summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-08-28rcu: Protect ->defer_qs_iw_pending from data racePaul E. McKenney
[ Upstream commit 90c09d57caeca94e6f3f87c49e96a91edd40cbfd ] On kernels built with CONFIG_IRQ_WORK=y, when rcu_read_unlock() is invoked within an interrupts-disabled region of code [1], it will invoke rcu_read_unlock_special(), which uses an irq-work handler to force the system to notice when the RCU read-side critical section actually ends. That end won't happen until interrupts are enabled at the soonest. In some kernels, such as those booted with rcutree.use_softirq=y, the irq-work handler is used unconditionally. The per-CPU rcu_data structure's ->defer_qs_iw_pending field is updated by the irq-work handler and is both read and updated by rcu_read_unlock_special(). This resulted in the following KCSAN splat: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ BUG: KCSAN: data-race in rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler / rcu_read_unlock_special read to 0xffff96b95f42d8d8 of 1 bytes by task 90 on cpu 8: rcu_read_unlock_special+0x175/0x260 __rcu_read_unlock+0x92/0xa0 rt_spin_unlock+0x9b/0xc0 __local_bh_enable+0x10d/0x170 __local_bh_enable_ip+0xfb/0x150 rcu_do_batch+0x595/0xc40 rcu_cpu_kthread+0x4e9/0x830 smpboot_thread_fn+0x24d/0x3b0 kthread+0x3bd/0x410 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 write to 0xffff96b95f42d8d8 of 1 bytes by task 88 on cpu 8: rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler+0x1e/0x30 irq_work_single+0xaf/0x160 run_irq_workd+0x91/0xc0 smpboot_thread_fn+0x24d/0x3b0 kthread+0x3bd/0x410 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 no locks held by irq_work/8/88. irq event stamp: 200272 hardirqs last enabled at (200272): [<ffffffffb0f56121>] finish_task_switch+0x131/0x320 hardirqs last disabled at (200271): [<ffffffffb25c7859>] __schedule+0x129/0xd70 softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffffffffb0ee093f>] copy_process+0x4df/0x1cc0 softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The problem is that irq-work handlers run with interrupts enabled, which means that rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler() could be interrupted, and that interrupt handler might contain an RCU read-side critical section, which might invoke rcu_read_unlock_special(). In the strict KCSAN mode of operation used by RCU, this constitutes a data race on the ->defer_qs_iw_pending field. This commit therefore disables interrupts across the portion of the rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_handler() that updates the ->defer_qs_iw_pending field. This suffices because this handler is not a fast path. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2025-06-04rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=yAnkur Arora
[ Upstream commit 83b28cfe796464ebbde1cf7916c126da6d572685 ] With PREEMPT_RCU=n, cond_resched() provides urgently needed quiescent states for read-side critical sections via rcu_all_qs(). One reason why this was needed: lacking preempt-count, the tick handler has no way of knowing whether it is executing in a read-side critical section or not. With (PREEMPT_LAZY=y, PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=n), we get (PREEMPT_COUNT=y, PREEMPT_RCU=n). In this configuration cond_resched() is a stub and does not provide quiescent states via rcu_all_qs(). (PREEMPT_RCU=y provides this information via rcu_read_unlock() and its nesting counter.) So, use the availability of preempt_count() to report quiescent states in rcu_flavor_sched_clock_irq(). Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2022-03-28rcu: Don't deboost before reporting expedited quiescent statePaul E. McKenney
commit 10c535787436d62ea28156a4b91365fd89b5a432 upstream. Currently rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore() releases rnp->boost_mtx before reporting the expedited quiescent state. Under heavy real-time load, this can result in this function being preempted before the quiescent state is reported, which can in turn prevent the expedited grace period from completing. Tim Murray reports that the resulting expedited grace periods can take hundreds of milliseconds and even more than one second, when they should normally complete in less than a millisecond. This was fine given that there were no particular response-time constraints for synchronize_rcu_expedited(), as it was designed for throughput rather than latency. However, some users now need sub-100-millisecond response-time constratints. This patch therefore follows Neeraj's suggestion (seconded by Tim and by Uladzislau Rezki) of simply reversing the two operations. Reported-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> Reported-by: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com> Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> Reviewed-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com> Tested-by: Tim Murray <timmurray@google.com> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com> Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4.x Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-03-08rcu/nocb: Fix missed nocb_timer requeueFrederic Weisbecker
commit b2fcf2102049f6e56981e0ab3d9b633b8e2741da upstream. This sequence of events can lead to a failure to requeue a CPU's ->nocb_timer: 1. There are no callbacks queued for any CPU covered by CPU 0-2's ->nocb_gp_kthread. Note that ->nocb_gp_kthread is associated with CPU 0. 2. CPU 1 enqueues its first callback with interrupts disabled, and thus must defer awakening its ->nocb_gp_kthread. It therefore queues its rcu_data structure's ->nocb_timer. At this point, CPU 1's rdp->nocb_defer_wakeup is RCU_NOCB_WAKE. 3. CPU 2, which shares the same ->nocb_gp_kthread, also enqueues a callback, but with interrupts enabled, allowing it to directly awaken the ->nocb_gp_kthread. 4. The newly awakened ->nocb_gp_kthread associates both CPU 1's and CPU 2's callbacks with a future grace period and arranges for that grace period to be started. 5. This ->nocb_gp_kthread goes to sleep waiting for the end of this future grace period. 6. This grace period elapses before the CPU 1's timer fires. This is normally improbably given that the timer is set for only one jiffy, but timers can be delayed. Besides, it is possible that kernel was built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y. 7. The grace period ends, so rcu_gp_kthread awakens the ->nocb_gp_kthread, which in turn awakens both CPU 1's and CPU 2's ->nocb_cb_kthread. Then ->nocb_gb_kthread sleeps waiting for more newly queued callbacks. 8. CPU 1's ->nocb_cb_kthread invokes its callback, then sleeps waiting for more invocable callbacks. 9. Note that neither kthread updated any ->nocb_timer state, so CPU 1's ->nocb_defer_wakeup is still set to RCU_NOCB_WAKE. 10. CPU 1 enqueues its second callback, this time with interrupts enabled so it can wake directly ->nocb_gp_kthread. It does so with calling wake_nocb_gp() which also cancels the pending timer that got queued in step 2. But that doesn't reset CPU 1's ->nocb_defer_wakeup which is still set to RCU_NOCB_WAKE. So CPU 1's ->nocb_defer_wakeup and its ->nocb_timer are now desynchronized. 11. ->nocb_gp_kthread associates the callback queued in 10 with a new grace period, arranges for that grace period to start and sleeps waiting for it to complete. 12. The grace period ends, rcu_gp_kthread awakens ->nocb_gp_kthread, which in turn wakes up CPU 1's ->nocb_cb_kthread which then invokes the callback queued in 10. 13. CPU 1 enqueues its third callback, this time with interrupts disabled so it must queue a timer for a deferred wakeup. However the value of its ->nocb_defer_wakeup is RCU_NOCB_WAKE which incorrectly indicates that a timer is already queued. Instead, CPU 1's ->nocb_timer was cancelled in 10. CPU 1 therefore fails to queue the ->nocb_timer. 14. CPU 1 has its pending callback and it may go unnoticed until some other CPU ever wakes up ->nocb_gp_kthread or CPU 1 ever calls an explicit deferred wakeup, for example, during idle entry. This commit fixes this bug by resetting rdp->nocb_defer_wakeup everytime we delete the ->nocb_timer. It is quite possible that there is a similar scenario involving ->nocb_bypass_timer and ->nocb_defer_wakeup. However, despite some effort from several people, a failure scenario has not yet been located. However, that by no means guarantees that no such scenario exists. Finding a failure scenario is left as an exercise for the reader, and the "Fixes:" tag below relates to ->nocb_bypass_timer instead of ->nocb_timer. Fixes: d1b222c6be1f (rcu/nocb: Add bypass callback queueing) Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2022-02-23rcu: Do not report strict GPs for outgoing CPUsPaul E. McKenney
commit bfb3aa735f82c8d98b32a669934ee7d6b346264d upstream. An outgoing CPU is marked offline in a stop-machine handler and most of that CPU's services stop at that point, including IRQ work queues. However, that CPU must take another pass through the scheduler and through a number of CPU-hotplug notifiers, many of which contain RCU readers. In the past, these readers were not a problem because the outgoing CPU has interrupts disabled, so that rcu_read_unlock_special() would not be invoked, and thus RCU would never attempt to queue IRQ work on the outgoing CPU. This changed with the advent of the CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD Kconfig option, in which rcu_read_unlock_special() is invoked upon exit from almost all RCU read-side critical sections. Worse yet, because interrupts are disabled, rcu_read_unlock_special() cannot immediately report a quiescent state and will therefore attempt to defer this reporting, for example, by queueing IRQ work. Which fails with a splat because the CPU is already marked as being offline. But it turns out that there is no need to report this quiescent state because rcu_report_dead() will do this job shortly after the outgoing CPU makes its final dive into the idle loop. This commit therefore makes rcu_read_unlock_special() refrain from queuing IRQ work onto outgoing CPUs. Fixes: 44bad5b3cca2 ("rcu: Do full report for .need_qs for strict GPs") Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-11-18rcu: Always inline rcu_dynticks_task*_{enter,exit}()Peter Zijlstra
[ Upstream commit 7663ad9a5dbcc27f3090e6bfd192c7e59222709f ] RCU managed to grow a few noinstr violations: vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_dynticks_eqs_enter()+0x0: call to rcu_dynticks_task_trace_enter() leaves .noinstr.text section vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: rcu_dynticks_eqs_exit()+0xe: call to rcu_dynticks_task_trace_exit() leaves .noinstr.text section Fix them by adding __always_inline to the relevant trivial functions. Also replace the noinstr with __always_inline for the existing rcu_dynticks_task_*() functions since noinstr would force noinline them, even when empty, which seems silly. Fixes: 7d0c9c50c5a1 ("rcu-tasks: Avoid IPIing userspace/idle tasks if kernel is so built") Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-18rcu: Fix macro name CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRACEZhouyi Zhou
[ Upstream commit fed31a4dd3adb5455df7c704de2abb639a1dc1c0 ] This commit fixes several typos where CONFIG_TASKS_RCU_TRACE should instead be CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU. Among other things, these typos could cause CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB=y kernels to suffer from memory-ordering bugs that could result in false-positive quiescent states and too-short grace periods. Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-09-15rcu: Add lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() to rcu_sched_clock_irq() and calleesPaul E. McKenney
[ Upstream commit a649d25dcc671a33b9cc3176411920fdc5fbd98e ] This commit adds a number of lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() calls to rcu_sched_clock_irq() and a number of the functions that it calls. The point of this is to help track down a situation where lockdep appears to be insisting that interrupts are enabled within these functions, which should only ever be invoked from the scheduling-clock interrupt handler. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201111133813.GA81547@elver.google.com/ Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2021-03-04rcu/nocb: Perform deferred wake up before last idle's need_resched() checkFrederic Weisbecker
commit 43789ef3f7d61aa7bed0cb2764e588fc990c30ef upstream. Entering RCU idle mode may cause a deferred wake up of an RCU NOCB_GP kthread (rcuog) to be serviced. Usually a local wake up happening while running the idle task is handled in one of the need_resched() checks carefully placed within the idle loop that can break to the scheduler. Unfortunately the call to rcu_idle_enter() is already beyond the last generic need_resched() check and we may halt the CPU with a resched request unhandled, leaving the task hanging. Fix this with splitting the rcuog wakeup handling from rcu_idle_enter() and place it before the last generic need_resched() check in the idle loop. It is then assumed that no call to call_rcu() will be performed after that in the idle loop until the CPU is put in low power mode. Fixes: 96d3fd0d315a (rcu: Break call_rcu() deadlock involving scheduler and perf) Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210131230548.32970-3-frederic@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2020-09-03Merge branch 'strictgp.2020.08.24a' into HEADPaul E. McKenney
strictgp.2020.08.24a: Strict grace periods for KASAN testing.
2020-08-24rcu: Remove unused "cpu" parameter from rcu_report_qs_rdp()Paul E. McKenney
The "cpu" parameter to rcu_report_qs_rdp() is not used, with rdp->cpu being used instead. Furtheremore, every call to rcu_report_qs_rdp() invokes it on rdp->cpu. This commit therefore removes this unused "cpu" parameter and converts a check of rdp->cpu against smp_processor_id() to a WARN_ON_ONCE(). Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Report QS for outermost PREEMPT=n rcu_read_unlock() for strict GPsPaul E. McKenney
The CONFIG_PREEMPT=n instance of rcu_read_unlock is even more aggressively than that of CONFIG_PREEMPT=y in deferring reporting quiescent states to the RCU core. This is just what is wanted in normal use because it reduces overhead, but the resulting delay is not what is wanted for kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y. This commit therefore adds an rcu_read_unlock_strict() function that checks for exceptional conditions, and reports the newly started quiescent state if it is safe to do so, also doing a spin-delay if requested via rcutree.rcu_unlock_delay. This commit also adds a call to rcu_read_unlock_strict() from the CONFIG_PREEMPT=n instance of __rcu_read_unlock(). [ paulmck: Fixed bug located by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> ] Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Provide optional RCU-reader exit delay for strict GPsPaul E. McKenney
The goal of this series is to increase the probability of tools like KASAN detecting that an RCU-protected pointer was used outside of its RCU read-side critical section. Thus far, the approach has been to make grace periods and callback processing happen faster. Another approach is to delay the pointer leaker. This commit therefore allows a delay to be applied to exit from RCU read-side critical sections. This slowdown is specified by a new rcutree.rcu_unlock_delay kernel boot parameter that specifies this delay in microseconds, defaulting to zero. Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Do full report for .need_qs for strict GPsPaul E. McKenney
The rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore() function is invoked at the end of an RCU read-side critical section (for example, directly from rcu_read_unlock()) and, if .need_qs is set, invokes rcu_qs() to report the new quiescent state. This works, except that rcu_qs() only updates per-CPU state, leaving reporting of the actual quiescent state to a later call to rcu_report_qs_rdp(), for example from within a later RCU_SOFTIRQ instance. Although this approach is exactly what you want if you are more concerned about efficiency than about short grace periods, in CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y kernels, short grace periods are the name of the game. This commit therefore makes rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore() directly invoke rcu_report_qs_rdp() in CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y, thus shortening grace periods. Historical note: To the best of my knowledge, causing rcu_read_unlock() to directly report a quiescent state first appeared in Jim Houston's and Joe Korty's JRCU. This is the second instance of a Linux-kernel RCU feature being inspired by JRCU, the first being RCU callback offloading (as in the RCU_NOCB_CPU Kconfig option). Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Always set .need_qs from __rcu_read_lock() for strict GPsPaul E. McKenney
The ->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs field in the task_struct structure indicates that the RCU core needs a quiscent state from the corresponding task. The __rcu_read_unlock() function checks this (via an eventual call to rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore()), and if set reports a quiscent state immediately upon exit from the outermost RCU read-side critical section. Currently, this flag is only set when the scheduling-clock interrupt decides that the current RCU grace period is too old, as in about one full second too old. But if the kernel has been built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y, we clearly do not want to wait that long. This commit therefore sets the .need_qs field immediately at the start of the RCU read-side critical section from within __rcu_read_lock() in order to unconditionally enlist help from __rcu_read_unlock(). But note the additional check for rcu_state.gp_kthread, which prevents attempts to awaken RCU's grace-period kthread during early boot before there is a scheduler. Leaving off this check results in early boot hangs. So early that there is no console output. Thus, this additional check fails until such time as RCU's grace-period kthread has been created, avoiding these empty-console hangs. Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu: Add Kconfig option for strict RCU grace periodsPaul E. McKenney
People running automated tests have asked for a way to make RCU minimize grace-period duration in order to increase the probability of KASAN detecting a pointer being improperly leaked from an RCU read-side critical section, for example, like this: rcu_read_lock(); p = rcu_dereference(gp); do_something_with(p); // OK rcu_read_unlock(); do_something_else_with(p); // BUG!!! The rcupdate.rcu_expedited boot parameter is a start in this direction, given that it makes calls to synchronize_rcu() instead invoke the faster (and more wasteful) synchronize_rcu_expedited(). However, this does nothing to shorten RCU grace periods that are instead initiated by call_rcu(), and RCU pointer-leak bugs can involve call_rcu() just as surely as they can synchronize_rcu(). This commit therefore adds a RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD Kconfig option that will be used to shorten normal (non-expedited) RCU grace periods. This commit also dumps out a message when this option is in effect. Later commits will actually shorten grace periods. Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24rcu/nocb: Add a warning for non-GP kthread running GP codePaul E. McKenney
This commit increases RCU's ability to defend itself by emitting a warning if one of the nocb CB kthreads invokes the GP kthread's wait function. This warning augments a similar check that is carried out at the end of rcutorture testing and when RCU CPU stall warnings are emitted. The problem with those checks is that the miscreants have long since departed and disposed of any and all evidence. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24nocb: Remove show_rcu_nocb_state() false positive printoutPaul E. McKenney
The rcu_data structure's ->nocb_timer field is used to defer wakeups of the corresponding no-CBs CPU's grace-period kthread ("rcuog*"), and that structure's ->nocb_defer_wakeup field is used to track such deferral. This means that the show_rcu_nocb_state() printing an error when those fields are set for a CPU not corresponding to a no-CBs grace-period kthread is erroneous. This commit therefore switches the check from ->nocb_timer to ->nocb_bypass_timer and removes the check of ->nocb_defer_wakeup. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-08-24nocb: Clarify RCU nocb CPU error messagePaul E. McKenney
A message of the form "rcu: !!! lDTs ." can be tracked down, but doing so is not trivial. This commit therefore eases this process by adding text so that this error message now reads as follows: "rcu: nocb GP activity on CB-only CPU!!! lDTs ." Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-06-29rcu: No-CBs-related sleeps to idle priorityPaul E. McKenney
This commit converts the schedule_timeout_interruptible() call used by RCU's no-CBs grace-period kthreads to schedule_timeout_idle(). This conversion avoids polluting the load-average with RCU-related sleeping. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-06-29rcu: Priority-boost-related sleeps to idle priorityPaul E. McKenney
This commit converts the long-standing schedule_timeout_interruptible() call used by RCU's priority-boosting kthreads to schedule_timeout_idle(). This conversion avoids polluting the load-average with RCU-related sleeping. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-05-19rcu/tree: Mark the idle relevant functions noinstrThomas Gleixner
These functions are invoked from context tracking and other places in the low level entry code. Move them into the .noinstr.text section to exclude them from instrumentation. Mark the places which are safe to invoke traceable functions with instrumentation_begin/end() so objtool won't complain. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200505134100.575356107@linutronix.de
2020-05-07Merge branches 'fixes.2020.04.27a', 'kfree_rcu.2020.04.27a', ↵Paul E. McKenney
'rcu-tasks.2020.04.27a', 'stall.2020.04.27a' and 'torture.2020.05.07a' into HEAD fixes.2020.04.27a: Miscellaneous fixes. kfree_rcu.2020.04.27a: Changes related to kfree_rcu(). rcu-tasks.2020.04.27a: Addition of new RCU-tasks flavors. stall.2020.04.27a: RCU CPU stall-warning updates. torture.2020.05.07a: Torture-test updates.
2020-04-27rcu-tasks: Avoid IPIing userspace/idle tasks if kernel is so builtPaul E. McKenney
Systems running CPU-bound real-time task do not want IPIs sent to CPUs executing nohz_full userspace tasks. Battery-powered systems don't want IPIs sent to idle CPUs in low-power mode. Unfortunately, RCU tasks trace can and will send such IPIs in some cases. Both of these situations occur only when the target CPU is in RCU dyntick-idle mode, in other words, when RCU is not watching the target CPU. This suggests that CPUs in dyntick-idle mode should use memory barriers in outermost invocations of rcu_read_lock_trace() and rcu_read_unlock_trace(), which would allow the RCU tasks trace grace period to directly read out the target CPU's read-side state. One challenge is that RCU tasks trace is not targeting a specific CPU, but rather a task. And that task could switch from one CPU to another at any time. This commit therefore uses try_invoke_on_locked_down_task() and checks for task_curr() in trc_inspect_reader_notrunning(). When this condition holds, the target task is running and cannot move. If CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB=y, the new rcu_dynticks_zero_in_eqs() function can be used to check if the specified integer (in this case, t->trc_reader_nesting) is zero while the target CPU remains in that same dyntick-idle sojourn. If so, the target task is in a quiescent state. If not, trc_read_check_handler() must indicate failure so that the grace-period kthread can take appropriate action or retry after an appropriate delay, as the case may be. With this change, given CONFIG_TASKS_TRACE_RCU_READ_MB=y, if a given CPU remains idle or a given task continues executing in nohz_full mode, the RCU tasks trace grace-period kthread will detect this without the need to send an IPI. Suggested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu-tasks: Make RCU Tasks Trace make use of RCU scheduler hooksPaul E. McKenney
This commit makes the calls to rcu_tasks_qs() detect and report quiescent states for RCU tasks trace. If the task is in a quiescent state and if ->trc_reader_checked is not yet set, the task sets its own ->trc_reader_checked. This will cause the grace-period kthread to remove it from the holdout list if it still remains there. [ paulmck: Fix conditional compilation per kbuild test robot feedback. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu-tasks: Use context-switch hook for PREEMPT=y kernelsPaul E. McKenney
Currently, the PREEMPT=y version of rcu_note_context_switch() does not invoke rcu_tasks_qs(), and we need it to in order to keep RCU Tasks Trace's IPIs down to a dull roar. This commit therefore enables this hook. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu: Don't use negative nesting depth in __rcu_read_unlock()Lai Jiangshan
Now that RCU flavors have been consolidated, an RCU-preempt rcu_read_unlock() in an interrupt or softirq handler cannot possibly end the RCU read-side critical section. Consider the old vulnerability involving rcu_read_unlock() being invoked within such a handler that interrupted an __rcu_read_unlock_special(), in which a wakeup might be invoked with a scheduler lock held. Because rcu_read_unlock_special() no longer does wakeups in such situations, it is no longer necessary for __rcu_read_unlock() to set the nesting level negative. This commit therefore removes this recursion-protection code from __rcu_read_unlock(). [ paulmck: Let rcu_exp_handler() continue to call rcu_report_exp_rdp(). ] [ paulmck: Adjust other checks given no more negative nesting. ] Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu: Remove unused ->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.deferred_qs fieldLai Jiangshan
The ->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.deferred_qs field is set to true in rcu_read_unlock_special() but never set to false. This is not particularly useful, so this commit removes this field. The only possible justification for this field is to ease debugging of RCU deferred quiscent states, but the combination of the other ->rcu_read_unlock_special fields plus ->rcu_blocked_node and of course ->rcu_read_lock_nesting should cover debugging needs. And if this last proves incorrect, this patch can always be reverted, along with the required setting of ->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.deferred_qs to false in rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(). Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu: Don't set nesting depth negative in rcu_preempt_deferred_qs()Lai Jiangshan
Now that RCU flavors have been consolidated, an RCU-preempt rcu_read_unlock() in an interrupt or softirq handler cannot possibly end the RCU read-side critical section. Consider the old vulnerability involving rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() being invoked within such a handler that interrupted an extended RCU read-side critical section, in which a wakeup might be invoked with a scheduler lock held. Because rcu_read_unlock_special() no longer does wakeups in such situations, it is no longer necessary for rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() to set the nesting level negative. This commit therefore removes this recursion-protection code from rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(). [ paulmck: Fix typo in commit log per Steve Rostedt. ] Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu: Make rcu_read_unlock_special() safe for rq/pi locksPaul E. McKenney
The scheduler is currently required to hold rq/pi locks across the entire RCU read-side critical section or not at all. This is inconvenient and leaves traps for the unwary, including the author of this commit. But now that excessively long grace periods enable scheduling-clock interrupts for holdout nohz_full CPUs, the nohz_full rescue logic in rcu_read_unlock_special() can be dispensed with. In other words, the rcu_read_unlock_special() function can refrain from doing wakeups unless such wakeups are guaranteed safe. This commit therefore avoids unsafe wakeups, freeing the scheduler to hold rq/pi locks across rcu_read_unlock() even if the corresponding RCU read-side critical section might have been preempted. This commit also updates RCU's requirements documentation. This commit is inspired by a patch from Lai Jiangshan: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191102124559.1135-2-laijs@linux.alibaba.com This commit is further intended to be a step towards his goal of permitting the inlining of RCU-preempt's rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock(). Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu: Convert rcu_nohz_full_cpu() ULONG_CMP_LT() to time_before()Paul E. McKenney
This commit converts the ULONG_CMP_LT() in rcu_nohz_full_cpu() to time_before() to reflect the fact that it is comparing a timestamp to the jiffies counter. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu: Convert rcu_initiate_boost() ULONG_CMP_GE() to time_after()Paul E. McKenney
This commit converts the ULONG_CMP_GE() in rcu_initiate_boost() to time_after() to reflect the fact that it is comparing a timestamp to the jiffies counter. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu: Add WRITE_ONCE() to rcu_node ->boost_tasksPaul E. McKenney
The rcu_node structure's ->boost_tasks field is read locklessly, so this commit adds the WRITE_ONCE() to an update in order to provide proper documentation and READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE() pairing. This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting due to failure being unlikely. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu: Add READ_ONCE and data_race() to rcu_node ->boost_tasksPaul E. McKenney
The rcu_node structure's ->boost_tasks field is read locklessly, so this commit adds the READ_ONCE() to one load in order to avoid destructive compiler optimizations. The other load is from a diagnostic print, so data_race() suffices. This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting due to failure being unlikely. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-04-27rcu: Add *_ONCE() and data_race() to rcu_node ->exp_tasks plus lockingPaul E. McKenney
There are lockless loads from the rcu_node structure's ->exp_tasks field, so this commit causes all stores to use WRITE_ONCE() and all lockless loads to use READ_ONCE() or data_race(), with the latter for debug prints. This code also did a unprotected traversal of the linked list pointed into by ->exp_tasks, so this commit also acquires the rcu_node structure's ->lock to properly protect this traversal. This list was traversed unprotected only when printing an RCU CPU stall warning for an expedited grace period, so the odds of seeing this in production are not all that high. This data race was reported by KCSAN. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-03-21Merge branches 'doc.2020.02.27a', 'fixes.2020.03.21a', ↵Paul E. McKenney
'kfree_rcu.2020.02.20a', 'locktorture.2020.02.20a', 'ovld.2020.02.20a', 'rcu-tasks.2020.02.20a', 'srcu.2020.02.20a' and 'torture.2020.02.20a' into HEAD doc.2020.02.27a: Documentation updates. fixes.2020.03.21a: Miscellaneous fixes. kfree_rcu.2020.02.20a: Updates to kfree_rcu(). locktorture.2020.02.20a: Lock torture-test updates. ovld.2020.02.20a: Updates to callback-overload handling. rcu-tasks.2020.02.20a: RCU-tasks updates. srcu.2020.02.20a: SRCU updates. torture.2020.02.20a: Torture-test updates.
2020-02-20rcu: Fix spelling mistake "leval" -> "level"Colin Ian King
This commit fixes a spelling mistake in a pr_info() message. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-02-20rcu: React to callback overload by boosting RCU readersPaul E. McKenney
RCU priority boosting currently is not applied until the grace period is at least 250 milliseconds old (or the number of milliseconds specified by the CONFIG_RCU_BOOST_DELAY Kconfig option). Although this has worked well, it can result in OOM under conditions of RCU callback flooding. One can argue that the real-time systems using RCU priority boosting should carefully avoid RCU callback flooding, but one can just as well argue that an OOM is a rather obnoxious error message. This commit therefore disables the RCU priority boosting delay when there are excessive numbers of callbacks queued. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-02-20rcu: React to callback overload by aggressively seeking quiescent statesPaul E. McKenney
In default configutions, RCU currently waits at least 100 milliseconds before asking cond_resched() and/or resched_rcu() for help seeking quiescent states to end a grace period. But 100 milliseconds can be one good long time during an RCU callback flood, for example, as can happen when user processes repeatedly open and close files in a tight loop. These 100-millisecond gaps in successive grace periods during a callback flood can result in excessive numbers of callbacks piling up, unnecessarily increasing memory footprint. This commit therefore asks cond_resched() and/or resched_rcu() for help as early as the first FQS scan when at least one of the CPUs has more than 20,000 callbacks queued, a number that can be changed using the new rcutree.qovld kernel boot parameter. An auxiliary qovld_calc variable is used to avoid acquisition of locks that have not yet been initialized. Early tests indicate that this reduces the RCU-callback memory footprint during rcutorture floods by from 50% to 4x, depending on configuration. Reported-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> [ paulmck: Fix bug located by Qian Cai. ] Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Tested-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> Tested-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
2020-02-20rcu: Make nocb_gp_wait() double-check unexpected-callback warningPaul E. McKenney
Currently, nocb_gp_wait() unconditionally complains if there is a callback not already associated with a grace period. This assumes that either there was no such callback initially on the one hand, or that the rcu_advance_cbs() function assigned all such callbacks to a grace period on the other. However, in theory there are some situations that would prevent rcu_advance_cbs() from assigning all of the callbacks. This commit therefore checks for unassociated callbacks immediately after rcu_advance_cbs() returns, while the corresponding rcu_node structure's ->lock is still held. If there are unassociated callbacks at that point, the subsequent WARN_ON_ONCE() is disabled. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-02-20rcu: Tighten rcu_lockdep_assert_cblist_protected() checkPaul E. McKenney
The ->nocb_lock lockdep assertion is currently guarded by cpu_online(), which is incorrect for no-CBs CPUs, whose callback lists must be protected by ->nocb_lock regardless of whether or not the corresponding CPU is online. This situation could result in failure to detect bugs resulting from failing to hold ->nocb_lock for offline CPUs. This commit therefore removes the cpu_online() guard. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-02-20rcu/nocb: Add missing annotation for rcu_nocb_bypass_unlock()Jules Irenge
Sparse reports warning at rcu_nocb_bypass_unlock() warning: context imbalance in rcu_nocb_bypass_unlock() - unexpected unlock The root cause is a missing annotation of rcu_nocb_bypass_unlock() which causes the warning. This commit therefore adds the missing __releases(&rdp->nocb_bypass_lock) annotation. Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
2020-02-20rcu: Add missing annotation for rcu_nocb_bypass_lock()Jules Irenge
Sparse reports warning at rcu_nocb_bypass_lock() |warning: context imbalance in rcu_nocb_bypass_lock() - wrong count at exit To fix this, this commit adds an __acquires(&rdp->nocb_bypass_lock). Given that rcu_nocb_bypass_lock() does actually call raw_spin_lock() when raw_spin_trylock() fails, this not only fixes the warning but also improves on the readability of the code. Signed-off-by: Jules Irenge <jbi.octave@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-02-20rcu: Add *_ONCE() to rcu_node ->boost_kthread_statusPaul E. McKenney
The rcu_node structure's ->boost_kthread_status field is accessed locklessly, so this commit causes all updates to use WRITE_ONCE() and all reads to use READ_ONCE(). This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting due to failure being unlikely. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-02-20rcu: Add *_ONCE() for grace-period progress indicatorsPaul E. McKenney
The various RCU structures' ->gp_seq, ->gp_seq_needed, ->gp_req_activity, and ->gp_activity fields are read locklessly, so they must be updated with WRITE_ONCE() and, when read locklessly, with READ_ONCE(). This commit makes these changes. This data race was reported by KCSAN. Not appropriate for backporting due to failure being unlikely. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24Merge branches 'doc.2019.12.10a', 'exp.2019.12.09a', 'fixes.2020.01.24a', ↵Paul E. McKenney
'kfree_rcu.2020.01.24a', 'list.2020.01.10a', 'preempt.2020.01.24a' and 'torture.2019.12.09a' into HEAD doc.2019.12.10a: Documentations updates exp.2019.12.09a: Expedited grace-period updates fixes.2020.01.24a: Miscellaneous fixes kfree_rcu.2020.01.24a: Batch kfree_rcu() work list.2020.01.10a: RCU-protected-list updates preempt.2020.01.24a: Preemptible RCU updates torture.2019.12.09a: Torture-test updates
2020-01-24rcu: Provide wrappers for uses of ->rcu_read_lock_nestingLai Jiangshan
This commit provides wrapper functions for uses of ->rcu_read_lock_nesting to improve readability and to ease future changes to support inlining of __rcu_read_lock() and __rcu_read_unlock(). Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Use READ_ONCE() for ->expmask in rcu_read_unlock_special()Paul E. McKenney
The rcu_node structure's ->expmask field is updated only when holding the ->lock, but is also accessed locklessly. This means that all ->expmask updates must use WRITE_ONCE() and all reads carried out without holding ->lock must use READ_ONCE(). This commit therefore changes the lockless ->expmask read in rcu_read_unlock_special() to use READ_ONCE(). Reported-by: syzbot+99f4ddade3c22ab0cf23@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
2020-01-24rcu: Clear ->rcu_read_unlock_special only onceLai Jiangshan
In rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(), ->rcu_read_unlock_special is cleared one piece at a time. Given that the "if" statements in this function use the copy in "special", this commit removes the clearing of the individual pieces in favor of clearing ->rcu_read_unlock_special in one go just after it has been determined to be non-zero. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2020-01-24rcu: Clear .exp_hint only when deferred quiescent state has been reportedLai Jiangshan
Currently, the .exp_hint flag is cleared in rcu_read_unlock_special(), which works, but which can also prevent subsequent rcu_read_unlock() calls from helping expedite the quiescent state needed by an ongoing expedited RCU grace period. This commit therefore defers clearing of .exp_hint from rcu_read_unlock_special() to rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(), thus ensuring that intervening calls to rcu_read_unlock() have a chance to help end the expedited grace period. Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>