| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
While we've always allowed such cases, the documentation didn't
say you could do it.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/161969805833.690.13680986983883602407@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
Mention specifically that you can't call aggregates, window functions,
or procedures this way (the inability to call SRFs was already
mentioned).
Also, the claim that PQfn doesn't support NULL arguments or results
has been a lie since we invented protocol 3.0. Not sure why this
text was never updated for that, but do it now.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2039442.1615317309@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Reject aggregates, window functions, and procedures. Aggregates
failed anyway, though with a somewhat obscure error message.
Window functions would hit an Assert or null-pointer dereference.
Procedures seemed to work as long as you didn't try to do
transaction control, but (a) transaction control is sort of the
point of a procedure, and (b) it's not entirely clear that no
bugs lurk in that path. Given the lack of testing of this area,
it seems safest to be conservative in what we support.
Also reject proretset functions, as the fastpath protocol can't
support returning a set.
Also remove an easily-triggered assertion that the given OID
isn't 0; the subsequent lookups can handle that case themselves.
Per report from Theodor-Arsenij Larionov-Trichkin.
Back-patch to all supported branches. (The procedure angle
only applies in v11+, of course.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2039442.1615317309@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
There were two problems:
a. We were always selecting the next available txn instead of selecting it
when it is larger than the previous transaction.
b. We were selecting the transactions which haven't made any changes to
the database (base snapshot is not set). Later it was hitting an Assert
because we don't decode such transactions and the changes in txn remain as
it is. It is better not to choose such transactions for streaming in the
first place.
Reported-by: Haiying Tang
Author: Dilip Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB61133B94E63177040F7ECDA1FB429@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Here we adjust the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for Result Cache so that we
don't show any Result Cache stats for parallel workers who don't
contribute anything to Result Cache plan nodes.
I originally had ideas that workers who don't help could still have their
Result Cache stats displayed. The idea with that was so that I could
write some parallel Result Cache regression tests that show the EXPLAIN
ANALYZE output. However, I realized a little too late that such tests
would just not be possible to have run in a stable way on the buildfarm.
With that knowledge, before 9eacee2e6 went in, I had removed all of the
tests that were showing the EXPLAIN ANALYZE output of a parallel Result
Cache plan, however, I forgot to put back the code that adjusts the
EXPLAIN output to hide the Result Cache stats for parallel workers who
were not fast enough to help out before query execution was over. All
other nodes behave this way and so should Result Cache.
Additionally, with this change, it now seems safe enough to remove the SET
force_parallel_mode = off that I had added to the regression tests.
Also, perform some cleanup in the partition_prune tests. I had adjusted
the explain_parallel_append() function to sanitize the Result Cache
EXPLAIN ANALYZE output. However, since I didn't actually include any
parallel Result Cache tests that show their EXPLAIN ANALYZE output, that
code does nothing and can be removed.
In passing, move the setting of memPeakKb into the scope where it's used.
Reported-by: Amit Khandekar
Author: David Rowley, Amit Khandekar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9d8SkfY95GpM1zmsOtX2-Ogx5q-WLsf8f0ykEb0hCRK3w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
As per analysis, it appears that the 'drop slot' message from the previous
test and 'create slot' message of the new test are either missed or not
yet delivered to the stats collector due to which we will still see the
stats from the old slot. This can happen rarely which could be the reason
that we are seeing some failures in the buildfarm randomly. To avoid that
we are using a different slot name for the tests in
test_decoding/sql/stats.sql.
Reported-by: Tom Lane based on buildfarm reports
Author: Sawada Masahiko
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Vignesh C
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Don't advocate dropping a whole table when dropping a column would
serve. While at it, try to make the layout of these messages a
bit cleaner and more consistent.
Per suggestion from Daniel Gustafsson. No back-patch, as we generally
don't like to churn translatable messages in released branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2798740.1619622555@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Commits 29aeda6e4 et al closed up some oversights involving not checking
for non-upgradable types within container types, such as arrays and
ranges. However, I only looked at version.c, failing to notice that
there were substantially-equivalent tests in check.c. (The division
of responsibility between those files is less than clear...)
In addition, because genbki.pl does not guarantee that auto-generated
rowtype OIDs will hold still across versions, we need to consider that
the composite type associated with a system catalog or view is
non-upgradable. It seems unlikely that someone would have a user
column declared that way, but if they did, trying to read it in another
PG version would likely draw "no such pg_type OID" failures, thanks
to the type OID embedded in composite Datums.
To support the composite and reg*-type cases, extend the recursive
query that does the search to allow any base query that returns
a column of pg_type OIDs, rather than limiting it to exactly one
starting type.
As before, back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2798740.1619622555@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Backpatch to 12, where 87259588d0ab introduced the current behavior.
Per note from Justin Pryzby.
Co-authored-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210416143135.GI3315@telsasoft.com
|
|
This was broken by a silly mistake in
e717a9a18b2e34c9c40e5259ad4d31cd7e420750.
Reported-by: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMkU=1zKGWEJdBbYKw7Tn7cJmYR_UjgdcXTPDqJj=dNwCETBCQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Improve the wording in the connection type section of
pg_hba.conf.sample a bit. After the hostgssenc part was added on, the
whole thing became a bit wordy, and it's also a bit inaccurate for
example in that the current wording for "host" appears to say that it
does not apply to GSS-encrypted connections.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/fc06dcc5-513f-e944-cd07-ba51dd7c6916%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
If no standbys can be found in the set of connection points provided,
the fallback behavior is "any", and not "all" that does not exist.
Author: Greg Nancarrow
Reviewed-by: Laurenz Albe
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJcOf-fDaCv8qCpWH7k5Yh6zFxZeUwZowu4sCWQ2zFx4CdkHpA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
We had a report of confusing server behavior caused by a client bug
that sent junk to the server: the server thought the junk was a
very long message length and waited patiently for data that would
never come. We can reduce the risk of that by being less trusting
about message lengths.
For a long time, libpq has had a heuristic rule that it wouldn't
believe large message size words, except for a small number of
message types that are expected to be (potentially) long. This
provides some defense against loss of message-boundary sync and
other corrupted-data cases. The server does something similar,
except that up to now it only limited the lengths of messages
received during the connection authentication phase. Let's
do the same as in libpq and put restrictions on the allowed
length of all messages, while distinguishing between message
types that are expected to be long and those that aren't.
I used a limit of 10000 bytes for non-long messages. (libpq's
corresponding limit is 30000 bytes, but given the asymmetry of
the FE/BE protocol, there's no good reason why the numbers should
be the same.) Experimentation suggests that this is at least a
factor of 10, maybe a factor of 100, more than we really need;
but plenty of daylight seems desirable to avoid false positives.
In any case we can adjust the limit based on beta-test results.
For long messages, set a limit of MaxAllocSize - 1, which is the
most that we can absorb into the StringInfo buffer that the message
is collected in. This just serves to make sure that a bogus message
size is reported as such, rather than as a confusing gripe about
not being able to enlarge a string buffer.
While at it, make sure that non-mainline code paths (such as
COPY FROM STDIN) are as paranoid as SocketBackend is, and validate
the message type code before believing the message length.
This provides an additional guard against getting stuck on corrupted
input.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2003757.1619373089@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Makes partition descriptor acquisition faster during the transient
period in which a partition is in the process of being detached.
This also adds the restriction that only one partition can be in
pending-detach state for a partitioned table.
While at it, return find_inheritance_children() API to what it was
before 71f4c8c6f74b, and create a separate
find_inheritance_children_extended() that returns detailed info about
detached partitions.
(This incidentally fixes a bug in 8aba9322511 whereby a memory context
holding a transient partdesc is reparented to a NULL PortalContext,
leading to permanent leak of that memory. The fix is to no longer rely
on reparenting contexts to PortalContext. Reported by Amit Langote.)
Per gripe from Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFgpP1LxJZOBYGt9rpvTjXXkg5qG2+Xch2Z1Q7KrqZR1A@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Somehow I'd convinced myself that rotating to UTC-12 was the way
to do this, but upon further review, it's definitely UTC+12.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1197050.1619123213@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Spotted by buildfarm member prion, with -DRELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE.
Introduced in f7aab36.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2759018.1619577848@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
|
Attempting to use this function with event triggers failed, as, since
its introduction in a676201, this code has never associated an object
name with event triggers. This addresses the failure by adding the
event trigger name to the set defining its object address.
Note that regression tests are added within event_trigger and not
object_address to avoid issues with concurrent connections in parallel
schedules.
Author: Joel Jacobson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3c905e77-a026-46ae-8835-c3f6cd1d24c8@www.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 9.6
|
|
Handle the situation where perl swaps the order of operands of
the comparison operator. See `perldoc overload` for details:
The third argument is set to TRUE if (and only if) the two
operands have been swapped. Perl may do this to ensure that the
first argument ($self) is an object implementing the overloaded
operation, in line with general object calling conventions.
|
|
Typos, corrections and language improvements in the docs.
Author: Justin Pryzby, Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy, Justin Pryzby, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210411041658.GB14564@telsasoft.com
|
|
Commit 8ff1c94649 allowed TRUNCATE command to truncate foreign tables.
Previously the information about "ONLY" options specified in TRUNCATE
command were passed to the foreign data wrapper. Then postgres_fdw
constructed the TRUNCATE command to issue the remote server and
included "ONLY" options in it based on the passed information.
On the other hand, "ONLY" options specified in SELECT, UPDATE or DELETE
have no effect when accessing or modifying the remote table, i.e.,
are not passed to the foreign data wrapper. So it's inconsistent to
make only TRUNCATE command pass the "ONLY" options to the foreign data
wrapper. Therefore this commit changes the TRUNCATE command so that
it doesn't pass the "ONLY" options to the foreign data wrapper,
for the consistency with other statements. Also this commit changes
postgres_fdw so that it always doesn't include "ONLY" options in
the TRUNCATE command that it constructs.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Justin Pryzby, Zhihong Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/551ed8c1-f531-818b-664a-2cecdab99cd8@oss.nttdata.com
|
|
Previously, we used to use the array of size max_replication_slots to
store stats for replication slots. But that had two problems in the cases
where a message for dropping a slot gets lost: 1) the stats for the new
slot are not recorded if the array is full and 2) writing beyond the end
of the array if the user reduces the max_replication_slots.
This commit uses HTAB for replication slot statistics, resolving both
problems. Now, pgstat_vacuum_stat() search for all the dead replication
slots in stats hashtable and tell the collector to remove them. To avoid
showing the stats for the already-dropped slots, pg_stat_replication_slots
view searches slot stats by the slot name taken from pg_replication_slots.
Also, we send a message for creating a slot at slot creation, initializing
the stats. This reduces the possibility that the stats are accumulated
into the old slot stats when a message for dropping a slot gets lost.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Author: Sawada Masahiko, test case by Vignesh C
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Vignesh C, Dilip Kumar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210319185247.ldebgpdaxsowiflw@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
The Truncate operation acquires an exclusive lock on the target relation
and indexes. It then waits for logical replication of the operation to
finish at commit. Now because we are acquiring the shared lock on the
target index to get index attributes in pgoutput while sending the
changes for the Truncate operation, it leads to a deadlock.
Actually, we don't need to acquire a lock on the target index as we build
the cache entry using a historic snapshot and all the later changes are
absorbed while decoding WAL. So, we wrote a special purpose function for
logical replication to get a bitmap of replica identity attribute numbers
where we get that information without locking the target index.
We decided not to backpatch this as there doesn't seem to be any field
complaint about this issue since it was introduced in commit 5dfd1e5a in
v11.
Reported-by: Haiying Tang
Author: Takamichi Osumi, test case by Li Japin
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Ajin Cherian
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB6113C2499C7DC70EE55ADB82FB759@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
New keywords per 71f4c8c6f74b.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210422204035.GA25929@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
Commit 2ec993a7c, which added triggers on views, modified the rewriter
to add dummy entries like "SET x = x" for all columns that weren't
actually being updated by the user in any UPDATE directed at a view.
That was needed at the time to produce a complete "NEW" row to pass
to the trigger. Later it was found to cause problems for ordinary
updatable views, so commit cab5dc5da restricted it to happen only for
trigger-updatable views. But in the wake of commit 86dc90056, we
really don't need it at all. nodeModifyTable.c populates the trigger
"OLD" row from the whole-row variable that is generated for the view,
and then it computes the "NEW" row using that old row and the UPDATE
targetlist. So there is no need for the UPDATE tlist to have dummy
entries, any more than it needs them for regular tables or other
types of views.
(The comments for rewriteTargetListIU suggest that we must do this
for correct expansion of NEW references in rules, but I now think
that that was just lazy comment editing in 2ec993a7c. If we didn't
need it for rules on views before there were triggers, we don't need
it after that.)
This essentially propagates 86dc90056's decision that we don't need
dummy column updates into the view case. Aside from making the
different cases more uniform and hence possibly forestalling future
bugs, it ought to save a little bit of rewriter/planner effort.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2181213.1619397634@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
For some reason, the "julian" option for extract()/date_part() has
never gotten listed in the manual. Also, while Appendix B mentioned
in passing that we don't conform to the usual astronomical definition
that a Julian date starts at noon UTC, it was kind of vague about what
we do instead. Clarify that, and add an example showing how to get
the astronomical definition if you want it.
It's been like this for ages, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1197050.1619123213@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
The verification of permissions doesn't succeed on Cygwin, because the
required feature is not implemented for Cygwin at the moment. So skip
this part of the test, like MinGW already does.
|
|
The tuple routing logic used by a logical replication worker can fire
triggers on relations part of a partition tree, but there was no test
coverage in this area. The existing script 003_constraints.pl included
something, but nothing when a tuple is applied across partitioned tables
on a subscriber.
Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB611383FA0FE92EB9DE21946AFB769@OS0PR01MB6113.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
We send the prepare for the concurrently aborted xacts so that later when
rollback prepared is decoded and sent, the downstream should be able to
rollback such a xact. For 'streaming' case (when we send changes for
in-progress transactions), we were sending prepare twice when concurrent
abort was detected.
Author: Peter Smith
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f82133c6-6055-b400-7922-97dae9f2b50b@enterprisedb.com
|
|
This was already unused in the initial commit
257836a75585934cc05ed7a80bccf8190d41e056. Apparently, it was used in
an earlier proposed patch version.
|
|
Author: Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PtvzuYY0zu=dVRK_WVz5WGos1+otZWgEWqjha1ncoSRag@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This function's behavior for UPDATE on a trigger-updatable view was
justified by analogy to what preptlist.c used to do for UPDATE on
regular tables. Since preptlist.c hasn't done that since 86dc90056,
that argument is no longer sensible, let alone convincing. I think
we do still need it to act that way, so update the comment to explain
why.
|
|
|
|
This will install amcheck in the database if not present. The default
schema is for the extension is pg_catalog, but this can be overridden by
providing a value for the option.
Mark Dilger, slightly editorialized by me.
(rather divergent)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bdc0f7c2-09e3-ee57-8471-569dfb509234@dunslane.net
|
|
As well as 'devel' version_stamp.pl provides for 'alphaN'
'betaN' and 'rcN', so teach PostgresVersion about those.
Also stash the version string instead of trying to reconstruct it during
stringification.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YIHlw5nSgAHs4dK1@paquier.xyz
|
|
1375422 has refactored this area of the executor code, and some comments
went out-of-sync.
Author: Yukun Wang
Reviewed-by: Amul Sul
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB60033394FCAEF79B98F078F5B4459@OS0PR01MB6003.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210423184338.GL7256@telsasoft.com
|
|
6f6f284 has introduced a specific macro to make printf()-ing of LSNs
easier. This takes care of what looks like the remaining code paths
that did not get the call.
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YIJS9x6K8ruizN7j@paquier.xyz
|
|
This isn't strictly necessary, but in theory it might matter if in the
future the width of the nbtree special area changes -- its total size
might not be an even number of MAXALIGN() quantums, even with padding.
PageInit() MAXALIGN()s all special area offsets, but amcheck uses the
offset to perform initial basic validation of line pointers, so we don't
rely on the offset from the page header.
The real reason to do this is to set a good example for new code that
adds amcheck coverage for other index AMs.
Reported-By: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALj2ACUMqTR9nErh99FbOBmzCXE9=gXNqhBiwYOhejJJS1LXqQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Instead, put them in via a format placeholder. This reduces the
number of distinct translatable messages and also reduces the chances
of typos during translation. We already did this for the system call
arguments in a number of cases, so this is just the same thing taken a
bit further.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/92d6f545-5102-65d8-3c87-489f71ea0a37%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
Some code thought this was unsigned, but it's signed int.
|
|
These functions shouldn't receive null arguments: multirange_constructor0()
doesn't have any arguments while multirange_constructor2() has a single array
argument, which is never null.
But mark them strict anyway for the sake of uniformity.
Also, make checks for null arguments use elog() instead of ereport() as these
errors should normally be never thrown. And adjust corresponding comments.
Catversion is bumped.
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0f783a96-8d67-9e71-996b-f34a7352eeef%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
Commit bbe0a81db6 introduced "INCLUDING COMPRESSION" option
in CREATE TABLE command, but previously TableLikeOption in gram.y and
parsenodes.h didn't classify this new option in alphabetical order
with the rest.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/YHerAixOhfR1ryXa@paquier.xyz
|
|
While at it, also document that toplevel is always true if
pg_stat_statements.track is set to top.
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reported-By: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a878d5ea-64a7-485e-5d2f-177618ebc52d@oss.nttdata.com
|
|
This was already mostly done, but some error messages were printed the
long way.
|
|
Author: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
|
|
Previously it was documented that if using "-X none" option there was
no guarantee that all required WAL files were archived at the end of
pg_basebackup when taking a backup from the standby. But this limitation
was removed by commit 52f8a59dd9. Now, even when taking a backup
from the standby, pg_basebackup can wait for all required WAL files
to be archived. Therefore this commit removes such obsolete
description from the docs.
Also this commit adds new description about the limitation when
taking a backup from the standby, into the docs. The limitation is that
pg_basebackup cannot force the standbfy to switch to a new WAL file
at the end of backup, which may cause pg_basebackup to wait a long
time for the last required WAL file to be switched and archived,
especially when write activity on the primary is low.
Back-patch to v10 where the issue was introduced.
Reported-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210420.133235.1342729068750553399.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
Oversight in 2a0faed.
Author: Hou Zhijie
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB5716405E2464D85E6DB6DC0794469@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
%lld with (long long), or %llu with (unsigned long long) are more
adapted. This is similar to 3286065.
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210421.200000.1462448394029407895.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
This is cleanup for commit 27e1f1456:
* ExecAppendAsyncEventWait(), which was modified a bit further by commit
a8af856d3, duplicated the same nevents calculation. Simplify the code
a little bit to avoid the duplication. Update comments there.
* Add an assertion to ExecAppendAsyncRequest().
* Update a comment about merging the async_capable options from input
relations in merge_fdw_options(), per complaint from Kyotaro Horiguchi.
* Add a comment for fetch_more_data_begin().
Author: Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK1637W30Wx3MnrReewhafn6F_0J76mrJGoFXFnpPq4QfvA%40mail.gmail.com
|
