_check(). Fix this by explicitly checking the supplied key against the nr_cpumask_bits variable before calling cpu_possible(). Fixes: 6710e1126934 ("bpf: introduce new bpf cpu map type BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP") Reported-by: Xiumei Mu Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Tested-by: Xiumei Mu Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Acked-by: Song Liu Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200416083120.453718-1-toke@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged users

2020-05-02T06:48:46Z

commit 6e7e63cbb023976d828cdb22422606bf77baa8a9 upstream. When check_xadd() verifies an XADD operation on a pointer to a stack slot containing a spilled pointer, check_stack_read() verifies that the read, which is part of XADD, is valid. However, since the placeholder value -1 is passed as `value_regno`, check_stack_read() can only return a binary decision and can't return the type of the value that was read. The intent here is to verify whether the value read from the stack slot may be used as a SCALAR_VALUE; but since check_stack_read() doesn't check the type, and the type information is lost when check_stack_read() returns, this is not enforced, and a malicious user can abuse XADD to leak spilled kernel pointers. Fix it by letting check_stack_read() verify that the value is usable as a SCALAR_VALUE if no type information is passed to the caller. To be able to use __is_pointer_value() in check_stack_read(), move it up. Fix up the expected unprivileged error message for a BPF selftest that, until now, assumed that unprivileged users can use XADD on stack-spilled pointers. This also gives us a test for the behavior introduced in this patch for free. In theory, this could also be fixed by forbidding XADD on stack spills entirely, since XADD is a locked operation (for operations on memory with concurrency) and there can't be any concurrency on the BPF stack; but Alexei has said that he wants to keep XADD on stack slots working to avoid changes to the test suite [1]. The following BPF program demonstrates how to leak a BPF map pointer as an unprivileged user using this bug: // r7 = map_pointer BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_7, small_map), // r8 = launder(map_pointer) BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_7, -8), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), ((struct bpf_insn) { .code = BPF_STX | BPF_DW | BPF_XADD, .dst_reg = BPF_REG_FP, .src_reg = BPF_REG_1, .off = -8 }), BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_FP, -8), // store r8 into map BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG1, BPF_REG_7), BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -4), BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_ARG2, 0, 0), BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN() [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200416211116.qxqcza5vo2ddnkdq@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com/ Fixes: 17a5267067f3 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)") Signed-off-by: Jann Horn Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200417000007.10734-1-jannh@google.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

printk: queue wake_up_klogd irq_work only if per-CPU areas are ready

2020-05-02T06:48:42Z

commit ab6f762f0f53162d41497708b33c9a3236d3609e upstream. printk_deferred(), similarly to printk_safe/printk_nmi, does not immediately attempt to print a new message on the consoles, avoiding calls into non-reentrant kernel paths, e.g. scheduler or timekeeping, which potentially can deadlock the system. Those printk() flavors, instead, rely on per-CPU flush irq_work to print messages from safer contexts. For same reasons (recursive scheduler or timekeeping calls) printk() uses per-CPU irq_work in order to wake up user space syslog/kmsg readers. However, only printk_safe/printk_nmi do make sure that per-CPU areas have been initialised and that it's safe to modify per-CPU irq_work. This means that, for instance, should printk_deferred() be invoked "too early", that is before per-CPU areas are initialised, printk_deferred() will perform illegal per-CPU access. Lech Perczak [0] reports that after commit 1b710b1b10ef ("char/random: silence a lockdep splat with printk()") user-space syslog/kmsg readers are not able to read new kernel messages. The reason is printk_deferred() being called too early (as was pointed out by Petr and John). Fix printk_deferred() and do not queue per-CPU irq_work before per-CPU areas are initialized. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/aa0732c6-5c4e-8a8b-a1c1-75ebe3dca05b@camlintechnologies.com/ Reported-by: Lech Perczak Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky Tested-by: Jann Horn Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Theodore Ts'o Cc: John Ogness Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Cc: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

audit: check the length of userspace generated audit records

2020-04-29T14:33:18Z

commit 763dafc520add02a1f4639b500c509acc0ea8e5b upstream. Commit 756125289285 ("audit: always check the netlink payload length in audit_receive_msg()") fixed a number of missing message length checks, but forgot to check the length of userspace generated audit records. The good news is that you need CAP_AUDIT_WRITE to submit userspace audit records, which is generally only given to trusted processes, so the impact should be limited. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 756125289285 ("audit: always check the netlink payload length in audit_receive_msg()") Reported-by: syzbot+49e69b4d71a420ceda3e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

signal: Avoid corrupting si_pid and si_uid in do_notify_parent

2020-04-29T14:33:17Z

commit 61e713bdca3678e84815f2427f7a063fc353a1fc upstream. Christof Meerwald writes: > Hi, > > this is probably related to commit > 7a0cf094944e2540758b7f957eb6846d5126f535 (signal: Correct namespace > fixups of si_pid and si_uid). > > With a 5.6.5 kernel I am seeing SIGCHLD signals that don't include a > properly set si_pid field - this seems to happen for multi-threaded > child processes. > > A simple test program (based on the sample from the signalfd man page): > > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > > #define handle_error(msg) \ > do { perror(msg); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } while (0) > > int main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > sigset_t mask; > int sfd; > struct signalfd_siginfo fdsi; > ssize_t s; > > sigemptyset(&mask); > sigaddset(&mask, SIGCHLD); > > if (sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &mask, NULL) == -1) > handle_error("sigprocmask"); > > pid_t chldpid; > char *chldargv[] = { "./sfdclient", NULL }; > posix_spawn(&chldpid, "./sfdclient", NULL, NULL, chldargv, NULL); > > sfd = signalfd(-1, &mask, 0); > if (sfd == -1) > handle_error("signalfd"); > > for (;;) { > s = read(sfd, &fdsi, sizeof(struct signalfd_siginfo)); > if (s != sizeof(struct signalfd_siginfo)) > handle_error("read"); > > if (fdsi.ssi_signo == SIGCHLD) { > printf("Got SIGCHLD %d %d %d %d\n", > fdsi.ssi_status, fdsi.ssi_code, > fdsi.ssi_uid, fdsi.ssi_pid); > return 0; > } else { > printf("Read unexpected signal\n"); > } > } > } > > > and a multi-threaded client to test with: > > #include > #include > > void *f(void *arg) > { > sleep(100); > } > > int main() > { > pthread_t t[8]; > > for (int i = 0; i != 8; ++i) > { > pthread_create(&t[i], NULL, f, NULL); > } > } > > I tried to do a bit of debugging and what seems to be happening is > that > > /* From an ancestor pid namespace? */ > if (!task_pid_nr_ns(current, task_active_pid_ns(t))) { > > fails inside task_pid_nr_ns because the check for "pid_alive" fails. > > This code seems to be called from do_notify_parent and there we > actually have "tsk != current" (I am assuming both are threads of the > current process?) I instrumented the code with a warning and received the following backtrace: > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 777 at kernel/pid.c:501 __task_pid_nr_ns.cold.6+0xc/0x15 > Modules linked in: > CPU: 0 PID: 777 Comm: sfdclient Not tainted 5.7.0-rc1userns+ #2924 > Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 > RIP: 0010:__task_pid_nr_ns.cold.6+0xc/0x15 > Code: ff 66 90 48 83 ec 08 89 7c 24 04 48 8d 7e 08 48 8d 74 24 04 e8 9a b6 44 00 48 83 c4 08 c3 48 c7 c7 59 9f ac 82 e8 c2 c4 04 00 <0f> 0b e9 3fd > RSP: 0018:ffffc9000042fbf8 EFLAGS: 00010046 > RAX: 000000000000000c RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffc9000042faf4 > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffff81193d29 > RBP: ffffc9000042fc18 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001 > R10: 000000100f938416 R11: 0000000000000309 R12: ffff8880b941c140 > R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff8880b941c140 > FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880bca00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > CR2: 00007f2e8c0a32e0 CR3: 0000000002e10000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 > Call Trace: > send_signal+0x1c8/0x310 > do_notify_parent+0x50f/0x550 > release_task.part.21+0x4fd/0x620 > do_exit+0x6f6/0xaf0 > do_group_exit+0x42/0xb0 > get_signal+0x13b/0xbb0 > do_signal+0x2b/0x670 > ? __audit_syscall_exit+0x24d/0x2b0 > ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x4d/0x60 > ? kfree+0x24c/0x2b0 > do_syscall_64+0x176/0x640 > ? trace_hardirqs_off_thunk+0x1a/0x1c > entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 The immediate problem is as Christof noticed that "pid_alive(current) == false". This happens because do_notify_parent is called from the last thread to exit in a process after that thread has been reaped. The bigger issue is that do_notify_parent can be called from any process that manages to wait on a thread of a multi-threaded process from wait_task_zombie. So any logic based upon current for do_notify_parent is just nonsense, as current can be pretty much anything. So change do_notify_parent to call __send_signal directly. Inspecting the code it appears this problem has existed since the pid namespace support started handling this case in 2.6.30. This fix only backports to 7a0cf094944e ("signal: Correct namespace fixups of si_pid and si_uid") where the problem logic was moved out of __send_signal and into send_signal. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 6588c1e3ff01 ("signals: SI_USER: Masquerade si_pid when crossing pid ns boundary") Ref: 921cf9f63089 ("signals: protect cinit from unblocked SIG_DFL signals") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200419201336.GI22017@edge.cmeerw.net/ Reported-by: Christof Meerwald Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

perf/core: Disable page faults when getting phys address

2020-04-29T14:33:02Z

[ Upstream commit d3296fb372bf7497b0e5d0478c4e7a677ec6f6e9 ] We hit following warning when running tests on kernel compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y: WARNING: CPU: 19 PID: 4472 at mm/gup.c:2381 __get_user_pages_fast+0x1a4/0x200 CPU: 19 PID: 4472 Comm: dummy Not tainted 5.6.0-rc6+ #3 RIP: 0010:__get_user_pages_fast+0x1a4/0x200 ... Call Trace: perf_prepare_sample+0xff1/0x1d90 perf_event_output_forward+0xe8/0x210 __perf_event_overflow+0x11a/0x310 __intel_pmu_pebs_event+0x657/0x850 intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm+0x7de/0x11d0 handle_pmi_common+0x1b2/0x650 intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x17b/0x370 perf_event_nmi_handler+0x40/0x60 nmi_handle+0x192/0x590 default_do_nmi+0x6d/0x150 do_nmi+0x2f9/0x3c0 nmi+0x8e/0xd7 While __get_user_pages_fast() is IRQ-safe, it calls access_ok(), which warns on: WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task() && !pagefault_disabled()) Peter suggested disabling page faults around __get_user_pages_fast(), which gets rid of the warning in access_ok() call. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200407141427.3184722-1-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kernel/gcov/fs.c: gcov_seq_next() should increase position index

2020-04-29T14:33:00Z

[ Upstream commit f4d74ef6220c1eda0875da30457bef5c7111ab06 ] If seq_file .next function does not change position index, read after some lseek can generate unexpected output. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Acked-by: Peter Oberparleiter Cc: Al Viro Cc: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Manfred Spraul Cc: NeilBrown Cc: Steven Rostedt Cc: Waiman Long Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f65c6ee7-bd00-f910-2f8a-37cc67e4ff88@virtuozzo.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin