| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Commit b5febc1d1 added a contrib/btree_gist test case that has been
observed to fail in the buildfarm as a result of background auto-analyze
updating stats and changing the selected plan. Forestall that by
forcibly analyzing in foreground, instead. The new plan choice is
just as good for our purposes, since we really only care that an
index-only plan does not get selected.
Back-patch to 9.5, like the previous patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/14643.1539629304@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Since 9.5, it's possible that some but not all columns of an index
support returning the indexed value for index-only scans. If the
same indexed column appears in index columns that behave both ways,
check_index_only() supposed that it'd be OK to do an index-only scan
testing that column; but that fails if we have to recheck the indexed
condition on one of the columns that doesn't support this.
In principle we could make this work by remapping the recheck expressions
to pull the value from a column that does support returning the indexed
value. But such cases are so weird and rare that, at least for now,
it doesn't seem worth the trouble. Instead, just teach check_index_only
that a value is returnable only if all the index columns containing it
are returnable, rather than any of them.
Per report from David Pereiro Lagares. Back-patch to 9.5 where the
possibility of this situation appeared.
Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1516210494.1798.16.camel@nlpgo.com
|
|
Fix still another bug in commit 35fcb1b3d: it failed to fully initialize
the SortSupport states it introduced to allow the executor to re-check
ORDER BY expressions containing distance operators. That led to a null
pointer dereference if the sortsupport code tried to use ssup_cxt. The
problem only manifests in narrow cases, explaining the lack of previous
field reports. It requires a GiST-indexable distance operator that lacks
SortSupport and is on a pass-by-ref data type, which among core+contrib
seems to be only btree_gist's interval opclass; and it requires the scan
to be done as an IndexScan not an IndexOnlyScan, which explains how
btree_gist's regression test didn't catch it. Per bug #14134 from
Jihyun Yu.
Peter Geoghegan
Report: <20160511154904.2603.43889@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
|
|
Buildfarm member skink failed with symptoms suggesting that an
auto-analyze had happened and changed the plan displayed for a
test query. Although this is evidently of low probability,
regression tests that sometimes fail are no fun, so add commands
to force a bitmap scan to be chosen.
|
|
inet, cidr, and timetz indexes still cannot support index-only scans,
because they don't store the original unmodified value in the index, but a
derived approximate value.
|
|
This extends GiST's support for nearest-neighbor searches to many of the
standard data types.
Teodor Sigaev
|
|
This isn't fully tested as yet, in particular I'm not sure that the
"foo--unpackaged--1.0.sql" scripts are OK. But it's time to get some
buildfarm cycles on it.
sepgsql is not converted to an extension, mainly because it seems to
require a very nonstandard installation process.
Dimitri Fontaine and Tom Lane
|
|
at end of files.
|
|
Jeff Davis, with minor adjustments by me.
|
|
about best practice for including the module creation scripts: to wit
that you should suppress NOTICE messages. This avoids creating
regression failures by adding or removing comment lines in the module
scripts.
|
|
with/without time zone, time with/without time zone, date, interval, oid, money and macaddr, char, varchar/text, bytea, numeric, bit, varbit, inet/cidr types for GiST
|
|
(7.3 and current CVS) with support of int8, float4, float8
in addition to int4. Thanks Janko Richter for contribution.
Oleg Bartunov
|
|
it automatically now on regression session startup.
|
|
Create objects in public schema.
Make spacing/capitalization consistent.
Remove transaction block use for object creation.
Remove unneeded function GRANTs.
|
|
datatype in test, to try to avoid any dependency on local time zone.
|
|
From Oleg Bartunov and Teodor Sigaev.
|
