| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.4
|
|
Backpatch-through: certain files through 9.3
|
|
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoaA9=1RWKtBWpDaj+sF3Stgc8sHgf5z=KGtbjwPLQVDMA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
pq_sendint() remains, so extension code doesn't unnecessarily break.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170914063418.sckdzgjfrsbekae4@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
This is a mechanical change in preparation for a later commit that
will change the layout of TupleDesc. Introducing a macro to abstract
the details of where attributes are stored will allow us to change
that in separate step and revise it in future.
Author: Thomas Munro, editorialized by Andres Freund
Reviewed-By: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=0ZtQ-SpsgCyzzYpsXS6e=kZWqk3g5Ygn3MDV7A8dabUA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Change pg_bsd_indent to follow upstream rules for placement of comments
to the right of code, and remove pgindent hack that caused comments
following #endif to not obey the general rule.
Commit e3860ffa4dd0dad0dd9eea4be9cc1412373a8c89 wasn't actually using
the published version of pg_bsd_indent, but a hacked-up version that
tried to minimize the amount of movement of comments to the right of
code. The situation of interest is where such a comment has to be
moved to the right of its default placement at column 33 because there's
code there. BSD indent has always moved right in units of tab stops
in such cases --- but in the previous incarnation, indent was working
in 8-space tab stops, while now it knows we use 4-space tabs. So the
net result is that in about half the cases, such comments are placed
one tab stop left of before. This is better all around: it leaves
more room on the line for comment text, and it means that in such
cases the comment uniformly starts at the next 4-space tab stop after
the code, rather than sometimes one and sometimes two tabs after.
Also, ensure that comments following #endif are indented the same
as comments following other preprocessor commands such as #else.
That inconsistency turns out to have been self-inflicted damage
from a poorly-thought-through post-indent "fixup" in pgindent.
This patch is much less interesting than the first round of indent
changes, but also bulkier, so I thought it best to separate the effects.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1dAmxK-0006EE-1r@gemulon.postgresql.org
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/30527.1495162840@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
perltidy run not included.
|
|
Commit a84069d9350400c860d5e932b50dfd337aa407b0 added a new type of
DestReceiver to avoid duplicating the existing code for the SHOW
command, but it turns out we can leverage that new DestReceiver
type in a few more places, saving some code.
Michael Paquier, reviewed by Andres Freund and by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAB7nPqSdFOQC0evc0r1nJeQyGBqjBrR41MC4rcMqUUpoJaZbtQ%40mail.gmail.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAB7nPqT2K4XFT1JgqufFBjsOc-NUKXg5qBDucHPMbk6Xi1kYaA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
If you create a DestReciver of type DestRemote and try to use it from
a replication connection that is not bound to a specific daabase, or
any other hypothetical type of backend that is not bound to a specific
database, it will fail because it doesn't have a pg_proc catalog to
look up properties of the types being printed. In general, that's
an unavoidable problem, but we can hardwire the properties of a few
builtin types in order to support utility commands. This new
DestReceiver of type DestRemoteSimple does just that.
Patch by me, reviewed by Michael Paquier.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobNo4qz06wHEmy9DszAre3dYx-WNhHSCbU9SAwf+9Ft6g@mail.gmail.com
|
