| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
them to use array_recv :-(. Per report from Tim Kordas.
|
|
are unnecessarily allocated on the heap rather than the stack. If the
StringInfo doesn't outlive the stack frame in which it is created,
there is no need to allocate it on the heap via makeStringInfo() --
stack allocation is faster. While it's not a big deal unless the
code is in a critical path, I don't see a reason not to save a few
cycles -- using stack allocation is not less readable.
I also cleaned up a bit of code along the way: moved variable
declarations into a more tightly-enclosing scope where possible,
fixed some pointless copying of strings in dblink, etc.
|
|
creation of a shell type. This allows a less hacky way of dealing with
the mutual dependency between a datatype and its I/O functions: make a
shell type, then make the functions, then define the datatype fully.
We should fix pg_dump to handle things this way, but this commit just deals
with the backend.
Martijn van Oosterhout, with some corrections by Tom Lane.
|
|
|
|
Kirkwood, minor improvements by Neil Conway. The regression tests have
been updated and the catversion has been bumped.
|
|
|
|
French uses "" for "don't want". Seems we have to keep the existing
behavior.
|
|
report from French Debian user. psql already handles "" fine.
|
|
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
|
|
inet operators.
|
|
minus inet.
Stephen R. van den Berg
|
|
Kris Jurka
|
|
|
|
the format on Tuple(Numeric) and the format to calculate(NumericVar)
are different. I understood that to reduce I/O. However, when many
comparisons or calculations of NUMERIC are executed, the conversion
of Numeric and NumericVar becomes a bottleneck.
It is profile result when "create index on NUMERIC column" is executed:
% cumulative self self total
time seconds seconds calls s/call s/call name
17.61 10.27 10.27 34542006 0.00 0.00 cmp_numerics
11.90 17.21 6.94 34542006 0.00 0.00 comparetup_index
7.42 21.54 4.33 71102587 0.00 0.00 AllocSetAlloc
7.02 25.64 4.09 69084012 0.00 0.00 set_var_from_num
4.87 28.48 2.84 69084012 0.00 0.00 alloc_var
4.79 31.27 2.79 142205745 0.00 0.00 AllocSetFreeIndex
4.55 33.92 2.65 34542004 0.00 0.00 cmp_abs
4.07 36.30 2.38 71101189 0.00 0.00 AllocSetFree
3.83 38.53 2.23 69084012 0.00 0.00 free_var
The create index command executes many comparisons of Numeric values.
Functions other than comparetup_index spent a lot of cycles for
conversion from Numeric to NumericVar.
An attached patch enables the comparison of Numeric values without
executing conversion to NumericVar. The execution time of that SQL
becomes half.
o Test SQL (index_test table has 1,000,000 tuples)
create index index_test_idx on index_test(num_col);
o Test results (executed the test five times)
(1)PentiumIII
original: 39.789s 36.823s 36.737s 37.752s 37.019s
patched : 18.560s 19.103s 18.830s 18.408s 18.853s
4.07 36.30 2.38 71101189 0.00 0.00 AllocSetFree
3.83 38.53 2.23 69084012 0.00 0.00 free_var
The create index command executes many comparisons of Numeric values.
Functions other than comparetup_index spent a lot of cycles for
conversion from Numeric to NumericVar.
An attached patch enables the comparison of Numeric values without
executing conversion to NumericVar. The execution time of that SQL
becomes half.
o Test SQL (index_test table has 1,000,000 tuples)
create index index_test_idx on index_test(num_col);
o Test results (executed the test five times)
(1)PentiumIII
original: 39.789s 36.823s 36.737s 37.752s 37.019s
patched : 18.560s 19.103s 18.830s 18.408s 18.853s
(2)Pentium4
original: 16.349s 14.997s 12.979s 13.169s 12.955s
patched : 7.005s 6.594s 6.770s 6.740s 6.828s
(3)Itanium2
original: 15.392s 15.447s 15.350s 15.370s 15.417s
patched : 7.413s 7.330s 7.334s 7.339s 7.339s
(4)Ultra Sparc
original: 64.435s 59.336s 59.332s 58.455s 59.781s
patched : 28.630s 28.666s 28.983s 28.744s 28.595s
Atsushi Ogawa
|
|
|
|
|
|
While we normally prefer the notation "foo.*" for a whole-row Var, that does
not work at SELECT top level, because in that context the parser will assume
that what is wanted is to expand the "*" into a list of separate target
columns, yielding behavior different from a whole-row Var. We have to emit
just "foo" instead in that context. Per report from Sokolov Yura.
|
|
and rely exclusively on the SQL type system to tell the difference between
the types. Prevent creation of invalid CIDR values via casting from INET
or set_masklen() --- both of these operations now silently zero any bits
to the right of the netmask. Remove duplicate CIDR comparison operators,
letting the type rely on the INET operators instead.
|
|
This completes the project to upgrade our handling of row comparisons.
|
|
instead of 10^0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continue to support GRANT ON [TABLE] for sequences for backward
compatibility; issue warning for invalid sequence permissions.
[Backward compatibility warning message.]
Add USAGE permission for sequences that allows only currval() and
nextval(), not setval().
Mention object name in grant/revoke warnings because of possible
multi-object operations.
|
|
but a lot better than nothing at all ...
|
|
Replace the former ad-hoc implementation used in the regression tests.
Joachim Wieland
|
|
rather than "return expr;" -- the latter style is used in most of the
tree. I kept the parentheses when they were necessary or useful because
the return expression was complex.
|
|
listed in the column's most-common-values statistics entry. This gives
us an exact selectivity result for the portion of the column population
represented by the MCV list, which can be a big leg up in accuracy if
that's a large fraction of the population. The heuristics involving
pattern contents and prefix are applied only to the part of the population
not included in the MCV list.
|
|
|
|
selection of a field from the result of a function returning RECORD.
I believe this case is new in 8.1; it's due to the addition of OUT parameters.
Per example from Michael Fuhr.
|
|
setup. This protects against undesired changes in locale behavior
if someone carelessly does setlocale(LC_ALL, "") (and we know who
you are, perl guys).
|
|
lacking it. Perhaps it was suppressed because of line length
considerations, but "table" should appear.
|
|
(previously we only did = and <> correctly). Also, allow row comparisons
with any operators that are in btree opclasses, not only those with these
specific names. This gets rid of a whole lot of indefensible assumptions
about the behavior of particular operators based on their names ... though
it's still true that IN and NOT IN expand to "= ANY". The patch adds a
RowCompareExpr expression node type, and makes some changes in the
representation of ANY/ALL/ROWCOMPARE SubLinks so that they can share code
with RowCompareExpr.
I have not yet done anything about making RowCompareExpr an indexable
operator, but will look at that soon.
initdb forced due to changes in stored rules.
|
|
#define HIGHBIT (0x80)
#define IS_HIGHBIT_SET(ch) ((unsigned char)(ch) & HIGHBIT)
and removed CSIGNBIT and mapped it uses to HIGHBIT. I have also added
uses for IS_HIGHBIT_SET where appropriate. This change is
purely for code clarity.
|
|
equal: if strcoll claims two strings are equal, check it with strcmp, and
sort according to strcmp if not identical. This fixes inconsistent
behavior under glibc's hu_HU locale, and probably under some other locales
as well. Also, take advantage of the now-well-defined behavior to speed up
texteq, textne, bpchareq, bpcharne: they may as well just do a bitwise
comparison and not bother with strcoll at all.
NOTE: affected databases may need to REINDEX indexes on text columns to be
sure they are self-consistent.
|
|
that simplify_boolean_equality() may leave behind. This is only relevant
if the user writes something a bit silly, like CASE x=y WHEN TRUE THEN.
Per example from Michael Fuhr; may or may not explain bug #2106.
|
|
the data defining the semantics of a lock method (ie, conflict resolution
table and ancillary data, which is all constant) and the hash tables
storing the current state. The only thing we give up by this is the
ability to use separate hashtables for different lock methods, but there
is no need for that anyway. Put some extra fields into the LockMethod
definition structs to clean up some other uglinesses, like hard-wired
tests for DEFAULT_LOCKMETHOD and USER_LOCKMETHOD. This commit doesn't
do anything about the performance issues we were discussing, but it clears
away some of the underbrush that's in the way of fixing that.
|
|
Map them to a single day, so '30 hours' is 'AM'.
Have to_char(interval) and to_char(time) use "HH", "HH12" as 12-hour
intervals, rather than bypass and print the full interval hours. This
is neeeded because to_char(time) is mapped to interval in this function.
Intervals should use "HH24", and document suggestion.
Allow "D" format specifiers for interval/time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Fuhr.
|
|
change errno. No reported bugs here, but why take a chance?
|
|
qualification when the underlying operator is indexable and useOr is true.
That is, indexkey op ANY (ARRAY[...]) is effectively translated into an
OR combination of one indexscan for each array element. This only works
for bitmap index scans, of course, since regular indexscans no longer
support OR'ing of scans. There are still some loose ends to clean up
before changing 'x IN (list)' to translate as a ScalarArrayOpExpr;
for instance predtest.c ought to be taught about it. But this gets the
basic functionality in place.
|
|
protected comment with dashes the first time round.)
|
|
comment line where output as too long, and update typedefs for /lib
directory. Also fix case where identifiers were used as variable names
in the backend, but as typedefs in ecpg (favor the backend for
indenting).
Backpatch to 8.1.X.
|
|
not only the array contents, before claiming two arrays are equal.
Per recent discussion.
|
|
the array (for array_push) or higher-dimensional array (for array_cat)
rather than decrementing it as before. This avoids generating lower
bounds other than one for any array operation within the SQL spec. Per
recent discussion.
Interestingly, this seems to have been the original behavior, because
while updating the docs I noticed that a large fraction of relevant
examples were *wrong* for the old behavior and are now right. Is it
worth correcting this in the back-branch docs?
|
