From b399151cb48db30ad1e0e93dd40d68c6d007b637 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jia Zhang Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2018 09:52:10 +0800 Subject: x86/cpu: Rename cpu_data.x86_mask to cpu_data.x86_stepping x86_mask is a confusing name which is hard to associate with the processor's stepping. Additionally, correct an indent issue in lib/cpu.c. Signed-off-by: Jia Zhang [ Updated it to more recent kernels. ] Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: bp@alien8.de Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1514771530-70829-1-git-send-email-qianyue.zj@alibaba-inc.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c index f7c55b0e753a..b94279bb5c04 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ static bool is_blacklisted(unsigned int cpu) */ if (c->x86 == 6 && c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL_X && - c->x86_mask == 0x01 && + c->x86_stepping == 0x01 && llc_size_per_core > 2621440 && c->microcode < 0x0b000021) { pr_err_once("Erratum BDF90: late loading with revision < 0x0b000021 (0x%x) disabled.\n", c->microcode); @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device, return UCODE_NFOUND; sprintf(name, "intel-ucode/%02x-%02x-%02x", - c->x86, c->x86_model, c->x86_mask); + c->x86, c->x86_model, c->x86_stepping); if (request_firmware_direct(&firmware, name, device)) { pr_debug("data file %s load failed\n", name); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 24dbc6000f4b9b0ef5a9daecb161f1907733765a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 13:22:08 -0600 Subject: x86/cpu: Change type of x86_cache_size variable to unsigned int Currently, x86_cache_size is of type int, which makes no sense as we will never have a valid cache size equal or less than 0. So instead of initializing this variable to -1, it can perfectly be initialized to 0 and use it as an unsigned variable instead. Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1464429 Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180213192208.GA26414@embeddedor.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 2 +- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 4 ++-- 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h index b7c8583328c7..44c2c4ec6d60 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 { char x86_vendor_id[16]; char x86_model_id[64]; /* in KB - valid for CPUS which support this call: */ - int x86_cache_size; + unsigned int x86_cache_size; int x86_cache_alignment; /* In bytes */ /* Cache QoS architectural values: */ int x86_cache_max_rmid; /* max index */ diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index a7d8df641a4c..824aee0117bb 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -1184,7 +1184,7 @@ static void identify_cpu(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) int i; c->loops_per_jiffy = loops_per_jiffy; - c->x86_cache_size = -1; + c->x86_cache_size = 0; c->x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_UNKNOWN; c->x86_model = c->x86_stepping = 0; /* So far unknown... */ c->x86_vendor_id[0] = '\0'; /* Unset */ diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c index b94279bb5c04..a15db2b4e0d6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ static struct microcode_ops microcode_intel_ops = { static int __init calc_llc_size_per_core(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { - u64 llc_size = c->x86_cache_size * 1024; + u64 llc_size = c->x86_cache_size * 1024ULL; do_div(llc_size, c->x86_max_cores); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c index ee4cc388e8d3..2c8522a39ed5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c @@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v) } /* Cache size */ - if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0) - seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size); + if (c->x86_cache_size) + seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %u KB\n", c->x86_cache_size); show_cpuinfo_core(m, c, cpu); show_cpuinfo_misc(m, c); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 3f1f576a195aa266813cbd4ca70291deb61e0129 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:26:38 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode: Propagate return value from updating functions ... so that callers can know when microcode was updated and act accordingly. Tested-by: Ashok Raj Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Borislav Petkov Cc: Dan Williams Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: David Woodhouse Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180216112640.11554-2-bp@alien8.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 9 +++++++-- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c | 10 +++++----- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++---------------- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 10 +++++----- 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h index 55520cec8b27..7fb1047d61c7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h @@ -37,7 +37,12 @@ struct cpu_signature { struct device; -enum ucode_state { UCODE_ERROR, UCODE_OK, UCODE_NFOUND }; +enum ucode_state { + UCODE_OK = 0, + UCODE_UPDATED, + UCODE_NFOUND, + UCODE_ERROR, +}; struct microcode_ops { enum ucode_state (*request_microcode_user) (int cpu, @@ -54,7 +59,7 @@ struct microcode_ops { * are being called. * See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. */ - int (*apply_microcode) (int cpu); + enum ucode_state (*apply_microcode) (int cpu); int (*collect_cpu_info) (int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig); }; diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c index 330b8462d426..a998e1a7d46f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ static unsigned int verify_patch_size(u8 family, u32 patch_size, return patch_size; } -static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) +static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) { struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); struct microcode_amd *mc_amd; @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) p = find_patch(cpu); if (!p) - return 0; + return UCODE_NFOUND; mc_amd = p->data; uci->mc = p->data; @@ -523,13 +523,13 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) if (rev >= mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) { c->microcode = rev; uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; - return 0; + return UCODE_OK; } if (__apply_microcode_amd(mc_amd)) { pr_err("CPU%d: update failed for patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); - return -1; + return UCODE_ERROR; } pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id); @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu) uci->cpu_sig.rev = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; c->microcode = mc_amd->hdr.patch_id; - return 0; + return UCODE_UPDATED; } static int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c index 319dd65f98a2..6fdaf7cf3182 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu) } struct apply_microcode_ctx { - int err; + enum ucode_state err; }; static void apply_microcode_local(void *arg) @@ -489,31 +489,29 @@ static void __exit microcode_dev_exit(void) /* fake device for request_firmware */ static struct platform_device *microcode_pdev; -static int reload_for_cpu(int cpu) +static enum ucode_state reload_for_cpu(int cpu) { struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; enum ucode_state ustate; - int err = 0; if (!uci->valid) - return err; + return UCODE_OK; ustate = microcode_ops->request_microcode_fw(cpu, µcode_pdev->dev, true); - if (ustate == UCODE_OK) - apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); - else - if (ustate == UCODE_ERROR) - err = -EINVAL; - return err; + if (ustate != UCODE_OK) + return ustate; + + return apply_microcode_on_target(cpu); } static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t size) { + enum ucode_state tmp_ret = UCODE_OK; unsigned long val; + ssize_t ret = 0; int cpu; - ssize_t ret = 0, tmp_ret; ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val); if (ret) @@ -526,15 +524,18 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev, mutex_lock(µcode_mutex); for_each_online_cpu(cpu) { tmp_ret = reload_for_cpu(cpu); - if (tmp_ret != 0) + if (tmp_ret > UCODE_NFOUND) { pr_warn("Error reloading microcode on CPU %d\n", cpu); - /* save retval of the first encountered reload error */ - if (!ret) - ret = tmp_ret; + /* set retval for the first encountered reload error */ + if (!ret) + ret = -EINVAL; + } } - if (!ret) + + if (!ret && tmp_ret == UCODE_UPDATED) perf_check_microcode(); + mutex_unlock(µcode_mutex); put_online_cpus(); diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c index a15db2b4e0d6..923054a6b760 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig) return 0; } -static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) +static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) { struct microcode_intel *mc; struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; @@ -782,7 +782,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) /* We should bind the task to the CPU */ if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)) - return -1; + return UCODE_ERROR; uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; mc = uci->mc; @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) /* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */ mc = find_patch(uci); if (!mc) - return 0; + return UCODE_NFOUND; } /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ @@ -801,7 +801,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) if (rev != mc->hdr.rev) { pr_err("CPU%d update to revision 0x%x failed\n", cpu, mc->hdr.rev); - return -1; + return UCODE_ERROR; } if (rev != prev_rev) { @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; c->microcode = rev; - return 0; + return UCODE_UPDATED; } static enum ucode_state generic_load_microcode(int cpu, void *data, size_t size, -- cgit v1.2.3 From c182d2b7d0ca48e0d6ff16f7d883161238c447ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ashok Raj Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:41 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Check microcode revision before updating sibling threads After updating microcode on one of the threads of a core, the other thread sibling automatically gets the update since the microcode resources on a hyperthreaded core are shared between the two threads. Check the microcode revision on the CPU before performing a microcode update and thus save us the WRMSR 0x79 because it is a particularly expensive operation. [ Borislav: Massage changelog and coding style. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Tom Lendacky Tested-by: Ashok Raj Cc: Arjan Van De Ven Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-2-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-3-bp@alien8.de --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c index 923054a6b760..87bd6dc94081 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -589,6 +589,17 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early) if (!mc) return 0; + /* + * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive + * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode + * already. + */ + rev = intel_get_microcode_revision(); + if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) { + uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; + return UCODE_OK; + } + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); @@ -776,7 +787,7 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) { struct microcode_intel *mc; struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; - struct cpuinfo_x86 *c; + struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); static int prev_rev; u32 rev; @@ -793,6 +804,18 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) return UCODE_NFOUND; } + /* + * Save us the MSR write below - which is a particular expensive + * operation - when the other hyperthread has updated the microcode + * already. + */ + rev = intel_get_microcode_revision(); + if (rev >= mc->hdr.rev) { + uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; + c->microcode = rev; + return UCODE_OK; + } + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); @@ -813,8 +836,6 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) prev_rev = rev; } - c = &cpu_data(cpu); - uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev; c->microcode = rev; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 91df9fdf51492aec9fed6b4cbd33160886740f47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ashok Raj Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:42 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode Updating microcode is less error prone when caches have been flushed and depending on what exactly the microcode is updating. For example, some of the issues around certain Broadwell parts can be addressed by doing a full cache flush. [ Borislav: Massage it and use native_wbinvd() in both cases. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Tom Lendacky Tested-by: Ashok Raj Cc: Arjan Van De Ven Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1519352533-15992-3-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-4-bp@alien8.de --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c index 87bd6dc94081..e2864bc2d575 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -600,6 +600,12 @@ static int apply_microcode_early(struct ucode_cpu_info *uci, bool early) return UCODE_OK; } + /* + * Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to avoid + * internal issues depending on what the microcode is updating. + */ + native_wbinvd(); + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ native_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); @@ -816,6 +822,12 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) return UCODE_OK; } + /* + * Writeback and invalidate caches before updating microcode to avoid + * internal issues depending on what the microcode is updating. + */ + native_wbinvd(); + /* write microcode via MSR 0x79 */ wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_UCODE_WRITE, (unsigned long)mc->bits); -- cgit v1.2.3 From d8c3b52c00a05036e0a6b315b4b17921a7b67997 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Borislav Petkov Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:28:44 +0100 Subject: x86/microcode/intel: Look into the patch cache first The cache might contain a newer patch - look in there first. A follow-on change will make sure newest patches are loaded into the cache of microcode patches. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Tom Lendacky Tested-by: Ashok Raj Cc: Arjan Van De Ven Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180228102846.13447-6-bp@alien8.de --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c index e2864bc2d575..2aded9db1d42 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c @@ -791,9 +791,9 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig) static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) { - struct microcode_intel *mc; - struct ucode_cpu_info *uci; + struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu); + struct microcode_intel *mc; static int prev_rev; u32 rev; @@ -801,11 +801,10 @@ static enum ucode_state apply_microcode_intel(int cpu) if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu)) return UCODE_ERROR; - uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu; - mc = uci->mc; + /* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */ + mc = find_patch(uci); if (!mc) { - /* Look for a newer patch in our cache: */ - mc = find_patch(uci); + mc = uci->mc; if (!mc) return UCODE_NFOUND; } -- cgit v1.2.3