| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The descriptions for ProcArrayGroupUpdate and XactGroupUpdate claim
that these events mean we are waiting for the group leader "at end
of a parallel operation," but neither pertains to parallel
operations. This commit reverts these descriptions to their
wording before commit 3048898e73, i.e., "end of a parallel
operation" is changed to "transaction end."
Author: Sameer Kumar
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPeHmh6UMrKQHKCmX%2B5vV5TH9P%3DKw9en3k68qEem6J%3DyrZPUA%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
|
|
Document the hard limit stemming from the size of an OID, and also
mention the perfomance impact that occurs before the hard limit
is reached.
Jakub Wartak and Robert Haas
Backpatch to all supported versions
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKZiRmwWhp2yxjqJLwbBjHdfbJBcUmmKMNAZyBjjtpgM9AMatQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Change "$1" to "username".
Reported-by: philipp.salvisberg@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/172112109590.736590.12219129462878821880@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
This section claims we use CRC-32 for WAL records and two-phase
state files, but we've actually used CRC-32C since v9.5 (commit
5028f22f6e). Fix that.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZrUFpLP-w2zTAHqq%40nathan
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Security: CVE-2024-7348
|
|
When pg_dump retrieves the list of database objects and performs the
data dump, there was possibility that objects are replaced with others
of the same name, such as views, and access them. This vulnerability
could result in code execution with superuser privileges during the
pg_dump process.
This issue can arise when dumping data of sequences, foreign
tables (only 13 or later), or tables registered with a WHERE clause in
the extension configuration table.
To address this, pg_dump now utilizes the newly introduced
restrict_nonsystem_relation_kind GUC parameter to restrict the
accesses to non-system views and foreign tables during the dump
process. This new GUC parameter is added to back branches too, but
these changes do not require cluster recreation.
Back-patch to all supported branches.
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch
Security: CVE-2024-7348
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
|
|
Prior to this commit, the docs for enable_partitionwise_aggregate and
enable_partitionwise_join mentioned the additional overheads enabling
these causes for the query planner, but they mentioned nothing about the
possible surge in work_mem-consuming executor nodes that could end up in
the final plan. Dimitrios reported the OOM killer intervened on his
query as a result of using enable_partitionwise_aggregate=on.
Here we adjust the docs to mention the possible increase in the number of
work_mem-consuming executor nodes that can appear in the final plan as a
result of enabling these GUCs.
Reported-by: Dimitrios Apostolou
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3603c380-d094-136e-e333-610914fb3e80%40gmx.net
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvoZ0_yqwPFEpb6h261L76BUpmh5GxBQq0LeRzQ5Jh3zzg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
|
|
In the syntax synopses for SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, etc,
SELECT ... and RETURNING ... targetlists were missing { ... }
braces around an OR (|) operator. That allows misinterpretation
which could lead to confusion.
David G. Johnston, per gripe from masondeanm@aol.com.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/172193970148.915373.2403176471224676074@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
Per complaint from Grant Gryczan.
It's a very old typo; backpatch all the way back.
Author: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/172179789219.915368.16590585529628354757@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
We were not being clear about which variants of the "direction"
clause are permitted in MOVE. Also, the text seemed to be
written with only the FETCH/MOVE NEXT case in mind, so it
didn't apply very well to other variants.
Also, document that "MOVE count IN cursor" only works if count
is a constant. This is not the whole truth, because some other
cases such as a parenthesized expression will also work, but
we want to push people to use "MOVE FORWARD count" instead.
The constant case is enough to cover what we allow in plain SQL,
and that seems sufficient to claim support for.
Update a comment in pl_gram.y claiming that we don't document
that point.
Per gripe from Philipp Salvisberg.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/172155553388.702.7932496598218792085@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
State explicitly that the coordinates in our geometric data types are
float8. Also explain that polygons store their bounding box.
While here, fix the table of geometric data types to show type
"line"'s size correctly: it's 24 bytes not 32. This has somehow
escaped notice since that table was made in 1998.
Per suggestion from Sebastian Skałacki. The size error seems
important enough to justify back-patching.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/172000045661.706.1822177575291548794@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
The ssl_prefer_server_ciphers setting is quite important from a
security point of view, so simply stating that older versions
doesn't have it isn't very helpful. This adds the version when
the GUC was added to help readers.
Backpatch to all supported versions since this setting has been
around since 9.4.
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5D7E0F5E-E620-4D54-8788-66D421AC76F0@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: v12
|
|
Add a note in docs that generated columns are skipped for logical
replication.
Author: Peter Smith
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut
Backpatch-through: 12
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PuXb1GLQztQkoWzYjSwkAZZ0dgCJaAHyJtZF3kmtcL=kA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The WAL writer is an auxiliary process, but its description in the
glossary did not match that.
This is inexact since d3014fff4cd4.
Author: Masahiro Ikeda
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d3a5a4278fd8d9e7a47c6aa4db9e9a39@oss.nttdata.com
Backpatch-through: 15
|
|
The behavior for columns added later to the table for publications with no
specified column lists was not clear.
Reported-by: Koen De Groote
Author: Peter Smith
Reviewed-by: Vignesh C, Laurenz Albe
Backpatch-through: 15
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/171621878740.686.11325940592820985181@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
If the CALL is within an atomic context (e.g. there's an outer
transaction block), _SPI_execute_plan should acquire a fresh snapshot
to execute any such functions with. We failed to do that and instead
passed them the Portal snapshot, which had been acquired at the start
of the current SQL command. This'd lead to seeing stale values of
rows modified since the start of the command.
This is arguably a bug in 84f5c2908: I failed to see that "are we in
non-atomic mode" needs to be defined the same way as it is further
down in _SPI_execute_plan, i.e. check !_SPI_current->atomic not just
options->allow_nonatomic. Alternatively the blame could be laid on
plpgsql, which is unconditionally passing allow_nonatomic = true
for CALL/DO even when it knows it's in an atomic context. However,
fixing it in spi.c seems like a better idea since that will also fix
the problem for any extensions that may have copied plpgsql's coding
pattern.
While here, update an obsolete comment about _SPI_execute_plan's
snapshot management.
Per report from Victor Yegorov. Back-patch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGnEboiRe+fG2QxuBO2390F7P8e2MQ6UyBjZSL_w1Cej+E4=Vw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The wording from the "columns" view was copied to the "attributes"
view without the required adjustments.
|
|
The documentation for POSIX semaphores is missing a reference to
max_wal_senders. This commit fixes that in the same way that
commit 4ebe51a5fb fixed the same issue in the documentation for
System V semaphores.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240517164452.GA1914161%40nathanxps13
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
The formulas for SEMMNI and SEMMNS do not include the archiver
process, which was converted to an auxiliary process in v14, and
the WAL summarizer process, which was introduced in v17. This
commit corrects these formulas and adds a missing reference to
max_wal_senders nearby. Since this section of the documentation
tends to be incorrect quite often, we should likely give up on
documenting the exact formulas in favor of something less fragile,
but that is left as a future exercise.
Reported-by: Sami Imseih
Reviewed-by: Sami Imseih
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240517164452.GA1914161%40nathanxps13
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Parameter column_name must be an existing column because ALTER
MATERIALIZED VIEW cannot add new columns. The old description was
likely copied from ALTER TABLE.
Author: Erik Wienhold
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/6880ca53-7961-4eeb-86d5-6bd05fc2027e@ewie.name
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Specifically, it terminates a background worker even if the caller
couldn't terminate the background worker with pg_terminate_backend().
Commit 3a9b18b3095366cd0c4305441d426d04572d88c1 neglected to update
this. Back-patch to v13, which introduced DROP DATABASE FORCE.
Reviewed by Amit Kapila. Reported by Kirill Reshke.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240429212756.60.nmisch@google.com
|
|
Erroneously introduced by 571df93cff8.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/8458c9c5-18f1-46d7-94c4-1c30e4f44908%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Presently, when this function is called for an unlogged sequence on
a standby server, it will error out with a message like
ERROR: could not open file "base/5/16388": No such file or directory
Since the pg_sequences system view uses pg_sequence_last_value(),
it can error similarly. To fix, modify the function to return NULL
for unlogged sequences on standby servers. Since this bug is
present on all versions since v15, this approach is preferable to
making the ERROR nicer because we need to repair the pg_sequences
view without modifying its definition on released versions. For
consistency, this commit also modifies the function to return NULL
for other sessions' temporary sequences. The pg_sequences view
already appropriately filters out such sequences, so there's no bug
there, but we might as well offer some defense in case someone
invokes this function directly.
Unlogged sequences were first introduced in v15, but temporary
sequences are much older, so while the fix for unlogged sequences
is only back-patched to v15, the temporary sequence portion is
back-patched to all supported versions.
We could also remove the privilege check in the pg_sequences view
definition in v18 if we modify this function to return NULL for
sequences for which the current user lacks privileges, but that is
left as a future exercise for when v18 development begins.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240501005730.GA594666%40nathanxps13
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Security: CVE-2024-4317
|
|
The catalog view pg_stats_ext fails to consider privileges for
expression statistics. The catalog view pg_stats_ext_exprs fails
to consider privileges and row-level security policies. To fix,
restrict the data in these views to table owners or roles that
inherit privileges of the table owner. It may be possible to apply
less restrictive privilege checks in some cases, but that is left
as a future exercise. Furthermore, for pg_stats_ext_exprs, do not
return data for tables with row-level security enabled, as is
already done for pg_stats_ext.
On the back-branches, a fix-CVE-2024-4317.sql script is provided
that will install into the "share" directory. This file can be
used to apply the fix to existing clusters.
Bumps catversion on 'master' branch only.
Reported-by: Lukas Fittl
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch, Tomas Vondra, Tom Lane
Security: CVE-2024-4317
Backpatch-through: 14
|
|
|
|
The documentation said that you need to pick a suitable LC_COLLATE
setting in addition to setting the DETERMINISTIC flag. This would
have been correct if the libc provider supported nondeterministic
collations, but since it doesn't, you actually need to set the LOCALE
option.
Reviewed-by: Kashif Zeeshan <kashi.zeeshan@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/a71023c2-0ae0-45ad-9688-cf3b93d0d65b%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Since schemas have more than one kind of privilege, we should
use the synopsis form that shows the privilege being possibly
repeated.
Yugo Nagata
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240424155052.7ac0d0773e4ae27ab723faea@sraoss.co.jp
|
|
The paragraph describing the JavaScript string literals allowed in
jsonpath expressions unnecessarily mentions JSON by erroneously
listing \v as allowed by JSON and mentioning the \xNN and \u{N...}
backslash escapes as deviations from JSON when in fact both are
accepted by ECMAScript/JavaScript. Fix this by only referring to
JavaScript.
Author: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1EB17DF9-2636-484B-9DD0-3CAB19C4F5C4@justatheory.com
|
|
Commit 9c08aea6a309 introduced -S/--strategy option, but forgot to
rename the parameter when copying the -T/--template bit.
|
|
The documents were clear that queryid should not be assumed to be stable
between major versions but said nothing about minor versions and left
the reader to guess if that was implied by the mention of the
instability of queryid between major versions.
Here we give minor versions an explicit mention to indicate queryid can
generally be assumed stable between minor versions.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpYGE6h0cD9UO-eHySPynPj1L3J%3DHxT%2BA7Ud8_Yo6AuzA%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
These operators were removed by 2f70fdb0644c in the v14 cycle but they were
accidentally left in the table of build-in operator classes. Backpatch down
to v14 where the operators where removed.
Author: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Reported-by: Colin Caine <cmcaine@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADwQTQbbr2UQ_fpbyc+8ay=RwEYgYk=TZxH3+RHDqAQfoG+EWA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: v14
|
|
The code associated with EXEC SQL DEFINE was unreadable and full of
bugs, notably:
* It'd attempt to free a non-malloced string if the ecpg program
tries to redefine a macro that was defined on the command line.
* Possible memory stomp if user writes "-D=foo".
* Undef'ing or redefining a macro defined on the command line would
change the state visible to the next file, when multiple files are
specified on the command line. (While possibly that could have been
an intentional choice, the code clearly intends to revert to the
original macro state; it's just failing to consider this interaction.)
* Missing "break" in defining a new macro meant that redefinition
of an existing name would cause an extra entry to be added to the
definition list. While not immediately harmful, a subsequent undef
would result in the prior entry becoming visible again.
* The interactions with input buffering are subtle and were entirely
undocumented.
It's not that surprising that we hadn't noticed these bugs,
because there was no test coverage at all of either the -D
command line switch or multiple input files. This patch adds
such coverage (in a rather hacky way I guess).
In addition to the code bugs, the user documentation was confused
about whether the -D switch defines a C macro or an ecpg one, and
it failed to mention that you can write "-Dsymbol=value".
These problems are old, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/998011.1713217712@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
November doesn't have 31 days. Remarkably, this thinko
has escaped detection since commit 3f1998727.
Noted by Y. Saburov.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/171276122213.681.531905738590773705@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
The tools.ietf.org site has been decommissioned and replaced by a
number of sites serving various purposes. Links to RFCs and BCPs
are now 301 redirected to their new respective IETF sites. Since
this serves no purpose and only adds network overhead, update our
links to the new locations.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3C1CEA99-FCED-447D-9858-5A579B4C6687@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: v12
|
|
Back in 7.2 the list of options had short options and long options
on the same line separated by comma, but since 7.3 they are listed
separate lines. The comma on -X was left behind so fix by removing
and backpatching all the way.
Reported-by: y.saburov@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/171267154345.684.7212826057932148541@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: v12
|
|
What the documentation calls an exclude_element is an index_elem
according to gram.y, and it allows all the same options that
a CREATE INDEX column specification does. The COLLATE patch
neglected to update the CREATE/ALTER TABLE docs about that,
and later the opclass-parameters patch made the same oversight.
Add those options to the syntax synopses, and polish the
associated text a bit.
Back-patch to v13 where opclass parameters came in. We could
update v12 with just the COLLATE omission, but it doesn't quite
seem worth the trouble at this point.
Shihao Zhong, reviewed by Daniel Vérité, Shubham Khanna and myself
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGRkXqShbVyB8E3gapfdtuwiWTiK=Q67Qb9qwxu=+-w0w46EBA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Remove a redundant comment, and document pg_class.reltablespace properly
in catalogs.sgml.
After commits a36c84c3e4a9, 87259588d0ab and others.
Backpatch to 12.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202403191013.w2kr7wqlamqz@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
In the synopsis, make the syntax for merge_update consistent with the
syntax for a plain UPDATE command. It was missing the optional "ROW"
keyword that can be used in a multi-column assignment, and the option
to assign from a multi-column subquery, both of which have been
supported by MERGE since it was introduced.
In the parameters section for the with_query parameter, mention that
WITH RECURSIVE isn't supported, since this is different from plain
INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE commands. While at it, move that entry to
the top of the list, for consistency with the other pages.
Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was introduced.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCWoQyWkMFfu7JXXQr8dA6%3DgxjhYzgpuBP2oz0QoJTxGWw%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Reported-by: doughale@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/170993253510.640.5664117187431542912@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Add a note about the additional privileges required after the fix in
4989ce72644b (wording per Tom Lane); also change marked-up mentions of
"target_table_name" to be simply "the target table" or the like. Also,
note that "join_condition" is scouted for requisite privileges.
Backpatch to 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/202402211653.zuh6objy3z72@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
Noted by Aidar Imamov.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/170869935022.643.3709087848818148291@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
Commit a2c84990bea7 accidentally used the link for pg_hba_file_rules
when linking to pg_ident_file_mappings. Backpatch to v16 where this
was introduced.
Author: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/qt5hvgvfi4qzlgml2dfssaut2t2x5nwf7b5l63fklr7fpxwm6g@hle3mtglpm4y
Backpatch-through: v16
|
|
The explanation of interval's behavior in datatype.sgml wasn't wrong
exactly, but it was unclear, partly because it buried the lede about
there being three internal fields. Rearrange and wordsmith for more
clarity.
The discussion of extract() claimed that input of type date was
handled by casting, but actually there's been a separate SQL function
taking date for a very long time. Also, it was mostly silent about
how interval inputs are handled, but there are several field types
for which it seems useful to be specific.
Improve discussion of justify_days()/justify_hours() too.
In passing, remove vertical space in some groups of examples,
as there was little consistency about whether to have such space
or not. (I only did this within the datetime functions section;
there are some related inconsistencies elsewhere.)
Per discussion of bug #18348 from Michael Bondarenko. There
may be some code changes coming out of that discussion too,
but we likely won't back-patch them. This docs-only patch
seems useful to back-patch, though I only carried it back to
v13 because it didn't apply easily in v12.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18348-b097a3587dfde8a4@postgresql.org
|
|
Commits 1b2c6b756 et al affected the core BRIN "bloom" opclasses,
not contrib/bloom. This only corrected a bad assertion so it's not
too significant to end users, but since we documented it we should
do so accurately.
Spotted by Takatsuka Haruka.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18353-926aa99cfe58aa78@postgresql.org
|
|
One case missed its trailing "|".
Reported by Tim Needham.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/170833547220.3279712.700702770281879175@wrigleys.postgresql.org
|
|
The pgcrypto docs contained a set of links for useful reading and
technical references. These sets of links were however not actively
curated and had stale content and dead links. Rather than investing
time into maintining these, this removes them altogether since there
are lots of resources online which are actively maintained.
Backpatch to all supported versions since these links have been in
the docs for a long time.
Reported-by: Hanefi Onaldi <hanefi.onaldi@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/170774255387.3279713.2822272755998870925@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: v12
|
|
The macOS Finder application creates .DS_Store files in directories
when opened, which creates problems for serverside utilities which
expect all files to be PostgreSQL specific files. Skip these files
when encountered in pg_checksums, pg_rewind and pg_basebackup.
This was extracted from a larger patchset for skipping hidden files
and system files, where the concencus was to just skip these. Since
this is equally likely to happen in every version, backpatch to all
supported versions.
Reported-by: Mark Guertin <markguertin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Bussmann <t.bussmann@gmx.net>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E258CE50-AB0E-455D-8AAD-BB4FE8F882FB@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: v12
|
|
Commit 9c08aea6a30 accidentally added one too many end brackets
in the synopsis for CREATE DATABASE .. strategy = strat. Fix by
removing. Backpatch to v15 where it was introduced.
Reported-by: tim.needham2@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/170734160862.3279712.810853722572951776@wrigleys.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: v15
|
