user/sven/linux.git/mm, branch v6.13.4

mm/compaction: fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning

2025-02-17T10:36:50Z

commit d1366e74342e75555af2648a2964deb2d5c92200 upstream. syzkaller reported a UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning of (1UL << order) in isolate_freepages_block(). The bogus compound_order can be any value because it is union with flags. Add back the MAX_PAGE_ORDER check to fix the warning. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250123021029.2826736-1-liushixin2@huawei.com Fixes: 3da0272a4c7d ("mm/compaction: correctly return failure with bogus compound_order in strict mode") Signed-off-by: Liu Shixin Reviewed-by: Kemeng Shi Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Cc: Baolin Wang Cc: David Hildenbrand Cc: Kemeng Shi Cc: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Nanyong Sun Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/hugetlb: fix hugepage allocation for interleaved memory nodes

2025-02-17T10:36:50Z

commit 76e961157e078bc5d3cd2df08317e00b00a829eb upstream. gather_bootmem_prealloc() assumes the start nid as 0 and size as num_node_state(N_MEMORY). That means in case if memory attached numa nodes are interleaved, then gather_bootmem_prealloc_parallel() will fail to scan few of these nodes. Since memory attached numa nodes can be interleaved in any fashion, hence ensure that the current code checks for all numa node ids (.size = nr_node_ids). Let's still keep max_threads as N_MEMORY, so that it can distributes all nr_node_ids among the these many no. threads. e.g. qemu cmdline ======================== numa_cmd="-numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=mem1,cpus=2-3 -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-1 -numa dist,src=0,dst=1,val=20" mem_cmd="-object memory-backend-ram,id=mem1,size=16G" w/o this patch for cmdline (default_hugepagesz=1GB hugepagesz=1GB hugepages=2): ========================== ~ # cat /proc/meminfo |grep -i huge AnonHugePages: 0 kB ShmemHugePages: 0 kB FileHugePages: 0 kB HugePages_Total: 0 HugePages_Free: 0 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 1048576 kB Hugetlb: 0 kB with this patch for cmdline (default_hugepagesz=1GB hugepagesz=1GB hugepages=2): =========================== ~ # cat /proc/meminfo |grep -i huge AnonHugePages: 0 kB ShmemHugePages: 0 kB FileHugePages: 0 kB HugePages_Total: 2 HugePages_Free: 2 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 1048576 kB Hugetlb: 2097152 kB Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f8d8dad3a5471d284f54185f65d575a6aaab692b.1736592534.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com Fixes: b78b27d02930 ("hugetlb: parallelize 1G hugetlb initialization") Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) Reported-by: Pavithra Prakash Suggested-by: Muchun Song Tested-by: Sourabh Jain Reviewed-by: Luiz Capitulino Acked-by: David Rientjes Cc: Donet Tom Cc: Gang Li Cc: Daniel Jordan Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/vmscan: accumulate nr_demoted for accurate demotion statistics

2025-02-17T10:36:50Z

commit a479b078fddb0ad7f9e3c6da22d9cf8f2b5c7799 upstream. In shrink_folio_list(), demote_folio_list() can be called 2 times. Currently stat->nr_demoted will only store the last nr_demoted( the later nr_demoted is always zero, the former nr_demoted will get lost), as a result number of demoted pages is not accurate. Accumulate the nr_demoted count across multiple calls to demote_folio_list(), ensuring accurate reporting of demotion statistics. [lizhijian@fujitsu.com: introduce local nr_demoted to fix nr_reclaimed double counting] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250111015253.425693-1-lizhijian@fujitsu.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250110122133.423481-1-lizhijian@fujitsu.com Fixes: f77f0c751478 ("mm,memcg: provide per-cgroup counters for NUMA balancing operations") Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian Acked-by: Kaiyang Zhao Tested-by: Donet Tom Reviewed-by: Donet Tom Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: gup: fix infinite loop within __get_longterm_locked

2025-02-17T10:36:49Z

commit 1aaf8c122918aa8897605a9aa1e8ed6600d6f930 upstream. We can run into an infinite loop in __get_longterm_locked() when collect_longterm_unpinnable_folios() finds only folios that are isolated from the LRU or were never added to the LRU. This can happen when all folios to be pinned are never added to the LRU, for example when vm_ops->fault allocated pages using cma_alloc() and never added them to the LRU. Fix it by simply taking a look at the list in the single caller, to see if anything was added. [zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com: move definition of local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250122012604.3654667-1-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250121020159.3636477-1-zhaoyang.huang@unisoc.com Fixes: 67e139b02d99 ("mm/gup.c: refactor check_and_migrate_movable_pages()") Signed-off-by: Zhaoyang Huang Reviewed-by: John Hubbard Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand Acked-by: David Hildenbrand Cc: Aijun Sun Cc: Alistair Popple Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm: kmemleak: fix upper boundary check for physical address objects

2025-02-17T10:36:49Z

commit 488b5b9eca68497b533ced059be5eff19578bbca upstream. Memblock allocations are registered by kmemleak separately, based on their physical address. During the scanning stage, it checks whether an object is within the min_low_pfn and max_low_pfn boundaries and ignores it otherwise. With the recent addition of __percpu pointer leak detection (commit 6c99d4eb7c5e ("kmemleak: enable tracking for percpu pointers")), kmemleak started reporting leaks in setup_zone_pageset() and setup_per_cpu_pageset(). These were caused by the node_data[0] object (initialised in alloc_node_data()) ending on the PFN_PHYS(max_low_pfn) boundary. The non-strict upper boundary check introduced by commit 84c326299191 ("mm: kmemleak: check physical address when scan") causes the pg_data_t object to be ignored (not scanned) and the __percpu pointers it contains to be reported as leaks. Make the max_low_pfn upper boundary check strict when deciding whether to ignore a physical address object and not scan it. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250127184233.2974311-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com Fixes: 84c326299191 ("mm: kmemleak: check physical address when scan") Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Reported-by: Jakub Kicinski Tested-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) Cc: Patrick Wang Cc: [6.0.x] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

mm/hugetlb: fix avoid_reserve to allow taking folio from subpool

2025-02-17T10:36:44Z

commit 58db7c5fbe7daa42098d4965133a864f98ba90ba upstream. Patch series "mm/hugetlb: Refactor hugetlb allocation resv accounting", v2. This is a follow up on Ackerley's series here as replacement: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cover.1728684491.git.ackerleytng@google.com The goal of this series is to cleanup hugetlb resv accounting, especially during folio allocation, to decouple a few things: - Hugetlb folios v.s. Hugetlbfs: IOW, the hope is in the future hugetlb folios can be allocated completely without hugetlbfs. - Decouple VMA v.s. hugetlb folio allocations: allocating a hugetlb folio should not always require a hugetlbfs VMA. For example, either it got allocated from the inode level (see hugetlbfs_fallocate() where it used a pesudo VMA for allocation), or it can be allocated by other kernel subsystems. It paves way for other users to allocate hugetlb folios out of either system reservations, or subpools (instead of hugetlbfs, as a file system). For longer term, this prepares hugetlb as a separate concept versus hugetlbfs, so that hugetlb folios can be allocated by not only hugetlbfs and other things. Tests I've done: - I had a reproducer in patch 1 for the bug I found, this will start to work after patch 1 or the whole set applied. - Hugetlb regression tests (on x86_64 2MBs), includes: - All vmtests on hugetlbfs - libhugetlbfs test suite (which may fail some tests, but no new failures will be introduced by this series, so all such failures happen before this series so shouldn't be relevant). This patch (of 7): Since commit 04f2cbe35699 ("hugetlb: guarantee that COW faults for a process that called mmap(MAP_PRIVATE) on hugetlbfs will succeed"), avoid_reserve was introduced for a special case of CoW on hugetlb private mappings, and only if the owner VMA is trying to allocate yet another hugetlb folio that is not reserved within the private vma reserved map. Later on, in commit d85f69b0b533 ("mm/hugetlb: alloc_huge_page handle areas hole punched by fallocate"), alloc_huge_page() enforced to not consume any global reservation as long as avoid_reserve=true. This operation doesn't look correct, because even if it will enforce the allocation to not use global reservation at all, it will still try to take one reservation from the spool (if the subpool existed). Then since the spool reserved pages take from global reservation, it'll also take one reservation globally. Logically it can cause global reservation to go wrong. I wrote a reproducer below, trigger this special path, and every run of such program will cause global reservation count to increment by one, until it hits the number of free pages: #define _GNU_SOURCE /* See feature_test_macros(7) */ #include #include #include #include #include #include #define MSIZE (2UL << 20) int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { const char *path; int *buf; int fd, ret; pid_t child; if (argc < 2) { printf("usage: %s \n", argv[0]); return -1; } path = argv[1]; fd = open(path, O_RDWR | O_CREAT, 0666); if (fd < 0) { perror("open failed"); return -1; } ret = fallocate(fd, 0, 0, MSIZE); if (ret != 0) { perror("fallocate"); return -1; } buf = mmap(NULL, MSIZE, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0); if (buf == MAP_FAILED) { perror("mmap() failed"); return -1; } /* Allocate a page */ *buf = 1; child = fork(); if (child == 0) { /* child doesn't need to do anything */ exit(0); } /* Trigger CoW from owner */ *buf = 2; munmap(buf, MSIZE); close(fd); unlink(path); return 0; } It can only reproduce with a sub-mount when there're reserved pages on the spool, like: # sysctl vm.nr_hugepages=128 # mkdir ./hugetlb-pool # mount -t hugetlbfs -o min_size=8M,pagesize=2M none ./hugetlb-pool Then run the reproducer on the mountpoint: # ./reproducer ./hugetlb-pool/test Fix it by taking the reservation from spool if available. In general, avoid_reserve is IMHO more about "avoid vma resv map", not spool's. I copied stable, however I have no intention for backporting if it's not a clean cherry-pick, because private hugetlb mapping, and then fork() on top is too rare to hit. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250107204002.2683356-1-peterx@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250107204002.2683356-2-peterx@redhat.com Fixes: d85f69b0b533 ("mm/hugetlb: alloc_huge_page handle areas hole punched by fallocate") Signed-off-by: Peter Xu Reviewed-by: Ackerley Tng Tested-by: Ackerley Tng Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador Cc: Breno Leitao Cc: Muchun Song Cc: Naoya Horiguchi Cc: Rik van Riel Cc: Roman Gushchin Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

kfence: skip __GFP_THISNODE allocations on NUMA systems

2025-02-17T10:36:44Z

commit e64f81946adf68cd75e2207dd9a51668348a4af8 upstream. On NUMA systems, __GFP_THISNODE indicates that an allocation _must_ be on a particular node, and failure to allocate on the desired node will result in a failed allocation. Skip __GFP_THISNODE allocations if we are running on a NUMA system, since KFENCE can't guarantee which node its pool pages are allocated on. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250124120145.410066-1-elver@google.com Fixes: 236e9f153852 ("kfence: skip all GFP_ZONEMASK allocations") Signed-off-by: Marco Elver Reported-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: Alexander Potapenko Cc: Chistoph Lameter Cc: Dmitriy Vyukov Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

memcg: fix soft lockup in the OOM process

2025-02-08T09:02:26Z

commit ade81479c7dda1ce3eedb215c78bc615bbd04f06 upstream. A soft lockup issue was found in the product with about 56,000 tasks were in the OOM cgroup, it was traversing them when the soft lockup was triggered. watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#2 stuck for 23s! [VM Thread:1503066] CPU: 2 PID: 1503066 Comm: VM Thread Kdump: loaded Tainted: G Hardware name: Huawei Cloud OpenStack Nova, BIOS RIP: 0010:console_unlock+0x343/0x540 RSP: 0000:ffffb751447db9a0 EFLAGS: 00000247 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13 RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000ffffffff RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000247 RBP: ffffffffafc71f90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000040 R10: 0000000000000080 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffafc74bd0 R13: ffffffffaf60a220 R14: 0000000000000247 R15: 0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007f2fe6ad91f0 CR3: 00000004b2076003 CR4: 0000000000360ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: vprintk_emit+0x193/0x280 printk+0x52/0x6e dump_task+0x114/0x130 mem_cgroup_scan_tasks+0x76/0x100 dump_header+0x1fe/0x210 oom_kill_process+0xd1/0x100 out_of_memory+0x125/0x570 mem_cgroup_out_of_memory+0xb5/0xd0 try_charge+0x720/0x770 mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x86/0x180 mem_cgroup_try_charge_delay+0x1c/0x40 do_anonymous_page+0xb5/0x390 handle_mm_fault+0xc4/0x1f0 This is because thousands of processes are in the OOM cgroup, it takes a long time to traverse all of them. As a result, this lead to soft lockup in the OOM process. To fix this issue, call 'cond_resched' in the 'mem_cgroup_scan_tasks' function per 1000 iterations. For global OOM, call 'touch_softlockup_watchdog' per 1000 iterations to avoid this issue. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241224025238.3768787-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com Fixes: 9cbb78bb3143 ("mm, memcg: introduce own oom handler to iterate only over its own threads") Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong Acked-by: Michal Hocko Cc: Roman Gushchin Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Shakeel Butt Cc: Muchun Song Cc: Michal Koutný Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

cachestat: fix page cache statistics permission checking

2025-02-01T16:21:23Z

commit 5f537664e705b0bf8b7e329861f20128534f6a83 upstream. When the 'cachestat()' system call was added in commit cf264e1329fb ("cachestat: implement cachestat syscall"), it was meant to be a much more convenient (and performant) version of mincore() that didn't need mapping things into the user virtual address space in order to work. But it ended up missing the "check for writability or ownership" fix for mincore(), done in commit 134fca9063ad ("mm/mincore.c: make mincore() more conservative"). This just adds equivalent logic to 'cachestat()', modified for the file context (rather than vma). Reported-by: Sudheendra Raghav Neela Fixes: cf264e1329fb ("cachestat: implement cachestat syscall") Tested-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Johannes Weiner Acked-by: Nhat Pham Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Revert "libfs: Add simple_offset_empty()"

2025-02-01T16:21:22Z

commit d7bde4f27ceef3dc6d72010a20d4da23db835a32 upstream. simple_empty() and simple_offset_empty() perform the same task. The latter's use as a canary to find bugs has not found any new issues. A subsequent patch will remove the use of the mtree for iterating directory contents, so revert back to using a similar mechanism for determining whether a directory is indeed empty. Only one such mechanism is ever needed. Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241228175522.1854234-3-cel@kernel.org Reviewed-by: Yang Erkun Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman