| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This adapts the manifest parsing code to take advantage of the
const-ified jsonapi.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f732b014-f614-4600-a437-dba5a2c3738b%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the
corresponding names from function definitions in a few places. These
inconsistencies were all introduced during Postgres 17 development.
pg_bsd_indent still has a couple of similar inconsistencies, which I
(pgeoghegan) have left untouched for now.
This commit was written with help from clang-tidy, by mechanically
applying the same rules as similar clean-up commits (the earliest such
commit was commit 035ce1fe).
|
|
Commit 10e3226ba13d added padding to incremental backups to ensure the
block data is properly aligned. The code in sendFile() however failed to
consider that the header may be a multiple of BLCKSZ and thus already
aligned, adding a full BLCKSZ of unnecessary padding.
Not only does this make the incremental file a bit larger, but the other
places calculating the amount of padding did realize it's not needed and
did not include it in the formula. This resulted in pg_basebackup
getting confused while parsing the data stream, trying to access files
with invalid filenames (e.g. with binary data etc.) and failing.
|
|
Per gripes from Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZhTQ6_w1vwOhqTQI@paquier.xyz
Along the way, also clean up a handful of typos in 3311ea86ed and
ea7b4e9a2a, found by Alexander Lakhin, and a couple of stylistic
snafus noted by Daniel Westermann and Daniel Gustafsson.
|
|
Coverity complained about not freeing some memory associated with
incrementally parsing backup manifests. To fix that, provide and use a new
shutdown function for the JsonManifestParseIncrementalState object, in
line with a suggestion from Tom Lane.
While analysing the problem, I noticed a buglet in freeing memory for
incremental json lexers. To fix that remove a bogus condition on
freeing the memory allocated for them.
|
|
Reported-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZhdKqj5DwoOzirFv%40paquier.xyz
|
|
The user can set RELSEG_SIZE to a high number at compile time, so we
can't use it to control the size of an array on the stack: it could be
many gigabytes in size. On closer inspection, we don't really need that
intermediate array anyway. Let's just write directly into the output
array, and then perform the absolute->relative adjustment in place.
This fixes new code from commit dc212340058.
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BhUKG%2B2hZ0sBztPW4mkLfng0qfkNtAHFUfxOMLizJ0BPmi5%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Seems to be a copy-and-paste error dating to dc2123400.
Noted while reviewing a related documentation patch.
|
|
Align blocks stored in incremental files to BLCKSZ, so that the
incremental backups work well with CoW filesystems.
The header of the incremental file is padded with \0 to a multiple of
BLCKSZ, so that the block data (also BLCKSZ) is aligned to BLCKSZ. The
padding is added only to files containing block data, so files with just
the header remain small. This adds a bit of extra space, but as the
number of blocks increases the overhead gets negligible very quickly.
And as the padding is \0 bytes, it does compress extremely well.
The alignment is important for CoW filesystems that usually require the
blocks to be aligned to filesystem page size for features like block
sharing, deduplication etc. to work well. With the variable sized header
the blocks in the increments were not aligned at all, negating the
benefits of the CoW filesystems.
This matters even for non-CoW filesystems, for example when placed on a
RAID array. If the block is not aligned, it may easily span multiple
devices, causing read and write amplification.
It might be better to align the blocks to the filesystem page, not
BLCKSZ, but we have no good way to determine that. Even if we determine
the page size at the time of taking the backup, the backup may move. For
now the BLCKSZ seems sufficient - the filesystem page is usually 4K, so
the default BLCKSZ (8K by default) is aligned to that.
Author: Tomas Vondra
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas, Jakub Wartak
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3024283a-7491-4240-80d0-421575f6bb23%40enterprisedb.com
|
|
This changes the three callers to json_parse_manifest() to use
json_parse_manifest_incremental_chunk() if appropriate. In the case of
the backend caller, since we don't know the size of the manifest in
advance we always call the incremental parser.
Author: Andrew Dunstan
Reviewed-By: Jacob Champion
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/7b0a51d6-0d9d-7366-3a1a-f74397a02f55@dunslane.net
|
|
Thanks to commits ea18eb7d62, b6ee30ec08, and 19a829a327, the
002_blocks.pl test now consistently passes, so we can remove this
temporary debugging code.
This reverts commit 5ddf9973477729cf161b4ad0a1efd52f4fea9c88.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240314210010.GA3056455%40nathanxps13
|
|
destroyStringInfo() is a counterpart to makeStringInfo(), freeing a
palloc'd StringInfo and its data. This is a convenience function to
align the StringInfo API with the PQExpBuffer API. Originally added
in the OAuth patchset, it was extracted and committed separately in
order to aid upcoming JSON work.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Author: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAOYmi+mWdTd6ujtyF7MsvXvk7ToLRVG_tYAcaGbQLvf=N4KrQw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Before this patch, if you took a full backup on server A and then
tried to use the backup manifest to take an incremental backup on
server B, it wouldn't know that the manifest was from a different
server and so the incremental backup operation could potentially
complete without error. When you later tried to run pg_combinebackup,
you'd find out that your incremental backup was and always had been
invalid. That's poor timing, because nobody likes finding out about
backup problems only at restore time.
With this patch, you'll get an error when trying to take the (invalid)
incremental backup, which seems a lot nicer.
Amul Sul, revised by me. Review by Michael Paquier.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYLZzbSAMM3cAjV4Y+iCRZn-bR9H2+Mdz7NdaJFU1Zb5w@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Similar to commit 7e735035f20.
Author: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CAMbWs4-WhpCFMbXCjtJ%2BFzmjfPrp7Hw1pk4p%2BZpU95Kh3ofZ1A%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
Apparently, I neglected to pgindent the prior commit.
Per buildfarm.
|
|
After XLOG_DBASE_CREATE_FILE_COPY, a correct incremental backup needs
to copy in full everything with the database and tablespace OID
mentioned in that record; but that record doesn't specifically mention
the blocks, or even the relfilenumbers, of the affected relations.
As a result, we were failing to copy data that we should have copied.
To fix, enter the DB OID and tablespace OID into the block reference
table with relfilenumber 0 and limit block 0; and treat that as a
limit block of 0 for every relfilenumber whose DB OID and tablespace
OID match.
Also, add a test case.
Patch by me, reviewed by Noah Misch.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmob0xa=ByvGLMdAgkUZyVQE=r4nyYZ_VEa40FCfEDFnTKA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
as determined by include-what-you-use (IWYU)
While IWYU also suggests to *add* a bunch of #include's (which is its
main purpose), this patch does not do that. In some cases, a more
specific #include replaces another less specific one.
Some manual adjustments of the automatic result:
- IWYU currently doesn't know about includes that provide global
variable declarations (like -Wmissing-variable-declarations), so
those includes are being kept manually.
- All includes for port(ability) headers are being kept for now, to
play it safe.
- No changes of catalog/pg_foo.h to catalog/pg_foo_d.h, to keep the
patch from exploding in size.
Note that this patch touches just *.c files, so nothing declared in
header files changes in hidden ways.
As a small example, in src/backend/access/transam/rmgr.c, some IWYU
pragma annotations are added to handle a special case there.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/af837490-6b2f-46df-ba05-37ea6a6653fc%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Now that BackendId was just another index into the proc array, it was
redundant with the 0-based proc numbers used in other places. Replace
all usage of backend IDs with proc numbers.
The only place where the term "backend id" remains is in a few pgstat
functions that expose backend IDs at the SQL level. Those IDs are now
in fact 0-based ProcNumbers too, but the documentation still calls
them "backend ids". That term still seems appropriate to describe what
the numbers are, so I let it be.
One user-visible effect is that pg_temp_0 is now a valid temp schema
name, for backend with ProcNumber 0.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8171f1aa-496f-46a6-afc3-c46fe7a9b407@iki.fi
|
|
Not only did the format placeholder not match the variable, the
variable also didn't match the function it was getting its value from.
|
|
Commit 6b80394781 introduced integer comparison functions designed
to be as efficient as possible while avoiding overflow. This
commit makes use of these functions in many of the in-tree qsort()
comparators to help ensure transitivity. Many of these comparator
functions should also see a small performance boost.
Author: Mats Kindahl
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2B14426g2Wa9QuUpmakwPxXFWG_1FaY0AsApkvcTBy-YfS6uaw%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
The macOS Finder application creates .DS_Store files in directories
when opened, which creates problems for serverside utilities which
expect all files to be PostgreSQL specific files. Skip these files
when encountered in pg_checksums, pg_rewind and pg_basebackup.
This was extracted from a larger patchset for skipping hidden files
and system files, where the concencus was to just skip these. Since
this is equally likely to happen in every version, backpatch to all
supported versions.
Reported-by: Mark Guertin <markguertin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Bussmann <t.bussmann@gmx.net>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E258CE50-AB0E-455D-8AAD-BB4FE8F882FB@gmail.com
Backpatch-through: v12
|
|
Analysis of buildfarm results showed that the code that was intended
to wait for the inserts performed by this test to complete did not
actually do so. Try to make that logic more robust.
Improve error checking elsewhere in the script, too, so that we
don't miss things like poll_query_until failing.
Along the way, fix a bit of pgindent damage introduced by commit
5ddf9973477729cf161b4ad0a1efd52f4fea9c88, which aimed to help us
debug the failures that this commit is trying to fix. It's making
the buildfarm sad.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmobWFb8NqyfC31YnKAbZiXf9tLuwmyuvx=iYMXMniPQ4nw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The tests in 002_blocks.pl are failing in the buildfarm from time to
time, but we don't know how to reproduce the failure elsewhere. The
most obvious explanation seems to be the unexpected disappearance of a
WAL summary file, so bump up the logging level in
RemoveWalSummaryIfOlderThan to try to help us spot such problems, and
print the cutoff time in addition to the removed filename. Also
adjust 002_blocks.pl to dump out a directory listing of the relevant
directory at various points.
This patch should be reverted once we sort out what's happening here.
Patch by me, reviewed by Nathan Bossart, who also reported the issue.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/20240124170846.GA2643050@nathanxps13
|
|
This makes it possible to access information about the progress
of WAL summarization from SQL. The previously-added functions
pg_available_wal_summaries() and pg_wal_summary_contents() only
examine on-disk state, but this function exposes information from
the server's shared memory.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+Tgmobvqqj-DW9F7uUzT-cQqs6wcVb-Xhs=w=hzJnXSE-kRGw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Reported-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZZKTDPxBBMt3C0J9@paquier.xyz
Backpatch-through: 12
|
|
Swap the arguments to TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds so that we get
a positive answer instead of zero.
Then use the result of that computation instead of ignoring it.
Per reports from Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/8b686764-7ac1-74c3-70f9-b64685a2535f@gmail.com
|
|
Recently-introduced code in reconstruct.c was using "unsigned"
to store the result of read(), pg_pread(), or write(). This is
completely bogus: it breaks subsequent tests for the result being
negative, as we're being reminded of by a chorus of buildfarm
warnings. Switch to "int" as was doubtless intended. (There are
several other uses of "unsigned" in this file that also look poorly
chosen to me, but for now I'm just trying to clean up the buildfarm.)
A larger problem is that "int" is not necessarily wide enough to hold
the result: per POSIX, all these functions return ssize_t. In places
where the requested read or write length clearly fits in int, that's
academic. It may be academic anyway as long as we constrain
individual data files to 1GB, since even a readv or writev-like
operation would then not be responsible for transferring more than
1GB. Nonetheless it seems like trouble waiting to happen, so I made
a pass over readv and writev calls and fixed the result variables
where that seemed appropriate. We might want to think about changing
some of the fd.c functions to return ssize_t too, for future-proofing;
but I didn't tackle that here.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1672202.1703441340@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Follow up to dc2123400
Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231222.154939.1509525390095583358.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231225.145124.1745560266993421173.horikyota.ntt@gmail.com
|
|
Apparently, spell check would have been a really good idea.
Alexander Lakhin, with a few additions as per an off-list report
from Andres Freund.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/f08f7c60-1ad3-0b57-d580-54b11f07cddf@gmail.com
|
|
To take an incremental backup, you use the new replication command
UPLOAD_MANIFEST to upload the manifest for the prior backup. This
prior backup could either be a full backup or another incremental
backup. You then use BASE_BACKUP with the INCREMENTAL option to take
the backup. pg_basebackup now has an --incremental=PATH_TO_MANIFEST
option to trigger this behavior.
An incremental backup is like a regular full backup except that
some relation files are replaced with files with names like
INCREMENTAL.${ORIGINAL_NAME}, and the backup_label file contains
additional lines identifying it as an incremental backup. The new
pg_combinebackup tool can be used to reconstruct a data directory
from a full backup and a series of incremental backups.
Patch by me. Reviewed by Matthias van de Meent, Dilip Kumar, Jakub
Wartak, Peter Eisentraut, and Álvaro Herrera. Thanks especially to
Jakub for incredibly helpful and extensive testing.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYOYZfMCyOXFyC-P+-mdrZqm5pP2N7S-r0z3_402h9rsA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
When active, this process writes WAL summary files to
$PGDATA/pg_wal/summaries. Each summary file contains information for a
certain range of LSNs on a certain TLI. For each relation, it stores a
"limit block" which is 0 if a relation is created or destroyed within
a certain range of WAL records, or otherwise the shortest length to
which the relation was truncated during that range of WAL records, or
otherwise InvalidBlockNumber. In addition, it stores a list of blocks
which have been modified during that range of WAL records, but
excluding blocks which were removed by truncation after they were
modified and never subsequently modified again.
In other words, it tells us which blocks need to copied in case of an
incremental backup covering that range of WAL records. But this
doesn't yet add the capability to actually perform an incremental
backup; the next patch will do that.
A new parameter summarize_wal enables or disables this new background
process. The background process also automatically deletes summary
files that are older than wal_summarize_keep_time, if that parameter
has a non-zero value and the summarizer is configured to run.
Patch by me, with some design help from Dilip Kumar and Andres Freund.
Reviewed by Matthias van de Meent, Dilip Kumar, Jakub Wartak, Peter
Eisentraut, and Álvaro Herrera.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYOYZfMCyOXFyC-P+-mdrZqm5pP2N7S-r0z3_402h9rsA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Previously, it thought that any plain file located under global, base,
or a tablespace directory had checksums unless it was in a short list
of excluded files. Now, it thinks that files in those directories have
checksums if parse_filename_for_nontemp_relation says that they are
relation files. (Temporary relation files don't matter because they're
excluded from the backup anyway.)
This changes the behavior if you have stray files not managed by
PostgreSQL in the relevant directories. Previously, you'd get some
kind of checksum-related complaint if such files existed, assuming
that the cluster had checksums enabled and that the base backup
wasn't run with NOVERIFY_CHECKSUMS. Now, you won't get those
complaints any more. That seems like an improvement to me, because
those files were presumably not created by PostgreSQL and so there
is no reason to think that they would be checksummed like a
PostgreSQL relation file. (If we want to complain about such files,
we should complain about them existing at all, not just about their
checksums.)
The point of this change is to make the code more consistent.
sendDir() was already calling parse_filename_for_nontemp_relation()
as part of an effort to determine which files to include in the
backup. So, it already had the information about whether a certain
file was a relation file. sendFile() then used a separate method,
embodied in is_checksummed_file(), to make what is essentially
the same determination. It's better not to make the same decision
using two different methods, especially in closely-related code.
Patch by me. Reviewed by Dilip Kumar and Álvaro Herrera. Thanks
also to Jakub Wartak and Peter Eisentraut for comments, suggestions,
and testing on the larger patch set of which this is a part.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-snhaKkWhi2Gz5i3cZeKefun6sYL==wBoqqnTXxX4_mFA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/202311141312.u4qx5gtpvfq3@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
sendFileWithContent() previously got the content length by using
strlen(), assuming that the content given is always a string. Some
patches are under discussion to pass binary contents to a base backup
stream, where an arbitrary length needs to be given by the caller
instead.
The patch extends sendFileWithContent() to be able to handle this case,
where len < 0 can be used to indicate an arbitrary length rather than
rely on strlen() for the content length.
A comment in sendFileWithContent() mentioned the backup_label file.
However, this routine is used by more file types, like the tablespace
map, so adjust it in passing.
Author: David Steele
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2daf8adc-8db7-4204-a7f2-a7e94e2bfa4b@pgmasters.net
|
|
This shouldn't change behavior except in the unusual case where
there are file in the tablespace directory that have entirely
numeric names but are nevertheless not possible names for a
tablespace directory, either because their names have leading zeroes
that shouldn't be there, or the value is actually zero, or because
the value is too large to represent as an OID.
In those cases, the directory would previously have made it into
the list of tablespaceinfo objects and no longer will. Thus, base
backups will now ignore such directories, instead of treating them
as legitimate tablespace directories. Similarly, if entries for
such tablespaces occur in a tablespace_map file, they will now
be rejected as erroneous, instead of being honored.
This is infrastructure for future work that wants to be able to
know the tablespace of each relation that is part of a backup
*as an OID*. By strengthening the up-front validation, we don't
have to worry about weird cases later, and can more easily avoid
repeated string->integer conversions.
Patch by me, reviewed by David Steele.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZNVeBzoqDL8xvr-nkaepq815jtDR4nJzPew7=3iEuM1g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Instead of returning the number of characters in the RelFileNumber,
return the RelFileNumber itself. Continue to return the fork number,
as before, and additionally return the segment number.
parse_filename_for_nontemp_relation now rejects a RelFileNumber or
segment number that begins with a leading zero. Before, we accepted
such cases as relation filenames, but if we continued to do so after
this change, the function might return the same values for two
different files (e.g. 1234.5 and 001234.5 or 1234.005) which could be
annoying for callers. Since we don't actually ever generate filenames
with leading zeroes in the names, any such files that we find must
have been created by something other than PostgreSQL, and it is
therefore reasonable to treat them as non-relation files.
Along the way, change unlogged_relation_entry to store a RelFileNumber
rather than an OID. This update should have been made in
851f4cc75cdd8c831f1baa9a7abf8c8248b65890, but it was overlooked.
It's trivial to make the update as part of this commit, perhaps more
trivial than it would have been without it, so do that.
Patch by me, reviewed by David Steele.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZNVeBzoqDL8xvr-nkaepq815jtDR4nJzPew7=3iEuM1g@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This further reduces the length and complexity of sendFile(),
hopefully make it easier to understand and modify. In addition
to moving some logic into a new function, I took this opportunity
to make a few slight adjustments to sendFile() itself, including
renaming the 'len' variable to 'bytes_done', since we use it to represent
the number of bytes we've already handled so far, not the total
length of the file.
Patch by me, reviewed by David Steele.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYt5jXH4U6cu1dm9Oe2FTn1aae6hBNhZzJJjyjbE_zYig@mail.gmail.com
|
|
If checksum verification fails for a particular page, we reread the
page and try one more time. The code that does this somewhat complex
and difficult to follow. Move some of the logic into a new function
and rearrange the code a bit to try to make it clearer. This way,
we don't need the block_retry Boolean, a couple of other variables
move from sendFile() into the new function, and some code is now less
deeply indented.
Patch by me, reviewed by David Steele.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYt5jXH4U6cu1dm9Oe2FTn1aae6hBNhZzJJjyjbE_zYig@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Presently, frontend code that needs to use these macros must either
include storage/fd.h, which declares several frontend-unsafe
functions, or duplicate the macros. This commit moves these macros
to common/file_utils.h, which is safe for both frontend and backend
code. Consequently, we can also remove the duplicated macros in
pg_checksums and stop including storage/fd.h in pg_rewind.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZOP5qoUualu5xl2Z%40paquier.xyz
|
|
This commit introduces descriptively-named macros for the
identifiers used in wire protocol messages. These new macros are
placed in a new header file so that they can be easily used by
third-party code.
Author: Dave Cramer
Reviewed-by: Alvaro Herrera, Tatsuo Ishii, Peter Smith, Robert Haas, Tom Lane, Peter Eisentraut, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADK3HHKbBmK-PKf1bPNFoMC%2BoBt%2BpD9PH8h5nvmBQskEHm-Ehw%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
|
|
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.
This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical. We've updated to
pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that
have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are
now indented one tab stop). We've also updated to perltidy version
20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to
add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up. Going
forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing
code.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230428092545.qfb3y5wcu4cm75ur@alvherre.pgsql
|
|
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/699beab4-a6ca-92c9-f152-f559caf6dc25@gmail.com
|
|
This fixes many spelling mistakes in comments, but a few references to
invalid parameter names, function names and option names too in comments
and also some in string constants
Also, fix an #undef that was undefining the incorrect definition
Author: Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d5f68d19-c0fc-91a9-118d-7c6a5a3f5fad@gmail.com
|
|
zstd compression supports a special mode for finding matched in distant
past, which may result in better compression ratio, at the expense of
using more memory (the window size is 128MB).
To enable this optional mode, use the "long" keyword when specifying the
compression method (--compress=zstd:long).
Author: Justin Pryzby
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra, Jacob Champion
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230224191840.GD1653@telsasoft.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220327205020.GM28503@telsasoft.com
|
|
In ancient times, these belonged to arguments or fields that were
actually of type long, but now they are not anymore, so this "L"
decoration is just confusing. (Some other 0L and other "L" constants
remain, where they are actually associated with a long type.)
|
|
Mainly move some detail from errmsg to errdetail, remove explicit
mention of superuser where appropriate, since that is implied in most
permission checks, and make messages more uniform.
Author: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20230316234701.GA903298@nathanxps13
|
|
The comment implies that a single retry is sufficient to avoid
spurious checksum failures, but in fact no number of retries is
sufficient for that purpose. Update the comment accordingly.
Patch by me, reviewed by Michael Paquier.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ_fFAoU6mrHt9QBs+dcYhN6yXenGTTMRebZNhtwPwHyg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
The functions that follow are concerned with various things, of
which the tar format is only one, so this comment doesn't really
seem helpful. The file isn't really divided into sections in the
way that this comment seems to contemplate -- or at least, not
any more.
Patch by me, reviewed by Michael Paquier.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ_fFAoU6mrHt9QBs+dcYhN6yXenGTTMRebZNhtwPwHyg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
We read blocks of data from files that we're backing up in chunks,
some multiple of BLCKSZ for each read. If checksum verification fails,
we then try rereading just the one block for which validation failed.
If that block happened to be the first block of the chunk, and if
the file was concurrently truncated to remove that block, then we'd
reach a call to bbsink_archive_contents() with a buffer length of 0.
That causes an assertion failure.
As far as I can see, there are no particularly bad consequences if
this happens in a non-assert build, and it's pretty unlikely to happen
in the first place because it requires a series of somewhat unlikely
things to happen in very quick succession. However, assertion failures
are bad, so rearrange the code to avoid that possibility.
Patch by me, reviewed by Michael Paquier.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoZ_fFAoU6mrHt9QBs+dcYhN6yXenGTTMRebZNhtwPwHyg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
We'd like to use TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds with the stop_time
possibly being TIMESTAMP_INFINITY, but up to now it's disclaimed
responsibility for overflow cases. Define it to clamp its output to
the range [0, INT_MAX], handling overflow correctly. (INT_MAX rather
than LONG_MAX seems appropriate, because the function is already
described as being intended for calculating wait times for WaitLatch
et al, and that infrastructure only handles waits up to INT_MAX.
Also, this choice gets rid of cross-platform behavioral differences.)
Having done that, we can replace some ad-hoc code in walreceiver.c
with a simple call to TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds.
While at it, fix some buglets in existing callers of
TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds: basebackup_copy.c had not read the
memo about TimestampDifferenceMilliseconds never returning a negative
value, and postmaster.c had not read the memo about Min() and Max()
being macros with multiple-evaluation hazards. Neither of these
quite seem worth back-patching.
Patch by me; thanks to Nathan Bossart for review.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3126727.1674759248@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
