| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
We had a report of confusing server behavior caused by a client bug
that sent junk to the server: the server thought the junk was a
very long message length and waited patiently for data that would
never come. We can reduce the risk of that by being less trusting
about message lengths.
For a long time, libpq has had a heuristic rule that it wouldn't
believe large message size words, except for a small number of
message types that are expected to be (potentially) long. This
provides some defense against loss of message-boundary sync and
other corrupted-data cases. The server does something similar,
except that up to now it only limited the lengths of messages
received during the connection authentication phase. Let's
do the same as in libpq and put restrictions on the allowed
length of all messages, while distinguishing between message
types that are expected to be long and those that aren't.
I used a limit of 10000 bytes for non-long messages. (libpq's
corresponding limit is 30000 bytes, but given the asymmetry of
the FE/BE protocol, there's no good reason why the numbers should
be the same.) Experimentation suggests that this is at least a
factor of 10, maybe a factor of 100, more than we really need;
but plenty of daylight seems desirable to avoid false positives.
In any case we can adjust the limit based on beta-test results.
For long messages, set a limit of MaxAllocSize - 1, which is the
most that we can absorb into the StringInfo buffer that the message
is collected in. This just serves to make sure that a bogus message
size is reported as such, rather than as a confusing gripe about
not being able to enlarge a string buffer.
While at it, make sure that non-mainline code paths (such as
COPY FROM STDIN) are as paranoid as SocketBackend is, and validate
the message type code before believing the message length.
This provides an additional guard against getting stuck on corrupted
input.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2003757.1619373089@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This gives a small performance gain, by reducing the number of calls
to the conversion/verification function, and letting it work with
larger inputs. Also, reorganizing the input pipeline makes it easier
to parallelize the input parsing: after the input has been converted
to the database encoding, the next stage of finding the newlines can
be done in parallel, because there cannot be any newline chars
"embedded" in multi-byte characters in the encodings that we support
as server encodings.
This changes behavior in one corner case: if client and server
encodings are the same single-byte encoding (e.g. latin1), previously
the input would not be checked for zero bytes ('\0'). Any fields
containing zero bytes would be truncated at the zero. But if encoding
conversion was needed, the conversion routine would throw an error on
the zero. After this commit, the input is always checked for zeros.
Reviewed-by: John Naylor
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/e7861509-3960-538a-9025-b75a61188e01%40iki.fi
|
|
Protocol version 3 was introduced in PostgreSQL 7.4. There shouldn't be
many clients or servers left out there without version 3 support. But as
a courtesy, I kept just enough of the old protocol support that we can
still send the "unsupported protocol version" error in v2 format, so that
old clients can display the message properly. Likewise, libpq still
understands v2 ErrorResponse messages when establishing a connection.
The impetus to do this now is that I'm working on a patch to COPY
FROM, to always prefetch some data. We cannot do that safely with the
old protocol, because it requires parsing the input one byte at a time
to detect the end-of-copy marker.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane, Alvaro Herrera, John Naylor
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9ec25819-0a8a-d51a-17dc-4150bb3cca3b%40iki.fi
|
|
If a multi-byte character is escaped with a backslash in TEXT mode input,
and the encoding is one of the client-only encodings where the bytes after
the first one can have an ASCII byte "embedded" in the char, we didn't
skip the character correctly. After a backslash, we only skipped the first
byte of the next character, so if it was a multi-byte character, we would
try to process its second byte as if it was a separate character. If it
was one of the characters with special meaning, like '\n', '\r', or
another '\\', that would cause trouble.
One such exmple is the byte sequence '\x5ca45c2e666f6f' in Big5 encoding.
That's supposed to be [backslash][two-byte character][.][f][o][o], but
because the second byte of the two-byte character is 0x5c, we incorrectly
treat it as another backslash. And because the next character is a dot, we
parse it as end-of-copy marker, and throw an "end-of-copy marker corrupt"
error.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Reviewed-by: John Naylor, Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/a897f84f-8dca-8798-3139-07da5bb38728%40iki.fi
|
|
The # of bytes processed was accumulated slightly incorrectly. After
loading more data to the input buffer, we added the number of bytes in
the buffer to the sum. But in case of multi-byte characters or escapes,
there can be a few unprocessed bytes left over from previous load in the
buffer. Those bytes got counted twice.
|
|
This commit introduces a view pg_stat_progress_copy, reporting progress
of COPY commands. This allows rough estimates how far a running COPY
progressed, with the caveat that the total number of bytes may not be
available in some cases (e.g. when the input comes from the client).
Author: Josef Šimánek
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao, Bharath Rupireddy, Vignesh C, Matthias van de Meent
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFp7QwqMGEi4OyyaLEK9DR0+E+oK3UtA4bEjDVCa4bNkwUY2PQ@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFp7Qwr6_FmRM6pCO0x_a0mymOfX_Gg+FEKet4XaTGSW=LitKQ@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Backpatch-through: 9.5
|
|
Author: Amit Langote
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BHiwqGaRoF3XrhPW-Y7P%2BG7bKo84Z_h%3DkQHvMh-80%3Dav3wmOw%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
I'm having a hard time telling whether the letter of the C standard
requires this, but we do have a couple of buildfarm members that
throw warnings when this is not done. Oversight in c532d15dd.
|
|
Copy.c has grown really large. Split it into more manageable parts:
- copy.c now contains only a few functions that are common to COPY FROM
and COPY TO.
- copyto.c contains code for COPY TO.
- copyfrom.c contains code for initializing COPY FROM, and inserting the
tuples to the correct table.
- copyfromparse.c contains code for reading from the client/file/program,
and parsing the input text/CSV/binary format into tuples.
All of these parts are fairly complicated, and fairly independent of each
other. There is a patch being discussed to implement parallel COPY FROM,
which will add a lot of new code to the COPY FROM path, and another patch
which would allow INSERTs to use the same multi-insert machinery as COPY
FROM, both of which will require refactoring that code. With those two
patches, there's going to be a lot of code churn in copy.c anyway, so now
seems like a good time to do this refactoring.
The CopyStateData struct is also split. All the formatting options, like
FORMAT, QUOTE, ESCAPE, are put in a new CopyFormatOption struct, which
is used by both COPY FROM and TO. Other state data are kept in separate
CopyFromStateData and CopyToStateData structs.
Reviewed-by: Soumyadeep Chakraborty, Erik Rijkers, Vignesh C, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8e15b560-f387-7acc-ac90-763986617bfb%40iki.fi
|
