| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Accidental omission in commit aa2ba50c2c13. There are too many lists of
these variables ...
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202511031738.eqaeaedpx5cr@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
A generated column may end up being part of the partition key
expression, if it's specified as an expression e.g. "(<generated
column name>)" or if the partition key expression contains a whole-row
reference, even though we do not allow a generated column to be part
of partition key expression. Fix this hole.
Co-authored-by: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CACJufxF%3DWDGthXSAQr9thYUsfx_1_t9E6N8tE3B8EqXcVoVfQw%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
It's possible to define BRIN indexes on functions that require a
snapshot to run, but the autosummarization feature introduced by commit
7526e10224f0 fails to provide one. This causes autovacuum to leave a
BRIN placeholder tuple behind after a failed work-item execution, making
such indexes less efficient. Repair by obtaining a snapshot prior to
running the task, and add a test to verify this behavior.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reported-by: Giovanni Fabris <giovanni.fabris@icon.it>
Reported-by: Arthur Nascimento <tureba@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202511031106.h4fwyuyui6fz@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
Fixup for commit ef5e60a9d35: The inconsistent use of articles was a
bit awkward.
|
|
Previously, passwordFromFile() returned NULL for valid cases (like no
matching password found) and actual errors (two out-of-memory paths).
This made it impossible for its sole caller, pqConnectOptions2(), to
distinguish between these scenarios and fail the connection
appropriately should an out-of-memory error occur.
This patch extends passwordFromFile() to be able to detect both valid
and failure cases, with an error string given back to the caller of the
function.
Out-of-memory failures unlikely happen in the field, so no backpatch is
done.
Author: Joshua Shanks <jjshanks@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOxqWDfihFRmhNVdfu8epYTXQRxkCHSOrg+=-ij2c_X3gW=o3g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
We had two places defining their own constants for this.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202510311750.mxiykx3tp4mx@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
When the startup process switches from streaming to archive as WAL
source, we avoid calling ShutdownWalRcv() if the WAL receiver is not
streaming, based on WalRcvStreaming(). WALRCV_STOPPING is a state set
by ShutdownWalRcv(), called only by the startup process, meaning that it
should not be possible to reach this state while in
WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable().
This commit adds an assertion to make sure that a WAL receiver is never
in a WALRCV_STOPPING state should the startup process attempt to reset
InstallXLogFileSegmentActive.
Idea suggested by Noah Misch.
Author: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19093-c4fff49a608f82a0@postgresql.org
|
|
This has come up as useful as an alternative of WalRcvStreaming(), to be
able to do sanity checks based on the state of a WAL receiver. This
will be used in a follow-up commit.
Author: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19093-c4fff49a608f82a0@postgresql.org
|
|
Commit b4f584f9d2a1 (affecting v15~, later backpatched down to 13 as of
3635a0a35aaf) introduced an unconditional WAL receiver shutdown when
switching from streaming to archive WAL sources. This causes problems
during a timeline switch, when a WAL receiver enters WALRCV_WAITING
state but remains alive, waiting for instructions.
The unconditional shutdown can break some monitoring scenarios as the
WAL receiver gets repeatedly terminated and re-spawned, causing
pg_stat_wal_receiver.status to show a "streaming" instead of "waiting"
status, masking the fact that the WAL receiver is waiting for a new TLI
and a new LSN to be able to continue streaming.
This commit changes the WAL receiver behavior so as the shutdown becomes
conditional, with InstallXLogFileSegmentActive being always reset to
prevent the regression fixed by b4f584f9d2a1: only terminate the WAL
receiver when it is actively streaming (WALRCV_STREAMING,
WALRCV_STARTING, or WALRCV_RESTARTING). When in WALRCV_WAITING state,
just reset InstallXLogFileSegmentActive flag to allow archive
restoration without killing the process. WALRCV_STOPPED and
WALRCV_STOPPING are not reachable states in this code path. For the
latter, the startup process is the one in charge of setting
WALRCV_STOPPING via ShutdownWalRcv(), waiting for the WAL receiver to
reach a WALRCV_STOPPED state after switching walRcvState, so
WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable() cannot be reached while a WAL receiver is
in a WALRCV_STOPPING state.
A regression test is added to check that a WAL receiver is not stopped
on timeline jump, that fails when the fix of this commit is reverted.
Reported-by: Ryan Bird <ryanzxg@gmail.com>
Author: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19093-c4fff49a608f82a0@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Author: Mikhail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANtu0ojXmqjmEzp-=aJSxjsdE76iAsRgHBoK0QtYHimb_mEfsg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Author: ChangAo Chen <cca5507@qq.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_392C0E92EC52432D0A336B9D52E66426F009@qq.com
|
|
New \pset variables display_true and display_false allow the user to
change how true and false values are displayed.
Author: David G. Johnston <David.G.Johnston@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKFQuwYts3vnfQ5AoKhEaKMTNMfJ443MW2kFswKwzn7fiofkrw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/56308F56.8060908@joh.to
|
|
We don't allow null values to appear in identity-generated columns in
other ways, so we shouldn't let unvalidated not-null constraints do it
either. Oversight in commit a379061a22a8.
Author: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>
Backpatch-through: 18
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACJufxGQM_+vZoYJMaRoZfNyV=L2jxosjv_0TLAScbuLJXWRfQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
A simple boolean suffices. This is cosmetic, so no backpatch.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202510311750.mxiykx3tp4mx@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
The new wal_fpi_bytes counter calculates the total amount of full page
images inserted in WAL records, in bytes. This commit adds this
information to VACUUM and ANALYZE logs alongside the existing counters,
building upon f9a09aa29520.
Author: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aQMMSSlFXy4Evxn3@paquier.xyz
|
|
The order in this list was previously pretty random and had grown
organically over time. This made it unnecessarily cumbersome to
maintain these lists, as there was no clear guidelines about where to
put new entries. Also, after the merger of the type-specific GUC
structs, the list still reflected the previous type-specific
super-order.
By using alphabetical order, the place for new entries becomes clear,
and often related entries will be listed close together.
This patch reorders the existing entries in guc_parameters.dat, and it
also augments the generation script to error if an entry is found at
the wrong place.
Note: The order is actually checked after lower-casing, to handle the
likes of "DateStyle".
Reviewed-by: John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8fdfb91e-60fb-44fa-8df6-f5dea47353c9@eisentraut.org
|
|
We've been nibbling away at removing uses of "long" for a long time,
since its width is platform-dependent. Here's one more: change the
remaining "long" fields in Plan nodes to Cardinality, since the three
surviving examples all represent group-count estimates. The upstream
planner code was converted to Cardinality some time ago; for example
the corresponding fields in Path nodes are type Cardinality, as are
the arguments of the make_foo_path functions. Downstream in the
executor, it turns out that these all feed to the table-size argument
of BuildTupleHashTable. Change that to "double" as well, and fix it
so that it safely clamps out-of-range values to the uint32 limit of
simplehash.h, as was not being done before.
Essentially, this is removing all the artificial datatype-dependent
limitations on these values from upstream processing, and applying
just one clamp at the moment where we're forced to do so by the
datatype choices of simplehash.h.
Also, remove BuildTupleHashTable's misguided attempt to enforce
work_mem/hash_mem_limit. It doesn't have enough information
(particularly not the expected tuple width) to do that accurately,
and it has no real business second-guessing the caller's choice.
For all these plan types, it's really the planner's responsibility
to not choose a hashed implementation if the hashtable is expected
to exceed hash_mem_limit. The previous patch improved the
accuracy of those estimates, and even if BuildTupleHashTable had
more information it should arrive at the same conclusions.
Reported-by: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1zia0JfW_QR8L5xA2vpa0oqVuiapm78h=WpNsHH13_9uw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
For several types of plan nodes that use TupleHashTables, the
planner estimated the expected size of the table as basically
numEntries * (MAXALIGN(dataWidth) + MAXALIGN(SizeofHeapTupleHeader)).
This is pretty far off, especially for small data widths, because
it doesn't account for the overhead of the simplehash.h hash table
nor for any per-tuple "additional space" the plan node may request.
Jeff Janes noted a case where the estimate was off by about a factor
of three, even though the obvious hazards such as inaccurate estimates
of numEntries or dataWidth didn't apply.
To improve matters, create functions provided by the relevant executor
modules that can estimate the required sizes with reasonable accuracy.
(We're still not accounting for effects like allocator padding, but
this at least gets the first-order effects correct.)
I added functions that can estimate the tuple table sizes for
nodeSetOp and nodeSubplan; these rely on an estimator for
TupleHashTables in general, and that in turn relies on one for
simplehash.h hash tables. That feels like kind of a lot of mechanism,
but if we take any short-cuts we're violating modularity boundaries.
The other places that use TupleHashTables are nodeAgg, which took
pains to get its numbers right already, and nodeRecursiveunion.
I did not try to improve the situation for nodeRecursiveunion because
there's nothing to improve: we are not making an estimate of the hash
table size, and it wouldn't help us to do so because we have no
non-hashed alternative implementation. On top of that, our estimate
of the number of entries to be hashed in that module is so suspect
that we'd likely often choose the wrong implementation if we did have
two ways to do it.
Reported-by: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1zia0JfW_QR8L5xA2vpa0oqVuiapm78h=WpNsHH13_9uw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Add comments explaining when and where it is safe for nbtree to treat
row compare keys as if they were simple scalar inequality keys on the
row's most significant column. This is particularly important within
_bt_advance_array_keys, which deals with required inequality keys in a
general and uniform way, without any special handling for row compares.
Also spell out the implications of _bt_check_rowcompare's approach of
_conditionally_ evaluating lower-order row compare subkeys, particularly
when one of its lower-order subkeys might see NULL index tuple values
(these may or may not affect whether the qual as a whole is satisfied).
The behavior in this area isn't particularly intuitive, so these issues
seem worth going into.
In passing, add a few more defensive/documenting row comparison related
assertions to _bt_first and _bt_check_rowcompare.
Follow-up to commits bd3f59fd and ec986020.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Victor Yegorov <vyegorov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wznwkak_K7pcAdv9uH8ZfNo8QO7+tHXOaCUddMeTfaCCFw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
_bt_first reliably uses the same equality key (on each index column) for
initial positioning purposes as the one that _bt_checkkeys can use to
end the scan following commit f09816a0. _bt_first no longer applies its
own independent rules to determine which initial positioning key to use
on each column (for equality and inequality keys alike). Preprocessing
is now fully in control of determining which keys start and end each
scan, ensuring that _bt_first and _bt_checkkeys have symmetric behavior.
Remove obsolete comments that described why _bt_first was expected to
use at least one of the available required equality keys for initial
positioning purposes. The rules in this area are now maximally strict
and uniform, so there's no reason to draw attention to equality keys.
Any column with a required equality key cannot have a redundant required
inequality key (nor can it have a redundant required equality key).
Oversight in commit f09816a0, which removed similar comments from
_bt_first, but missed these comments.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
The C standard says that the second and third arguments of a
conditional operator shall be both void type or both not-void
type. The Windows version of INTERRUPTS_PENDING_CONDITION()
got this wrong. It's pretty harmless because the result of
the operator is ignored anyway, but apparently recent versions
of MSVC have started issuing a warning about it. Silence the
warning by casting the dummy zero to void.
Reported-by: Christian Ullrich <chris@chrullrich.net>
Author: Bryan Green <dbryan.green@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cc4ef8db-f8dc-4347-8a22-e7ebf44c0308@chrullrich.net
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Author: Daniil Davydov <3danissimo@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJDiXggmZWew8+SY_9o0atpmaJmPTL25wdz07MrDoqCkp4D1ug@mail.gmail.com
|
|
subpath(ltree,offset,len) now correctly errors when given an offset
less than -n, where n is the number of labels in the given ltree.
There was a duplicate block of code that allowed an offset as low
as -2n. The documentation says no such thing, so this must have
been a copy-and-paste error in the original ltree patch.
While here, avoid redundant calculation of "end" and write
LTREE_MAX_LEVELS rather than its hard-coded value.
Author: Marcus Gartner <m.a.gartner@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAUGV_SvBO9gWYbaejb9nhe-mS9FkNP4QADNTdM3wdRhvLobwA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The original messages were confusing in dry-run mode in that they state
that something is being done, when in reality it isn't. Use alternative
wording in that case, to make the distinction clear.
Author: Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Backpatch-through: 18
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PsvQJQnQO0KT0S2oegenkvJ8FUuY-QS5syyqmT24R2xFQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The code updates the system identifier, then runs pg_walreset; if the
latter fails, it complains about the former, which makes no sense.
Change the error message to complain about the right thing.
Noticed while reviewing a patch touching nearby code.
Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Backpatch-through: 17
|
|
Several functions in the codebase accept "Datum *" parameters but do
not modify the pointed-to data. These have been updated to take
"const Datum *" instead, improving type safety and making the
interfaces clearer about their intent. This change helps the compiler
catch accidental modifications and better documents immutability of
arguments.
Most of "Datum *" parameters have a pairing "bool *isnull" parameter,
they are constified as well.
No functional behavior is changed by this patch.
Author: Chao Li <lic@highgo.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEoWx2msfT0knvzUa72ZBwu9LR_RLY4on85w2a9YpE-o2By5HQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The return value is not used anywhere.
In passing, add a comment explaining the function's arguments.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6dd9d208-a3ed-49b5-b03d-8617261da973%40eisentraut.org
|
|
For clarity. Also rename several related macros and turn them into
inline functions.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6dd9d208-a3ed-49b5-b03d-8617261da973%40eisentraut.org
|
|
This makes their purpose more self-documenting.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6dd9d208-a3ed-49b5-b03d-8617261da973%40eisentraut.org
|
|
This makes the purpose clearer and avoids having two extra symbols,
one of which (CLOCK_24_HOUR) was unused.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6dd9d208-a3ed-49b5-b03d-8617261da973%40eisentraut.org
|
|
The test introduced by this commit checks that a reload of
primary_conninfo leads to a WAL receiver restarted, by looking at the
request generated in the server logs. This is something for what there
was no coverage.
This has come up for a different patch, while discussing a regression
where a WAL receiver should not be stopped while waiting for a new
position to stream, like at the end of a timeline. In the case of the
other patch, we want to check that this log entry is not generated, but
if the error message is reworded the test would become silently broken.
The test of this commit ensures that we at least keep track the log
message format, for a supported scenario.
Extracted from a larger patch by the same author.
Author: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aQKlC1v2_MXGV6_9@paquier.xyz
|
|
This removes some of the specifics of how the default was set, and adds
a mention of latency as a reason the value is lower than the storage
hardware might suggest. It still mentions caching.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKAnmmK_nSPYr53LobUwQD59a-8U9GEC3XGJ43oaTYJq5nAOkw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAN55FZ3kO4vLq56PWrfJ7Fw6Wz8DhEN9j9GX3aScx%2BWOirtK-g%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 15-, where CI support was added
|
|
They use Windows Server 2022, not 2019.
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/flat/CAN55FZ1OsaM+852BMQDJ+Kgfg+07knJ6dM3PjbGbtYaK4qwfqA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
For all extant uses of TupleHashTables, execGrouping.c itself does
nothing with the "tablecxt" except to allocate new hash entries in it,
and the callers do nothing with it except to reset the whole context.
So this is an ideal use-case for a BumpContext, and the hash tables
are frequently big enough for the savings to be significant.
(Commit cc721c459 already taught nodeAgg.c this idea, but neglected
the other callers of BuildTupleHashTable.)
While at it, let's clean up some ill-advised leftovers from rebasing
TupleHashTables on simplehash.h:
* Many comments and variable names were based on the idea that the
tablecxt holds the whole TupleHashTable, whereas now it only holds the
hashed tuples (plus any caller-defined "additional storage"). Rename
to names like tuplescxt and tuplesContext, and adjust the comments.
Also adjust the memory context names to be like "<Foo> hashed tuples".
* Make ResetTupleHashTable() reset the tuplescxt rather than relying
on the caller to do so; that was fairly bizarre and seems like a
recipe for leaks. This is less efficient in the case where nodeAgg.c
uses the same tuplescxt for several different hashtables, but only
microscopically so because mcxt.c will short-circuit the extra resets
via its isReset flag. I judge the extra safety and intellectual
cleanliness well worth those few cycles.
* Remove the long-obsolete "allow_jit" check added by ac88807f9;
instead, just Assert that metacxt and tuplescxt are different.
We need that anyway for this definition of ResetTupleHashTable() to
be safe.
There is a side issue of the extent to which this change invalidates
the planner's estimates of hashtable memory consumption. However,
those estimates are already pretty bad, so improving them seems like
it can be a separate project. This change is useful to do first to
establish consistent executor behavior that the planner can expect.
A loose end not addressed here is that the "entrysize" calculation
in BuildTupleHashTable seems wrong: "sizeof(TupleHashEntryData) +
additionalsize" corresponds neither to the size of the simplehash
entries nor to the total space needed per tuple. It's questionable
why BuildTupleHashTable is second-guessing its caller's nbuckets
choice at all, since the original source of the number should have had
more information. But that all seems wrapped up with the planner's
estimation logic, so let's leave it for the planned followup patch.
Reported-by: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Reported-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Author: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1zia0JfW_QR8L5xA2vpa0oqVuiapm78h=WpNsHH13_9uw@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2268409.1761512111@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This is a follow up 991295f. I searched over src/ and made all
ItemPointer arguments as const as much as possible.
Note: We cut out from the original patch the pieces that would have
created incompatibilities in the index or table AM APIs. Those could
be considered separately.
Author: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEoWx2nBaypg16Z5ciHuKw66pk850RFWw9ACS2DqqJ_AkKeRsw%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
The original is pretty baroque for no apparent reason; arguably, commit
2f9661311b83 should have done this. Noted while reviewing related code
for bug #18984. This is cosmetic (though I'm surprised that my compiler
generates shorter assembly this way), so no backpatch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18984-0f4778a6599ac3ae@postgresql.org
|
|
There are a few places where we have
typedef struct FooData { ... } FooData;
typedef FooData *Foo;
and then function declarations with
bar(const Foo x)
which isn't incorrect but probably meant
bar(const FooData *x)
meaning that the thing x points to is immutable, not x itself.
This patch makes those changes where appropriate. In one
case (execGrouping.c), the thing being pointed to was not immutable,
so in that case remove the const altogether, to avoid further
confusion.
Co-authored-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEoWx2m2E0xE8Kvbkv31ULh_E%2B5zph-WA_bEdv3UR9CLhw%2B3vg%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEoWx2kTDz%3Db6T2xHX78vy_B_osDeCC5dcTCi9eG0vXHp5QpdQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
The docs for max_protocol_version suggested PQprotocolVersion()
instead of PQfullProtocolVersion() to find out the exact protocol
version. Since PQprotocolVersion() only returns the major protocol
version, that is bad advice.
Author: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>
Reviewed-by: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAGECzQSKFxQsYAgr11PhdOr-RtPZEdAXZnHx6U3avLuk3xQaTQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Add const qualifiers to ItemPointerEquals() and ItemPointerCompare().
This will allow further changes up the stack. It also complements
commit aeb767ca0b0, as we now have all of itemptr.h appropriately
const-qualified.
Author: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAEoWx2nBaypg16Z5ciHuKw66pk850RFWw9ACS2DqqJ_AkKeRsw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This makes future editing easier.
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6dd9d208-a3ed-49b5-b03d-8617261da973%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Replace with initializer or memset().
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6dd9d208-a3ed-49b5-b03d-8617261da973%40eisentraut.org
|
|
literals
Reviewed-by: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/6dd9d208-a3ed-49b5-b03d-8617261da973%40eisentraut.org
|
|
The new wal_fpi_bytes counter calculates the total amount of full page
images inserted in WAL records, in bytes. This commit exposes this
information in EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, WAL) alongside the existing counters,
for both the text and JSON/YAML outputs, building upon f9a09aa29520.
Author: Shinya Kato <shinya11.kato@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discusssion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOzEurQtZEAfg6P0kU3Wa-f9BWQOi0RzJEMPN56wNTOmJLmfaQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This commit reverts 818fefd8fd4, that has been introduced to address a
an instability in some of the TAP tests due to the presence of random
standby snapshot WAL records, when slots are invalidated by
InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot().
Anyway, this commit had also the consequence of introducing a behavior
regression. After 818fefd8fd4, the code may determine that a slot needs
to be invalidated while it may not require one: the slot may have moved
from a conflicting state to a non-conflicting state between the moment
when the mutex is released and the moment when we recheck the slot, in
InvalidatePossiblyObsoleteSlot(). Hence, the invalidations may be more
aggressive than they actually have to.
105b2cb3361 has tackled the test instability in a way that should be
hopefully sufficient for the buildfarm, even for slow members:
- In v18, the test relies on an injection point that bypasses the
creation of the random records generated for standby snapshots,
eliminating the random factor that impacted the test. This option was
not available when 818fefd8fd4 was discussed.
- In v16 and v17, the problem was bypassed by disallowing a slot to
become active in some of the scenarios tested.
While on it, this commit adds a comment to document that it is fine for
a recheck to use xmin and LSN values stored in the slot, without storing
and reusing them across multiple checks.
Reported-by: "suyu.cmj" <mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com>
Author: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f492465f-657e-49af-8317-987460cb68b0.mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com
Backpatch-through: 16
|
|
RIGHT_SEMI joins rely on the HEAP_TUPLE_HAS_MATCH flag to guarantee
that only the first match for each inner tuple is considered.
However, in a parallel hash join, the inner relation is stored in a
shared global hash table that can be probed by multiple workers
concurrently. This allows different workers to inspect and set the
match flags of the same inner tuples at the same time.
If two workers probe the same inner tuple concurrently, both may see
the match flag as unset and emit the same tuple, leading to duplicate
output rows and violating RIGHT_SEMI join semantics.
For now, we disable parallel plans for RIGHT_SEMI joins. In the long
term, it may be possible to support parallel execution by performing
atomic operations on the match flag, for example using a CAS or
similar mechanism.
Backpatch to v18, where RIGHT_SEMI join was introduced.
Bug: #19094
Reported-by: Lori Corbani <Lori.Corbani@jax.org>
Diagnosed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19094-6ed410eb5b256abd@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 18
|
|
Because long is 32-bit on 64-bit Windows, it isn't a good datatype to
store the difference between 2 pointers. The under-sized type could
overflow and lead to scary warnings in MEMORY_CONTEXT_CHECKING builds,
such as:
WARNING: problem in alloc set ExecutorState: bad single-chunk %p in block %p
However, the problem lies only in the code running the check, not from
an actual memory accounting bug.
Fix by using "Size" instead of "long". This means using an unsigned
type rather than the previous signed type. If the block's freeptr was
corrupted, we'd still catch that if the unsigned type wrapped. Unsigned
allows us to avoid further needless complexities around comparing signed
and unsigned types.
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Backpatch-through: 13
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo-RmiT4s33J=aC9C_-wPZjOXQ232V-EZFgKftSsNRi4w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Reviewed-by: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/bedcc93d06203dfd89815b10f815ca2de8626e85.camel%40j-davis.com
|
|
Two or more constants can have the same location. We handled this
correctly for non squashed constants, but failed to do it if squashed
(resulting in out-of-bounds memory access), because the code structure
became broken by commit 0f65f3eec478: we failed to update 'last_loc'
correctly when skipping these squashed constants.
The simplest fix seems to be to get rid of 'last_loc' altogether -- in
hindsight, it's quite pointless. Also, when ignoring a constant because
of this, make sure to fulfill fill_in_constant_lengths's duty of setting
its length to -1.
Lastly, we can use == instead of <= because the locations have been
sorted beforehand, so the < case cannot arise.
Co-authored-by: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>
Backpatch-through: 18
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2b91e358-0d99-43f7-be44-d2d4dbce37b3%40garret.ru
|
|
Previously, we'd fill all fields except ccbin, and only later obtain and
detoast ccbin, with hypothetical failures being possible. If ccbin is
null (rare catalog corruption I have never witnessed) or its a corrupted
toast entry, we leak a tiny bit of memory in CacheMemoryContext from
having strdup'd the constraint name. Repair these by only attempting to
fill the struct once ccbin has been detoasted.
Author: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAr=i3_Z4GvmediX900+sSySTeMkvuytYShhQqEwoGyvhA@mail.gmail.com
|