user/sven/linux.git/security, branch v4.19.124

selinux: properly handle multiple messages in selinux_netlink_send()

2020-05-06T06:13:32Z

commit fb73974172ffaaf57a7c42f35424d9aece1a5af6 upstream. Fix the SELinux netlink_send hook to properly handle multiple netlink messages in a single sk_buff; each message is parsed and subject to SELinux access control. Prior to this patch, SELinux only inspected the first message in the sk_buff. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

KEYS: Avoid false positive ENOMEM error on key read

2020-04-29T14:31:23Z

[ Upstream commit 4f0882491a148059a52480e753b7f07fc550e188 ] By allocating a kernel buffer with a user-supplied buffer length, it is possible that a false positive ENOMEM error may be returned because the user-supplied length is just too large even if the system do have enough memory to hold the actual key data. Moreover, if the buffer length is larger than the maximum amount of memory that can be returned by kmalloc() (2^(MAX_ORDER-1) number of pages), a warning message will also be printed. To reduce this possibility, we set a threshold (PAGE_SIZE) over which we do check the actual key length first before allocating a buffer of the right size to hold it. The threshold is arbitrary, it is just used to trigger a buffer length check. It does not limit the actual key length as long as there is enough memory to satisfy the memory request. To further avoid large buffer allocation failure due to page fragmentation, kvmalloc() is used to allocate the buffer so that vmapped pages can be used when there is not a large enough contiguous set of pages available for allocation. In the extremely unlikely scenario that the key keeps on being changed and made longer (still <= buflen) in between 2 __keyctl_read_key() calls, the __keyctl_read_key() calling loop in keyctl_read_key() may have to be iterated a large number of times, but definitely not infinite. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

KEYS: Don't write out to userspace while holding key semaphore

2020-04-23T08:30:24Z

commit d3ec10aa95819bff18a0d936b18884c7816d0914 upstream. A lockdep circular locking dependency report was seen when running a keyutils test: [12537.027242] ====================================================== [12537.059309] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [12537.088148] 4.18.0-147.7.1.el8_1.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G OE --------- - - [12537.125253] ------------------------------------------------------ [12537.153189] keyctl/25598 is trying to acquire lock: [12537.175087] 000000007c39f96c (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12537.208365] [12537.208365] but task is already holding lock: [12537.234507] 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12537.270476] [12537.270476] which lock already depends on the new lock. [12537.270476] [12537.307209] [12537.307209] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [12537.340754] [12537.340754] -> #3 (&type->lock_class){++++}: [12537.367434] down_write+0x4d/0x110 [12537.385202] __key_link_begin+0x87/0x280 [12537.405232] request_key_and_link+0x483/0xf70 [12537.427221] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.444839] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.468445] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.496731] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.519418] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.546263] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.573551] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.601045] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.617906] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.636225] [12537.636225] -> #2 (root_key_user.cons_lock){+.+.}: [12537.664525] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.683734] request_key_and_link+0x35a/0xf70 [12537.705640] request_key+0x3c/0x80 [12537.723304] dns_query+0x1db/0x5a5 [dns_resolver] [12537.746773] dns_resolve_server_name_to_ip+0x1e1/0x4d0 [cifs] [12537.775607] cifs_reconnect+0xe04/0x2500 [cifs] [12537.798322] cifs_readv_from_socket+0x461/0x690 [cifs] [12537.823369] cifs_read_from_socket+0xa0/0xe0 [cifs] [12537.847262] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x311/0x2db0 [cifs] [12537.873477] kthread+0x30c/0x3d0 [12537.890281] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 [12537.908649] [12537.908649] -> #1 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}: [12537.935225] __mutex_lock+0x105/0x11f0 [12537.954450] cifs_call_async+0x102/0x7f0 [cifs] [12537.977250] smb2_async_readv+0x6c3/0xc90 [cifs] [12538.000659] cifs_readpages+0x120a/0x1e50 [cifs] [12538.023920] read_pages+0xf5/0x560 [12538.041583] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x41d/0x4b0 [12538.067047] ondemand_readahead+0x44c/0xc10 [12538.092069] filemap_fault+0xec1/0x1830 [12538.111637] __do_fault+0x82/0x260 [12538.129216] do_fault+0x419/0xfb0 [12538.146390] __handle_mm_fault+0x862/0xdf0 [12538.167408] handle_mm_fault+0x154/0x550 [12538.187401] __do_page_fault+0x42f/0xa60 [12538.207395] do_page_fault+0x38/0x5e0 [12538.225777] page_fault+0x1e/0x30 [12538.243010] [12538.243010] -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}: [12538.267875] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12538.286848] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12538.306006] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12538.327936] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12538.352154] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12538.370558] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12538.391470] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12538.410511] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf [12538.435535] [12538.435535] other info that might help us debug this: [12538.435535] [12538.472829] Chain exists of: [12538.472829] &mm->mmap_sem --> root_key_user.cons_lock --> &type->lock_class [12538.472829] [12538.524820] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [12538.524820] [12538.551431] CPU0 CPU1 [12538.572654] ---- ---- [12538.595865] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.613737] lock(root_key_user.cons_lock); [12538.644234] lock(&type->lock_class); [12538.672410] lock(&mm->mmap_sem); [12538.687758] [12538.687758] *** DEADLOCK *** [12538.687758] [12538.714455] 1 lock held by keyctl/25598: [12538.732097] #0: 000000003de5b58d (&type->lock_class){++++}, at: keyctl_read_key+0x15a/0x220 [12538.770573] [12538.770573] stack backtrace: [12538.790136] CPU: 2 PID: 25598 Comm: keyctl Kdump: loaded Tainted: G [12538.844855] Hardware name: HP ProLiant DL360 Gen9/ProLiant DL360 Gen9, BIOS P89 12/27/2015 [12538.881963] Call Trace: [12538.892897] dump_stack+0x9a/0xf0 [12538.907908] print_circular_bug.isra.25.cold.50+0x1bc/0x279 [12538.932891] ? save_trace+0xd6/0x250 [12538.948979] check_prev_add.constprop.32+0xc36/0x14f0 [12538.971643] ? keyring_compare_object+0x104/0x190 [12538.992738] ? check_usage+0x550/0x550 [12539.009845] ? sched_clock+0x5/0x10 [12539.025484] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x18/0x1e0 [12539.043555] __lock_acquire+0x1f12/0x38d0 [12539.061551] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x10/0x10 [12539.080554] lock_acquire+0x14c/0x420 [12539.100330] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.119079] __might_fault+0x119/0x1b0 [12539.135869] ? __might_fault+0xc4/0x1b0 [12539.153234] keyring_read_iterator+0x7e/0x170 [12539.172787] ? keyring_read+0x110/0x110 [12539.190059] assoc_array_subtree_iterate+0x97/0x280 [12539.211526] keyring_read+0xe9/0x110 [12539.227561] ? keyring_gc_check_iterator+0xc0/0xc0 [12539.249076] keyctl_read_key+0x1b9/0x220 [12539.266660] do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x4b0 [12539.283091] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6a/0xdf One way to prevent this deadlock scenario from happening is to not allow writing to userspace while holding the key semaphore. Instead, an internal buffer is allocated for getting the keys out from the read method first before copying them out to userspace without holding the lock. That requires taking out the __user modifier from all the relevant read methods as well as additional changes to not use any userspace write helpers. That is, 1) The put_user() call is replaced by a direct copy. 2) The copy_to_user() call is replaced by memcpy(). 3) All the fault handling code is removed. Compiling on a x86-64 system, the size of the rxrpc_read() function is reduced from 3795 bytes to 2384 bytes with this patch. Fixes: ^1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

keys: Fix proc_keys_next to increase position index

2020-04-21T07:03:08Z

commit 86d32f9a7c54ad74f4514d7fef7c847883207291 upstream. If seq_file .next function does not change position index, read after some lseek can generate unexpected output: $ dd if=/proc/keys bs=1 # full usual output 0f6bfdf5 I--Q--- 2 perm 3f010000 1000 1000 user 4af2f79ab8848d0a: 740 1fb91b32 I--Q--- 3 perm 1f3f0000 1000 65534 keyring _uid.1000: 2 27589480 I--Q--- 1 perm 0b0b0000 0 0 user invocation_id: 16 2f33ab67 I--Q--- 152 perm 3f030000 0 0 keyring _ses: 2 33f1d8fa I--Q--- 4 perm 3f030000 1000 1000 keyring _ses: 1 3d427fda I--Q--- 2 perm 3f010000 1000 1000 user 69ec44aec7678e5a: 740 3ead4096 I--Q--- 1 perm 1f3f0000 1000 65534 keyring _uid_ses.1000: 1 521+0 records in 521+0 records out 521 bytes copied, 0,00123769 s, 421 kB/s But a read after lseek in middle of last line results in the partial last line and then a repeat of the final line: $ dd if=/proc/keys bs=500 skip=1 dd: /proc/keys: cannot skip to specified offset g _uid_ses.1000: 1 3ead4096 I--Q--- 1 perm 1f3f0000 1000 65534 keyring _uid_ses.1000: 1 0+1 records in 0+1 records out 97 bytes copied, 0,000135035 s, 718 kB/s and a read after lseek beyond end of file results in the last line being shown: $ dd if=/proc/keys bs=1000 skip=1 # read after lseek beyond end of file dd: /proc/keys: cannot skip to specified offset 3ead4096 I--Q--- 1 perm 1f3f0000 1000 65534 keyring _uid_ses.1000: 1 0+1 records in 0+1 records out 76 bytes copied, 0,000119981 s, 633 kB/s See https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283 Fixes: 1f4aace60b0e ("fs/seq_file.c: simplify seq_file iteration code ...") Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin Signed-off-by: David Howells Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

KEYS: reaching the keys quotas correctly

2020-04-17T08:48:46Z

commit 2e356101e72ab1361821b3af024d64877d9a798d upstream. Currently, when we add a new user key, the calltrace as below: add_key() key_create_or_update() key_alloc() __key_instantiate_and_link generic_key_instantiate key_payload_reserve ...... Since commit a08bf91ce28e ("KEYS: allow reaching the keys quotas exactly"), we can reach max bytes/keys in key_alloc, but we forget to remove this limit when we reserver space for payload in key_payload_reserve. So we can only reach max keys but not max bytes when having delta between plen and type->def_datalen. Remove this limit when instantiating the key, so we can keep consistent with key_alloc. Also, fix the similar problem in keyctl_chown_key(). Fixes: 0b77f5bfb45c ("keys: make the keyring quotas controllable through /proc/sys") Fixes: a08bf91ce28e ("KEYS: allow reaching the keys quotas exactly") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.0.x Cc: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Yang Xu Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

selinux: ensure we cleanup the internal AVC counters on error in avc_update()

2020-02-24T07:34:43Z

[ Upstream commit 030b995ad9ece9fa2d218af4429c1c78c2342096 ] In AVC update we don't call avc_node_kill() when avc_xperms_populate() fails, resulting in the avc->avc_cache.active_nodes counter having a false value. In last patch this changes was missed , so correcting it. Fixes: fa1aa143ac4a ("selinux: extended permissions for ioctls") Signed-off-by: Jaihind Yadav Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Siddojigari [PM: merge fuzz, minor description cleanup] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selinux: ensure we cleanup the internal AVC counters on error in avc_insert()

2020-02-24T07:34:41Z

[ Upstream commit d8db60cb23e49a92cf8cada3297395c7fa50fdf8 ] Fix avc_insert() to call avc_node_kill() if we've already allocated an AVC node and the code fails to insert the node in the cache. Fixes: fa1aa143ac4a ("selinux: extended permissions for ioctls") Reported-by: rsiddoji@codeaurora.org Suggested-by: Stephen Smalley Acked-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

selinux: fall back to ref-walk if audit is required

2020-02-24T07:34:40Z

[ Upstream commit 0188d5c025ca8fe756ba3193bd7d150139af5a88 ] commit bda0be7ad994 ("security: make inode_follow_link RCU-walk aware") passed down the rcu flag to the SELinux AVC, but failed to adjust the test in slow_avc_audit() to also return -ECHILD on LSM_AUDIT_DATA_DENTRY. Previously, we only returned -ECHILD if generating an audit record with LSM_AUDIT_DATA_INODE since this was only relevant from inode_permission. Move the handling of MAY_NOT_BLOCK to avc_audit() and its inlined equivalent in selinux_inode_permission() immediately after we determine that audit is required, and always fall back to ref-walk in this case. Fixes: bda0be7ad994 ("security: make inode_follow_link RCU-walk aware") Reported-by: Will Deacon Suggested-by: Al Viro Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley Signed-off-by: Paul Moore Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin

tomoyo: Use atomic_t for statistics counter

2020-02-05T14:43:38Z

commit a8772fad0172aeae339144598b809fd8d4823331 upstream. syzbot is reporting that there is a race at tomoyo_stat_update() [1]. Although it is acceptable to fail to track exact number of times policy was updated, convert to atomic_t because this is not a hot path. [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=a4d7b973972eeed410596e6604580e0133b0fc04 Reported-by: syzbot Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman

keys: Timestamp new keys

2020-01-27T13:50:23Z

[ Upstream commit 7c1857bdbdf1e4c541e45eab477ee23ed4333ea4 ] Set the timestamp on new keys rather than leaving it unset. Fixes: 31d5a79d7f3d ("KEYS: Do LRU discard in full keyrings") Signed-off-by: David Howells Signed-off-by: James Morris Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin