user/sven/linux.git/samples, branch v5.4.54

samples/vfs: avoid warning in statx override

2020-07-09T07:37:54Z

[ Upstream commit c3eeaae9fd736b7f2afbda8d3cbb1cbae06decf3 ] Something changed recently to uncover this warning: samples/vfs/test-statx.c:24:15: warning: `struct foo' declared inside parameter list will not be visible outside of this definition or declaration 24 | #define statx foo | ^~~ Which is due the use of "struct statx" (here, "struct foo") in a function prototype argument list before it has been defined: int # 56 "/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/statx-generic.h" foo # 56 "/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/statx-generic.h" 3 4 (int __dirfd, const char *__restrict __path, int __flags, unsigned int __mask, struct # 57 "/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/statx-generic.h" foo # 57 "/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/statx-generic.h" 3 4 *__restrict __buf) __attribute__ ((__nothrow__ , __leaf__)) __attribute__ ((__nonnull__ (2, 5))); Add explicit struct before #include to avoid warning. Fixes: f1b5618e013a ("vfs: Add a sample program for the new mount API") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Cc: Miklos Szeredi Cc: Al Viro Cc: David Howells Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/202006282213.C516EA6@keescook Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

bpf, xdp, samples: Fix null pointer dereference in *_user code

2020-06-30T19:36:55Z

[ Upstream commit 6903cdae9f9f08d61e49c16cbef11c293e33a615 ] Memset on the pointer right after malloc can cause a NULL pointer deference if it failed to allocate memory. A simple fix is to replace malloc()/memset() pair with a simple call to calloc(). Fixes: 0fca931a6f21 ("samples/bpf: program demonstrating access to xdp_rxq_info") Signed-off-by: Gaurav Singh Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Acked-by: John Fastabend Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

samples/bpf: xdp_redirect_cpu: Set MAX_CPUS according to NR_CPUS

2020-06-30T19:36:55Z

[ Upstream commit 6a09815428547657f3ffd2f5c31ac2a191e7fdf3 ] xdp_redirect_cpu is currently failing in bpf_prog_load_xattr() allocating cpu_map map if CONFIG_NR_CPUS is less than 64 since cpu_map_alloc() requires max_entries to be less than NR_CPUS. Set cpu_map max_entries according to NR_CPUS in xdp_redirect_cpu_kern.c and get currently running cpus in xdp_redirect_cpu_user.c Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/374472755001c260158c4e4b22f193bdd3c56fb7.1589300442.git.lorenzo@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

samples: bpf: Fix build error

2020-06-03T06:21:15Z

[ Upstream commit 23ad04669f81f958e9a4121b0266228d2eb3c357 ] GCC 10 is very strict about symbol clash, and lwt_len_hist_user contains a symbol which clashes with libbpf: /usr/bin/ld: samples/bpf/lwt_len_hist_user.o:(.bss+0x0): multiple definition of `bpf_log_buf'; samples/bpf/bpf_load.o:(.bss+0x8c0): first defined here collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status bpf_log_buf here seems to be a leftover, so removing it. Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Yonghong Song Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200511113234.80722-1-mcroce@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

vmalloc: fix remap_vmalloc_range() bounds checks

2020-04-29T14:33:14Z

commit bdebd6a2831b6fab69eb85cee74a8ba77f1a1cc2 upstream. remap_vmalloc_range() has had various issues with the bounds checks it promises to perform ("This function checks that addr is a valid vmalloc'ed area, and that it is big enough to cover the vma") over time, e.g.: - not detecting pgoff< Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Martin KaFai Lau Cc: Song Liu Cc: Yonghong Song Cc: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: John Fastabend Cc: KP Singh Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200415222312.236431-1-jannh@google.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

samples/bpf: Set -fno-stack-protector when building BPF programs

2020-02-24T07:36:36Z

[ Upstream commit 450278977acbf494a20367c22fbb38729772d1fc ] It seems Clang can in some cases turn on stack protection by default, which doesn't work with BPF. This was reported once before[0], but it seems the flag to explicitly turn off the stack protector wasn't added to the Makefile, so do that now. The symptom of this is compile errors like the following: error: :0:0: in function bpf_prog1 i32 (%struct.__sk_buff*): A call to built-in function '__stack_chk_fail' is not supported. [0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg556400.html Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191216103819.359535-1-toke@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

samples/bpf: Xdp_redirect_cpu fix missing tracepoint attach

2020-02-11T12:35:29Z

commit f9e6bfdbaf0cf304d72c70a05d81acac01a04f48 upstream. When sample xdp_redirect_cpu was converted to use libbpf, the tracepoints used by this sample were not getting attached automatically like with bpf_load.c. The BPF-maps was still getting loaded, thus nobody notice that the tracepoints were not updating these maps. This fix doesn't use the new skeleton code, as this bug was introduced in v5.1 and stable might want to backport this. E.g. Red Hat QA uses this sample as part of their testing. Fixes: bbaf6029c49c ("samples/bpf: Convert XDP samples to libbpf usage") Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/157685877642.26195.2798780195186786841.stgit@firesoul Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

samples/bpf: Don't try to remove user's homedir on clean

2020-02-11T12:35:29Z

commit b2e5e93ae8af6a34bca536cdc4b453ab1e707b8b upstream. The 'clean' rule in the samples/bpf Makefile tries to remove backup files (ending in ~). However, if no such files exist, it will instead try to remove the user's home directory. While the attempt is mostly harmless, it does lead to a somewhat scary warning like this: rm: cannot remove '~': Is a directory Fix this by using find instead of shell expansion to locate any actual backup files that need to be removed. Fixes: b62a796c109c ("samples/bpf: allow make to be run from samples/bpf/ directory") Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/157952560126.1683545.7273054725976032511.stgit@toke.dk Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

samples/bpf: Fix broken xdp_rxq_info due to map order assumptions

2020-01-26T09:00:58Z

commit edbca120a8cdfa5a5793707e33497aa5185875ca upstream. In the days of using bpf_load.c the order in which the 'maps' sections were defines in BPF side (*_kern.c) file, were used by userspace side to identify the map via using the map order as an index. In effect the order-index is created based on the order the maps sections are stored in the ELF-object file, by the LLVM compiler. This have also carried over in libbpf via API bpf_map__next(NULL, obj) to extract maps in the order libbpf parsed the ELF-object file. When BTF based maps were introduced a new section type ".maps" were created. I found that the LLVM compiler doesn't create the ".maps" sections in the order they are defined in the C-file. The order in the ELF file is based on the order the map pointer is referenced in the code. This combination of changes lead to xdp_rxq_info mixing up the map file-descriptors in userspace, resulting in very broken behaviour, but without warning the user. This patch fix issue by instead using bpf_object__find_map_by_name() to find maps via their names. (Note, this is the ELF name, which can be longer than the name the kernel retains). Fixes: be5bca44aa6b ("samples: bpf: convert some XDP samples from bpf_load to libbpf") Fixes: 451d1dc886b5 ("samples: bpf: update map definition to new syntax BTF-defined map") Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/157529025128.29832.5953245340679936909.stgit@firesoul Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

samples: bpf: update map definition to new syntax BTF-defined map

2020-01-26T09:00:58Z

commit 451d1dc886b548d6e18c933adca326c1307023c9 upstream. Since, the new syntax of BTF-defined map has been introduced, the syntax for using maps under samples directory are mixed up. For example, some are already using the new syntax, and some are using existing syntax by calling them as 'legacy'. As stated at commit abd29c931459 ("libbpf: allow specifying map definitions using BTF"), the BTF-defined map has more compatablility with extending supported map definition features. The commit doesn't replace all of the map to new BTF-defined map, because some of the samples still use bpf_load instead of libbpf, which can't properly create BTF-defined map. This will only updates the samples which uses libbpf API for loading bpf program. (ex. bpf_prog_load_xattr) Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman