user/sven/linux.git/scripts, branch v6.12.36

rust: compile libcore with edition 2024 for 1.87+

2025-06-27T10:11:40Z

commit f4daa80d6be7d3c55ca72a8e560afc4e21f886aa upstream. Rust 1.87 (released on 2025-05-15) compiles core library with edition 2024 instead of 2021 [1]. Ensure that the edition matches libcore's expectation to avoid potential breakage. [ J3m3 reported in Zulip [2] that the `rust-analyzer` target was broken after this patch -- indeed, we need to avoid `core-cfgs` since those are passed to the `rust-analyzer` target. So, instead, I tweaked the patch to create a new `core-edition` variable and explicitly mention the `--edition` flag instead of reusing `core-cfg`s. In addition, pass a new argument using this new variable to `generate_rust_analyzer.py` so that we set the right edition there. By the way, for future reference: the `filter-out` change is needed for Rust < 1.87, since otherwise we would skip the `--edition=2021` we just added, ending up with no edition flag, and thus the compiler would default to the 2015 one. [2] https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/291565/topic/x/near/520206547 - Miguel ] Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # Needed in 6.12.y and later (Rust is pinned in older LTSs). Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138162 [1] Reported-by: est31 Closes: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1163 Signed-off-by: Gary Guo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250517085600.2857460-1-gary@garyguo.net Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda [ Solved conflicts for 6.12.y backport. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

kbuild: rust: add rustc-min-version support function

2025-06-27T10:11:40Z

commit ac954145e1ee3f72033161cbe4ac0b16b5354ae7 upstream. Introduce `rustc-min-version` support function that mimics `{gcc,clang}-min-version` ones, following commit 88b61e3bff93 ("Makefile.compiler: replace cc-ifversion with compiler-specific macros"). In addition, use it in the first use case we have in the kernel (which was done independently to minimize the changes needed for the fix). Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Reviewed-by: Fiona Behrens Reviewed-by: Nicolas Schier Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Make 'cc-option' work correctly for the -Wno-xyzzy pattern

2025-06-27T10:11:27Z

[ Upstream commit 550ccb178de2f379f5e1a1833dd6f4bdafef4b68 ] This is the follow-up to commit a79be02bba5c ("Fix mis-uses of 'cc-option' for warning disablement") where I mentioned that the best fix would be to just make 'cc-option' a bit smarter, and work for all compiler options, including the '-Wno-xyzzy' pattern that it used to accept unknown options for. It turns out that fixing cc-option is pretty straightforward: just rewrite any '-Wno-xyzzy' option pattern to use '-Wxyzzy' instead for testing. That makes the whole artificial distinction between 'cc-option' and 'cc-disable-warning' go away, and we can happily forget about the odd build rule that you have to treat compiler options that disable warnings specially. The 'cc-disable-warning' helper remains as a backwards compatibility syntax for now, but is implemented in terms of the new and improved cc-option. Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Weißschuh Cc: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

randstruct: gcc-plugin: Fix attribute addition

2025-06-19T13:32:04Z

[ Upstream commit f39f18f3c3531aa802b58a20d39d96e82eb96c14 ] Based on changes in the 2021 public version of the randstruct out-of-tree GCC plugin[1], more carefully update the attributes on resulting decls, to avoid tripping checks in GCC 15's comptypes_check_enum_int() when it has been configured with "--enable-checking=misc": arch/arm64/kernel/kexec_image.c:132:14: internal compiler error: in comptypes_check_enum_int, at c/c-typeck.cc:1519 132 | const struct kexec_file_ops kexec_image_ops = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ internal_error(char const*, ...), at gcc/gcc/diagnostic-global-context.cc:517 fancy_abort(char const*, int, char const*), at gcc/gcc/diagnostic.cc:1803 comptypes_check_enum_int(tree_node*, tree_node*, bool*), at gcc/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc:1519 ... Link: https://archive.org/download/grsecurity/grsecurity-3.1-5.10.41-202105280954.patch.gz [1] Reported-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Closes: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/367 Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250530000646.104457-1-thiago.bauermann@linaro.org/ Reported-by: Ingo Saitz Closes: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1104745 Fixes: 313dd1b62921 ("gcc-plugins: Add the randstruct plugin") Tested-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250530221824.work.623-kees@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

randstruct: gcc-plugin: Remove bogus void member

2025-06-19T13:32:03Z

[ Upstream commit e136a4062174a9a8d1c1447ca040ea81accfa6a8 ] When building the randomized replacement tree of struct members, the randstruct GCC plugin would insert, as the first member, a 0-sized void member. This appears as though it was done to catch non-designated ("unnamed") static initializers, which wouldn't be stable since they depend on the original struct layout order. This was accomplished by having the side-effect of the "void member" tripping an assert in GCC internals (count_type_elements) if the member list ever needed to be counted (e.g. for figuring out the order of members during a non-designated initialization), which would catch impossible type (void) in the struct: security/landlock/fs.c: In function ‘hook_file_ioctl_common’: security/landlock/fs.c:1745:61: internal compiler error: in count_type_elements, at expr.cc:7075 1745 | .u.op = &(struct lsm_ioctlop_audit) { | ^ static HOST_WIDE_INT count_type_elements (const_tree type, bool for_ctor_p) { switch (TREE_CODE (type)) ... case VOID_TYPE: default: gcc_unreachable (); } } However this is a redundant safety measure since randstruct uses the __designated_initializer attribute both internally and within the __randomized_layout attribute macro so that this would be enforced by the compiler directly even when randstruct was not enabled (via -Wdesignated-init). A recent change in Landlock ended up tripping the same member counting routine when using a full-struct copy initializer as part of an anonymous initializer. This, however, is a false positive as the initializer is copying between identical structs (and hence identical layouts). The "path" member is "struct path", a randomized struct, and is being copied to from another "struct path", the "f_path" member: landlock_log_denial(landlock_cred(file->f_cred), &(struct landlock_request) { .type = LANDLOCK_REQUEST_FS_ACCESS, .audit = { .type = LSM_AUDIT_DATA_IOCTL_OP, .u.op = &(struct lsm_ioctlop_audit) { .path = file->f_path, .cmd = cmd, }, }, ... As can be seen with the coming randstruct KUnit test, there appears to be no behavioral problems with this kind of initialization when the void member is removed from the randstruct GCC plugin, so remove it. Reported-by: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Z_PRaKx7q70MKgCA@gallifrey/ Reported-by: Mark Brown Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250407-kbuild-disable-gcc-plugins-v1-1-5d46ae583f5e@kernel.org/ Reported-by: WangYuli Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/337D5D4887277B27+3c677db3-a8b9-47f0-93a4-7809355f1381@uniontech.com/ Fixes: 313dd1b62921 ("gcc-plugins: Add the randstruct plugin") Signed-off-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kbuild: Properly disable -Wunterminated-string-initialization for clang

2025-05-29T09:03:25Z

commit 4f79eaa2ceac86a0e0f304b0bab556cca5bf4f30 upstream. Clang and GCC have different behaviors around disabling warnings included in -Wall and -Wextra and the order in which flags are specified, which is exposed by clang's new support for -Wunterminated-string-initialization. $ cat test.c const char foo[3] = "FOO"; const char bar[3] __attribute__((__nonstring__)) = "BAR"; $ clang -fsyntax-only -Wextra test.c test.c:1:21: warning: initializer-string for character array is too long, array size is 3 but initializer has size 4 (including the null terminating character); did you mean to use the 'nonstring' attribute? [-Wunterminated-string-initialization] 1 | const char foo[3] = "FOO"; | ^~~~~ $ clang -fsyntax-only -Wextra -Wno-unterminated-string-initialization test.c $ clang -fsyntax-only -Wno-unterminated-string-initialization -Wextra test.c test.c:1:21: warning: initializer-string for character array is too long, array size is 3 but initializer has size 4 (including the null terminating character); did you mean to use the 'nonstring' attribute? [-Wunterminated-string-initialization] 1 | const char foo[3] = "FOO"; | ^~~~~ $ gcc -fsyntax-only -Wextra test.c test.c:1:21: warning: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ truncates NUL terminator but destination lacks ‘nonstring’ attribute (4 chars into 3 available) [-Wunterminated-string-initialization] 1 | const char foo[3] = "FOO"; | ^~~~~ $ gcc -fsyntax-only -Wextra -Wno-unterminated-string-initialization test.c $ gcc -fsyntax-only -Wno-unterminated-string-initialization -Wextra test.c Move -Wextra up right below -Wall in Makefile.extrawarn to ensure these flags are at the beginning of the warning options list. Move the couple of warning options that have been added to the main Makefile since commit e88ca24319e4 ("kbuild: consolidate warning flags in scripts/Makefile.extrawarn") to scripts/Makefile.extrawarn after -Wall / -Wextra to ensure they get properly disabled for all compilers. Fixes: 9d7a0577c9db ("gcc-15: disable '-Wunterminated-string-initialization' entirely for now") Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/10359 Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

Fix mis-uses of 'cc-option' for warning disablement

2025-05-29T09:03:25Z

commit a79be02bba5c31f967885c7f3bf3a756d77d11d9 upstream. This was triggered by one of my mis-uses causing odd build warnings on sparc in linux-next, but while figuring out why the "obviously correct" use of cc-option caused such odd breakage, I found eight other cases of the same thing in the tree. The root cause is that 'cc-option' doesn't work for checking negative warning options (ie things like '-Wno-stringop-overflow') because gcc will silently accept options it doesn't recognize, and so 'cc-option' ends up thinking they are perfectly fine. And it all works, until you have a situation where _another_ warning is emitted. At that point the compiler will go "Hmm, maybe the user intended to disable this warning but used that wrong option that I didn't recognize", and generate a warning for the unrecognized negative option. Which explains why we have several cases of this in the tree: the 'cc-option' test really doesn't work for this situation, but most of the time it simply doesn't matter that ity doesn't work. The reason my recently added case caused problems on sparc was pointed out by Thomas Weißschuh: the sparc build had a previous explicit warning that then triggered the new one. I think the best fix for this would be to make 'cc-option' a bit smarter about this sitation, possibly by adding an intentional warning to the test case that then triggers the unrecognized option warning reliably. But the short-term fix is to replace 'cc-option' with an existing helper designed for this exact case: 'cc-disable-warning', which picks the negative warning but uses the positive form for testing the compiler support. Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250422204718.0b4e3f81@canb.auug.org.au/ Explained-by: Thomas Weißschuh Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

kconfig: do not clear SYMBOL_VALID when reading include/config/auto.conf

2025-05-29T09:02:17Z

[ Upstream commit 226ac19c217f24f0927d0a73cf9ee613971a188d ] When conf_read_simple() is called with S_DEF_AUTO, it is meant to read previous symbol values from include/config/auto.conf to determine which include/config/* files should be touched. This process should not modify the current symbol status in any way. However, conf_touch_deps() currently invalidates all symbol values and recalculates them, which is totally unneeded. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kbuild: fix argument parsing in scripts/config

2025-05-29T09:02:17Z

[ Upstream commit f757f6011c92b5a01db742c39149bed9e526478f ] The script previously assumed --file was always the first argument, which caused issues when it appeared later. This patch updates the parsing logic to scan all arguments to find --file, sets the config file correctly, and resets the argument list with the remaining commands. It also fixes --refresh to respect --file by passing KCONFIG_CONFIG=$FN to make oldconfig. Signed-off-by: Seyediman Seyedarab Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

kconfig: merge_config: use an empty file as initfile

2025-05-29T09:02:02Z

[ Upstream commit a26fe287eed112b4e21e854f173c8918a6a8596d ] The scripts/kconfig/merge_config.sh script requires an existing $INITFILE (or the $1 argument) as a base file for merging Kconfig fragments. However, an empty $INITFILE can serve as an initial starting point, later referenced by the KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG Makefile variable if -m is not used. This variable can point to any configuration file containing preset config symbols (the merged output) as stated in Documentation/kbuild/kconfig.rst. When -m is used $INITFILE will contain just the merge output requiring the user to run make (i.e. KCONFIG_ALLCONFIG=<$INITFILE> make or make olddefconfig). Instead of failing when `$INITFILE` is missing, create an empty file and use it as the starting point for merges. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gomez Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin