| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Reported-by: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
|
|
Author: Yugo Nagata
|
|
|
|
Author: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>
|
|
Author: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>
|
|
Author: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
pg_upgrade never used Windows junction points but instead always used
Windows hard links.
Reported-by: Adrian Klaver
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6a638c60-90bb-4921-8ee4-5fdad68f8b09@aklaver.com
Backpatch-through: 9.3, where the mention first appeared
|
|
It was unsafe to instruct users to start/stop the server after
pg_upgrade was run but before the standby servers were rsync'ed. The
new instructions avoid this.
RELEASE NOTES: This fix should be mentioned in the minor release notes.
Reported-by: Dmitriy Sarafannikov and Sergey Burladyan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/87wp8o506b.fsf@seb.koffice.internal
Backpatch-through: 9.5, where standby server upgrade instructions first appeared
|
|
Patch by Yugo Nagata.
|
|
It was explained that read only transactions (not in standby) allow to
update sequences. This had been wrong since the commit:
05d8a561ff85db1545f5768fe8d8dc9d99ad2ef7
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170614.110826.425627939780392324.t-ishii%40sraoss.co.jp
|
|
Previously we required every exported transaction to have an xid
assigned. That was used to check that the exporting transaction is
still running, which in turn is needed to guarantee that that
necessary rows haven't been removed in between exporting and importing
the snapshot.
The exported xid caused unnecessary problems with logical decoding,
because slot creation has to wait for all concurrent xid to finish,
which in turn serializes concurrent slot creation. It also
prohibited snapshots to be exported on hot-standby replicas.
Instead export the virtual transactionid, which avoids the unnecessary
serialization and the inability to export snapshots on standbys. This
changes the file name of the exported snapshot, but since we never
documented what that one means, that seems ok.
Author: Petr Jelinek, slightly editorialized by me
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f598b4b8-8cd7-0d54-0939-adda763d8c34@2ndquadrant.com
|
|
|
|
Paul Ramsey griped about this awhile ago, but I'd been holding fire
on changing it until we settled what to do about the CASE/COALESCE
issue.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACowWR0AMyUt5fwtvuDqWyYNdp-hQJj9XqSxJR6YM9sKWov=_w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
When we reimplemented SRFs in commit 69f4b9c85, our initial choice was
to allow the behavior to vary from historical practice in cases where a
SRF call appeared within a conditional-execution construct (currently,
only CASE or COALESCE). But that was controversial to begin with, and
subsequent discussion has resulted in a consensus that it's better to
throw an error instead of executing the query differently from before,
so long as we can provide a reasonably clear error message and a way to
rewrite the query.
Hence, add a parser mechanism to allow detection of such cases during
parse analysis. The mechanism just requires storing, in the ParseState,
a pointer to the set-returning FuncExpr or OpExpr most recently emitted
by parse analysis. Then the parsing functions for CASE and COALESCE can
detect the presence of a SRF in their arguments by noting whether this
pointer changes while analyzing their arguments. Furthermore, if it does,
it provides a suitable error cursor location for the complaint. (This
means that if there's more than one SRF in the arguments, the error will
point at the last one to be analyzed not the first. While connoisseurs of
parsing behavior might find that odd, it's unlikely the average user would
ever notice.)
While at it, we can also provide more specific error messages than before
about some pre-existing restrictions, such as no-SRFs-within-aggregates.
Also, reject at parse time cases where a NULLIF or IS DISTINCT FROM
construct would need to return a set. We've never supported that, but the
restriction is depended on in more subtle ways now, so it seems wise to
detect it at the start.
Also, provide some documentation about how to rewrite a SRF-within-CASE
query using a custom wrapper SRF.
It turns out that the information_schema.user_mapping_options view
contained an instance of exactly the behavior we're now forbidding; but
rewriting it makes it more clear and safer too.
initdb forced because of user_mapping_options change.
Patch by me, with error message suggestions from Alvaro Herrera and
Andres Freund, pursuant to a complaint from Regina Obe.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/000001d2d5de$d8d66170$8a832450$@pcorp.us
|
|
The exact numbers don't matter, since they are examples, but it was
looking quite dated.
For the target version, we now automatically substitute the current
major version. The updated example source version should be good for a
couple of years.
|
|
Author: Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>
|
|
Add PL/Lua, PL/v8.
Remove stale/unmaintained PL/PHP, PL/Py, PL/Ruby, PL/Scheme.
Reported-by: Adam Sah <asah@midgard.net>
|
|
This was apparently forgotten in the original patch.
|
|
|
|
Patch by Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>. Confirmed by Amit
Langote, who is the original author of the document part.
|
|
Also, fix client interface JDBC language name to Java.
Author: Sehrope Sarkuni <sehrope@jackdb.com>
|
|
Reported-by: Nikolaus Thiel <klt@fsfe.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarify in the syntax synopsis that partition bound values must be
exactly numeric literals or string literals; previously it
said "bound_literal" which was defined nowhere.
Replace confusing --- and, I think, incorrect in detail --- definition
of how range bounds work with a reference to row-wise comparison plus
a concrete example (which I stole from Robert Haas).
Minor copy-editing in the same area.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30475.1496005465@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28106.1496041449@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Kevin Grittner observed that 2186b608b3cb859fe0ec04015a5c4e4cbf69caed
introduced a new occurence of this by copying existing text, and I
found a few more cases using grep.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CADAecHWfG-K+YvocHCkrXV-ycm+eUOaaUVfYZNOnwf0pSmuQCw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Consistent with what we do for indexes, we shouldn't try to record
dependencies on collation OID 0 or the default collation OID (which
is pinned). Also, the fact that indcollation and partcollation can
contain zero OIDs when the data type is not collatable should be
documented.
Amit Langote, per a complaint from me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmoba5mtPgM3NKfG06vv8na5gGbVOj0h4zvivXQwLw8wXXQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Changed by: Tsunakawa, Takayuki <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com>
|
|
When the checkpointer writes the shutdown checkpoint, it checks
afterwards whether any WAL has been written since it started and
throws a PANIC if so. At that point, only walsenders are still
active, so one might think this could not happen, but walsenders can
also generate WAL, for instance in BASE_BACKUP and logical decoding
related commands (e.g. via hint bits). So they can trigger this panic
if such a command is run while the shutdown checkpoint is being
written.
To fix this, divide the walsender shutdown into two phases. First,
checkpointer, itself triggered by postmaster, sends a
PROCSIG_WALSND_INIT_STOPPING signal to all walsenders. If the backend
is idle or runs an SQL query this causes the backend to shutdown, if
logical replication is in progress all existing WAL records are
processed followed by a shutdown. Otherwise this causes the walsender
to switch to the "stopping" state. In this state, the walsender will
reject any further replication commands. The checkpointer begins the
shutdown checkpoint once all walsenders are confirmed as
stopping. When the shutdown checkpoint finishes, the postmaster sends
us SIGUSR2. This instructs walsender to send any outstanding WAL,
including the shutdown checkpoint record, wait for it to be replicated
to the standby, and then exit.
Author: Andres Freund, based on an earlier patch by Michael Paquier
Reported-By: Fujii Masao, Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170602002912.tqlwn4gymzlxpvs2@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: 9.4, where logical decoding was introduced
|
|
This reverts commit 086221cf6b1727c2baed4703c582f657b7c5350e, which
was made to master only.
The approach implemented in the above commit has some issues. While
those could easily be fixed incrementally, doing so would make
backpatching considerably harder, so instead first revert this patch.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170602002912.tqlwn4gymzlxpvs2@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
There was a grammar ambiguity between SET PUBLICATION name REFRESH and
SET PUBLICATION SKIP REFRESH, because SKIP is not a reserved word. To
resolve that, fold the refresh choice into the WITH options. Refreshing
is the default now.
Reported-by: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>
|
|
Add some information about what to do when this fails.
|
|
Reported by: Tim Goodaire
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170601182230.1487.26008@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
Previously the changes to the "data" part of the sequence, i.e. the
one containing the current value, were not transactional, whereas the
definition, including minimum and maximum value were. That leads to
odd behaviour if a schema change is rolled back, with the potential
that out-of-bound sequence values can be returned.
To avoid the issue create a new relfilenode fork whenever ALTER
SEQUENCE is executed, similar to how TRUNCATE ... RESTART IDENTITY
already is already handled.
This commit also makes ALTER SEQUENCE RESTART transactional, as it
seems to be too confusing to have some forms of ALTER SEQUENCE behave
transactionally, some forms not. This way setval() and nextval() are
not transactional, but DDL is, which seems to make sense.
This commit also rolls back parts of the changes made in 3d092fe540
and f8dc1985f as they're now not needed anymore.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170522154227.nvafbsm62sjpbxvd@alap3.anarazel.de
Backpatch: Bug is in master/v10 only
|
|
On some platforms, -fpic fails for sufficiently large shared libraries.
We've mostly not hit that boundary yet, but there are some extensions
such as Citus and pglogical where it's becoming a problem. A bit of
research suggests that the penalty for -fPIC is small, in the
single-digit-percentage range --- and there's none at all on popular
platforms such as x86_64. So let's just default to -fPIC everywhere
and provide one less thing for extension developers to worry about.
Per complaint from Christoph Berg. Back-patch to all supported branches.
(I did not bother to touch the recently-removed Makefiles for sco and
unixware in the back branches, though. We'd have no way to test that
it doesn't break anything on those platforms.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170529155850.qojdfrwkkqnjb3ap@msg.df7cb.de
|
|
|
|
Some of the text was made nonsensical by commit
e9500240661c03750923e6f539bfa2d75cfaa32a. Fix that and make some other
minor changes.
Reported-by: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
|
|
pg_resetwal (formerly pg_resetxlog) doesn't insist on finding a matching
version number in pg_control, and that seems like an important thing to
preserve since recovering from corrupt pg_control is a prime reason to
need to run it. However, that means you can try to run it against a
data directory of a different major version, which is at best useless
and at worst disastrous. So as to provide some protection against that
type of pilot error, inspect PG_VERSION at startup and refuse to do
anything if it doesn't match. PG_VERSION is read-only after initdb,
so it's unlikely to get corrupted, and even if it were corrupted it would
be easy to fix by hand.
This hazard has been there all along, so back-patch to all supported
branches.
Michael Paquier, with some kibitzing by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/f4b8eb91-b934-8a0d-b3cc-68f06e2279d1@enterprisedb.com
|
|
Noted by Peter Eisentraut
|
|
Left-justify these comments, remove committer names, remove SGML markup
that was randomly added to some of them. Aside from being more consistent
with previous practice, this keeps the lines shorter than 80 characters,
improving readability in standard terminal windows.
|
|
Mention the rounding behavioral change for money/int8.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170519164653.29941.19098@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
This variable was only used with Kerberos v4. That support was removed
in 2005, but we forgot to remove the documentation.
Noted by Shinichi Matsuda
|
|
Pointed out by Jeff Janes
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMkU=1zGhK-nW10RAXhokcT3MM=YBg=j5LkG9RMDwmu3i0H0Og@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The cash_div_intX functions applied rint() to the result of the division.
That's not merely useless (because the result is already an integer) but
it causes precision loss for values larger than 2^52 or so, because of
the forced conversion to float8.
On the other hand, the cash_mul_fltX functions neglected to apply rint() to
their multiplication results, thus possibly causing off-by-one outputs.
Per C standard, arithmetic between any integral value and a float value is
performed in float format. Thus, cash_mul_flt4 and cash_div_flt4 produced
answers good to only about six digits, even when the float value is exact.
We can improve matters noticeably by widening the float inputs to double.
(It's tempting to consider using "long double" arithmetic if available,
but that's probably too much of a stretch for a back-patched fix.)
Also, document that cash_div_intX operators truncate rather than round.
Per bug #14663 from Richard Pistole. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/22403.1495223615@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This is more secure, and saves a redirect since we no longer accept
plain HTTP connections on the website.
References in code comments should probably be updated too, but
that doesn't seem to need back-patching, whereas this does.
Also, in the 9.2 branch, remove suggestion that you can get the
source code via FTP, since that service will be shut down soon.
Daniel Gustafsson, with a few additional changes by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9A2C89A7-0BB8-41A8-B288-8B7BD09D7D44@yesql.se
|
|
If one host in a multi-host connection string times out, move on to
the next specified host instead of giving up entirely.
Takayuki Tsunakawa, reviewed by Michael Paquier. I added
a minor adjustment to the documentation.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F6F42F5@G01JPEXMBYT05
|
