user/sven/linux.git/rust, branch v6.12.53

rust: block: fix `srctree/` links

2025-10-12T10:57:16Z

commit 208d7f788e84e80992d7b1c82ff17b620eb1371e upstream. This `srctree/` link pointed to a file with an underscore, but the header used a dash instead. Thus fix it. This cleans a future warning that will check our `srctree/` links. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 3253aba3408a ("rust: block: introduce `kernel::block::mq` module") Reviewed-by: Daniel Almeida Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rust: alloc: fix `rusttest` by providing `Cmalloc::aligned_layout` too

2025-08-28T14:31:13Z

[ Upstream commit 0f580d5d3d9d9cd0953695cd32e43aac3a946338 ] Commit fde578c86281 ("rust: alloc: replace aligned_size() with Kmalloc::aligned_layout()") provides a public `aligned_layout` function in `Kamlloc`, but not in `Cmalloc`, and thus uses of it will trigger an error in `rusttest`. Such a user appeared in the following commit 22ab0641b939 ("rust: drm: ensure kmalloc() compatible Layout"): error[E0599]: no function or associated item named `aligned_layout` found for struct `alloc::allocator_test::Cmalloc` in the current scope --> rust/kernel/drm/device.rs:100:31 | 100 | let layout = Kmalloc::aligned_layout(Layout::new::()); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ function or associated item not found in `Cmalloc` | ::: rust/kernel/alloc/allocator_test.rs:19:1 | 19 | pub struct Cmalloc; | ------------------ function or associated item `aligned_layout` not found for this struct Thus add an equivalent one for `Cmalloc`. Fixes: fde578c86281 ("rust: alloc: replace aligned_size() with Kmalloc::aligned_layout()") Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250816204215.2719559-1-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rust: alloc: replace aligned_size() with Kmalloc::aligned_layout()

2025-08-28T14:31:12Z

[ Upstream commit fde578c86281f27b182680c7642836a0dbbd0be7 ] aligned_size() dates back to when Rust did support kmalloc() only, but is now used in ReallocFunc::call() and hence for all allocators. However, the additional padding applied by aligned_size() is only required by the kmalloc() allocator backend. Hence, replace aligned_size() with Kmalloc::aligned_layout() and use it for the affected allocators, i.e. kmalloc() and kvmalloc(), only. While at it, make Kmalloc::aligned_layout() public, such that Rust abstractions, which have to call subsystem specific kmalloc() based allocation primitives directly, can make use of it. Fixes: 8a799831fc63 ("rust: alloc: implement `ReallocFunc`") Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250731154919.4132-2-dakr@kernel.org [ Remove `const` from Kmalloc::aligned_layout(). - Danilo ] Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rust: workaround `rustdoc` target modifiers bug

2025-08-20T16:30:57Z

commit abbf9a44944171ca99c150adad9361a2f517d3b6 upstream. Starting with Rust 1.88.0 (released 2025-06-26), `rustdoc` complains about a target modifier mismatch in configurations where `-Zfixed-x18` is passed: error: mixing `-Zfixed-x18` will cause an ABI mismatch in crate `rust_out` | = help: the `-Zfixed-x18` flag modifies the ABI so Rust crates compiled with different values of this flag cannot be used together safely = note: unset `-Zfixed-x18` in this crate is incompatible with `-Zfixed-x18=` in dependency `core` = help: set `-Zfixed-x18=` in this crate or unset `-Zfixed-x18` in `core` = help: if you are sure this will not cause problems, you may use `-Cunsafe-allow-abi-mismatch=fixed-x18` to silence this error The reason is that `rustdoc` was not passing the target modifiers when configuring the session options, and thus it would report a mismatch that did not exist as soon as a target modifier is used in a dependency. We did not notice it in the kernel until now because `-Zfixed-x18` has been a target modifier only since 1.88.0 (and it is the only one we use so far). The issue has been reported upstream [1] and a fix has been submitted [2], including a test similar to the kernel case. [ This is now fixed upstream (thanks Guillaume for the quick review), so it will be fixed in Rust 1.90.0 (expected 2025-09-18). - Miguel ] Meanwhile, conditionally pass `-Cunsafe-allow-abi-mismatch=fixed-x18` to workaround the issue on our side. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs). Reported-by: Konrad Dybcio Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/36cdc798-524f-4910-8b77-d7b9fac08d77@oss.qualcomm.com/ Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/144521 [1] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/144523 [2] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250727092317.2930617-1-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rust: kbuild: clean output before running `rustdoc`

2025-08-20T16:30:57Z

commit 252fea131e15aba2cd487119d1a8f546471199e2 upstream. `rustdoc` can get confused when generating documentation into a folder that contains generated files from other `rustdoc` versions. For instance, running something like: rustup default 1.78.0 make LLVM=1 rustdoc rustup default 1.88.0 make LLVM=1 rustdoc may generate errors like: error: couldn't generate documentation: invalid template: last line expected to start with a comment | = note: failed to create or modify "./Documentation/output/rust/rustdoc/src-files.js" Thus just always clean the output folder before generating the documentation -- we are anyway regenerating it every time the `rustdoc` target gets called, at least for the time being. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs). Reported-by: Daniel Almeida Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/288089/topic/x/near/527201113 Reviewed-by: Tamir Duberstein Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250726133435.2460085-1-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rust: use `#[used(compiler)]` to fix build and `modpost` with Rust >= 1.89.0

2025-07-24T06:56:37Z

commit 7498159226772d66f150dd406be462d75964a366 upstream. Starting with Rust 1.89.0 (expected 2025-08-07), the Rust compiler fails to build the `rusttest` target due to undefined references such as: kernel...-cgu.0:(.text....+0x116): undefined reference to `rust_helper_kunit_get_current_test' Moreover, tooling like `modpost` gets confused: WARNING: modpost: missing MODULE_DESCRIPTION() in drivers/gpu/drm/nova/nova.o ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in drivers/gpu/nova-core/nova_core.o The reason behind both issues is that the Rust compiler will now [1] treat `#[used]` as `#[used(linker)]` instead of `#[used(compiler)]` for our targets. This means that the retain section flag (`R`, `SHF_GNU_RETAIN`) will be used and that they will be marked as `unique` too, with different IDs. In turn, that means we end up with undefined references that did not get discarded in `rusttest` and that multiple `.modinfo` sections are generated, which confuse tooling like `modpost` because they only expect one. Thus start using `#[used(compiler)]` to keep the previous behavior and to be explicit about what we want. Sadly, it is an unstable feature (`used_with_arg`) [2] -- we will talk to upstream Rust about it. The good news is that it has been available for a long time (Rust >= 1.60) [3]. The changes should also be fine for previous Rust versions, since they behave the same way as before [4]. Alternatively, we could use `#[no_mangle]` or `#[export_name = ...]` since those still behave like `#[used(compiler)]`, but of course it is not really what we want to express, and it requires other changes to avoid symbol conflicts. Cc: David Wood Cc: Wesley Wiser Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs). Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/140872 [1] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93798 [2] Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91504 [3] Link: https://godbolt.org/z/sxzWTMfzW [4] Reviewed-by: Alice Ryhl Acked-by: Björn Roy Baron Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250712160103.1244945-3-ojeda@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rust: init: allow `dead_code` warnings for Rust >= 1.89.0

2025-07-17T16:37:14Z

Starting with Rust 1.89.0 (expected 2025-08-07), the Rust compiler may warn: error: trait `MustNotImplDrop` is never used --> rust/kernel/init/macros.rs:927:15 | 927 | trait MustNotImplDrop {} | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | ::: rust/kernel/sync/arc.rs:133:1 | 133 | #[pin_data] | ----------- in this procedural macro expansion | = note: `-D dead-code` implied by `-D warnings` = help: to override `-D warnings` add `#[allow(dead_code)]` = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::__pin_data` which comes from the expansion of the attribute macro `pin_data` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info) Thus `allow` it to clean it up. This does not happen in mainline nor 6.15.y, because there the macro was moved out of the `kernel` crate, and `dead_code` warnings are not emitted if the macro is foreign to the crate. Thus this patch is directly sent to stable and intended for 6.12.y only. Similarly, it is not needed in previous LTSs, because there the Rust version is pinned. Acked-by: Benno Lossin Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

rust: arm: fix unknown (to Clang) argument '-mno-fdpic'

2025-07-06T09:01:33Z

[ Upstream commit 977c4308ee4270cf46e2c66b37de8e04670daa0c ] Currently rust on arm fails to compile due to '-mno-fdpic'. This flag disables a GCC feature that we don't want for kernel builds, so let's skip it as it doesn't apply to Clang. UPD include/generated/asm-offsets.h CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh RUSTC L rust/core.o BINDGEN rust/bindings/bindings_generated.rs BINDGEN rust/bindings/bindings_helpers_generated.rs CC rust/helpers/helpers.o Unable to generate bindings: clang diagnosed error: error: unknown argument: '-mno-fdpic' make[2]: *** [rust/Makefile:369: rust/bindings/bindings_helpers_generated.rs] Error 1 make[2]: *** Deleting file 'rust/bindings/bindings_helpers_generated.rs' make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Unable to generate bindings: clang diagnosed error: error: unknown argument: '-mno-fdpic' make[2]: *** [rust/Makefile:349: rust/bindings/bindings_generated.rs] Error 1 make[2]: *** Deleting file 'rust/bindings/bindings_generated.rs' make[1]: *** [/home/pmos/build/src/linux-next-next-20250521/Makefile:1285: prepare] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:248: __sub-make] Error 2 [ Naresh provided the draft diff [1]. Ben explained [2]: FDPIC is only relevant with no-MMU targets, and then only for userspace. When configured for the arm-*-uclinuxfdpiceabi target, GCC enables FDPIC by default to facilitate compiling userspace programs. FDPIC is never used for the kernel, and we pass -mno-fdpic when building the kernel to override the default and make sure FDPIC is disabled. and [3]: -mno-fdpic disables a GCC feature that we don't want for kernel builds. clang does not support this feature, so it always behaves as though -mno-fdpic is passed. Therefore, it should be fine to mix the two, at least as far as FDPIC is concerned. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CA+G9fYt4otQK4pHv8pJBW9e28yHSGCDncKquwuJiJ_1ou0pq0w@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/aAKrq2InExQk7f_k@dell-precision-5540/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/aAo_F_UP1Gd4jHlZ@dell-precision-5540/ - Miguel ] Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYvOanQBYXKSg7C6EU30k8sTRC0JRPJXYu7wWK51w38QUQ@mail.gmail.com/ Suggested-by: Miguel Ojeda Acked-by: Naresh Kamboju Signed-off-by: Rudraksha Gupta Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250522-rust-mno-fdpic-arm-fix-v2-1-a6f691d9c198@gmail.com [ Reworded title. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rust: module: place cleanup_module() in .exit.text section

2025-07-06T09:01:33Z

[ Upstream commit 249c3a0e53acefc2b06d3b3e1fc28fb2081f878d ] Place cleanup_module() in .exit.text section. Currently, cleanup_module() is likely placed in the .text section. It's inconsistent with the layout of C modules, where cleanup_module() is placed in .exit.text. [ Boqun asked for an example of how the section changed to be put in the log. Tomonori provided the following examples: C module: $ objdump -t ~/build/x86/drivers/block/loop.o|grep clean 0000000000000000 l O .exit.data 0000000000000008 __UNIQUE_ID___addressable_cleanup_module412 0000000000000000 g F .exit.text 000000000000009c cleanup_module Rust module without this patch: $ objdump -t ~/build/x86/samples/rust/rust_minimal.o|grep clean 00000000000002b0 g F .text 00000000000000c6 cleanup_module 0000000000000000 g O .exit.data 0000000000000008 _R...___UNIQUE_ID___addressable_cleanup_module Rust module with this patch: $ objdump -t ~/build/x86/samples/rust/rust_minimal.o|grep clean 0000000000000000 g F .exit.text 00000000000000c6 cleanup_module 0000000000000000 g O .exit.data 0000000000000008 _R...___UNIQUE_ID___addressable_cleanup_module - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308044506.14458-1-fujita.tomonori@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

rust: compile libcore with edition 2024 for 1.87+

2025-06-27T10:11:40Z

commit f4daa80d6be7d3c55ca72a8e560afc4e21f886aa upstream. Rust 1.87 (released on 2025-05-15) compiles core library with edition 2024 instead of 2021 [1]. Ensure that the edition matches libcore's expectation to avoid potential breakage. [ J3m3 reported in Zulip [2] that the `rust-analyzer` target was broken after this patch -- indeed, we need to avoid `core-cfgs` since those are passed to the `rust-analyzer` target. So, instead, I tweaked the patch to create a new `core-edition` variable and explicitly mention the `--edition` flag instead of reusing `core-cfg`s. In addition, pass a new argument using this new variable to `generate_rust_analyzer.py` so that we set the right edition there. By the way, for future reference: the `filter-out` change is needed for Rust < 1.87, since otherwise we would skip the `--edition=2021` we just added, ending up with no edition flag, and thus the compiler would default to the 2015 one. [2] https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/291565/topic/x/near/520206547 - Miguel ] Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs). Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138162 [1] Reported-by: est31 Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1163 Signed-off-by: Gary Guo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250517085600.2857460-1-gary@garyguo.net Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda [ Solved conflicts for 6.12.y backport. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman