| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
declarations.
|
|
allows casts without specific length requirements to continue to work
as they did before; that is, x::char will not truncate the value of x,
whereas x::char(1) will. Likewise for NUMERIC precision/scale.
The column length defaults of char(1) and numeric(30,6) are now inserted
in analyze.c's processing of CREATE TABLE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
complete source checked out so I cannot commit it myself.
Michael
|
|
CONSTRAINT
Oliver Elphick
|
|
coerce_type, so that the right things happen when coercing a previously-
unknown constant to a destination data type.
|
|
SQL cast constructs can be performed during expression transformation
instead of during parsing. This allows constructs like x::numeric(9,2)
and x::int2::float8 to behave as one would expect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Let unprivileged users change their own passwords.
* The password is now an Sconst in the parser, which better reflects its text datatype and also
forces users to quote them.
* If your password is NULL you won't be written to the password file, meaning you can't connect
until you have a password set up (if you use password authentication).
* When you drop a user that owns a database you get an error. The database is not gone.
|
|
error-proof. Rearranged some old code and removed dead sections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
in trigger manager.
Jan
|
|
SELECT null::text;
SELECT int4fac(null);
work as expected now. In some cases a NULL must be surrounded by
parentheses:
SELECT 2 + null; fails
SELECT 2 + (null); OK
This is a grammatical ambiguity that seems difficult to avoid. Other
than that, NULLs seem to behave about like you'd expect. The internal
implementation is that NULL constants are typed as UNKNOWN (like
untyped string constants) until the parser can deduce the right type.
|
|
Somehow got bracketed with #ifdef NOT_USED instead.
|
|
|
|
Jan
|
|
>go about this. That will risk breaking existing applications that use
>those names as column names.
>
>It should actually almost work to write sq.nextval as things stand,
>because Postgres has for a long time considered table.function and
>function(table) to be interchangeable notations for certain kinds of
>functions. nextval doesn't seem to be one of that kind of function,
>at the moment. I'd suggest leaving the grammar as it was, and taking a
>look at ParseFuncOrColumn in parse_func.c to see if you can't persuade
>it to accept the sequence functions in that style.
OK, good point. I tried to implement it somewhere else and ended up
extending transformAttr. Attached you'll find the patch.
Jeroen van Vianen
|
|
didn't have time for documentation yet, but I'll write some. There are
still some things to work out what happens when you alter or drop users,
but the group stuff in and by itself is done.
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
|
|
anywhere from zero to two TODO items.
* Allow flag to control COPY input/output of NULLs
I got this:
COPY table .... [ WITH NULL AS 'string' ]
which does what you'd expect. The default is \N, otherwise you can use
empty strings, etc. On Copy In this acts like a filter: every data item
that looks like 'string' becomes a NULL. Pretty straightforward.
This also seems to be related to
* Make postgres user have a password by default
If I recall this discussion correctly, the problem was actually that the
default password for the postgres (or any) user is in fact "\N", because
of the way copy is used. With this change, the file pg_pwd is copied out
with nulls as empty strings, so if someone doesn't have a password, the
password is just '', which one would expect from a new account. I don't
think anyone really wants a hard-coded default password.
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
|
|
|
|
Note this forces initdb because of change of Aggref node in stored rules.
|
|
|
|
yet, but at least we can give a better error message:
regression=> select count(distinct f1) from int4_tbl;
ERROR: aggregate(DISTINCT ...) is not implemented yet
instead of 'parser: parse error at or near distinct'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
typecasts, eg 'NULL::text'. Later parts of the parser don't like this
yet, but I'll work on that next.
|
|
|
|
shows the specific ungrouped variable being complained of. Perhaps this
will reduce user confusion...
|
|
(which are palloc'd) instead of DLLists (which are malloc'd). Not very
significant, since this routine seldom has anything useful to do, but
a leak is a leak...
|
|
Added functionality for automatic trigger creation during CREATE TABLE.
Added ON DELETE RESTRICT and some others.
Jan
|
|
This one should work much better than the one I sent in previously. The
functionality is the same, but the patch was missing one file resulting
in
the compilation failing. The docs also received a minor fix.
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
|
|
Make all system indexes unique.
Make all cache loads use system indexes.
Rename *rel to *relid in inheritance tables.
Rename cache names to be clearer.
|
|
table defaults or rules: translate them to a function call so that
parse_coerce doesn't reduce them to a date or time constant immediately.
Also, eliminate a lot of redundancy in the expression grammar by
defining a new nonterminal com_expr, which contains all the productions
that can be shared by a_expr and b_expr.
|
|
subselects can only appear on the righthand side of a binary operator.
That's still true for quantified predicates like x = ANY (SELECT ...),
but a subselect that delivers a single result can now appear anywhere
in an expression. This is implemented by changing EXPR_SUBLINK sublinks
to represent just the (SELECT ...) expression, without any 'left hand
side' or combining operator --- so they're now more like EXISTS_SUBLINK.
To handle the case of '(x, y, z) = (SELECT ...)', I added a new sublink
type MULTIEXPR_SUBLINK, which acts just like EXPR_SUBLINK used to.
But the grammar will only generate one for a multiple-left-hand-side
row expression.
|
|
Fewer calls to nameout.
Better use of RelationGetRelationName.
|
|
make_const --- don't repeat cache searches that aren't needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following patch extends the COMMENT ON functionality to the
rest of the database objects beyond just tables, columns, and views. The
grammer of the COMMENT ON statement now looks like:
COMMENT ON [
[ DATABASE | INDEX | RULE | SEQUENCE | TABLE | TYPE | VIEW ] <objname>
|
COLUMN <relation>.<attribute> |
AGGREGATE <aggname> <aggtype> |
FUNCTION <funcname> (arg1, arg2, ...) |
OPERATOR <op> (leftoperand_typ rightoperand_typ) |
TRIGGER <triggername> ON relname>
Mike Mascari
(mascarim@yahoo.com)
|
|
This patch fix a TODO list item.
* require SELECT DISTINCT target list to have all ORDER BY columns
example
ogawa=> select distinct x from t1 order by y;
ERROR: ORDER BY columns must appear in SELECT DISTINCT target list
---
Atsushi Ogawa
|
|
boundary-condition bug in myinput() which caused flex scanner to fail
on tokens larger than a bufferload. Turns out flex doesn't want null-
terminated input ... and if it gives you a 1-character buffer, you'd
better supply a character, not a null, lest you be thought to be
reporting end of input.
|
|
>From the ORACLE 7 SQL Language Reference Manual:
-----------------------------------------------------
COMMENT
Purpose:
To add a comment about a table, view, snapshot, or
column into the data dictionary.
Prerequisites:
The table, view, or snapshot must be in your own
schema
or you must have COMMENT ANY TABLE system privilege.
Syntax:
COMMENT ON [ TABLE table ] |
[ COLUMN table.column] IS 'text'
You can effectively drop a comment from the database
by setting it to the empty string ''.
-----------------------------------------------------
Example:
COMMENT ON TABLE workorders IS
'Maintains base records for workorder information';
COMMENT ON COLUMN workorders.hours IS
'Number of hours the engineer worked on the task';
to drop a comment:
COMMENT ON COLUMN workorders.hours IS '';
The current patch will simply perform the insert into
pg_description, as per the TODO. And, of course, when
the table is dropped, any comments relating to it
or any of its attributes are also dropped. I haven't
looked at the ODBC source yet, but I do know from
an ODBC client standpoint that the standard does
support the notion of table and column comments.
Hopefully the ODBC driver is already fetching these
values from pg_description, but if not, it should be
trivial.
Hope this makes the grade,
Mike Mascari
(mascarim@yahoo.com)
|
