| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The function generated to perform JIT compiled tuple deforming failed
when HeapTupleHeader's t_hoff was bigger than a signed int8. I'd
failed to realize that LLVM's getelementptr would treat an int8 index
argument as signed, rather than unsigned. That means that a hoff
larger than 127 would result in a negative offset being applied. Fix
that by widening the index to 32bit.
Add a testcase with a wide table. Don't drop it, as it seems useful to
verify other tools deal properly with wide tables.
Thanks to Justin Pryzby for both reporting a bug and then reducing it
to a reproducible testcase!
Reported-By: Justin Pryzby
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181115223959.GB10913@telsasoft.com
Backpatch: 11, just as jit compilation was
|
|
This commit completes the work prepared in 1a0586de36, splitting the
old TupleTableSlot implementation (which could store buffer, heap,
minimal and virtual slots) into four different slot types. As
described in the aforementioned commit, this is done with the goal of
making tuple table slots extensible, to allow for pluggable table
access methods.
To achieve runtime extensibility for TupleTableSlots, operations on
slots that can differ between types of slots are performed using the
TupleTableSlotOps struct provided at slot creation time. That
includes information from the size of TupleTableSlot struct to be
allocated, initialization, deforming etc. See the struct's definition
for more detailed information about callbacks TupleTableSlotOps.
I decided to rename TTSOpsBufferTuple to TTSOpsBufferHeapTuple and
ExecCopySlotTuple to ExecCopySlotHeapTuple, as that seems more
consistent with other naming introduced in recent patches.
There's plenty optimization potential in the slot implementation, but
according to benchmarking the state after this commit has similar
performance characteristics to before this set of changes, which seems
sufficient.
There's a few changes in execReplication.c that currently need to poke
through the slot abstraction, that'll be repaired once the pluggable
storage patchset provides the necessary infrastructure.
Author: Andres Freund and Ashutosh Bapat, with changes by Amit Khandekar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
This yields a minor speedup, which roughly balances the loss from the
upcoming introduction of callbacks to do some operations on slots.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Virtual tuple table slots never need tuple deforming. Therefore, if we
know at expression compilation time, that a certain slot will always
be virtual, there's no need to create a tuple deforming routine for
it.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Previously this information was computed when JIT compiling an
expression. But the information is useful for assertions in the
non-JIT case too (for assertions), therefore it makes sense to move
it.
This will, in a followup commit, allow to treat different slot types
differently. E.g. for virtual slots there's no need to generate a JIT
function to deform the slot.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Author: Andres Freund
|
|
This mainly de-duplicates code. As evaluating a system variable isn't
the hottest path and the current inline implementation ends up calling
out to an external function anyway, this is OK from a performance POV.
The main motivation for de-duplicating is the upcoming slot
abstraction work, after which there's not guaranteed to be a HeapTuple
backing the slot.
Author: Andres Freund, Amit Khandekar
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20181105210039.hh4vvi4vwoq5ba2q@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
This only became a problem with 4c640f4f38, which didn't synchronize
the value agg_strict_input_check.nargs is set to, with the guard
condition for emitting the operation.
Besides such instructions being unnecessary overhead, currently the
LLVM JIT provider doesn't support them. It seems more sensible to
avoid generating such instruction than supporting them. Add assertions
to make it easier to debug a potential further occurance.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2a505161-2727-2473-7c46-591ed108ac52@email.cz
Backpatch: 11-, like 4c640f4f38.
|
|
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
|
|
There's several reasons for this change:
1) It reduces the total size of TupleTableSlot / reduces alignment
padding, making the commonly accessed members fit into a single
cacheline (but we currently do not force proper alignment, so
that's not yet guaranteed to be helpful)
2) Combining the booleans into a flag allows to combine read/writes
from memory.
3) With the upcoming slot abstraction changes, it allows to have core
and extended flags, in a memory efficient way.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat and Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180220224318.gw4oe5jadhpmcdnm@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Previously it was an int / 4 bytes. The maximum number of attributes
in a tuple is restricted by the maximum value Var->varattno, which is
an AttrNumber/int16. Hence use the same data type for
TupleTableSlot->tts_nvalid.
Author: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180220224318.gw4oe5jadhpmcdnm@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Previously, when using parallel query, EXPLAIN (ANALYZE)'s JIT
compilation timings did not include the overhead from doing so on the
workers. Fix that.
We do so by simply aggregating the cost of doing JIT compilation on
workers and the leader together. Arguably that's not quite accurate,
because the total time spend doing so is spent in parallel - but it's
hard to do much better. For additional detail, when VERBOSE is
specified, the stats for workers are displayed separately.
Author: Amit Khandekar and Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJ3gD9eLrz51RK_gTkod+71iDcjpB_N8eC6vU2AW-VicsAERpQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 11-
|
|
Noticed thanks to buildfarm animal seawasp.
Author: Andres Freund
Backpatch: v11-, where LLVM based JIT compliation was introduced.
|
|
Previously the attribute was only checked for external functions
inlined, not "static" functions that had to be inlined as
dependencies.
This isn't really a bug, but makes debugging a bit harder. The new
behaviour also makes more sense. Therefore backpatch.
Author: Andres Freund
Backpatch: 11-, where JIT compilation was added
|
|
During the work of upstreaming my previous patches for gdb and perf
support the API changed. Adapt. Normally this wouldn't necessarily be
something to backpatch, but the previous API wasn't upstream, and at
least the gdb support is quite useful for debugging.
Author: Andres Freund
Backpatch: 11, where LLVM based JIT support was added.
|
|
The location of LLVMAddPromoteMemoryToRegisterPass moved.
Author: Andres Freund
Backpatch: 11, where LLVM based JIT support was added.
|
|
While no negative consequences are currently known, it's clearly wrong
to not reset the context in one of the branches.
Reported-By: Dmitry Dolgov
Author: Dmitry Dolgov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf165-=+Drw3Voim7M5EjHT1zwPF9BQRjLFQzCzYnNZEiQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 11-, where JIT compilation support was added
|
|
The JIT compiled implementation missed maintaining
AggState->{current_set,curaggcontext}. That could lead to trouble
because the transition value could be allocated in the wrong context.
Reported-By: Rushabh Lathia
Diagnosed-By: Dmitry Dolgov
Author: Dmitry Dolgov, with minor changes by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf165-=+Drw3Voim7M5EjHT1zwPF9BQRjLFQzCzYnNZEiQ@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 11-, where JIT compilation support was added
|
|
It appears that there are more files, whose header comment paths are
wrong. So, fix those paths. No backpatching per proposal of Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsJyYbOj59MOQL%2B4XxdcomLSLfLqBtAvwR%2BpsCqj3ELdQ%40mail.gmail.com
|
|
The duplicated return clearly doesn't make sense / isn't
reachable. Likely introduced by me (Andres), while revising the code.
Author: Rushabh Lathia
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf2raxWOcbuTP36M1rEF3=Rfo7oD29K3psdyHMeE5swBRg@mail.gmail.com
|
|
Tom's earlier commit in 41c912cad159 didn't update a few cases that
are only encountered with the non-standard --with-llvm config
flag. Additionally there's also one case that appears to be a
deficiency in gcc's (up to trunk as of a few days ago) detection of
"fallthrough" comments - changing the placement slightly fixes that.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180502003239.wfnqu7ekz7j7imm4@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/15719.1523984266@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Commit 372728b0d created some problems for usages like building a
subdirectory without having first done "make all" at the top level,
or for proceeding directly to "make install" without "make all".
The only reasonably clean way to fix this seems to be to force the
submake-generated-headers rule to fire in *any* "make all" or "make
install" command anywhere in the tree. To avoid lots of redundant work,
as well as parallel make jobs possibly clobbering each others' output, we
still need to be sure that the rule fires only once in a recursive build.
For that, adopt the same MAKELEVEL hack previously used for "temp-install".
But try to document it a bit better.
The submake-errcodes mechanism previously used in src/port/ and src/common/
is subsumed by this, so we can get rid of those special cases. It was
inadequate for src/common/ anyway after the aforesaid commit, and it always
risked parallel attempts to build errcodes.h.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1f5FAB-0006LU-MB@gemulon.postgresql.org
|
|
Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180331105640.GK28454@telsasoft.com
|
|
This provides infrastructure to allow JITed code to inline code
implemented in C. This e.g. can be postgres internal functions or
extension code.
This already speeds up long running queries, by allowing the LLVM
optimizer to optimize across function boundaries. The optimization
potential currently doesn't reach its full potential because LLVM
cannot optimize the FunctionCallInfoData argument fully away, because
it's allocated on the heap rather than the stack. Fixing that is
beyond what's realistic for v11.
To be able to do that, use CLANG to convert C code to LLVM bitcode,
and have LLVM build a summary for it. That bitcode can then be used to
to inline functions at runtime. For that the bitcode needs to be
installed. Postgres bitcode goes into $pkglibdir/bitcode/postgres,
extensions go into equivalent directories. PGXS has been modified so
that happens automatically if postgres has been compiled with LLVM
support.
Currently this isn't the fastest inline implementation, modules are
reloaded from disk during inlining. That's to work around an apparent
LLVM bug, triggering an apparently spurious error in LLVM assertion
enabled builds. Once that is resolved we can remove the superfluous
read from disk.
Docs will follow in a later commit containing docs for the whole JIT
feature.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Instead using memset to set tts_isnull, call the new
slot_getmissingattrs().
Also fix a bug (= instead of >=) in the code generation. Normally = is
correct, but when repeatedly deforming fields not in a
tuple (e.g. deform up to natts + 1 and then natts + 2) >= is needed.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180328010053.i2qvsuuusst4lgmc@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
This is mostly done to be able to validate features and fixes
submitted to LLVM. Given the size of these changes that seems
acceptable.
Author: Andres Freund
|
|
Due to the differing APIs between versions, I forgot to deallocate the
generated module in older LLVM versions, leading to a memory leak.
Author: Andres Freund
|
|
Author: Thomas Munro
|
|
Performing JIT compilation for deforming gains performance benefits
over unJITed deforming from compile-time knowledge of the tuple
descriptor. Fixed column widths, NOT NULLness, etc can be taken
advantage of.
Right now the JITed deforming is only used when deforming tuples as
part of expression evaluation (and obviously only if the descriptor is
known). It's likely to be beneficial in other cases, too.
By default tuple deforming is JITed whenever an expression is JIT
compiled. There's a separate boolean GUC controlling it, but that's
expected to be primarily useful for development and benchmarking.
Docs will follow in a later commit containing docs for the whole JIT
feature.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
The LLVM JIT provider uses clang to synchronize types between normal C
code and runtime generated code. Clang represents stdbool.h style
booleans in return values & parameters differently from booleans
stored in variables.
Thus the expression compilation code from 2a0faed9d needs to be
adapted to 9a95a77d9. Instead of hardcoding i8 as the type for
booleans (which already was wrong on some edge case platforms!), use
postgres' notion of a boolean as used for storage and for parameters.
Per buildfarm animal xenodermus.
Author: Andres Freund
|
|
In addition to the interpretation of expressions (which back
evaluation of WHERE clauses, target list projection, aggregates
transition values etc) support compiling expressions to native code,
using the infrastructure added in earlier commits.
To avoid duplicating a lot of code, only support emitting code for
cases that are likely to be performance critical. For expression steps
that aren't deemed that, use the existing interpreter.
The generated code isn't great - some architectural changes are
required to address that. But this already yields a significant
speedup for some analytics queries, particularly with WHERE clauses
filtering a lot, or computing multiple aggregates.
Author: Andres Freund
Tested-By: Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
Disable JITing for VALUES() nodes.
VALUES() nodes are only ever executed once. This is primarily helpful
for debugging, when forcing JITing even for cheap queries.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
This currently requires patches to the LLVM codebase to be
effective (submitted upstream), the GUCs are available without those
patches however.
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
This commit introduces the ability to actually generate code using
LLVM. In particular, this adds:
- Ability to emit code both in heavily optimized and largely
unoptimized fashion
- Batching facility to allow functions to be defined in small
increments, but optimized and emitted in executable form in larger
batches (for performance and memory efficiency)
- Type and function declaration synchronization between runtime
generated code and normal postgres code. This is critical to be able
to access struct fields etc.
- Developer oriented jit_dump_bitcode GUC, for inspecting / debugging
the generated code.
- per JitContext statistics of number of functions, time spent
generating code, optimizing, and emitting it. This will later be
employed for EXPLAIN support.
This commit doesn't yet contain any code actually generating
functions. That'll follow in later commits.
Documentation for GUCs added, and for JIT in general, will be added in
later commits.
Author: Andres Freund, with contributions by Pierre Ducroquet
Testing-By: Thomas Munro, Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
Author: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
|
|
This commit introduces:
1) JIT provider abstraction, which allows JIT functionality to be
implemented in separate shared libraries. That's desirable because
it allows to install JIT support as a separate package, and because
it allows experimentation with different forms of JITing.
2) JITContexts which can be, using functions introduced in follow up
commits, used to emit JITed functions, and have them be cleaned up
on error.
3) The outline of a LLVM JIT provider, which will be fleshed out in
subsequent commits.
Documentation for GUCs added, and for JIT in general, will be added in
later commits.
Author: Andres Freund, with architectural input from Jeff Davis
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20170901064131.tazjxwus3k2w3ybh@alap3.anarazel.de
|
