| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The link returns 404 and no replacement is available in the project
on Sourceforge where the content once was. Since we already link to
resources for both beginner and experienced docs hackers, remove the
the dead link.
Backpatch to all supported versions as the link was added in 8.1.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reported-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxH=YzQPDOe+2WuYZ7seD-BOyjCBmP6JiErpoSiVZWDRnw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Previously, the UUID functions documentation defined the "UUID" index entry
to link to the UUID data type page, even though that entry already exists there.
Instead, the UUID functions page should define its own index entry linking
to itself.
This commit updates the UUID index entry in the UUID functions documentation
to point to the correct section, improving navigation and avoiding duplication.
Back-patch to all supported versions.
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f33e0493-5773-4296-87c5-7ce459054cfe@oss.nttdata.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Specify whether the bucket bounds are inclusive or exclusive,
and improve some other vague language. Explain the behavior that
occurs when the "low" bound is greater than the "high" bound.
Make width_bucket_numeric's comment more like that for
width_bucket_float8, in particular noting that infinite
bounds are rejected (since they became possible in v14).
Reported-by: Ben Peachey Higdon <bpeacheyhigdon@gmail.com>
Author: Robert Treat <rob@xzilla.net>
Co-authored-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2BD74F86-5B89-4AC1-8F13-23CED3546AC1@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
While choosing an autogenerated name for an index, look for
pre-existing relations using a SnapshotDirty snapshot, instead of the
previous behavior that considered only committed-good pg_class rows.
This allows us to detect and avoid conflicts against indexes that are
still being built.
It's still possible to fail due to a race condition, but the window
is now just the amount of time that it takes DefineIndex to validate
all its parameters, call smgrcreate(), and enter the index's pg_class
row. Formerly the race window covered the entire time needed to
create and fill an index, which could be very long if the table is
large. Worse, if the conflicting index creation is part of a larger
transaction, it wouldn't be visible till COMMIT.
So this isn't a complete solution, but it should greatly ameliorate
the problem, and the patch is simple enough to be back-patchable.
It might at some point be useful to do the same for pg_constraint
entries (cf. ChooseConstraintName, ConstraintNameExists, and related
functions). However, in the absence of field complaints, I'll leave
that alone for now. The relation-name test should be good enough for
index-based constraints, while foreign-key constraints seem to be okay
since they require exclusive locks to create.
Bug: #18959
Reported-by: Maximilian Chrzan <maximilian.chrzan@here.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18959-f63b53b864bb1417@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
logical decoding.
Commit 4909b38af0 introduced logic to distribute invalidation messages
from catalog-modifying transactions to all concurrent in-progress
transactions. However, since each transaction distributes not only its
original invalidation messages but also previously distributed
messages to other transactions, this leads to an exponential increase
in allocation request size for invalidation messages, ultimately
causing memory allocation failure.
This commit fixes this issue by tracking distributed invalidation
messages separately per decoded transaction and not redistributing
these messages to other in-progress transactions. The maximum size of
distributed invalidation messages that one transaction can store is
limited to MAX_DISTR_INVAL_MSG_PER_TXN (8MB). Once the size of the
distributed invalidation messages exceeds this threshold, we
invalidate all caches in locations where distributed invalidation
messages need to be executed.
Back-patch to all supported versions where we introduced the fix by
commit 4909b38af0.
Note that this commit adds two new fields to ReorderBufferTXN to store
the distributed transactions. This change breaks ABI compatibility in
back branches, affecting third-party extensions that depend on the
size of the ReorderBufferTXN struct, though this scenario seems
unlikely.
Additionally, it adds a new flag to the txn_flags field of
ReorderBufferTXN to indicate distributed invalidation message
overflow. This should not affect existing implementations, as it is
unlikely that third-party extensions use unused bits in the txn_flags
field.
Bug: #18938 #18942
Author: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@deepbluecap.com>
Reported-by: John Hutchins <john.hutchins@wicourts.gov>
Reported-by: Laurence Parry <greenreaper@hotmail.com>
Reported-by: Max Madden <maxmmadden@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Braulio Fdo Gonzalez <brauliofg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/680bdaf6-f7d1-4536-b580-05c2760c67c6@deepbluecap.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18942-0ab1e5ae156613ad@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18938-57c9a1c463b68ce0@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD1FGCT2sYrP_70RTuo56QTizyc+J3wJdtn2gtO3VttQFpdMZg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANO2=B=2BT1hSYCE=nuuTnVTnjidMg0+-FfnRnqM6kd23qoygg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
The patch fixes the issue with the unexpected removal of old WAL segments
after checkpoint, followed by an immediate restart. The issue occurs when
a slot is advanced after the start of the checkpoint and before old WAL
segments are removed at the end of the checkpoint.
The idea of the patch is to get the minimal restart_lsn at the beginning
of checkpoint (or restart point) creation and use this value when calculating
the oldest LSN for WAL segments removal at the end of checkpoint. This idea
was proposed by Tomas Vondra in the discussion. Unlike 291221c46575, this
fix doesn't affect ABI and is intended for back branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/1d12d2-67235980-35-19a406a0%4063439497
Author: Vitaly Davydov <v.davydov@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Teach nbtree's _bt_killitems to leave the so->currPos page that it sets
LP_DEAD items on in whatever state it was in when _bt_killitems was
called. In particular, make sure that so->dropPin scans don't acquire a
pin whose reference is saved in so->currPos.buf.
Allowing _bt_killitems to change so->currPos.buf like this is wrong.
The immediate consequence of allowing it is that code in _bt_steppage
(that copies so->currPos into so->markPos) will behave as if the scan is
a !so->dropPin scan. so->markPos will therefore retain the buffer pin
indefinitely, even though _bt_killitems only needs to acquire a pin
(along with a lock) for long enough to mark known-dead items LP_DEAD.
This issue came to light following a report of a failure of an assertion
from recent commit e6eed40e. The test case in question involves the use
of mark and restore. An initial call to _bt_killitems takes place that
leaves so->currPos.buf in a state that is inconsistent with the scan
being so->dropPin. A subsequent call to _bt_killitems for the same
position (following so->currPos being saved in so->markPos, and then
restored as so->currPos) resulted in the failure of an assertion that
tests that so->currPos.buf is InvalidBuffer when the scan is so->dropPin
(non-assert builds got a "resource was not closed" WARNING instead).
The same problem exists on earlier releases, though the issue is far
more subtle there. Recent commit e6eed40e introduced the so->dropPin
field as a partial replacement for testing so->currPos.buf directly.
Earlier releases won't get an assertion failure (or buffer pin leak),
but they will allow the second _bt_killitems call from the test case to
behave as if a buffer pin was consistently held since the original call
to _bt_readpage. This is wrong; there will have been an initial window
during which no pin was held on the so->currPos page, and yet the second
_bt_killitems call will neglect to check if so->currPos.lsn continues to
match the page's now-current LSN.
As a result of all this, it's just about possible that _bt_killitems
will set the wrong items LP_DEAD (on release branches). This could only
happen with merge joins (the sole user of nbtree mark/restore support),
when a concurrently inserted index tuple used a recently-recycled TID
(and only when the new tuple was inserted onto the same page as a
distinct concurrently-removed tuple with the same TID). This is exactly
the scenario that _bt_killitems' check of the page's now-current LSN
against the LSN stashed in currPos was supposed to prevent.
A follow-up commit will make nbtree completely stop conditioning whether
or not a position's pin needs to be dropped on whether the 'buf' field
is set. All call sites that might need to drop a still-held pin will be
taught to rely on the scan-level so->dropPin field recently introduced
by commit e6eed40e. That will make bugs of the same general nature as
this one impossible (or make them much easier to detect, at least).
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reported-By: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/545be1e5-3786-439a-9257-a90d30f8b849@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Traditionally, libpq's pqPutMsgEnd has rounded down the amount-to-send
to be a multiple of 8K when it is eagerly writing some data. This
still seems like a good idea when sending through a Unix socket, as
pipes typically have a buffer size of 8K or some fraction/multiple of
that. But there's not much argument for it on a TCP connection, since
(a) standard MTU values are not commensurate with that, and (b) the
kernel typically applies its own packet splitting/merging logic.
Worse, our SSL and GSSAPI code paths both have API stipulations that
if they fail to send all the data that was offered in the previous
write attempt, we mustn't offer less data in the next attempt; else
we may get "SSL error: bad length" or "GSSAPI caller failed to
retransmit all data needing to be retried". The previous write
attempt might've been pqFlush attempting to send everything in the
buffer, so pqPutMsgEnd can't safely write less than the full buffer
contents. (Well, we could add some more state to track exactly how
much the previous write attempt was, but there's little value evident
in such extra complication.) Hence, apply the round-down only on
AF_UNIX sockets, where we never use SSL or GSSAPI.
Interestingly, we had a very closely related bug report before,
which I attempted to fix in commit d053a879b. But the test case
we had then seemingly didn't trigger this pqFlush-then-pqPutMsgEnd
scenario, or at least we failed to recognize this variant of the bug.
Bug: #18907
Reported-by: Dorjpalam Batbaatar <htgn.dbat.95@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18907-d41b9bcf6f29edda@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Reported-by: Daria Shanina <vilensipkdm@gmail.com>
Author: Daria Shanina <vilensipkdm@gmail.com>
Author: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
For some reason this wasn't mentioned before.
Author: Patrick Stählin <me@packi.ch>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/931e012a-57ba-41ba-9b88-24323a46dec5@packi.ch
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
The documentation for the pg_authid system catalog and the
pg_shadow system view indicates that passwords might be stored in
cleartext, but that hasn't been possible for some time.
Oversight in commit eb61136dc7.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aD2yKkZro4nbl5ol%40nathan
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
We store values for these options as array elements with the syntax
"name=value", hence a name containing "=" confuses matters when
it's time to read the array back in. Since validation of the
options is often done (long) after this conversion to array format,
that leads to confusing and off-point error messages. We can
improve matters by rejecting names containing "=" up-front.
(Probably a better design would have involved pairs of array
elements, but it's too late now --- and anyway, there's no
evident use-case for option names like this. We already
reject such names in some other contexts such as GUCs.)
Reported-by: Chapman Flack <jcflack@acm.org>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Chapman Flack <jcflack@acm.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6830EB30.8090904@acm.org
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Clean up after rearranging PG_TRY blocks.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2954090.1748723636@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
PLy_elog_impl and its subroutine PLy_traceback intended to avoid
leaking any PyObject reference counts, but their coverage of the
matter was sadly incomplete. In particular, out-of-memory errors
in most of the string-construction subroutines could lead to
reference count leaks, because those calls were outside the
PG_TRY blocks responsible for dropping reference counts.
Fix by (a) adjusting the scopes of the PG_TRY blocks, and
(b) moving the responsibility for releasing the reference counts
of the traceback-stack objects to PLy_elog_impl. This requires
some additional "volatile" markers, but not too many.
In passing, fix an ancient thinko: use of the "e_module_o" PyObject
was guarded by "if (e_type_s)", where surely "if (e_module_o)"
was meant. This would only have visible consequences if the
"__name__" attribute were present but the "__module__" attribute
wasn't, which apparently never happens; but someday it might.
Rearranging the PG_TRY blocks requires indenting a fair amount
of code one more tab stop, which I'll do separately for clarity.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2954090.1748723636@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
When a MERGE's target table is the parent of an inheritance tree, any
INSERT actions insert into the parent table using ModifyTableState's
rootResultRelInfo. However, there are two bugs in the way this is
initialized:
1. ExecInitMerge() incorrectly uses a different ResultRelInfo entry
from ModifyTableState's resultRelInfo array to build the insert
projection, which may not be compatible with rootResultRelInfo.
2. ExecInitModifyTable() does not fully initialize rootResultRelInfo.
Specifically, ri_WithCheckOptions, ri_WithCheckOptionExprs,
ri_returningList, and ri_projectReturning are not initialized.
This can lead to crashes, or incorrect query results due to failing to
check WCO's or process the RETURNING list for INSERT actions.
Fix both these bugs in ExecInitMerge(), noting that it is only
necessary to fully initialize rootResultRelInfo if the MERGE has
INSERT actions and the target table is a plain inheritance parent.
Backpatch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Reported-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jian He <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4rlmjfniiyffp6b3kv4pfy4jw3pciy6mq72rdgnedsnbsx7qe5@j5hlpiwdguvc
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
A few places that access system catalogs don't set up an active
snapshot before potentially accessing their TOAST tables. To fix,
push an active snapshot just before each section of code that might
require accessing one of these TOAST tables, and pop it shortly
afterwards. While at it, this commit adds some rather strict
assertions in an attempt to prevent such issues in the future.
Commit 16bf24e0e4 recently removed pg_replication_origin's TOAST
table in order to fix the same problem for that catalog. On the
back-branches, those bugs are left in place. We cannot easily
remove a catalog's TOAST table on released major versions, and only
replication origins with extremely long names are affected. Given
the low severity of the issue, fixing older versions doesn't seem
worth the trouble of significantly modifying the patch.
Also, on v13 and v14, the aforementioned strict assertions have
been omitted because commit 2776922201, which added
HaveRegisteredOrActiveSnapshot(), was not back-patched. While we
could probably back-patch it now, I've opted against it because it
seems unlikely that new TOAST snapshot issues will be introduced in
the oldest supported versions.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18127-fe54b6a667f29658%40postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18309-c0bf914950c46692%40postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZvMSUPOqUU-VNADN%40nathan
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
postgres_fdw tries to use PG_TRY blocks to ensure that it will
eventually free the PGresult created by the remote modify command.
However, it's fundamentally impossible for this scheme to work
reliably when there's RETURNING data, because the query could fail
in between invocations of postgres_fdw's DirectModify methods.
There is at least one instance of exactly this situation in the
regression tests, and the ensuing session-lifespan leak is visible
under Valgrind.
We can improve matters by using a memory context reset callback
attached to the ExecutorState context. That ensures that the
PGresult will be freed when the ExecutorState context is torn
down, even if control never reaches postgresEndDirectModify.
I have little faith that there aren't other potential PGresult
leakages in the backend modules that use libpq. So I think it'd
be a good idea to apply this concept universally by creating
infrastructure that attaches a reset callback to every PGresult
generated in the backend. However, that seems too invasive for
v18 at this point, let alone the back branches. So for the
moment, apply this narrow fix that just makes DirectModify safe.
I have a patch in the queue for the more general idea, but it
will have to wait for v19.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2976982.1748049023@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Our GSSAPI code only allows packet sizes up to 16kB. However it
emerges that during authentication, larger packets might be needed;
various authorities suggest 48kB or 64kB as the maximum packet size.
This limitation caused login failure for AD users who belong to many
AD groups. To add insult to injury, we gave an unintelligible error
message, typically "GSSAPI context establishment error: The routine
must be called again to complete its function: Unknown error".
As noted in code comments, the 16kB packet limit is effectively a
protocol constant once we are doing normal data transmission: the
GSSAPI code splits the data stream at those points, and if we change
the limit then we will have cross-version compatibility problems
due to the receiver's buffer being too small in some combinations.
However, during the authentication exchange the packet sizes are
not determined by us, but by the underlying GSSAPI library. So we
might as well just try to send what the library tells us to.
An unpatched recipient will fail on a packet larger than 16kB,
but that's not worse than the sender failing without even trying.
So this doesn't introduce any meaningful compatibility problem.
We still need a buffer size limit, but we can easily make it be
64kB rather than 16kB until transport negotiation is complete.
(Larger values were discussed, but don't seem likely to add
anything.)
Reported-by: Chris Gooch <cgooch@bamfunds.com>
Fix-suggested-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DS0PR22MB5971A9C8A3F44BCC6293C4DABE99A@DS0PR22MB5971.namprd22.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Previously, XactLockTableWait() and ConditionalXactLockTableWait() could enter
a non-interruptible loop when they successfully acquired a lock on a transaction
but the transaction still appeared to be running. Since this loop continued
until the transaction completed, it could result in long, uninterruptible waits.
Although this scenario is generally unlikely since XactLockTableWait() and
ConditionalXactLockTableWait() can basically acquire a transaction lock
only when the transaction is not running, it can occur in a hot standby.
In such cases, the transaction may still appear active due to
the KnownAssignedXids list, even while no lock on the transaction exists.
For example, this situation can happen when creating a logical replication
slot on a standby.
The cause of the non-interruptible loop was the absence of CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS()
within it. This commit adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to the loop in both functions,
ensuring they can be interrupted safely.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Author: Kevin K Biju <kevinkbiju@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM45KeELdjhS-rGuvN=ZLJ_asvZACucZ9LZWVzH7bGcD12DDwg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Commits 53af9491a043 and 2d5fe514052a fixed a number of problems with
foreign keys that reference partitioned tables, and a query to detect
already broken FKs was supplied with the release notes for 17.1, 16.5,
15.9, 14.14, 13.17. However, that query has a bug that causes it to
wrongly report self-referential foreign keys even when they are correct,
so if the user was to drop and rebuild the FKs as indicated, the query
would continue to report them as needing to be repaired. Here we fix
the query to not have that problem.
Reported-by: Paul Foerster <paul.foerster@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5456A1D0-CD47-4315-9C65-71B27E7A2906@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13-17
|
|
If we hit out-of-memory between creating the PGconn and inserting
it into dblink's hashtable, we'd lose track of the PGconn, which
is quite bad since it represents a live connection to a remote DB.
Fix by rearranging things so that we create the hashtable entry
first.
Also reduce the number of states we have to deal with by getting rid
of the separately-allocated remoteConn object, instead allocating it
in-line in the hashtable entries. (That incidentally removes a
session-lifespan memory leak observed in the regression tests.)
There is an apparently-irreducible remaining OOM hazard, which
is that if the connection fails at the libpq level (ie it's
CONNECTION_BAD) then we have to pstrdup the PGconn's error message
before we can release it, and theoretically that could fail. However,
in such cases we're only leaking memory not a live remote connection,
so I'm not convinced that it's worth sweating over.
This is a pretty low-probability failure mode of course, but losing
a live connection seems bad enough to justify back-patching.
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1346940.1748381911@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
pg_stat_statements anticipates that certain constant locations may be
recorded multiple times and attempts to avoid calculating a length for
these locations in fill_in_constant_lengths().
However, during generate_normalized_query() where normalized query
strings are generated, these locations are not excluded from
consideration. This could increment the parameter number counter for
every recorded occurrence at such a location, leading to an incorrect
normalization in certain cases with gaps in the numbers reported.
For example, take this query:
SELECT WHERE '1' IN ('2'::int, '3'::int::text)
Before this commit, it would be normalized like that, with gaps in the
parameter numbers:
SELECT WHERE $1 IN ($3::int, $4::int::text)
However the correct, less confusing one should be like that:
SELECT WHERE $1 IN ($2::int, $3::int::text)
This commit fixes the computation of the parameter numbers to track the
number of constants replaced with an $n by a separate counter instead of
the iterator used to loop through the list of locations.
The underlying query IDs are not changed, neither are the normalized
strings for existing PGSS hash entries. New entries with fresh
normalized queries would automatically get reshaped based on the new
parameter numbering.
Issue discovered while discussing a separate problem for HEAD, but this
affects all the stable branches.
Author: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA5RZ0tzxvWXsacGyxrixdhy3tTTDfJQqxyFBRFh31nNHBQ5qA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
As written, the test was throwing an error because of an unbalanced
parenthesis. The regex used in the test is adjusted to not fail and to
test the case of an opening parenthesis in a character class after some
nested square brackets.
Oversight in d46911e584d4.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16ab039d1af455652bdf4173402ddda145f2c73b.camel@cybertec.at
|
|
The code that translates SIMILAR TO pattern matching expressions to
POSIX-style regular expressions did not consider that square brackets
can be nested. For example, in an expression like [[:alpha:]%_], the
logic replaced the placeholders '_' and '%' but it should not.
This commit fixes the conversion logic by tracking the nesting level of
square brackets marking character class areas, while considering that
in expressions like []] or [^]] the first closing square bracket is a
regular character. Multiple tests are added to show how the conversions
should or should not apply applied while in a character class area, with
specific cases added for all the characters converted outside character
classes like an opening parenthesis '(', dollar sign '$', etc.
Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16ab039d1af455652bdf4173402ddda145f2c73b.camel@cybertec.at
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
The test did not wait for all the subscriptions to have caught up when
dropping the subscription "tab_copy". In a slow environment, it could
be possible for the replay of the COMMIT PREPARED transaction "mygid"
to not be confirmed yet, causing one prepared transaction to be left
around before moving to the next steps of the test.
One failure noticed is a transaction found in pg_prepared_xacts for the
cases where copy_data = false and two_phase = true, but there should be
none after dropping the subscription.
As an extra safety measure, a check is added before dropping the
subscription, scanning pg_prepared_xacts to make sure that no prepared
transactions are left once both subscriptions have caught up.
Issue introduced by a8fd13cab0ba, fixing a problem similar to
eaf5321c3524.
Per buildfarm member kestrel.
Author: Vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALDaNm329QaZ+bwU--bW6GjbNSZ8-38cDE8QWofafub7NV67oA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
The documentation for exported snapshots in logical decoding previously
stated that snapshot creation may fail on a hot standby. This is no longer
accurate, as snapshot exporting on standbys has been supported since
PostgreSQL 10. This commit removes the outdated description.
Additionally, the docs referred to the NOEXPORT_SNAPSHOT option to
suppress snapshot exporting in CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT. However,
since PostgreSQL 15, NOEXPORT_SNAPSHOT is considered legacy syntax
and retained only for backward compatibility. This commit updates
the documentation for v15 and later to use the modern equivalent:
SNAPSHOT 'nothing'. The older syntax is preserved in documentation for
v14 and earlier.
Back-patched to all supported branches.
Reported-by: Kevin K Biju <kevinkbiju@gmail.com>
Author: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin K Biju <kevinkbiju@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/174791480466.798.17122832105389395178@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
PgStat_StatTabEntry and AutoVacOpts structs were leaked until
the end of the autovacuum worker's run, which is bad news if
there are a lot of relations in the database.
Note: pfree'ing the PgStat_StatTabEntry structs here seems a bit
risky, because pgstat_fetch_stat_tabentry_ext does not guarantee
anything about whether its result is long-lived. It appears okay
so long as autovacuum forces PGSTAT_FETCH_CONSISTENCY_NONE, but
I think that API could use a re-think.
Also ensure that the VacuumRelation structure passed to
vacuum() is in recoverable storage.
Back-patch to v15 where we started to manage table statistics
this way. (The AutoVacOpts leakage is probably older, but
I'm not excited enough to worry about just that part.)
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/285483.1746756246@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
Since commit 8b1dccd37c7, the PREPARE TRANSACTION WAL record includes
information about dropped statistics entries. However, the WAL resource
manager description function for PREPARE TRANSACTION record failed to
parse this information correctly and always assumed there were
no such entries.
As a result, for example, pg_waldump could not display the dropped
statistics entries stored in PREPARE TRANSACTION records.
The root cause was that ParsePrepareRecord() did not set the number of
statistics entries to drop on commit or abort. These values remained
zero-initialized and were never updated from the parsed record.
This commit fixes the issue by properly setting those values during parsing.
With this fix, pg_waldump can now correctly report dropped statistics
entries in PREPARE TRANSACTION records.
Back-patch to v15, where commit 8b1dccd37c7 was introduced.
Author: Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJDiXgh-6Epb2XiJe4uL0zF-cf0_s_7Lw1TfEHDMLzYjEmfGOw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
Invalid indexes are suffixed with "_ccnew" or "_ccold". The
documentation missed to mention the initial underscore.
ChooseRelationName() may also append an extra number if indexes with a
similar name already exist; let's add a note about that too.
Author: Alec Cozens <acozens@pixelpower.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/174733277404.1455388.11471370288789479593@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
In the grammar, <expr> is a c_expr, which accepts only a limited set
of integer literals and simple expressions without parens. The
deparsing logic didn't quite match the grammar rule, and failed to use
parens e.g. for "5::bigint".
To fix, always surround the expression with parens. Would be nice to
omit the parens in simple cases, but unfortunately it's non-trivial to
detect such simple cases. Even if the expression is a simple literal
123 in the original query, after parse analysis it becomes a FuncExpr
with COERCE_IMPLICIT_CAST rather than a simple Const.
Reported-by: yonghao lee
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18929-077d6b7093b176e2@postgresql.org
|
|
Prevent moving the confirmed_flush backwards, as this could lead to data
duplication issues caused by replicating already replicated changes.
This can happen when a client acknowledges an LSN it doesn't have to do
anything for, and thus didn't store persistently. After a restart, the
client can send the prior LSN that it stored persistently as an
acknowledgement, but we need to ignore such an LSN to avoid retreating
confirm_flush LSN.
Diagnosed-by: Zhijie Hou <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Author: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Nisha Moond <nisha.moond412@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJpy0uDZ29P=BYB1JDWMCh-6wXaNqMwG1u1mB4=10Ly0x7HhwQ@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS0PR01MB57164AB5716AF2E477D53F6F9489A@OS0PR01MB5716.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
|
|
Per the letter of the C11 standard, one must #define
__STDC_WANT_LIB_EXT1__ as 1 before including <string.h> in order to
have access to memset_s(). It appears that many platforms are lenient
about this, because we weren't doing it and yet the code appeared to
work anyway. But we now find that with -std=c11, macOS is strict and
doesn't declare memset_s, leading to compile failures since we try to
use it anyway. (Given the lack of prior reports, perhaps this is new
behavior in the latest SDK? No matter, we're clearly in the wrong.)
In addition to the immediate problem, which could be fixed merely by
adding the needed #define to explicit_bzero.c, it seems possible that
our configure-time probe for memset_s() could fail in case a platform
implements the function in some odd way due to this spec requirement.
This concern can be fixed in largely the same way that we dealt with
strchrnul() in 6da2ba1d8: switch to using a declaration-based
configure probe instead of a does-it-link probe.
Back-patch to v13 where we started using memset_s().
Reported-by: Lakshmi Narayana Velayudam <dev.narayana.v@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4pTnLcKGG78xeOjiBr5yS7ZeE-Rh=FaFQQGOO=nPzA1L8yEA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
This aligns the copyright and legal notice wordig with commit
a233a603bab8 and pgweb commit 2d764dbc083ab8. Backpatch down
to all supported versions.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/744E414E-3F52-404C-97FB-ED9B3AA37DC8@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
In an XMLTABLE expression, columns can be marked NOT NULL, and the
parser internally fabricates an option named "is_not_null" to
represent this. However, the parser also allows users to specify
arbitrary option names. This creates a conflict: a user can
explicitly use "is_not_null" as an option name and assign it a
non-Boolean value, which violates internal assumptions and triggers an
assertion failure.
To fix, this patch checks whether a user-supplied name collides with
the internally reserved option name and raises an error if so.
Additionally, the internal name is renamed to "__pg__is_not_null" to
further reduce the risk of collision with user-defined names.
Reported-by: Евгений Горбанев <gorbanyoves@basealt.ru>
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6bac9886-65bf-4cec-96bd-e304159f28db@basealt.ru
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
The documentation for log_check() had the parameters in the wrong
order. Also while there, rename %parameters to %params to better
documentation for similar functions which use %params. Backpatch
down to v14 where this was introduced.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9F503B5-32F2-45D7-A0AE-952879AD65F1@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
The comment describes the order in which fields are sent, and it had one
of the fields in the wrong place.
This has been wrong since e6dbcb72fafa (2008), so backpatch all the way
back.
Author: Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAE2gYzzf38bR_R=izhpMxAmqHXKeM5ajkmukh4mNs_oXfxcMCA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Presently, LibreSSL does not have working support for RSA-PSS,
so disable that test. Per discussion at
https://marc.info/?l=libressl&m=174664225002441&w=2
they do intend to fix this, but it's a ways off yet.
Reported-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKG+fLqyweHqFSBcErueUVT0vDuSNWui-ySz3+d_APmq7dw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
The previous commit assumed we have a configure probe for
SSL_CTX_set_cert_cb. v15 lacks that, so add it now.
(Details borrowed from 36f40ce2d.)
Reported-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKG+fLqyweHqFSBcErueUVT0vDuSNWui-ySz3+d_APmq7dw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15 only
|
|
Right now there's only one caller, so that this is merely
an exercise in shoving code from one module to another,
but there will shortly be another one. It seems better to
avoid having two copies of this highly-subject-to-change test.
Back-patch to v15, where we first introduced some tests that
don't work with LibreSSL.
Reported-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+hUKG+fLqyweHqFSBcErueUVT0vDuSNWui-ySz3+d_APmq7dw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
|
|
Security: CVE-2025-4207
|
|
With GB18030 as source encoding, applications could crash the server via
SQL functions convert() or convert_from(). Applications themselves
could crash after passing unterminated GB18030 input to libpq functions
PQescapeLiteral(), PQescapeIdentifier(), PQescapeStringConn(), or
PQescapeString(). Extension code could crash by passing unterminated
GB18030 input to jsonapi.h functions. All those functions have been
intended to handle untrusted, unterminated input safely.
A crash required allocating the input such that the last byte of the
allocation was the last byte of a virtual memory page. Some malloc()
implementations take measures against that, making the SIGSEGV hard to
reach. Back-patch to v13 (all supported versions).
Author: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Author: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Security: CVE-2025-4207
|
|
Start the file with static functions not specific to pe_test_vectors
tests. This way, new tests can use them without disrupting the file's
layout. Change report_result() PQExpBuffer arguments to plain strings.
Back-patch to v13 (all supported versions), for the next commit.
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Security: CVE-2025-4207
|
|
Source-Git-URL: https://git.postgresql.org/git/pgtranslation/messages.git
Source-Git-Hash: bf32e002db044b887fa5a02fe415e606f35eba1b
|
|
|
|
Also adjust the phrasing in the comments.
Author: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK17%3DPHSDZ%2B0G6jcj12buyyE1bQQc3sbp1Wxri7tODT-SDw%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
For self-referencing foreign keys in partitioned tables, we weren't
handling creation of pg_constraint rows during CREATE TABLE PARTITION AS
as well as ALTER TABLE ATTACH PARTITION. This is an old bug -- mostly,
we broke this in 614a406b4ff1 while trying to fix it (so 12.13, 13.9,
14.6 and 15.0 and up all behave incorrectly). This commit reverts part
of that with additional fixes for full correctness, and installs more
tests to verify the parts we broke, not just the catalog contents but
also the user-visible behavior.
Backpatch to all live branches. In branches 13 and 14, commit
46a8c27a7226 changed the behavior during DETACH to drop a FK
constraint rather than trying to repair it, because the complete fix of
repairing catalog constraints was problematic due to lack of previous
fixes. For this reason, the test behavior in those branches is a bit
different. However, as best as I can tell, the fix works correctly
there.
In release notes we have to recommend that all self-referencing foreign
keys on partitioned tables be recreated if partitions have been created
or attached after the FK was created, keeping in mind that violating
rows might already be present on the referencing side.
Reported-by: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Reported-by: Matthew Gabeler-Lee <fastcat@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Luca Vallisa <luca.vallisa@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAECtzeWHCA+6tTcm2Oh2+g7fURUJpLZb-=pRXgeWJ-Pi+VU=_w@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18156-a44bc7096f0683e6@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAT=myvsiF-Attja5DcWoUWh21R12R-sfXECY2-3ynt8kaOqjw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
SQL "SET search_path = 'pg_catalog, pg_temp'" is silently equivalent to
"SET search_path = pg_temp, pg_catalog, "pg_catalog, pg_temp"" instead
of the intended "SET search_path = pg_catalog, pg_temp". (The intent
was a two-element search path. With the single quotes, it instead
specifies one element with a comma and a space in the middle of the
element.) In addition to the SET statement, this affects SET clauses of
CREATE FUNCTION, ALTER ROLE, and ALTER DATABASE. It does not affect the
set_config() SQL function.
Though the documentation did not show an insecure command, remove single
quotes that could entice a reader to write an insecure command.
Back-patch to v13 (all supported versions).
Reported-by: Sven Klemm <sven@timescale.com>
Author: Sven Klemm <sven@timescale.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
While back-patching 9f45e6a91, I neglected that the convention in
pre-v16 libpq was to include a trailing newline in error message
strings (since then, we add those separately). Add them now.
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a9c837ad-d507-4607-94e4-c5743a8f49e0@eisentraut.org
Backpatch-through: 13-15
|
|
Add a documentation warning to ts_headline() pointing out that, when
working with untrusted input documents, the output is not guaranteed
to be safe for direct inclusion in web pages. This is because, while
it does remove some XML tags from the input, it doesn't remove all
HTML markup, and so the result may be unsafe (e.g., it might permit
XSS attacks).
To guard against that, all HTML markup should be removed from the
input, making it plain text, or the output should be passed through an
HTML sanitizer.
In addition, document precisely what the default text search parser
recognises as valid XML tags, since that's what determines which XML
tags ts_headline() will remove.
Reported-by: Richard Neill <richard.neill@telos.digital>
Author: Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
|
