user/sven/linux.git/lib, branch v3.10.68

decompress_bunzip2: off by one in get_next_block()

2015-01-27T15:52:33Z

commit b5c8afe5be51078a979d86ae5ae78c4ac948063d upstream. "origPtr" is used as an offset into the bd->dbuf[] array. That array is allocated in start_bunzip() and has "bd->dbufSize" number of elements so the test here should be >= instead of >. Later we check "origPtr" again before using it as an offset so I don't know if this bug can be triggered in real life. Fixes: bc22c17e12c1 ('bzip2/lzma: library support for gzip, bzip2 and lzma decompression') Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter Cc: Alain Knaff Cc: Yinghai Lu Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

lib/bitmap.c: fix undefined shift in __bitmap_shift_{left|right}()

2014-11-14T16:47:59Z

commit ea5d05b34aca25c066e0699512d0ffbd8ee6ac3e upstream. If __bitmap_shift_left() or __bitmap_shift_right() are asked to shift by a multiple of BITS_PER_LONG, they will try to shift a long value by BITS_PER_LONG bits which is undefined. Change the functions to avoid the undefined shift. Coverity id: 1192175 Coverity id: 1192174 Signed-off-by: Jan Kara Cc: Rasmus Villemoes Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

random: add and use memzero_explicit() for clearing data

2014-11-14T16:47:55Z

commit d4c5efdb97773f59a2b711754ca0953f24516739 upstream. zatimend has reported that in his environment (3.16/gcc4.8.3/corei7) memset() calls which clear out sensitive data in extract_{buf,entropy, entropy_user}() in random driver are being optimized away by gcc. Add a helper memzero_explicit() (similarly as explicit_bzero() variants) that can be used in such cases where a variable with sensitive data is being cleared out in the end. Other use cases might also be in crypto code. [ I have put this into lib/string.c though, as it's always built-in and doesn't need any dependencies then. ] Fixes kernel bugzilla: 82041 Reported-by: zatimend@hotmail.co.uk Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa Cc: Alexey Dobriyan Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

lzo: check for length overrun in variable length encoding.

2014-10-30T16:35:11Z

commit 72cf90124e87d975d0b2114d930808c58b4c05e4 upstream. This fix ensures that we never meet an integer overflow while adding 255 while parsing a variable length encoding. It works differently from commit 206a81c ("lzo: properly check for overruns") because instead of ensuring that we don't overrun the input, which is tricky to guarantee due to many assumptions in the code, it simply checks that the cumulated number of 255 read cannot overflow by bounding this number. The MAX_255_COUNT is the maximum number of times we can add 255 to a base count without overflowing an integer. The multiply will overflow when multiplying 255 by more than MAXINT/255. The sum will overflow earlier depending on the base count. Since the base count is taken from a u8 and a few bits, it is safe to assume that it will always be lower than or equal to 2*255, thus we can always prevent any overflow by accepting two less 255 steps. This patch also reduces the CPU overhead and actually increases performance by 1.1% compared to the initial code, while the previous fix costs 3.1% (measured on x86_64). The fix needs to be backported to all currently supported stable kernels. Reported-by: Willem Pinckaers Cc: "Don A. Bailey" Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "lzo: properly check for overruns"

2014-10-30T16:35:11Z

commit af958a38a60c7ca3d8a39c918c1baa2ff7b6b233 upstream. This reverts commit 206a81c ("lzo: properly check for overruns"). As analysed by Willem Pinckaers, this fix is still incomplete on certain rare corner cases, and it is easier to restart from the original code. Reported-by: Willem Pinckaers Cc: "Don A. Bailey" Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

lib/btree.c: fix leak of whole btree nodes

2014-08-07T21:30:27Z

commit c75b53af2f0043aff500af0a6f878497bef41bca upstream. I use btree from 3.14-rc2 in my own module. When the btree module is removed, a warning arises: kmem_cache_destroy btree_node: Slab cache still has objects CPU: 13 PID: 9150 Comm: rmmod Tainted: GF O 3.14.0-rc2 #1 Hardware name: Inspur NF5270M3/NF5270M3, BIOS CHEETAH_2.1.3 09/10/2013 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x49/0x5d kmem_cache_destroy+0xcf/0xe0 btree_module_exit+0x10/0x12 [btree] SyS_delete_module+0x198/0x1f0 system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b The cause is that it doesn't release the last btree node, when height = 1 and fill = 1. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unneeded test of NULL] Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang Cc: Joern Engel Cc: Johannes Berg Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

idr: fix overflow bug during maximum ID calculation at maximum height

2014-07-01T03:09:42Z

commit 3afb69cb5572b3c8c898c00880803cf1a49852c4 upstream. idr_replace() open-codes the logic to calculate the maximum valid ID given the height of the idr tree; unfortunately, the open-coded logic doesn't account for the fact that the top layer may have unused slots and over-shifts the limit to zero when the tree is at its maximum height. The following test code shows it fails to replace the value for id=((1<<27)+42): static void test5(void) { int id; DEFINE_IDR(test_idr); #define TEST5_START ((1<<27)+42) /* use the highest layer */ printk(KERN_INFO "Start test5\n"); id = idr_alloc(&test_idr, (void *)1, TEST5_START, 0, GFP_KERNEL); BUG_ON(id != TEST5_START); TEST_BUG_ON(idr_replace(&test_idr, (void *)2, TEST5_START) != (void *)1); idr_destroy(&test_idr); printk(KERN_INFO "End of test5\n"); } Fix the bug by using idr_max() which correctly takes into account the maximum allowed shift. sub_alloc() shares the same problem and may incorrectly fail with -EAGAIN; however, this bug doesn't affect correct operation because idr_get_empty_slot(), which already uses idr_max(), retries with the increased @id in such cases. [tj@kernel.org: Updated patch description.] Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan Acked-by: Tejun Heo Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

lzo: properly check for overruns

2014-06-26T19:12:41Z

commit 206a81c18401c0cde6e579164f752c4b147324ce upstream. The lzo decompressor can, if given some really crazy data, possibly overrun some variable types. Modify the checking logic to properly detect overruns before they happen. Reported-by: "Don A. Bailey" Tested-by: "Don A. Bailey" Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netlink: rate-limit leftover bytes warning and print process name

2014-06-26T19:12:37Z

[ Upstream commit bfc5184b69cf9eeb286137640351c650c27f118a ] Any process is able to send netlink messages with leftover bytes. Make the warning rate-limited to prevent too much log spam. The warning is supposed to help find userspace bugs, so print the triggering command name to implicate the buggy program. [v2: Use pr_warn_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimited.] Signed-off-by: Michal Schmidt Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

netlink: don't compare the nul-termination in nla_strcmp

2014-04-14T13:42:18Z

[ Upstream commit 8b7b932434f5eee495b91a2804f5b64ebb2bc835 ] nla_strcmp compares the string length plus one, so it's implicitly including the nul-termination in the comparison. int nla_strcmp(const struct nlattr *nla, const char *str) { int len = strlen(str) + 1; ... d = memcmp(nla_data(nla), str, len); However, if NLA_STRING is used, userspace can send us a string without the nul-termination. This is a problem since the string comparison will not match as the last byte may be not the nul-termination. Fix this by skipping the comparison of the nul-termination if the attribute data is nul-terminated. Suggested by Thomas Graf. Cc: Florian Westphal Cc: Thomas Graf Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman