| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
If a file is truncated, we must update minRecoveryPoint. Once a file is
truncated, there's no going back; it would not be safe to stop recovery
at a point earlier than that anymore.
Commit 7bffc9b7bf changed xact_redo_commit() so that it updates
minRecoveryPoint on truncation, but forgot to change xact_redo_abort().
Back-patch to all supported versions.
Reported-by: mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b029fce3-4fac-4265-968e-16f36ff4d075.mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com
|
|
This changes the behavior of examining the pg_file_settings view after
changing a config option that requires restart. The user needs to know
that any change of such options does not take effect until a restart,
and this worked correctly if the line is edited without removing it.
However, for the case where the line is removed altogether, the flag
doesn't get set, because a flag was only set in set_config_option, but
that's not called for lines removed. Repair.
(Ref.: commits 62d16c7fc561 and a486e35706ea)
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202107262302.xsfdfc5sb7sh@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
The error messages using the word "non-negative" are confusing
because it's ambiguous about whether it accepts zero or not.
This commit improves those error messages by replacing it with
less ambiguous word like "greater than zero" or
"greater than or equal to zero".
Also this commit added the note about the word "non-negative" to
the error message style guide, to help writing the new error messages.
When postgres_fdw option fetch_size was set to zero, previously
the error message "fetch_size requires a non-negative integer value"
was reported. This error message was outright buggy. Therefore
back-patch to all supported versions where such buggy error message
could be thrown.
Reported-by: Hou Zhijie
Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716415335A06B489F1B3A8194569@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Add pg_resetxlog -u option to set the oldest xid in pg_control.
Previously -x set this value be -2 billion less than the -x value.
However, this causes the server to immediately scan all relation's
relfrozenxid so it can advance pg_control's oldest xid to be inside the
autovacuum_freeze_max_age range, which is inefficient and might disrupt
diagnostic recovery. pg_upgrade will use this option to better create
the new cluster to match the old cluster.
Reported-by: Jason Harvey, Floris Van Nee
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20190615183759.GB239428@rfd.leadboat.com, 87da83168c644fd9aae38f546cc70295@opammb0562.comp.optiver.com
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
|
These have been introduced by 7fbe0c8, and could happen for
pg_basebackup and pg_receivewal.
Per report from Coverity for the ones in walmethods.c, I have spotted
the ones in receivelog.c after more review.
Backpatch-through: 10
|
|
This commit changes the startup process in the standby server so that
it handles the interrupt signals after waiting for wal_retrieve_retry_interval
on the latch and resetting it, before entering another wait on the latch.
This change causes the standby server to promptly handle interrupt signals.
Otherwise, previously, there was the case where the standby needs to
wait extra five seconds to shutdown when the shutdown request arrived
while the startup process was waiting for wal_retrieve_retry_interval
on the latch.
Author: Fujii Masao, but implementation idea is from Soumyadeep Chakraborty
Reviewed-by: Soumyadeep Chakraborty
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9d7e6ab0-8a53-ddb9-63cd-289bcb25fe0e@oss.nttdata.com
Per discussion of BUG #17073, back-patch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17073-1a5fdaed0fa5d4d0@postgresql.org
|
|
We have an implementation restriction that PREPARE TRANSACTION can't
handle cases where both session-lifespan and transaction-lifespan locks
are held on the same lockable object. (That's because we'd otherwise
need to acquire a new PROCLOCK entry during post-prepare cleanup, which
is an operation that might fail. The situation can only arise with odd
usages of advisory locks, so removing the restriction is probably not
worth the amount of effort it would take.) AtPrepare_Locks attempted
to enforce this, but its logic was many bricks shy of a load, because
it only detected cases where the session and transaction locks had the
same lockmode. Locks of different modes on the same object would lead
to the rather unhelpful message "PANIC: we seem to have dropped a bit
somewhere".
To fix, build a transient hashtable with one entry per locktag,
not one per locktag + mode, and use that to detect conflicts.
Per bug #17122 from Alexander Pyhalov. This bug is ancient,
so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17122-04f3c32098a62233@postgresql.org
|
|
We previously took a hard-line attitude that callers should never print
a null string pointer, and doing so is worthy of an assertion failure
or crash. However, we've long since flushed out any easy-to-find bugs
of that nature. What remains is a lot of code that perhaps could fail
that way in hard-to-reach corner cases. For example, in something as
simple as
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_OBJECT),
errmsg("constraint \"%s\" for table \"%s\" does not exist",
conname, get_rel_name(relid))));
one must wonder whether it's completely guaranteed that get_rel_name
cannot return NULL in this context. If such a situation did occur,
the existing policy converts what might be a pretty minor bug into
a server crash condition. This is not good for robustness.
Hence, let's follow the lead of glibc and print "(null)" instead
of failing. We should, of course, still consider it a bug if that
behavior is reachable in ordinary use; but crashing seems less
desirable than not crashing.
This fix works across-the-board in v12 and up, where we always use
src/port/snprintf.c. Before that, on most platforms we're at the mercy
of the local libc, but it appears that Solaris 10 is the only supported
platform where we'd still get a crash. Most other platforms such as
*BSD, macOS, and Solaris 11 have adopted glibc's behavior at some
point. (AIX and HPUX just print "" not "(null)", but that's close
enough.) I've not checked what Windows' native printf would do, but
it doesn't matter because we've long used snprintf.c on that platform.
In v12 and up, also const-ify related code so that we're not casting
away const on the constant string. This is just neatnik-ism, since
next to no compilers will warn about that.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17098-b960f3616c861f83@postgresql.org
|
|
Back-patch to v10 where pg_import_system_collations() was added.
Author: Atsushi Torikoshi
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b7f484692a3e283710032e68b7f40617@oss.nttdata.com
|
|
If an error was raised during our initial attempt to check whether
a successfully-compiled expression is "simple", subsequent calls of
exec_stmt_execsql would suppose that stmt->mod_stmt was already computed
when it had not been. This could lead to assertion failures in debug
builds; in production builds the effect would typically be to act as
if INTO STRICT had been specified even when it had not been. Of course
that only matters if the subsequent attempt to execute the expression
succeeds, so that the problem can only be reached by fixing a failure
in some referenced, inline-able SQL function and then retrying the
calling plpgsql function in the same session.
(There might be even-more-obscure ways to change the expression's
behavior without changing the plpgsql function, but that one seems
like the only one people would be likely to hit in practice.)
The most foolproof way to fix this would be to arrange for
exec_prepare_plan to not set expr->plan until we've finished the
subsidiary simple-expression check. But it seems hard to do that
without creating reference-count leak issues. So settle for documenting
the hazard in a comment and fixing exec_stmt_execsql to test separately
for whether it's computed stmt->mod_stmt. (That adds a test-and-branch
per execution, but hopefully that's negligible in context.) In v11 and
up, also fix exec_stmt_call which had a variant of the same issue.
Per bug #17113 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17113-077605ce00e0e7ec@postgresql.org
|
|
The logic handling the opening of new WAL segments was fuzzy when using
--compress if a partial, non-compressed, segment with the same base name
existed in the repository storing those files. In this case, using
--compress would cause the code to first check for the existence and the
size of a non-compressed segment, followed by the opening of a new
compressed, partial, segment. The code was accidentally working
correctly on most platforms as the buildfarm has proved, except
bowerbird where gzflush() could fail in this code path. It is wrong
anyway to take the code path used pre-padding when creating a new
partial, non-compressed, segment, so let's fix it.
Note that this issue exists when users mix successive runs of
pg_receivewal with or without compression, as discovered with the tests
introduced by ffc9dda.
While on it, this refactors the code so as code paths that need to know
about the ".gz" suffix are down from four to one in walmethods.c, easing
a bit the introduction of new compression methods. This addresses a
second issue where log messages generated for an unexpected failure
would not show the compressed segment name involved, which was
confusing, printing instead the name of the non-compressed equivalent.
Reported-by: Georgios Kokolatos
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YPDLz2x3o1aX2wRh@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 10
|
|
We don't allow to create replication slot_name as an empty string ('') via
SQL API pg_create_logical_replication_slot() but it is allowed to be set
via Alter Subscription command. This will lead to apply worker repeatedly
keep trying to stream data via slot_name '' and the user is not allowed to
create the slot with that name.
Author: Japin Li
Reviewed-By: Ranier Vilela, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 10, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/MEYP282MB1669CBD98E721C77CA696499B61A9@MEYP282MB1669.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
|
|
This grammar has no effect as there are no dependencies on statistics,
but it is supported by the parser. This is more consistent with the
other DROP commands.
Author: Vignesh C
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm1LA=yNmzcSfy+0oe6CEAgsxXRf_-UutE3ZncFi8QkFNQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 10
|
|
We had documentation of default_transaction_isolation et al,
but for some reason not of transaction_isolation et al.
AFAICS this is just an ancient oversight, so repair.
Per bug #17077 from Yanliang Lei.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17077-ade8e166a01e1374@postgresql.org
|
|
41469253e went to the trouble of removing a theoretical bug from
free_sort_tuple by checking if the tuple was NULL before freeing it. Let's
make this a little more robust by also setting the tuple to NULL so that
should we be called again we won't end up doing a pfree on the already
pfree'd tuple. Per advice from Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3188192.1626136953@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 9.6, same as 41469253e
|
|
This fixes a theoretical bug in tuplesort.c which, if a bounded sort was
used in combination with a byval Datum sort (tuplesort_begin_datum), when
switching the sort to a bounded heap in make_bounded_heap(), we'd call
free_sort_tuple(). The problem was that when sorting Datums of a byval
type, the tuple is NULL and free_sort_tuple() would free the memory for it
regardless of that. This would result in a crash.
Here we fix that simply by adding a check to see if the tuple is NULL
before trying to disassociate and free any memory belonging to it.
The reason this bug is only theoretical is that nowhere in the current
code base do we do tuplesort_set_bound() when performing a Datum sort.
However, let's backpatch a fix for this as if any extension uses the code
in this way then it's likely to cause problems.
Author: Ronan Dunklau
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpdoqNC5FjDb3KUTSMs5dg6f+XxH4Bg_dVcLi8UYAG3EQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6, oldest supported version
|
|
|
|
This should have been removed in commit 7e30c186da, which split the loop
into two. Only the first loop uses the 'from' variable; updating it in
the second loop is bogus. It was never read after the first loop, so this
was harmless and surely optimized away by the compiler, but let's be tidy.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEudQAoWq%2BAL3BnELHu7gms2GN07k-np6yLbukGaxJ1vY-zeiQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Although we were careful to lock the object being added or dropped,
we failed to get any sort of lock on the extension itself. This
allowed the ALTER to proceed in parallel with a DROP EXTENSION,
which is problematic for a couple of reasons. If both commands
succeeded we'd be left with a dangling link in pg_depend, which
would cause problems later. Also, if the ALTER failed for some
reason, it might try to print the extension's name, and that could
result in a crash or (in older branches) a silly error message
complaining about extension "(null)".
Per bug #17098 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all
supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17098-b960f3616c861f83@postgresql.org
|
|
This fixes an overflow error when using the numeric * operator if the
result has more than 16383 digits after the decimal point by rounding
the result. Overflow errors should only occur if the result has too
many digits *before* the decimal point.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCUmeFWCrq2dNzZpRj5+6LfN85jYiDoqm+ucSXhb9U2TbA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
I incorrectly diagnosed the reason why hoverfly is unhappy.
Looking closer, it appears that it fails to link libldap
unless libssl is also present; so the problem was my
idea of clearing LIBS before making the check. Revert
to essentially the original coding, except that instead
of failing when libldap_r isn't there, use libldap.
Per buildfarm member hoverfly.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17083-a19190d9591946a7@postgresql.org
|
|
In commit d0a02bdb8, I'd supposed that uniformly probing for
ldap_bind would make the intent clearer. However, that seems
not to work on AIX, for obscure reasons (maybe it's a macro
there?). Revert to the former behavior of probing
ldap_simple_bind for thread-safe cases and ldap_bind otherwise.
Per buildfarm member hoverfly.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17083-a19190d9591946a7@postgresql.org
|
|
The separate libldap_r is gone and libldap itself is now always
thread-safe. Unfortunately there seems no easy way to tell by
inspection whether libldap is thread-safe, so we have to take
it on faith that libldap is thread-safe if there's no libldap_r.
That should be okay, as it appears that libldap_r was a standard
part of the installation going back at least 20 years.
Report and patch by Adrian Ho. Back-patch to all supported
branches, since people might try to build any of them with
a newer OpenLDAP.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17083-a19190d9591946a7@postgresql.org
|
|
Since the executor can't cope with a utility statement appearing
as a node of a plan tree, we can't support cases where a rewrite
rule inserts a NOTIFY into an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE command appearing
in a WITH clause of a larger query. (One can imagine ways around
that, but it'd be a new feature not a bug fix, and so far there's
been no demand for it.) RewriteQuery checked for this, but it
missed the case where the DML command rewrites to *only* a NOTIFY.
That'd lead to crashes later on in planning. Add the missed check,
and improve the level of testing of this area.
Per bug #17094 from Yaoguang Chen. It's been busted since WITH
was introduced, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17094-bf15dff55eaf2e28@postgresql.org
|
|
Commit 6753333f stopped using semaphores as the sleep/wake mechanism for
heavyweight locks, but some obsolete references to that scheme remained
in comments. As with similar commit 25b93a29, back-patch all the way.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKGLafjB1uzXcy%3D%3D2L3cy7rjHkqOVn7qRYGBjk%3D%3DtMJE7Yg%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
I accidentally missed adding this when adjusting 55fe60938 for back
patching. This adjustment was made for 9.6 to 13. 14 and master are not
affected.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvp=twCsGAGQG=A=cqOaj4mpknPBW-EZB-sd+5ZS5gCTtA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Due to how pg_size_pretty(bigint) was implemented, it's possible that when
given a negative number of bytes that the returning value would not match
the equivalent positive return value when given the equivalent positive
number of bytes. This was due to two separate issues.
1. The function used bit shifting to convert the number of bytes into
larger units. The rounding performed by bit shifting is not the same as
dividing. For example -3 >> 1 = -2, but -3 / 2 = -1. These two
operations are only equivalent with positive numbers.
2. The half_rounded() macro rounded towards positive infinity. This meant
that negative numbers rounded towards zero and positive numbers rounded
away from zero.
Here we fix #1 by dividing the values instead of bit shifting. We fix #2
by adjusting the half_rounded macro always to round away from zero.
Additionally, adjust the pg_size_pretty(numeric) function to be more
explicit that it's using division rather than bit shifting. A casual
observer might have believed bit shifting was used due to a static
function being named numeric_shift_right. However, that function was
calculating the divisor from the number of bits and performed division.
Here we make that more clear. This change is just cosmetic and does not
affect the return value of the numeric version of the function.
Here we also add a set of regression tests both versions of
pg_size_pretty() which test the values directly before and after the
function switches to the next unit.
This bug was introduced in 8a1fab36a. Prior to that negative values were
always displayed in bytes.
Author: Dean Rasheed, David Rowley
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCXnNW4HsmZnxhfezR5FuiGgp+mkY4AzcL5eRGO4fuadWg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6, where the bug was introduced.
|
|
As in 50371df26, this is a bad idea since the callback can't really
know what error is being thrown and thus whether or not it is safe
to attempt catalog accesses. Rather than pushing said accesses into
the mainline code where they'd usually be a waste of cycles, we can
look at the query's rangetable instead.
This change does mean that we'll be printing query aliases (if any
were used) rather than the table or column's true name. But that
doesn't seem like a bad thing: it's certainly a more useful definition
in self-join cases, for instance. In any case, it seems unlikely that
any applications would be depending on this detail, so it seems safe
to change.
Patch by me. Original complaint by Andres Freund; Bharath Rupireddy
noted the connection to conversion_error_callback.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210106020229.ne5xnuu6wlondjpe@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Our code has supported fractional-minute UTC offsets for ages, but
there was no mention of the possibility in the main docs, and only
a very indirect reference in Appendix B. Improve that.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/162543102827.697.5755498651217979813@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
Commit 03ffc4d6d added logic to bypass all caching behavior in
LookupOpclassInfo when CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS is enabled. It doesn't
look like I stopped to think much about what that would cost, but
recent investigation shows that the cost is enormous: it roughly
doubles the time needed for cache-clobber test runs.
There does seem to be value in this behavior when trying to test
the opclass-cache loading logic itself, but for other purposes the
cost is excessive. Hence, let's back off to doing this only when
debug_invalidate_system_caches_always is at least 3; or in older
branches, when CLOBBER_CACHE_RECURSIVELY is defined.
While here, clean up some other minor issues in LookupOpclassInfo.
Re-order the code so we aren't left with broken cache entries (leading
to later core dumps) in the unlikely case that we suffer OOM while
trying to allocate space for a new entry. (That seems to be my
oversight in 03ffc4d6d.) Also, in >= v13, stop allocating one array
entry too many. That's evidently left over from sloppy reversion in
851b14b0c.
Back-patch to all supported branches, mainly to reduce the runtime
of cache-clobbering buildfarm animals.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1370856.1625428625@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
A new chapter for Hash Indexes, designed to help users understand how
they work and when to use them.
Backpatch-through 10 where we have made hash indexes durable.
Author: Simon Riggs
Reviewed-By: Justin Pryzby, Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANbhV-HRjNPYgHo--P1ewBrFJ-GpZPb9_25P7=Wgu7s7hy_sLQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Author: Greg Sabino Mullane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKAnmmJYH2FBn_+Vwd2FD5SaKn8hjhAXOCHpZc6n4wXaUaW_SA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
|
Document that setting maintenance_work_mem to values over 1GB has no
effect on VACUUM.
Reported-by: Martín Marqués
Author: Laurenz Albe
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CABeG9LsZ2ozUMcqtqWu_-GiFKB17ih3p8wBHXcpfnHqhCnsc7A%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6, oldest supported release
|
|
Reported-by: tom@crystae.net
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/162345756191.14472.9754568432103008703@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
|
The existing code tried to do syscache lookups in an already-failed
transaction, which is problematic to say the least. After some
consideration of alternatives, the best fix seems to be to just drop
type names from the error message altogether. The table and column
names seem like sufficient localization. If the user is unsure what
types are involved, she can check the local and remote table
definitions.
Having done that, we can also discard the LogicalRepTypMap hash
table, which had no other use. Arguably, LOGICAL_REP_MSG_TYPE
replication messages are now obsolete as well; but we should
probably keep them in case some other use emerges. (The complexity
of removing something from the replication protocol would likely
outweigh any savings anyhow.)
Masahiko Sawada and Bharath Rupireddy, per complaint from Andres
Freund. Back-patch to v10 where this code originated.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210106020229.ne5xnuu6wlondjpe@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
|
|
These are the same as world and install-world respectively, but without
building or installing the documentation. There are many reasons for
wanting to be able to do this, including speed, lack of documentation
building tools, and wanting to build other formats of the documentation.
Plans for simplifying the buildfarm client code include using these
targets.
Backpatch to all live branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6a421136-d462-b043-a8eb-e75b2861f3df@dunslane.net
|
|
The prove_installcheck recipe in src/Makefile.global.in was emitting
bogus paths for a couple of elements when used with PGXS. Here we create
a separate recipe for the PGXS case that does it correctly. We also take
the opportunity to make the make the file more readable by breaking up
the prove_installcheck and prove_check recipes across several lines, and
to remove the setting for REGRESS_SHLIB to src/test/recovery/Makefile,
which is the only set of tests that actually need it.
Backpatch to all live branches
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f2401388-936b-f4ef-a07c-a0bcc49b3300@dunslane.net
|
|
ICU 69 causes compile failures with PostgreSQL 10. ICU 69 has
switched to using stdbool.h, which conflicts with the home-made
definitions that we used until PostgreSQL 10. Newer PostgreSQL major
versions are therefore not affected. (Older PostgreSQL versions don't
have ICU support.)
The workaround is to undefine "bool" after including ICU headers,
similar to the solution already in place for plperl for the same
underlying reasons.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/28588e5a-c204-0361-01f1-a1ee1b590233%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
Reaching PITR on such a transaction would cause the generation of a LOG
message mentioning a transaction committed, not aborted.
Oversight in 4f1b890.
Author: Simon Riggs
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANbhV-GJ6KijeCgdOrxqMCQ+C8QiK657EMhCy4csjrPcEUFv_Q@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
|
Causing a core dump on out-of-memory seems pretty unfriendly,
and surely is far outside the expected behavior of a general-purpose
library. Just print an error message (as we did already) and return.
These functions unfortunately don't have an error return convention,
but code using them is probably just looking for a quick-n-dirty
print method and wouldn't bother to check anyway.
Although these functions are semi-deprecated, it still seems
appropriate to back-patch this. In passing, also back-patch
b90e6cef1, just to reduce cosmetic differences between the
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3122443.1624735363@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
83158f7 has improved index_set_state_flags() so as it is possible to use
transactional updates when updating pg_index state flags, but there was
not really a test case which stressed directly the possibility it fixed.
This commit adds such a test, using a predicate that looks valid in
appearance but calls a stable function.
Author: Andrey Lepikhov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9b905019-5297-7372-0ad2-e1a4bb66a719@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
|
3c84046 is the original commit that introduced index_set_state_flags(),
where the presence of SnapshotNow made necessary the use of an in-place
update. SnapshotNow has been removed in 813fb03, so there is no actual
reasons to not make this operation transactional.
As reported by Andrey, it is possible to trigger the assertion of this
routine expecting no transactional updates when switching the pg_index
state flags, using a predicate mark as immutable but calling stable or
volatile functions. 83158f7 has been around for a couple of months on
HEAD now with no issues found related to it, so it looks safe enough for
a backpatch.
Reported-by: Andrey Lepikhov
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Anastasia Lubennikova
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200903080440.GA8559@paquier.xyz
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9b905019-5297-7372-0ad2-e1a4bb66a719@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
|
specscanner.l leaked a kilobyte of memory per token of the spec file.
Apparently somebody thought that the introductory code block would be
executed once; but it's once per yylex() call.
A couple of functions in isolationtester.c leaked small amounts of
memory due to not bothering to free one-time allocations. Might
as well improve these so that valgrind gives this program a clean
bill of health. Also get rid of an ugly static variable.
Coverity complained about one of the one-time leaks, which led me
to try valgrind'ing isolationtester, which led to discovery of the
larger leak.
|
|
It's not really necessary for this function to open or lock the
relation associated with the pg_policy entry it's modifying. The
error checks it's making on the rel are if anything counterproductive
(e.g., if we don't want to allow installation of policies on system
catalogs, here is not the place to prevent that). In particular, it
seems just wrong to insist on an ownership check. That has the net
effect of forcing people to use superuser for DROP OWNED BY, which
surely is not an effect we want. Also there is no point in rebuilding
the dependencies of the policy expressions, which aren't being
changed. Lastly, locking the table also seems counterproductive; it's
not helping to prevent race conditions, since we failed to re-read the
pg_policy row after acquiring the lock. That means that concurrent
DDL would likely result in "tuple concurrently updated/deleted"
errors; which is the same behavior this code will produce, with less
overhead.
Per discussion of bug #17062. Back-patch to all supported versions,
as the failure cases this eliminates seem just as undesirable in 9.6
as in HEAD.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1573181.1624220108@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
A walsender process that has executed a SQL command left the text of
that command in pg_stat_activity.query indefinitely, which is quite
confusing if it's in RUNNING state but not doing that query. An easy
and useful fix is to treat replication commands as if they were SQL
queries, and show them in pg_stat_activity according to the same rules
as for regular queries. While we're at it, it seems also sensible to
set debug_query_string, allowing error logging and debugging to see
the replication command.
While here, clean up assorted silliness in exec_replication_command:
* Clean up SQLCmd code path, and fix its only-accidentally-not-buggy
memory management.
* Remove useless duplicate call of SnapBuildClearExportedSnapshot().
* replication_scanner_finish() was never called.
Back-patch of commit f560209c6 into v10-v13. I'd originally felt
that this didn't merit back-patching, but subsequent confusion
while debugging walsender problems suggests that it'll be useful.
Also, the original commit has now aged long enough to provide some
comfort that it won't cause problems.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2673480.1624557299@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/880181.1600026471@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This back-branch test script was later absorbed into
insert-conflict-specconflict.spec, which required some stabilization
in commit 741d7f104, so perhaps it's not surprising that it needs a
bit of love too.
It's odd though that we hadn't seen it fail before now, because
I thought that 741d7f104 did not change isolationtester's timing
behavior for scripts without any annotation markers. In any case,
this script is racy on its face, so add an annotation to force stable
reporting order.
Report: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=piculet&dt=2021-06-24%2009%3A54%3A56
Report: https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=petalura&dt=2021-06-24%2010%3A10%3A00
|
|
In previous commit, I missed that relmap_redo() was also not acquiring the
RelationMappingLock. Thanks to Thomas Munro for pointing that out.
Backpatch-through: 9.6, like previous commit.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKGLev%3DPpOSaL3WRZgOvgk217et%2BbxeJcRr4eR-NttP1F6Q%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Contrary to the comment here, POSIX does not guarantee atomicity of a
read(), if another process calls write() concurrently. Or at least Linux
does not. Add locking to load_relmap_file() to avoid the race condition.
Fixes bug #17064. Thanks to Alexander Lakhin for the report and test case.
Backpatch-through: 9.6, all supported versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/17064-bb0d7904ef72add3@postgresql.org
|
|
Reported-by: Simon Riggs
Author: Takamichi Osumi
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 9.6
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210222222847.tpnb6eg3yiykzpky@alap3.anarazel.de
|
