user/sven/linux.git/scripts/package/mkspec, branch v5.0.19

kbuild: rpm-pkg: fix binrpm-pkg breakage when O= is used

2018-11-05T16:28:48Z

Zhenzhong Duan reported that running 'make O=/build/kernel binrpm-pkg' failed with the following errors: Running 'make O=/build/kernel binrpm-pkg' failed with below two errors. Makefile:600: include/config/auto.conf: No such file or directory + cp make -C /mnt/root/kernel O=/build/kernel image_name make -f /mnt/root/kernel/Makefile ... cp: invalid option -- 'C' Try 'cp --help' for more information. Prior to commit 80463f1b7bf9 ("kbuild: add --include-dir flag only for out-of-tree build"), both srctree and objtree were added to --include-dir redundantly, and the wrong code 'make image_name' was working by relying on that. Now, the potential issue that had previously been hidden just showed up. 'make image_name' recurses to the generated $(objtree)/Makefile and ends up with running in srctree, which is incorrect. It should be invoked with '-f $srctree/Makefile' (or KBUILD_SRC=) to be executed in objtree. Fixes: 80463f1b7bf9 ("kbuild: add --include-dir flag only for out-of-tree build") Reported-by: Zhenzhong Duan Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

kbuild: rpm-pkg: use kernel-install as a fallback for new-kernel-pkg

2018-04-13T14:18:41Z

The new-kernel-pkg script is only present when grubby is installed, but it may not always be the case. So if the script isn't present, attempt to use the kernel-install script as a fallback instead. Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

kbuild: rpm-pkg: Support GNU tar >= 1.29

2018-03-27T16:42:17Z

There is a change in how command line parsing is done in this version. Excludes and includes are now ordered with the file list. Since the spec file puts the file list before the exclude list it means newer tar ignores the excludes and packs all the build output into the kernel-devel RPM resulting in a huge package. Simple argument re-ordering fixes the problem. Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

kbuild: rpm-pkg: replace $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot}

2017-11-14T14:19:01Z

$RPM_BUILD_ROOT must be escaped to prevent shell from expanding it when generating the spec file. %{build_root} is more readable than \$RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

kbuild: rpm-pkg: fix build error when CONFIG_MODULES is disabled

2017-11-14T14:18:53Z

When CONFIG_MODULES is disabled, make rpm-pkg / binrpm-pkg fails with the following message: The present kernel configuration has modules disabled. Type 'make config' and enable loadable module support. Then build a kernel with module support enabled. Do not install modules in the case. Also, omit the devel package. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

kbuild: rpm-pkg: refactor mkspec with here doc

2017-11-14T14:18:24Z

The repeat of echo is unreadable. The here-document is a well-known device for such scripts. One difficulty is we have a bunch of PREBUILT conditionals that would split the here-document. My idea is to add "$S" annotatation to lines only for the source package spec file, then post-process it by sed. I hope it will make our life easier than repeat of "cat <

kbuild: rpm-pkg: clean up mkspec

2017-10-09T09:13:19Z

Clean up the mkspec without changing the behavior. - grep CONFIG_DRM=y more simply - move "EXCLUDE" out of the "%install" section because it can be computed when the spec file is generated - remove "BuildRoot:" field, which is now redundant - do not mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/modules explicitly because it is automatically created by "make modules_install" - exclude "%package devel" from source package spec file because it does not make sense where "%files devel" is already excluded - exclude "%build" from source package spec file - remove unneeded "make clean" because we had already cleaned before making tar file - merge two %ifarch ia64 conditionals - replace KBUILD_IMAGE with direct use of $(make image_name) - remove trailing empty line from the spec file Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

kbuild: rpm-pkg: install vmlinux.bz2 unconditionally

2017-10-09T09:13:19Z

This conditional was added by commit fc370ecfdb37 ("kbuild: add vmlinux to kernel rpm"). Its git-log mentioned vmlinux.bz2 was necessary for debugging, but did not explain why ppc64 was an exception. I see no problem to copy vmlinux.bz2 all the time. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

kbuild: rpm-pkg: remove ppc64 specific image handling

2017-10-09T09:13:19Z

This conditional was added by commit 1a0f3d422bb9 ("kbuild: fix make rpm for powerpc"). Its git-log explains the default kernel image is zImage, but obviously the current arch/powerpc/Makefile does not set KBUILD_IMAGE, so the image file is actually vmlinux. Moreover, since commit 09549aa1baa9 ("deb-pkg: Remove the KBUILD_IMAGE workaround"), all architectures are supposed to set the full path to the image in KBUILD_IMAGE. I see no good reason to differentiate ppc64 from others. Rip off the conditional. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

kbuild: rpm-pkg: fix version number handling

2017-09-20T15:06:03Z

The "Release:" field of the spec file is determined based on the .version file. However, the .version file is not copied to the source tar file. So, when we build the kernel from the source package, the UTS_VERSION always indicates #1. This does not match with "rpm -q". The kernel UTS_VERSION and "rpm -q" do not agree for binrpm-pkg, either. Please note the kernel has already been built before the spec file is created. Currently, mkspec invokes mkversion. This script returns an incremented version. So, the "Release:" field of the spec file is greater than the version in the kernel by one. For the source package build (where .version file is missing), we can give KBUILD_BUILD_VERSION=%{release} to the build command. For the binary package build, we can simply read out the .version file because it contains the version number that was used for building the kernel image. We can remove scripts/mkversion because scripts/package/Makefile need not touch the .version file. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada