summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/backend/parser
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-08-24Avoid unnecessary plancache revalidation of utility statements.Tom Lane
Revalidation of a plancache entry (after a cache invalidation event) requires acquiring a snapshot. Normally that is harmless, but not if the cached statement is one that needs to run without acquiring a snapshot. We were already aware of that for TransactionStmts, but for some reason hadn't extrapolated to the other statements that PlannedStmtRequiresSnapshot() knows mustn't set a snapshot. This can lead to unexpected failures of commands such as SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL. We can fix it in the same way, by excluding those command types from revalidation. However, we can do even better than that: there is no need to revalidate for any statement type for which parse analysis, rewrite, and plan steps do nothing interesting, which is nearly all utility commands. To mechanize this, invent a parser function stmt_requires_parse_analysis() that tells whether parse analysis does anything beyond wrapping a CMD_UTILITY Query around the raw parse tree. If that's what it does, then rewrite and plan will just skip the Query, so that it is not possible for the same raw parse tree to produce a different plan tree after cache invalidation. stmt_requires_parse_analysis() is basically equivalent to the existing function analyze_requires_snapshot(), except that for obscure reasons that function omits ReturnStmt and CallStmt. It is unclear whether those were oversights or intentional. I have not been able to demonstrate a bug from not acquiring a snapshot while analyzing these commands, but at best it seems mighty fragile. It seems safer to acquire a snapshot for parse analysis of these commands too, which allows making stmt_requires_parse_analysis and analyze_requires_snapshot equivalent. In passing this fixes a second bug, which is that ResetPlanCache would exclude ReturnStmts and CallStmts from revalidation. That's surely *not* safe, since they contain parsable expressions. Per bug #18059 from Pavel Kulakov. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18059-79c692f036b25346@postgresql.org
2023-08-24Fix translation markersPeter Eisentraut
Conditionals cannot be inside gettext trigger functions, they must be applied outside.
2023-08-18Remove dubious warning message from SQL/JSON functionsPeter Eisentraut
There was a warning that FORMAT JSON has no effect on json/jsonb types, which is true, but it's not clear why we should issue a warning about it. The SQL standard does not say anything about this, which should generally govern the behavior here. So remove it. Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/dfec2cae-d17e-c508-6d16-c2dba82db486%40eisentraut.org
2023-07-21Don't include CaseTestExpr in JsonValueExpr.formatted_exprAmit Langote
A CaseTestExpr is currently being put into JsonValueExpr.formatted_expr as placeholder for the result of evaluating JsonValueExpr.raw_expr, which in turn is evaluated separately. Though, there's no need for this indirection if raw_expr itself can be embedded into formatted_expr and evaluated as part of evaluating the latter, especially as there is no special reason to evaluate it separately. So this commit makes it so. As a result, JsonValueExpr.raw_expr no longer needs to be evaluated in ExecInterpExpr(), eval_const_exprs_mutator() etc. and is now only used for displaying the original "unformatted" expression in ruleutils.c. Comments about and the code manipulating formatted_expr is updated to mention that it is now always set and is the expression that gives a JsonValueExpr its runtime value. While at it, this also removes the function makeCaseTestExpr(), because the code in makeJsonConstructorExpr() looks more readable without it IMO and isn't used by anyone else either. Finally, a note is added in the comment above CaseTestExpr's definition that JsonConstructorExpr is also using it. Backpatched to 16 from the development branch to keep the code in sync across branches. Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqE4XTdfb1nW=Ojoy_tQSRhYt-q_kb6i5d4xcKyrLC1Nbg@mail.gmail.com
2023-07-20Pass constructName to transformJsonValueExpr()Amit Langote
This allows it to pass to coerce_to_specific_type() the actual name corresponding to the specific JSON_* function expression being transformed, instead of the currently hardcoded string. Backpatched to 16 from the development branch to keep the code in sync across branches. Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqHu58pO3cJ7rB6ZLwUztVdG1J66xSjDdjfan5uT5NhESw@mail.gmail.com
2023-07-14Add missing initializations of p_perminfoAmit Langote
In a61b1f74823, we failed to update transformFromClauseItem() and buildNSItemFromLists() to set ParseNamespaceItem.p_perminfo causing it to point to garbage. Pointed out by Tom Lane. Reported-by: Farias de Oliveira <matheusfarias519@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3173476.1689286373%40sss.pgh.pa.us Backpatch-through: 16
2023-07-08Make some indentation in gram.y consistentPeter Eisentraut
Reviewed-by: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/CA+HiwqE4XTdfb1nW=Ojoy_tQSRhYt-q_kb6i5d4xcKyrLC1Nbg@mail.gmail.com
2023-06-28Remove dependency to query text in JumbleQuery()Michael Paquier
Since 3db72eb, the query ID of utilities is generated using the Query structure, making the use of the query string in JumbleQuery() unnecessary. This commit removes the argument "querytext" from JumbleQuery(). Reported-by: Joe Conway Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZJlQAWE4COFqHuAV@paquier.xyz
2023-06-15Remove outdated reference to a removed fileAmit Langote
parse_jsontable.c was removed as part of 2f2b18bd3f55, though its mention in src/backend/parser/README was not. Fix that. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BHiwqHDzw8AP8p_dEkFr0xg458ZTf58zbivAHhK4UeNrx9Tdg%40mail.gmail.com
2023-05-19Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.Tom Lane
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files. This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical. We've updated to pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are now indented one tab stop). We've also updated to perltidy version 20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up. Going forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing code. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230428092545.qfb3y5wcu4cm75ur@alvherre.pgsql
2023-05-17Revert "Add USER SET parameter values for pg_db_role_setting"Alexander Korotkov
This reverts commit 096dd80f3ccc and its fixups beecbe8e5001, afdd9f7f0e00, 529da086ba, db93e739ac61. Catversion is bumped. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d46f9265-ff3c-6743-2278-6772598233c2%40pgmasters.net
2023-05-17Add back SQLValueFunction for SQL keywordsMichael Paquier
This is equivalent to a revert of f193883 and fb32748, with the addition that the declaration of the SQLValueFunction node needs to gain a couple of node_attr for query jumbling. The performance impact of removing the function call inlining is proving to be too huge for some workloads where these are used. A worst-case test case of involving only simple SELECT queries with a SQL keyword is proving to lead to a reduction of 10% in TPS via pgbench and prepared queries on a high-end machine. None of the tests I ran back for this set of changes saw such a huge gap, but Alexander Lakhin and Andres Freund have found that this can be noticeable. Keeping the older performance would mean to do more inlining in the executor when using COERCE_SQL_SYNTAX for a function expression, similarly to what SQLValueFunction does. This requires more redesign work and there is little time until 16beta1 is released, so for now reverting the change is the best way forward, bringing back the previous performance. Bump catalog version. Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b32bed1b-0746-9b20-1472-4bdc9ca66d52@gmail.com
2023-05-10Fix publication syntax error messageAlvaro Herrera
There was some odd wording in corner-case gram.y error messages "some error ... at or near", which appears to have been modeled after "syntax error" messages. However, they don't work that way, and they're just wrong. They're also uncovered by tests. Remove the trailing words, and also add tests. They were introduced with 5a2832465fd8; backpatch to 15. Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
2023-05-02Fix typos in commentsMichael Paquier
The changes done in this commit impact comments with no direct user-visible changes, with fixes for incorrect function, variable or structure names. Author: Alexander Lakhin Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/e8c38840-596a-83d6-bd8d-cebc51111572@gmail.com
2023-04-28Fix crashes with CREATE SCHEMA AUTHORIZATION and schema elementsMichael Paquier
CREATE SCHEMA AUTHORIZATION with appended schema elements can lead to crashes when comparing the schema name of the query with the schemas used in the qualification of some clauses in the elements' queries. The origin of the problem is that the transformation routine for the elements listed in a CREATE SCHEMA query uses as new, expected, schema name the one listed in CreateSchemaStmt itself. However, depending on the query, CreateSchemaStmt.schemaname may be NULL, being computed instead from the role specification of the query given by the AUTHORIZATION clause, that could be either: - A user name string, with the new schema name being set to the same value as the role given. - Guessed from CURRENT_ROLE, SESSION_ROLE or CURRENT_ROLE, with a new schema name computed from the security context where CREATE SCHEMA is running. Regression tests are added for CREATE SCHEMA with some appended elements (some of them with schema qualifications), covering also some role specification patterns. While on it, this simplifies the context structure used during the transformation of the elements listed in a CREATE SCHEMA query by removing the fields for the role specification and the role type. They were not used, and for the role specification this could be confusing as the schema name may by extracted from that at the beginning of CreateSchemaCommand(). This issue exists for a long time, so backpatch down to all the versions supported. Reported-by: Song Hongyu Author: Michael Paquier Reviewed-by: Richard Guo Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17909-f65c12dfc5f0451d@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 11
2023-04-13Harmonize some more function parameter names.Peter Geoghegan
Make sure that function declarations use names that exactly match the corresponding names from function definitions in a few places. These inconsistencies were all introduced relatively recently, after the code base had parameter name mismatches fixed in bulk (see commits starting with commits 4274dc22 and 035ce1fe). pg_bsd_indent still has a couple of similar inconsistencies, which I (pgeoghegan) have left untouched for now. Like all earlier commits that cleaned up function parameter names, this commit was written with help from clang-tidy.
2023-04-12Revert "Catalog NOT NULL constraints" and falloutAlvaro Herrera
This reverts commit e056c557aef4 and minor later fixes thereof. There's a few problems in this new feature -- most notably regarding pg_upgrade behavior, but others as well. This new feature is not in any way critical on its own, so instead of scrambling to fix it we revert it and try again in early 17 with these issues in mind. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3801207.1681057430@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-04-11Fix uninitialized variable in transformTableLikeClause()David Rowley
process_notnull_constraints should be set to false until we discover a NOT NULL column. Discovered while running Valgrind. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvoMyiZVi1KW5WVdqMRzWsWkD3F7n6QD+BbAO6WTeAWsUQ@mail.gmail.com
2023-04-07Catalog NOT NULL constraintsAlvaro Herrera
We now create pg_constaint rows for NOT NULL constraints with contype='n'. We propagate these constraints during operations such as adding inheritance relationships, creating and attaching partitions, creating tables LIKE other tables. We mostly follow the well-known rules of conislocal and coninhcount that we have for CHECK constraints, with some adaptations; for example, as opposed to CHECK constraints, we don't match NOT NULL ones by name when descending a hierarchy to alter it; instead we match by column number. This means we don't require the constraint names to be identical across a hierarchy. For now, we omit them from system catalogs. Maybe this is worth reconsidering. We don't support NOT VALID nor DEFERRABLE clauses either; these can be added as separate features later (this patch is already large and complicated enough.) This has been very long in the making. The first patch was written by Bernd Helmle in 2010 to add a new pg_constraint.contype value ('n'), which I (Álvaro) then hijacked in 2011 and 2012, until that one was killed by the realization that we ought to use contype='c' instead: manufactured CHECK constraints. However, later SQL standard development, as well as nonobvious emergent properties of that design (mostly, failure to distinguish them from "normal" CHECK constraints as well as the performance implication of having to test the CHECK expression) led us to reconsider this choice, so now the current implementation uses contype='n' again. In 2016 Vitaly Burovoy also worked on this feature[1] but found no consensus for his proposed approach, which was claimed to be closer to the letter of the standard, requiring additional pg_attribute columns to track the OID of the NOT NULL constraint for that column. [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAKOSWNkN6HSyatuys8xZxzRCR-KL1OkHS5-b9qd9bf1Rad3PLA@mail.gmail.com Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Author: Bernd Helmle <mailings@oopsware.de> Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACA0E642A0267EDA387AF2B%40%5B172.26.14.62%5D Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AANLkTinLXMOEMz+0J29tf1POokKi4XDkWJ6-DDR9BKgU@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20110707213401.GA27098@alvh.no-ip.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1343682669-sup-2532@alvh.no-ip.org Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKOSWNkN6HSyatuys8xZxzRCR-KL1OkHS5-b9qd9bf1Rad3PLA@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220817181249.q7qvj3okywctra3c@alvherre.pgsql
2023-04-04Code review for recent SQL/JSON commitsAlvaro Herrera
- At the last minute and for no particularly good reason, I changed the WITHOUT token to be marked especially for lookahead, from the one in WITHOUT TIME to the one in WITHOUT UNIQUE. Study of upcoming patches (where a new WITHOUT ARRAY WRAPPER clause is added) showed me that the former was better, so put it back the way the original patch had it. - update exprTypmod() for JsonConstructorExpr to return the typmod of the RETURNING clause, as a comment there suggested. Perhaps it's possible for this to make a difference with datetime types, but I didn't try to build a test case. - The nodeFuncs.c support code for new nodes was calling walker() directly instead of the WALK() macro as introduced by commit 1c27d16e6e5c. Modernize that. Also add exprLocation() support for a couple of nodes that missed it. Lastly, reorder the code more sensibly. The WITHOUT_LA -> WITHOUT change means that stored rules containing either WITHOUT TIME ZONE or WITHOUT UNIQUE KEYS would change representation. Therefore, bump catversion. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230329181708.e64g2tpy7jyufqkr@alvherre.pgsql
2023-03-31SQL/JSON: support the IS JSON predicateAlvaro Herrera
This patch introduces the SQL standard IS JSON predicate. It operates on text and bytea values representing JSON, as well as on the json and jsonb types. Each test has IS and IS NOT variants and supports a WITH UNIQUE KEYS flag. The tests are: IS JSON [VALUE] IS JSON ARRAY IS JSON OBJECT IS JSON SCALAR These should be self-explanatory. The WITH UNIQUE KEYS flag makes these return false when duplicate keys exist in any object within the value, not necessarily directly contained in the outermost object. Author: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> Author: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> Author: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com> Author: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Author: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF4Au4w2x-5LTnN_bxky-mq4=WOqsGsxSpENCzHRAzSnEd8+WQ@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220616233130.rparivafipt6doj3@alap3.anarazel.de Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/abd9b83b-aa66-f230-3d6d-734817f0995d%40postgresql.org
2023-03-31No need to add FORMAT to the keyword precedence listAlvaro Herrera
Commit 7081ac46ace8 put it there. Remove it.
2023-03-31Fix List memory issue in transformColumnDefinitionDavid Rowley
When calling generateSerialExtraStmts(), we would pass in the constraint->options. In some cases, generateSerialExtraStmts() would modify the referenced List to remove elements from it, but doing so is invalid without assigning the list back to all variables that point to it. In the particular reported problem case, the List became empty, in which cases it became NIL, but the passed in constraint->options didn't get to find out about that and was left pointing to free'd memory. To fix this, just perform a list_copy() inside generateSerialExtraStmts(). We could just do a list_copy() just before we perform the delete from the list, however, that seems less robust. Let's make sure the generated CreateSeqStmt gets a completely different copy of the list to be safe. Bug: #17879 Reported-by: Fei Changhong Diagnosed-by: Fei Changhong Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17879-b7dfb5debee58ff5@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: 11, all supported versions
2023-03-30Simplify transformJsonAggConstructor() APIAlvaro Herrera
There's no need for callers to pass aggregate names so that the function can resolve them to OIDs, when callers can just pass aggregate OIDs directly to begin with.
2023-03-30Fix inconsistencies and style issues in new SQL/JSON codeAlvaro Herrera
Reported by Alexander Lakhin. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/60483139-5c34-851d-baee-6c0d014e1710@gmail.com
2023-03-29SQL/JSON: add standard JSON constructor functionsAlvaro Herrera
This commit introduces the SQL/JSON standard-conforming constructors for JSON types: JSON_ARRAY() JSON_ARRAYAGG() JSON_OBJECT() JSON_OBJECTAGG() Most of the functionality was already present in PostgreSQL-specific functions, but these include some new functionality such as the ability to skip or include NULL values, and to allow duplicate keys or throw error when they are found, as well as the standard specified syntax to specify output type and format. Author: Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> Author: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> Author: Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com> Author: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com> Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> Reviewers have included (in no particular order) Andres Freund, Alexander Korotkov, Pavel Stehule, Andrew Alsup, Erik Rijkers, Zihong Yu, Himanshu Upadhyaya, Daniel Gustafsson, Justin Pryzby. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAF4Au4w2x-5LTnN_bxky-mq4=WOqsGsxSpENCzHRAzSnEd8+WQ@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/cd0bb935-0158-78a7-08b5-904886deac4b@postgrespro.ru Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220616233130.rparivafipt6doj3@alap3.anarazel.de Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/abd9b83b-aa66-f230-3d6d-734817f0995d%40postgresql.org
2023-03-25Add SysCacheGetAttrNotNull for guaranteed not-null attrsDaniel Gustafsson
When extracting an attr from a cached tuple in the syscache with SysCacheGetAttr the isnull parameter must be checked in case the attr cannot be NULL. For cases when this is known beforehand, a wrapper is introduced which perform the errorhandling internally on behalf of the caller, invoking an elog in case of a NULL attr. Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> Reviewed-by: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AD76405E-DB45-46B6-941F-17B1EB3A9076@yesql.se
2023-03-24Invent GENERIC_PLAN option for EXPLAIN.Tom Lane
This provides a very simple way to see the generic plan for a parameterized query. Without this, it's necessary to define a prepared statement and temporarily change plan_cache_mode, which is a bit tedious. One thing that's a bit of a hack perhaps is that we disable execution-time partition pruning when the GENERIC_PLAN option is given. That's because the pruning code may attempt to fetch the value of one of the parameters, which would fail. Laurenz Albe, reviewed by Julien Rouhaud, Christoph Berg, Michel Pelletier, Jim Jones, and myself Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0a29b954b10b57f0d135fe12aa0909bd41883eb0.camel@cybertec.at
2023-03-15Support [NO] INDENT option in XMLSERIALIZE().Tom Lane
This adds the ability to pretty-print XML documents ... according to libxml's somewhat idiosyncratic notions of what's pretty, anyway. One notable divergence from a strict reading of the spec is that libxml is willing to collapse empty nodes "<node></node>" to just "<node/>", whereas SQL and the underlying XML spec say that this option should only result in whitespace tweaks. Nonetheless, it seems close enough to justify using the SQL-standard syntax. Jim Jones, reviewed by Peter Smith and myself Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2f5df461-dad8-6d7d-4568-08e10608a69b@uni-muenster.de
2023-03-13Fix failure to detect some cases of improperly-nested aggregates.Tom Lane
check_agg_arguments_walker() supposed that it needn't descend into the arguments of a lower-level aggregate function, but this is just wrong in the presence of multiple levels of sub-select. The oversight would lead to executor failures on queries that should be rejected. (Prior to v11, they actually were rejected, thanks to a "redundant" execution-time check.) Per bug #17835 from Anban Company. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17835-4f29f3098b2d0ba4@postgresql.org
2023-03-07Fix more bugs caused by adding columns to the end of a view.Tom Lane
If a view is defined atop another view, and then CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW is used to add columns to the lower view, then when the upper view's referencing RTE is expanded by ApplyRetrieveRule we will have a subquery RTE with fewer eref->colnames than output columns. This confuses various code that assumes those lists are always in sync, as they are in plain parser output. We have seen such problems before (cf commit d5b760ecb), and now I think the time has come to do what was speculated about in that commit: let's make ApplyRetrieveRule synthesize some column names to preserve the invariant that holds in parser output. Otherwise we'll be chasing this class of bugs indefinitely. Moreover, it appears from testing that this actually gives us better results in the test case d5b760ecb added, and likely in other corner cases that we lack coverage for. In HEAD, I replaced d5b760ecb's hack to make expandRTE exit early with an elog(ERROR) call, since the case is now presumably unreachable. But it seems like changing that in back branches would bring more risk than benefit, so there I just updated the comment. Per bug #17811 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17811-d31686b78f0dffc9@postgresql.org
2023-03-02Remove bms_first_member().Tom Lane
This function has been semi-deprecated ever since we invented bms_next_member(). Its habit of scribbling on the input bitmapset isn't great, plus for sufficiently large bitmapsets it would take O(N^2) time to complete a loop. Now we have the additional problem that reducing the input to empty while leaving it still accessible would violate a planned invariant. So let's just get rid of it, after updating the few extant callers to use bms_next_member(). Patch by me; thanks to Nathan Bossart and Richard Guo for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1159933.1677621588@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-02-10Fix incorrect format placeholderPeter Eisentraut
2023-02-06Remove useless casts to (void *) in hash_search() callsPeter Eisentraut
Some of these appear to be leftovers from when hash_search() took a char * argument (changed in 5999e78fc45dcb91784b64b6e9ae43f4e4f68ca2). Since after this there is some more horizontal space available, do some light reformatting where suitable. Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/fd9adf5d-b1aa-e82f-e4c7-263c30145807%40enterprisedb.com
2023-02-04Allow underscores in integer and numeric constants.Dean Rasheed
This allows underscores to be used in integer and numeric literals, and their corresponding type input functions, for visual grouping. For example: 1_500_000_000 3.14159_26535_89793 0xffff_ffff 0b_1001_0001 A single underscore is allowed between any 2 digits, or immediately after the base prefix indicator of non-decimal integers, per SQL:202x draft. Peter Eisentraut and Dean Rasheed Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/84aae844-dc55-a4be-86d9-4f0fa405cc97%40enterprisedb.com
2023-01-30Make Vars be outer-join-aware.Tom Lane
Traditionally we used the same Var struct to represent the value of a table column everywhere in parse and plan trees. This choice predates our support for SQL outer joins, and it's really a pretty bad idea with outer joins, because the Var's value can depend on where it is in the tree: it might go to NULL above an outer join. So expression nodes that are equal() per equalfuncs.c might not represent the same value, which is a huge correctness hazard for the planner. To improve this, decorate Var nodes with a bitmapset showing which outer joins (identified by RTE indexes) may have nulled them at the point in the parse tree where the Var appears. This allows us to trust that equal() Vars represent the same value. A certain amount of klugery is still needed to cope with cases where we re-order two outer joins, but it's possible to make it work without sacrificing that core principle. PlaceHolderVars receive similar decoration for the same reason. In the planner, we include these outer join bitmapsets into the relids that an expression is considered to depend on, and in consequence also add outer-join relids to the relids of join RelOptInfos. This allows us to correctly perceive whether an expression can be calculated above or below a particular outer join. This change affects FDWs that want to plan foreign joins. They *must* follow suit when labeling foreign joins in order to match with the core planner, but for many purposes (if postgres_fdw is any guide) they'd prefer to consider only base relations within the join. To support both requirements, redefine ForeignScan.fs_relids as base+OJ relids, and add a new field fs_base_relids that's set up by the core planner. Large though it is, this commit just does the minimum necessary to install the new mechanisms and get check-world passing again. Follow-up patches will perform some cleanup. (The README additions and comments mention some stuff that will appear in the follow-up.) Patch by me; thanks to Richard Guo for review. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/830269.1656693747@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-01-23Allow parallel aggregate on string_agg and array_aggDavid Rowley
This adds combine, serial and deserial functions for the array_agg() and string_agg() aggregate functions, thus allowing these aggregates to partake in partial aggregations. This allows both parallel aggregation to take place when these aggregates are present and also allows additional partition-wise aggregation plan shapes to include plans that require additional aggregation once the partially aggregated results from the partitions have been combined. Author: David Rowley Reviewed-by: Andres Freund, Tomas Vondra, Stephen Frost, Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9sx_6GTcvd6TMuZnNtCh0VhBzhX6FZqw17TgVFH-ga_A@mail.gmail.com
2023-01-21Move queryjumble.c code to src/backend/nodes/Michael Paquier
This will ease a follow-up move that will generate automatically this code. The C file is renamed, for consistency with the node-related files whose code are generated by gen_node_support.pl: - queryjumble.c -> queryjumblefuncs.c - utils/queryjumble.h -> nodes/queryjumble.h Per a suggestion from Peter Eisentraut. Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y5BHOUhX3zTH/ig6@paquier.xyz
2023-01-18Get rid of the "new" and "old" entries in a view's rangetable.Tom Lane
The rule system needs "old" and/or "new" pseudo-RTEs in rule actions that are ON INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE. Historically it's put such entries into the ON SELECT rules of views as well, but those are really quite vestigial. The only thing we've used them for is to carry the view's relid forward to AcquireExecutorLocks (so that we can re-lock the view to verify it hasn't changed before re-using a plan) and to carry its relid and permissions data forward to execution-time permissions checks. What we can do instead of that is to retain these fields of the RTE_RELATION RTE for the view even after we convert it to an RTE_SUBQUERY RTE. This requires a tiny amount of extra complication in the planner and AcquireExecutorLocks, but on the other hand we can get rid of the logic that moves that data from one place to another. The principal immediate benefit of doing this, aside from a small saving in the pg_rewrite data for views, is that these pseudo-RTEs no longer trigger ruleutils.c's heuristic about qualifying variable names when the rangetable's length is more than 1. That results in quite a number of small simplifications in regression test outputs, which are all to the good IMO. Bump catversion because we need to dump a few more fields of RTE_SUBQUERY RTEs. While those will always be zeroes anyway in stored rules (because we'd never populate them until query rewrite) they are useful for debugging, and it seems like we'd better make sure to transmit such RTEs accurately in plans sent to parallel workers. I don't think the executor actually examines these fields after startup, but someday it might. This is a second attempt at committing 1b4d280ea. The difference from the first time is that now we can add some filtering rules to AdjustUpgrade.pm to allow cross-version upgrade testing to pass despite all the cosmetic changes in CREATE VIEW outputs. Amit Langote (filtering rules by me) Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqEf7gPN4Hn+LoZ4tP2q_Qt7n3vw7-6fJKOf92tSEnX6Gg@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/891521.1673657296@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-01-11Revert "Get rid of the "new" and "old" entries in a view's rangetable."Tom Lane
This reverts commit 1b4d280ea1eb7ddb2e16654d5fa16960bb959566. It's broken the buildfarm members that run cross-version-upgrade tests, because they're not prepared to deal with cosmetic differences between CREATE VIEW commands emitted by older servers and HEAD. Even if we had a solution to that, which we don't, it'd take some time to roll it out to the affected animals. This improvement isn't valuable enough to justify addressing that problem on an emergency basis, so revert it for now.
2023-01-11Get rid of the "new" and "old" entries in a view's rangetable.Tom Lane
The rule system needs "old" and/or "new" pseudo-RTEs in rule actions that are ON INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE. Historically it's put such entries into the ON SELECT rules of views as well, but those are really quite vestigial. The only thing we've used them for is to carry the view's relid forward to AcquireExecutorLocks (so that we can re-lock the view to verify it hasn't changed before re-using a plan) and to carry its relid and permissions data forward to execution-time permissions checks. What we can do instead of that is to retain these fields of the RTE_RELATION RTE for the view even after we convert it to an RTE_SUBQUERY RTE. This requires a tiny amount of extra complication in the planner and AcquireExecutorLocks, but on the other hand we can get rid of the logic that moves that data from one place to another. The principal immediate benefit of doing this, aside from a small saving in the pg_rewrite data for views, is that these pseudo-RTEs no longer trigger ruleutils.c's heuristic about qualifying variable names when the rangetable's length is more than 1. That results in quite a number of small simplifications in regression test outputs, which are all to the good IMO. Bump catversion because we need to dump a few more fields of RTE_SUBQUERY RTEs. While those will always be zeroes anyway in stored rules (because we'd never populate them until query rewrite) they are useful for debugging, and it seems like we'd better make sure to transmit such RTEs accurately in plans sent to parallel workers. I don't think the executor actually examines these fields after startup, but someday it might. Amit Langote Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqEf7gPN4Hn+LoZ4tP2q_Qt7n3vw7-6fJKOf92tSEnX6Gg@mail.gmail.com
2023-01-11Improve handling of inherited GENERATED expressions.Tom Lane
In both partitioning and traditional inheritance, require child columns to be GENERATED if and only if their parent(s) are. Formerly we allowed the case of an inherited column being GENERATED when its parent isn't, but that results in inconsistent behavior: the column can be directly updated through an UPDATE on the parent table, leading to it containing a user-supplied value that might not match the generation expression. This also fixes an oversight that we enforced partition-key-columns-can't- be-GENERATED against parent tables, but not against child tables that were dynamically attached to them. Also, remove the restriction that the child's generation expression be equivalent to the parent's. In the wake of commit 3f7836ff6, there doesn't seem to be any reason that we need that restriction, since generation expressions are always computed per-table anyway. By removing this, we can also allow a child to merge multiple inheritance parents with inconsistent generation expressions, by overriding them with its own expression, much as we've long allowed for DEFAULT expressions. Since we're rejecting a case that we used to accept, this doesn't seem like a back-patchable change. Given the lack of field complaints about the inconsistent behavior, it's likely that no one is doing this anyway, but we won't change it in minor releases. Amit Langote and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2793383.1672944799@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-01-10Fix MERGE's test for unreachable WHEN clauses.Dean Rasheed
The former code would only detect an unreachable WHEN clause if it had an AND condition. Fix, so that unreachable unconditional WHEN clauses are also detected. Back-patch to v15, where MERGE was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEZATCVQ=7E2z4cSBB49jjeGGsB6WeoYQY32NDeSvcHiLUZ=ow@mail.gmail.com
2023-01-06Fix typoPeter Eisentraut
This doesn't affect the correctness of the code, but it was clearly inconsistent before this change.
2023-01-02Update copyright for 2023Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 11
2022-12-27Suppress uninitialized-variable warning from a61b1f748.Tom Lane
Some compilers complain about sub_rteperminfos not being initialized, evidently because they don't detect that it is only used and set if isGeneralSelect is true. Make it follow the long-established pattern for its sibling variable sub_rtable. Per reports from Pavel Stehule and the buildfarm. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFj8pRDOvGOi-n616kM0Cc7qSbg_nGoS=-haB+D785sUXADqSg@mail.gmail.com
2022-12-27Convert the reg* input functions to report (most) errors softly.Tom Lane
This is not really complete, but it catches most cases of practical interest. The main omissions are: * regtype, regprocedure, and regoperator parse type names by calling the main grammar, so any grammar-detected syntax error will still be a hard error. Also, if one includes a type modifier in such a type specification, errors detected by the typmodin function will be hard errors. * Lookup errors are handled just by passing missing_ok = true to the relevant catalog lookup function. Because we've used quite a restrictive definition of "missing_ok", this means that edge cases such as "the named schema exists, but you lack USAGE permission on it" are still hard errors. It would make sense to me to replace most/all missing_ok parameters with an escontext parameter and then allow these additional lookup failure cases to be trapped too. But that's a job for some other day. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3342239.1671988406@sss.pgh.pa.us
2022-12-23Allow window functions to adjust their frameOptionsDavid Rowley
WindowFuncs such as row_number() don't care if it's called with ROWS UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW or with RANGE UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND CURRENT ROW. The latter is less efficient as the RANGE option requires that the executor check for peer rows, so using the ROW option instead would cause less overhead. Because RANGE is part of the default frame options for WindowClauses, it means WindowAgg is, by default, working much harder than it needs to for window functions where the ROWS / RANGE option has no effect on the window function's result. On a test query from the discussion thread, a performance improvement of 344% was seen by using ROWS instead of RANGE. Here we add a new support function node type to allow support functions to be called for window functions so that the most optimal version of the frame options can be set. The planner has been adjusted so that the frame options are changed only if all window functions sharing the same window clause agree on what the optimized frame options are. Here we give the ability for row_number(), rank(), dense_rank(), percent_rank(), cume_dist() and ntile() to alter their WindowClause's frameOptions. Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing, Erwin Brandstetter, Zhihong Yu Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGHENJ7LBBszxS+SkWWFVnBmOT2oVsBhDMB1DFrgerCeYa_DyA@mail.gmail.com Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvohAKEtTXxq7Pc-ic2dKT8oZfbRKeEJP64M0B6+S88z+A@mail.gmail.com
2022-12-20Add copyright notices to meson filesAndrew Dunstan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/222b43a5-2fb3-2c1b-9cd0-375d376c8246@dunslane.net
2022-12-16Fix inability to reference CYCLE column from inside its CTE.Tom Lane
Such references failed with "cache lookup failed for type 0" because we didn't resolve the type of the CYCLE column until after analyzing the CTE's query. We can just move that processing to before the recursive parse_sub_analyze call, though. While here, invent a couple of local variables to make this code less egregiously wider-than-80-columns. Per bug #17723 from Vik Fearing. Back-patch to v14 where the CYCLE feature was added. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17723-2c4985ff111e7bba@postgresql.org