| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
A couple of code paths use the special area on the page passed by the
function caller, expecting to find some data in it. However, feeding
an incorrect page can lead to out-of-bound reads when trying to access
the page special area (like a heap page that has no special area,
leading PageGetSpecialPointer() to grab a pointer outside the allocated
page).
The functions used for hash and btree indexes have some protection
already against that, while some other functions using a relation OID
as argument would make sure that the access method involved is correct,
but functions taking in input a raw page without knowing the relation
the page is attached to would run into problems.
This commit improves the set of checks used in the code paths of BRIN,
btree (including one check if a leaf page is found with a non-zero
level), GIN and GiST to verify that the page given in input has a
special area size that fits with each access method, which is done
though PageGetSpecialSize(), becore calling PageGetSpecialPointer().
The scope of the checks done is limited to work with pages that one
would pass after getting a block with get_raw_page(), as it is possible
to craft byteas that could bypass existing code paths. Having too many
checks would also impact the usability of pageinspect, as the existing
code is very useful to look at the content details in a corrupted page,
so the focus is really to avoid out-of-bound reads as this is never a
good thing even with functions whose execution is limited to
superusers.
The safest approach could be to rework the functions so as these fetch a
block using a relation OID and a block number, but there are also cases
where using a raw page is useful.
Tests are added to cover all the code paths that needed such checks, and
an error message for hash indexes is reworded to fit better with what
this commit adds.
Reported-By: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Julien Rouhaud, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16527-ef7606186f0610a1@postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/561e187b-3549-c8d5-03f5-525c14e65bd0@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 10
|
|
This commit fixes a set of issues related to the use of the SQL
functions in this module when the caller is able to pass down raw page
data as input argument:
- The page size check was fuzzy in a couple of places, sometimes
looking after only a sub-range, but what we are looking for is an exact
match on BLCKSZ. After considering a few options here, I have settled
down to do a generalization of get_page_from_raw(). Most of the SQL
functions already used that, and this is not strictly required if not
accessing an 8-byte-wide value from a raw page, but this feels safer in
the long run for alignment-picky environment, particularly if a code
path begins to access such values. This also reduces the number of
strings that need to be translated.
- The BRIN function brin_page_items() uses a Relation but it did not
check the access method of the opened index, potentially leading to
crashes. All the other functions in need of a Relation already did
that.
- Some code paths could fail on elog(), but we should to use ereport()
for failures that can be triggered by the user.
Tests are added to stress all the cases that are fixed as of this
commit, with some junk raw pages (\set VERBOSITY ensures that this works
across all page sizes) and unexpected index types when functions open
relations.
Author: Michael Paquier, Justin Prysby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220218030020.GA1137@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 10
|
|
9e98583 introduced a helper to centralize building their needed state
(tuplestore, tuple descriptors, etc.), checking for any errors. This
commit updates all places of contrib/ that can be switched to use
SetSingleFuncCall() as a drop-in replacement, resulting in the removal
of a lot of boilerplate code in all the modules updated by this commit.
Per analysis, some places remain as they are:
- pg_logdir_ls() in adminpack/ uses historically TYPEFUNC_RECORD as
return type, and I suspect that changing it may cause issues at run-time
with some of its past versions, down to 1.0.
- dblink/ uses a wrapper function doing exactly the work of
SetSingleFuncCall(). Here the switch should be possible, but rather
invasive so it does not seem the extra backpatch maintenance cost.
- tablefunc/, similarly, uses multiple helper functions with portions of
SetSingleFuncCall() spread across the code paths of this module.
Author: Melanie Plageman
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_bvDPJoL9mH6eYwvBpPtTGQwbDzfJbCM-OjkSZDu5yTPg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Backpatch-through: 10
|
|
A few patches committed after ca3b37487 mistakenly forgot to make the
copyright year 2021. Fix these.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqyLmd9P2oBQYJ=DbrV8QwyPRdmXtCTFYPE08h+ip0UJw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This brings gist_page_items() and gist_page_items_bytea() in line with
nbtree's bt_page_items() function.
Minor follow-up to commit 756ab291, which added the GiST functions.
Author: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E0794687-7315-4C29-A9C7-EC54D448596D@yandex-team.ru
|
|
GistPageSetDeleted() sets pd_lower when deleting a page, and sets the
page contents to a GISTDeletedPageContents. Avoid treating deleted GiST
pages as regular slotted pages within pageinspect.
Oversight in commit 756ab291.
Author: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
|
|
Per Coverity. BuildIndexValueDescription() cannot actually return NULL in
this instance, because it only returns NULL if the user doesn't have the
required privileges, and this function can only be used by superuser. But
better safe than sorry.
|
|
The gist_page_items() function opened the index relation on first call and
closed it on the last call. But there's no guarantee that the function is
run to completion, leading to a relcache leak and warning at the end of
the transaction. To fix, refactor the function to return all the rows in
one call, as a tuplestore.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/234863.1610916631%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Author: Andrey Borodin and me
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/3E4F9093-A1B5-4DF8-A292-0B48692E3954%40yandex-team.ru
|
