summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/library/machine.Signal.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHoward Lovatt <howard.lovatt@gmail.com>2020-10-10 08:18:24 +1100
committerDamien George <damien@micropython.org>2020-10-20 17:21:30 +1100
commitcf6845b1cf4680bb2eade175aaab00428bedf8ba (patch)
tree46c1fcc0d727ce271ec5b6d4d038ebd8f89fcbe8 /docs/library/machine.Signal.rst
parent23f9439f441173dae961de4d2fe73986c166ff8f (diff)
docs/library/machine.Signal.rst: Correct typo: usecases to use cases.
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/library/machine.Signal.rst')
-rw-r--r--docs/library/machine.Signal.rst2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/docs/library/machine.Signal.rst b/docs/library/machine.Signal.rst
index 651c8c849..1e1fcb548 100644
--- a/docs/library/machine.Signal.rst
+++ b/docs/library/machine.Signal.rst
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Following is the guide when Signal vs Pin should be used:
* Use Pin: If you implement a higher-level protocol or bus to communicate
with more complex devices.
-The split between Pin and Signal come from the usecases above and the
+The split between Pin and Signal come from the use cases above and the
architecture of MicroPython: Pin offers the lowest overhead, which may
be important when bit-banging protocols. But Signal adds additional
flexibility on top of Pin, at the cost of minor overhead (much smaller