| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
as determined by IWYU
These are mostly issues that are new since commit dbbca2cf299.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/0df1d5b1-8ca8-4f84-93be-121081bde049%40eisentraut.org
|
|
Oversight in e2562667, which stopped using SpinlockSemaArray but forgot
to remove it from the array.
Reported-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/310f4005-91d7-42b2-ac70-92624260dd28%40iki.fi
|
|
A later change will require atomic support, so it wouldn't make sense
for a hypothetical new system not to be able to implement spinlocks.
Reviewed-by: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> (concept, not the patch)
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> (concept, not the patch)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3351991.1697728588%40sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
Commit aafc05de1b removed the calls to detach from shared memory from
syslogger startup. That was not intentional, so put them back.
Author: Rui Zhao
Reviewed-by: Aleksander Alekseev
Backpatch-through: 17
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11505016-8cf3-4691-b996-7faed99b7877.xiyuan.zr@alibaba-inc.com
|
|
Move responsibility of generating the cancel key to the backend
process. The cancel key is now generated after forking, and the
backend advertises it in the ProcSignal array. When a cancel request
arrives, the backend handling it scans the ProcSignal array to find
the target pid and cancel key. This is similar to how this previously
worked in the EXEC_BACKEND case with the ShmemBackendArray, just
reusing the ProcSignal array.
One notable change is that we no longer generate cancellation keys for
non-backend processes. We generated them before just to prevent a
malicious user from canceling them; the keys for non-backend processes
were never actually given to anyone. There is now an explicit flag
indicating whether a process has a valid key or not.
I wrote this originally in preparation for supporting longer cancel
keys, but it's a nice cleanup on its own.
Reviewed-by: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/508d0505-8b7a-4864-a681-e7e5edfe32aa@iki.fi
|
|
Commit 86db52a506 changed the locking of injection points to use only
atomic ops and spinlocks, to make it possible to define injection
points in processes that don't have a PGPROC entry (yet). However, it
didn't work in EXEC_BACKEND mode, because the pointer to shared memory
area was not initialized until the process "attaches" to all the
shared memory structs. To fix, pass the pointer to the child process
along with other global variables that need to be set up early.
Backpatch-through: 17
|
|
This fixes warnings from -Wmissing-variable-declarations (not yet part
of the standard warning options) under EXEC_BACKEND. The
NON_EXEC_STATIC variables need a suitable declaration in a header file
under EXEC_BACKEND.
Also fix the inconsistent application of the volatile qualifier for
PMSignalState, which was revealed by this change.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e0a62134-83da-4ba4-8cdb-ceb0111c95ce@eisentraut.org
|
|
memcpy(NULL, src, 0) is forbidden by POSIX, even though every
production version of libc allows it. Let's be tidy.
Per report from Thomas Munro, running UBSan with EXEC_BACKEND.
Backpatch to v17, where this code was added.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BhUKG%2Be-dV7YWBzfBZXsgovgRuX5VmvmOT%2Bv0aXiZJ-EKbXcw@mail.gmail.com
|
|
We have in launch_backend.c:
/*
* The following need to be available to the save/restore_backend_variables
* functions. They are marked NON_EXEC_STATIC in their home modules.
*/
extern slock_t *ShmemLock;
extern slock_t *ProcStructLock;
extern PGPROC *AuxiliaryProcs;
extern PMSignalData *PMSignalState;
extern pg_time_t first_syslogger_file_time;
extern struct bkend *ShmemBackendArray;
extern bool redirection_done;
That comment is not completely true: ShmemLock, ShmemBackendArray, and
redirection_done are not in fact NON_EXEC_STATIC. ShmemLock once was,
but was then needed elsewhere. ShmemBackendArray was static inside
postmaster.c before launch_backend.c was created. redirection_done
was never static.
This patch moves the declaration of ShmemLock and redirection_done to
a header file.
ShmemBackendArray gets a NON_EXEC_STATIC. This doesn't make a
difference, since it only exists if EXEC_BACKEND anyway, but it makes
it consistent.
After that, the comment is now correct.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e0a62134-83da-4ba4-8cdb-ceb0111c95ce@eisentraut.org
|
|
These probably should have been static all along, it was only
forgotten out of sloppiness.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/e0a62134-83da-4ba4-8cdb-ceb0111c95ce@eisentraut.org
|
|
A few patches that were written <= 2023 and committed in 2024 still
contained 2023 copyright year. Fix that.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvr5egyW3FmHbAg-Uq2p_Aizwco1Zjs6Vbq18KqN64-hRA@mail.gmail.com
|
|
This fixes various typos, duplicated words, and tiny bits of whitespace
mainly in code comments but also in docs.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Author: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Author: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Author: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Author: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3F577953-A29E-4722-98AD-2DA9EFF2CBB8@yesql.se
|
|
To avoid the compiler warnings:
launch_backend.c:211:39: warning: comparison of constant 16 with expression of type 'BackendType' (aka 'enum BackendType') is always true [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
launch_backend.c:233:39: warning: comparison of constant 16 with expression of type 'BackendType' (aka 'enum BackendType') is always true [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
The point of the assertions was to fail more explicitly if someone
adds a new BackendType to the end of the enum, but forgets to add it
to the child_process_kinds array. It was a pretty weak assertion to
begin with, because it wouldn't catch if you added a new BackendType
in the middle of the enum. So let's just remove it.
Per buildfarm member ayu and a few others, spotted by Tom Lane.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4119680.1710913067@sss.pgh.pa.us
|
|
This is code that runs in the backend process after forking, rather
than postmaster. Move it out of postmaster.c for clarity.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7a59b073-5b5b-151e-7ed3-8b01ff7ce9ef@iki.fi
|
|
Introduce new postmaster_child_launch() function that deals with the
differences in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
Refactor the mechanism of passing information from the parent to child
process. Instead of using different command-line arguments when
launching the child process in EXEC_BACKEND mode, pass a
variable-length blob of startup data along with all the global
variables. The contents of that blob depend on the kind of child
process being launched. In !EXEC_BACKEND mode, we use the same blob,
but it's simply inherited from the parent to child process.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7a59b073-5b5b-151e-7ed3-8b01ff7ce9ef@iki.fi
|
|
This just moves the functions, with no other changes, to make the next
commits smaller and easier to review. The moved functions are related
to launching postmaster child processes in EXEC_BACKEND mode.
Reviewed-by: Tristan Partin, Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7a59b073-5b5b-151e-7ed3-8b01ff7ce9ef@iki.fi
|
