user/sven/linux.git/lib, branch v6.6.6

parisc: Drop the HP-UX ENOSYM and EREMOTERELEASE error codes

2023-12-08T07:52:20Z

commit e5f3e299a2b1e9c3ece24a38adfc089aef307e8a upstream. Those return codes are only defined for the parisc architecture and are leftovers from when we wanted to be HP-UX compatible. They are not returned by any Linux kernel syscall but do trigger problems with the glibc strerrorname_np() and strerror() functions as reported in glibc issue #31080. There is no need to keep them, so simply remove them. Signed-off-by: Helge Deller Reported-by: Bruno Haible Closes: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31080 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

lib/generic-radix-tree.c: Don't overflow in peek()

2023-11-28T17:19:35Z

[ Upstream commit 9492261ff2460252cf2d8de89cdf854c7e2b28a0 ] When we started spreading new inode numbers throughout most of the 64 bit inode space, that triggered some corner case bugs, in particular some integer overflows related to the radix tree code. Oops. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kunit: test: Fix the possible memory leak in executor_test

2023-11-20T10:59:15Z

[ Upstream commit 8040345fdae4cb256c5d981f91ae0f22bea8adcc ] When CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y, making CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK=y and CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_AUTO_SCAN=y, the below memory leak is detected. If kunit_filter_suites() succeeds, not only copy but also filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases should be freed. So as Rae suggested, to avoid the suite set never be freed when KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ() fails and exits after kunit_filter_suites() succeeds, update kfree_at_end() func to free_suite_set_at_end() to use kunit_free_suite_set() to free them as kunit_module_exit() and kunit_run_all_tests() do it. As the second arg got of free_suite_set_at_end() is a local variable, copy it for free to avoid wild-memory-access. After applying this patch, the following memory leak is never detected. unreferenced object 0xffff8881001de400 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1396, jiffies 4294720452 (age 932.801s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x44d/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test+0x12f/0x360 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cd388 (size 192): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1396, jiffies 4294720452 (age 932.801s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff 80 cd 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x481/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test+0x12f/0x360 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888100da8400 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1398, jiffies 4294720454 (age 781.945s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 32 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite2.......... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x44d/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x12f/0x560 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888105117878 (size 96): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1398, jiffies 4294720454 (age 781.945s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff a0 ac 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x481/0xcc0 [] filter_suites_test_glob_test+0x12f/0x560 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888102c31c00 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1404, jiffies 4294720460 (age 781.948s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 6e 6f 72 6d 61 6c 5f 73 75 69 74 65 00 00 00 00 normal_suite.... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0xf7/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_test+0x195/0x5f0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cd250 (size 192): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1404, jiffies 4294720460 (age 781.948s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff 00 a9 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0x1a1/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_test+0x195/0x5f0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff888104f4e400 (size 1024): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1408, jiffies 4294720464 (age 781.944s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 73 75 69 74 65 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 suite........... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc_node_track_caller+0x53/0x150 [] kmemdup+0x22/0x50 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0xf7/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_skip_test+0x133/0x6e0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 unreferenced object 0xffff8881052cc620 (size 192): comm "kunit_try_catch", pid 1408, jiffies 4294720464 (age 781.944s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): a0 85 9e 82 ff ff ff ff c0 a8 7c 84 ff ff ff ff ..........|..... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x52/0x150 [] kunit_filter_attr_tests+0x1a1/0x860 [] kunit_filter_suites+0x82f/0xcc0 [] filter_attr_skip_test+0x133/0x6e0 [] kunit_generic_run_threadfn_adapter+0x4a/0x90 [] kthread+0x2b6/0x380 [] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 [] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Fixes: e5857d396f35 ("kunit: flatten kunit_suite*** to kunit_suite** in .kunit_test_suites") Fixes: 76066f93f1df ("kunit: add tests for filtering attributes") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Suggested-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: David Gow Suggested-by: David Gow Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309142251.uJ8saAZv-lkp@intel.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309270433.wGmFRGjd-lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kunit: Fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()

2023-11-20T10:59:15Z

[ Upstream commit 24de14c98b37ea40a7e493dfd0d93b400b6efbca ] If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not in the first iteration, the filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases allocated in the last kunit_filter_attr_tests() in last inner for loop is leaked. So add a new free_filtered_suite err label and free the filtered_suite and filtered_suite->test_cases so far. And change kmalloc_array of copy to kcalloc to Clear the copy to make the kfree safe. Fixes: 529534e8cba3 ("kunit: Add ability to filter attributes") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kunit: Fix the wrong kfree of copy for kunit_filter_suites()

2023-11-20T10:59:15Z

[ Upstream commit e44679515a7b803cf0143dc9de3d2ecbe907f939 ] If the outer layer for loop is iterated more than once and it fails not in the first iteration, the copy pointer has been moved. So it should free the original copy's backup copy_start. Fixes: abbf73816b6f ("kunit: fix possible memory leak in kunit_filter_suites()") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kunit: Fix missed memory release in kunit_free_suite_set()

2023-11-20T10:59:15Z

[ Upstream commit a6074cf0126b0bee51ab77a15930dc24a4d5db90 ] modprobe cpumask_kunit and rmmod cpumask_kunit, kmemleak detect a suspected memory leak as below. If kunit_filter_suites() in kunit_module_init() succeeds, the suite_set.start will not be NULL and the kunit_free_suite_set() in kunit_module_exit() should free all the memory which has not been freed. However the test_cases in suites is left out. unreferenced object 0xffff54ac47e83200 (size 512): comm "modprobe", pid 592, jiffies 4294913238 (age 1367.612s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 84 13 1a f0 d3 b6 ff ff 30 68 1a f0 d3 b6 ff ff ........0h...... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<000000008dec63a2>] slab_post_alloc_hook+0xb8/0x368 [<00000000ec280d8e>] __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x174/0x290 [<00000000896c7740>] __kmalloc+0x60/0x2c0 [<000000007a50fa06>] kunit_filter_suites+0x254/0x5b8 [<0000000078cc98e2>] kunit_module_notify+0xf4/0x240 [<0000000033cea952>] notifier_call_chain+0x98/0x17c [<00000000973d05cc>] notifier_call_chain_robust+0x4c/0xa4 [<000000005f95895f>] blocking_notifier_call_chain_robust+0x4c/0x74 [<0000000048e36fa7>] load_module+0x1a2c/0x1c40 [<0000000004eb8a91>] init_module_from_file+0x94/0xcc [<0000000037dbba28>] idempotent_init_module+0x184/0x278 [<00000000161b75cb>] __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x68/0xa8 [<000000006dc1669b>] invoke_syscall+0x44/0x100 [<00000000fa87e304>] el0_svc_common.constprop.1+0x68/0xe0 [<000000009d8ad866>] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [<000000005b83c607>] el0_svc+0x3c/0xc4 Fixes: a127b154a8f2 ("kunit: tool: allow filtering test cases via glob") Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan Reviewed-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

maple_tree: add GFP_KERNEL to allocations in mas_expected_entries()

2023-10-18T19:12:41Z

Users complained about OOM errors during fork without triggering compaction. This can be fixed by modifying the flags used in mas_expected_entries() so that the compaction will be triggered in low memory situations. Since mas_expected_entries() is only used during fork, the extra argument does not need to be passed through. Additionally, the two test_maple_tree test cases and one benchmark test were altered to use the correct locking type so that allocations would not trigger sleeping and thus fail. Testing was completed with lockdep atomic sleep detection. The additional locking change requires rwsem support additions to the tools/ directory through the use of pthreads pthread_rwlock_t. With this change test_maple_tree works in userspace, as a module, and in-kernel. Users may notice that the system gave up early on attempting to start new processes instead of attempting to reclaim memory. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230915093243epcms1p46fa00bbac1ab7b7dca94acb66c44c456@epcms1p4 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231012155233.2272446-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com Fixes: 54a611b60590 ("Maple Tree: add new data structure") Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett Reviewed-by: Peng Zhang Cc: Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

maple_tree: add MAS_UNDERFLOW and MAS_OVERFLOW states

2023-09-30T00:20:46Z

When updating the maple tree iterator to avoid rewalks, an issue was introduced when shifting beyond the limits. This can be seen by trying to go to the previous address of 0, which would set the maple node to MAS_NONE and keep the range as the last entry. Subsequent calls to mas_find() would then search upwards from mas->last and skip the value at mas->index/mas->last. This showed up as a bug in mprotect which skips the actual VMA at the current range after attempting to go to the previous VMA from 0. Since MAS_NONE may already be set when searching for a value that isn't contained within a node, changing the handling of MAS_NONE in mas_find() would make the code more complicated and error prone. Furthermore, there was no way to tell which limit was hit, and thus which action to take (next or the entry at the current range). This solution is to add two states to track what happened with the previous iterator action. This allows for the expected behaviour of the next command to return the correct item (either the item at the range requested, or the next/previous). Tests are also added and updated accordingly. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230921181236.509072-3-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com Link: https://gist.github.com/heatd/85d2971fae1501b55b6ea401fbbe485b Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230921181236.509072-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com/ Fixes: 39193685d585 ("maple_tree: try harder to keep active node with mas_prev()") Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett Reported-by: Pedro Falcato Closes: https://gist.github.com/heatd/85d2971fae1501b55b6ea401fbbe485b Closes: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/79656 Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

argv_split: fix kernel-doc warnings

2023-09-19T20:21:33Z

Use proper kernel-doc notation to prevent build warnings: lib/argv_split.c:36: warning: Function parameter or member 'argv' not described in 'argv_free' lib/argv_split.c:61: warning: No description found for return value of 'argv_split' Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230912060838.3794-1-rdunlap@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton

scatterlist: add missing function params to kernel-doc

2023-09-19T20:21:33Z

Describe missing function parameters to prevent kernel-doc warnings: lib/scatterlist.c:288: warning: Function parameter or member 'first_chunk' not described in '__sg_alloc_table' lib/scatterlist.c:800: warning: Function parameter or member 'flags' not described in 'sg_miter_start' Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230912060848.4673-1-rdunlap@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton